The softwood lumber war: Politics, economics, and the long U.S.-Canada trade dispute

The Softwood Lumber War: Politics, Economics, and the Long U.S.-Canada Trade Dispute

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-301

  Zhang, Daowei ^a  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909636625     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781936331581     Document Type: Book

References (385)

1. Adams , D.A. , and R.W. Haynes . 1980. The 1980 Softwood Timber Assessment Market Model: The Structure, Projections and Policy Simulations. Forest Science Monograph 22.
2. Adams , D.M. , B.A. McCarl , and L. Homayounfarrokh . 1986. The Role of Exchange Rates in Canadian-United States Lumber Trade. Forest Science 32: 973-988.
3. AF&PA (American Forest and Paper Association). 2006. 2006 Statistics: Paper, Paperboard & Wood Pulp. 1111 19th Street, N.W., Suite 800, Washington, DC.
4. Aldonas , G. 2003. Statement by Under Secretary Grant Aldonas on Softwood Lumber Discussions. U.S. Department of Commerce. News Release. July 31.
5. Anderson , F.J. , and R.D. Cairns . 1988. The Softwood Lumber Agreement and Resource Politics. Canadian Public Policy 14: 186-196.
6. Apsey , T.M. 2006. What's All This Got To Do with the Price of 2x4's? Calgary, AB: University of Calgary Press.
7. Apsey , T.M. , and J.C. Thomas . 1997. The Lessons of the Softwood Lumber Disputes: Politics, Protectionism, and the Panel Process. Council of Forest Industries, Vancouver, BC.
8. Asian Wall Street Journal. 1992. U.S. Ruling on Canadian Exports of Lumber Threatens Trade Pact. March 9, 20.
9. Atiyeh , V. 1981. Statement of the Honorable Victor Atiyeh, Governor of the State of Oregon. In Forest Products Industry Issues: Joint Hearing before the Subcommittee on International Trade and Subcommittee on Taxation and Debt Management of the Committee on Finance, United States Senate, Ninety-Seventh Congress, First Session, November 24, 1981. Washington, DC: U.S. GPO, 1982; 53-64.
10. Bangor Daily News. 1995. Kantor Says Lumber Dispute a Top Priority: Trade Representative Warns of Tariff on Softwood Coming from Canada. December 21, 1.
11. Baucus , M. 2002. Letter to ITC Chairman Stephen Koplan. Signed by 50 Other Senators. March 22.
12. Baucus , M. 2005. Letter to Commerce Secretary Carlos M. Gutierrez. Signed by 20 Other Senators. October 20.
13. Becker , G.S. 1983. A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political Influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 98: 371-400.
14. Binkley , C.S. , and D. Zhang . 1998. The Impact of Timber-Fee Increases on B.C. Forest Products Companies: An Economic and Policy Analysis. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28(4): 617-635.
15. Blunt , R. 2005. Letter to the President. Signed by 46 Other Congressmen. April 19.
16. Boyd , R.G. , and W.F. Hyde . 1989. Forest Sector Intervention: The Impacts of Regulation on Social Welfare. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
17. British Columbia Ministry of Forests. 1987. Province of British Columbia Presentation to the U.S. Government. Prepared by Ben Marr , Tom Lee , and Hartley Lewis . Victoria, BC. November.
18. British Columbia Ministry of Forests. 1994. British Columbia Stumpage and Royalty Changes on May 1, 1994. Valuation Branch. Victoria, BC.
19. British Columbia Ministry of Forests. Various years. Annual Report. Victoria, BC.
20. Buffalo News. 1994. Canada Wins Softwood Lumber Dispute. August 4, A14.
21. Bullock , D.S. 1992. Objectives and Constraints of Government Policy: The Countercyclicity of Transfers to Agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74: 618-629.
22. Canada Newswire. 2001. Forest Industry Chief Executives Identify Major Drivers of Change. March 8.
23. Canada Newswire. 2003. Independent Lumber Producers Join Maritimes for Withdrawal of Latest Federal Proposal on Softwood Lumber. May 30.
24. Canadian Embassy to the U.S. 1991. Letter to U.S. State Department. September 3.
25. Canadian Foreign Affairs and International Trade. 1994. News Release No. 248. December 15.
26. Canadian Forest Service. 2004. Selected Forest Statistics in Canada. Forest Information Management Division, Natural Resources Canada. 580 Booth Street, Ottawa, ON.
27. Canadian Forest Service. Various issues. Canada-United States Softwood Lumber Agreement Quarterly Statistical Monitor. 580 Booth Street, Ottawa, ON.
28. Carliner , M. 1996. Personal communication. October 28.
29. Cashore , B. 1998. Flights of the Phoenix: Explaining the Durability of the Canada-U.S. Softwood Lumber Dispute. Canadian-American Public Policy No. 32. The Canadian-American Center, University of Maine, Orono.
30. Cashore , B. , and G. Auld . 2003. British Columbia's Environmental Forest Policy in Perspective. Journal of Forestry 101(8): 42-47.
31. CBC News. 1986. The Journal: American Tariff Threatens Free Trade Talks. October 16. http://archives.cbc.ca/500f.asp?id=1-73-787-4781 (accessed July 20, 2006 ).
32. CBC News. 2002. The National: Negotiations End in Failure; Canada Admits Defeat. March 22. http://archives.cbc.ca/500f.asp?id=1-73-787-4781 (accessed July 20, 2006 ).
33. CBP (U.S. Bureau of Customs and Border Protection). 2003. Distribution of Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset to Affected Domestic Producers. Federal Register 68(134): 41597-41654. July 14.
34. CIT (U.S. Court of International Trade). 1986. Cabot Corp. v. United States, 620, F. Supp. 722.
35. CIT (U.S. Court of International Trade). 2006a. Slip Op. 06-48: Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance et al. v. United States et al. Consol. Court No. 05-00324. April 7.
36. CIT (U.S. Court of International Trade). 2006b. Slip Op. 06-104: Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance et al. v. United States et al. Consol. Court No. 05-00324. July 14.
37. CIT (U.S. Court of International Trade). 2006c. Slip Op. 06-109: Tembec Inc. et al. v. United States. Consol. Court No. 05-00028. July 21.
38. CIT (U.S. Court of International Trade). 2006d. Slip Op. 06-152: Tembec Inc. et al. v. United States. Consol. Court No. 05-00028. October 13.
39. Coalition for Fair Lumber Imports. 2005. http://www.fairlumbercoalition.org/ (accessed March 25, 2005 ).
40. Congressional Record. 1985a. 99th Cong. 1st sess., vol. 131(60), H 355. February 7.
41. Congressional Record. 1985b. 99th Cong. 1st sess., vol. 131(60), H 3085. May 9.
42. Congressional Record. 1985c. 99th Cong. 1st sess., vol. 131(79), S 8068. June 13.
43. Congressional Record. 1985d. 99th Cong. 1st sess., vol. 131(70), S 7214. May 24.
44. Congressional Record. 1985e. 99th Cong. 1st sess., vol. 131(33), H 1358. March 21.
45. Congressional Record. 1985f. 99th Cong. 1st sess., vol. 131(48), S 4635. April 23.
46. Congressional Record. 1995a. 104th Cong. 1st sess., vol. 141(132), S 11810. August 8.
47. Congressional Record. 1995b. 104th Cong. 1st sess., vol. 141(173), S 16663. November 3.
48. Congressional Record. 1997. 105th Cong. 1st sess., vol. 143(55), H 2156. May 1.
49. Congressional Record. 2003. 108th Cong. 1st sess., vol. 149(15), S 1671. January 28.
50. Congressional Record. 2004a. 108th Cong. 2nd sess., vol. 150(125), S 10420. October 5.
51. Congressional Record. 2004b. 108th Cong. 2nd sess., vol. 150(132), S 11431. November 17.
52. Craig , L. 1985. Letter to the President. Signed by 37 Other Congressmen. October 29.
53. Craig , L . 2004. Letter to Secretary of Commerce Donald Evans. Signed by 13 Other Senators. November 23.
54. Crane , D. 1988. So Much for the Dispute Settlement Mechanism. Toronto Star, A23.
55. Dana , S.T. 1956. Forest and Range Policy: Its Development in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
56. Davis , J. , A.L. Best , J.M. Smith , D.A. Wilson , P.E. Lachance , and S.L. Pringle . 1957. The Outlook for the Canadian Forest Industry. Hull, QB: Queen's Printer and Controller of Stationery.
57. Devadoss , S. , A.H. Aguiar , S.R. Shook , and J. Araji . 2005. A Spatial Equilibrium Analysis of US-Canadian Disputes on the World Softwood Lumber Market. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 53(2-3): 177-192.
58. Dewey Ballantine . 1986. Overview of U.S. Softwood Lumber Industry. U.S. Lumber Briefing to a Group of U.S. Officials. Dewey, Ballantine, Bushby, Palmer & Wood. January 14.
59. Dezell , M. 1992. Being a Political History of Softwood Lumber Dispute. Presented to Hartley Lewis, Legislative Assembly of British Columbia, Victoria, Canada.
60. DOC (U.S. Department of Commerce). 1983. Final Negative Countervailing Duty Determination: Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada. Federal Register 48: 24159-24183. May 31.
61. DOC (U.S. Department of Commerce). 1986a. Carbon Black from Mexico: Preliminary Results of Administrative Review. Federal Register 51: 13269-13273. April 18.
62. DOC (U.S. Department of Commerce). 1986b. Preliminary Countervailing Duty Determination: Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada. Federal Register 51: 37453-37469. October 22.
63. DOC (U.S. Department of Commerce). 1991. Self-Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation: Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada. Federal Register 56: 56055-56057. October 31.
64. DOC (U.S. Department of Commerce). 1992a. Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination: Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada. Federal Register 57: 8800-8817. March 12.
65. DOC (U.S. Department of Commerce). 1992b. Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination: Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada. Federal Register 57: 22570-22624. May 28.
66. DOC (U.S. Department of Commerce). 1993. In the Matter of Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Redetermination Pursuant to Binational Panel Remand. USA-92-1904-01. September 17.
67. DOC (U.S. Department of Commerce). 1994. United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement, Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews: Request for an Extraordinary Challenge Committee. Federal Register 59: 21754-21755. April 26.
68. DOC (U.S. Department of Commerce). 2001a. Notice of Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, Preliminary Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination, and Alignment of Final Countervailing Duty Determination with Final Antidumping Duty Determination: Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada. Federal Register 66: 43186-43216. August 17.
69. DOC (U.S. Department of Commerce). 2001b. Notice of Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement of Final Determination: Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada. Federal Register 66: 56062-56078. November 6.
70. DOC (U.S. Department of Commerce). 2005a. Notice of Determination under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act: Antidumping Measures on Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada. Federal Register 70: 22636-22646. May 2.
71. DOC (U.S. Department of Commerce). 2005b. Remand Determination in the Matter of Sales at Less Than Fair Value of Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada. Secretariat File No. USA-CDA-2002-1904-02. NAFTA Binational Panel Review. July 13.
72. DOC (U.S. Department of Commerce). 2005c. Fifth Remand Determination in the Matter of Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada. Secretariat File No. USA-CDA-2002-1904-03. NAFTA Binational Panel Review. November 22.
73. DOC (U.S. Department of Commerce). 2005d. NAFTA Panel Decision: Fifth Remand Determination Countervailing Duty Investigation on Softwood Lumber from Canada. News Release. November 22.
74. Dottori , F. 2003. Letter to Pierre S. Pettigrew in Reference of U.S. Coalition's Proposal of October 29, 2003. November 3.
75. Driggs , M.A. 1985. Memorandum for John A. Svahn (Assistant to the President for Policy Development) (Subject: EPC Meeting, EC Steel Negotiations and Canadian Lumber). October 23.
76. Economic Policy Council. 1985a. Minutes of Economic Policy Council Meeting, October 24.
77. Economic Policy Council. 1985b. Minutes of Economic Policy Council Meeting. November 26.
78. The Economist. 2003. A Simple Lesson in Economics: The Softwood Lumber Dispute. February 1, 366(8309): 49.
79. Ellis , L.E. 1948. Print Paper Pendulum: Group Pressures and the Price of Newsprint. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
80. Ellis , L.E . 1960. Newsprint: Producers, Publishers, Political Pressures. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
81. Ellis , L.E . 1968. Reciprocity 1911: A Study of Canadian-American Relations. New York: Greenwood Press.
82. Feldman , E.J. 2006. The Deal. Baker & Hostetler LLP. Washington Square, Suite 1100, 1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20036-5304.
83. Financial Post. 1987. B.C. Hikes for Tax Bite. September 21, 6.
84. Financial Post. 2001. Secret Talks on Softwood: Canada and U.S. Scramble: Attempt to Avoid Embarrassing Trade War over Imports. March 24, 1.
85. Foreign Affairs and International Trade Canada. 1999. Developing a Canadian Position on Possible WTO Industrial Goods Tariff and NTMs Negotiations. Discussion Paper. http://www.international.gc.ca/tna-nac/discussion/wto_tar-en.asp? (accessed January 17, 2007 ).
86. Fox , I.K. 1991. The Politics of Canada-U.S. Trade in Forest Products. In Canada-United States Trade in Forest Products, edited by R.S. Uhler . Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 15-56.
87. The Free Trader. 2001. Louisiana-Pacific President Makes Major Speech on SLA. Free Trade Lumber Council. 1 Place Ville-Marie, Suite 2821. Montreal. January 11, 8.
88. The Free Trader. 2002a. Analysis of the Coalition's Proposal. Free Trade Lumber Council. Montreal. May 15, 2-20.
89. The Free Trader. 2002b. Comments on BCLTC Counter-Proposal.
90. The Free Trader. 2003. Lumber IV: Interim Measures Proposal.
91. FTA Extraordinary Challenge Committee (FTA ECC). 1994. Memorandum Opinions and Order in the Matter of Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada. United States-Canada Free Trade Agreement Article 1904.13 Extraordinary Challenge Committee. ECC-94-1904-01USA. August 3.
92. FTA Injury Panel. 1993. Decision of the Panel Reviewing the Final Determination of the U.S. International Trade Commission in the Matter of Softwood Lumber from Canada. United States-Canada Free Trade Agreement Article 1904 Binational Panel Review. USA-92-1904-02. July 26.
93. FTA Injury Panel. 1994a. Decision of the Panel on Review of the U.S. International Trade Commission's Second Remand Determination in the Matter of Softwood Lumber from Canada. United States-Canada Free Trade Agreement Article 1904 Binational Panel Review. USA-92-1904-02. January 28.
94. FTA Injury Panel. 1994b. Decision of the Panel on Review of the Remand Determination of the U.S. International Trade Commission in the Matter of Softwood Lumber from Canada. United States-Canada Free Trade Agreement Article 1904 Binational Panel Review. USA-92-1904-02. July 6.
95. FTA Subsidy Panel. 1993a. Decision of the Panel in the Matter of Softwood Lumber Products from Canada. United States-Canada Free Trade Agreement Article 1904 Binational Panel Review. USA-92-1904-01. May 6.
96. FTA Subsidy Panel. 1993b. Decision of the Panel on Remand in the Matter of Softwood Lumber Products from Canada. United States-Canada Free Trade Agreement Article 1904 Binational Panel Review. USA-92-1904-01. December 17.
97. Gardner , B.L. 1983. Efficient Redistribution through Commodity Markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 65: 225-234.
98. Gardner , B.L. . 1987. Causes of U.S. Farm Commodity Programs. Journal of Political Economics 95: 290-310.
99. Gazette. 1986a. Carney Sold Out Forest Industry. September 11, B7.
100. Gazette. 1986b. Still Hope for Lumber Deal. October 4, H3.
101. Gazette. 1991. U.S. Considers Tariffs on Canadian Lumber. April 20, E2.
102. Gazette. 1996. Quebec Seen as Key to Softwood Dispute: U.S. Trade Representative Set to Respond to Call for Action. February 2, D3.
103. Gazette. 2002a. U.S. Lumber Lobby Slams Door Offer. March 14, D2.
104. Gazette. 2002b. Feds Balk at Firm's Softwood Solution: Forest Giant's Bid to Broker a Settlement Would Legitimize U.S. Stand, Pettigrew Says. November 21, B3.
105. Gazette. 2005. Minister Slams U.S. Hard Line on Softwood Duties. January 27, B3.
106. Gilligan , M.J. 1997. Empowering Exporters: Reciprocity, Delegation, and Collective Action in American Trade Policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
107. Globe and Mail. 1986. U.S. Administration Courts Key Senators on Free Trade. April 18, B12.
108. Globe and Mail. 1987. Industry, Government at New Low at End of Softwood Lumber Affair. January 7, B1.
109. Gorte , R.W. 2001. Softwood Lumber Imports from Canada: History and Analysis of the Dispute. Report RL 30826. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
110. Haley , D. 1980. A Regional Comparison of Stumpage Values in British Columbia and the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Forestry Chronicle 56(10): 225-250.
111. Hamilton , G. 1994. Environmentalists Side with U.S. Lobby on Subsidies. Vancouver Sun, April 8, D1.
112. Hart , M. , B. Dymond , and C. Robertson . 1994. Decision at Midnight: Inside the Canada-US Free Trade Negotiations. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
113. Haynes , R.W. 2003. An Analysis of the Timber Situation in the United States: 1952-2050. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-560. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
114. Hird , J.E. 1993. Congressional Voting on Superfund: Self-Interest or Ideology? Public Choice 77(October): 333-357.
115. Horlick , G. 1991. United States: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Opinion in PPG Industries, Inc. v. United States. International Legal Materials 30: 1179-1196. March 22.
116. Horlick , G . 2006. Personal communication. June 16.
117. Howard , J.L. 2001. U.S. Timber Production, Trade, Consumption, and Price Statistics 1965-1999. Research Paper FPL-RP-595. Madison, WI: USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory.
118. Howse , R. 1998. Settling Trade Remedy Disputes: When the WTO Forum Is Better Than the NAFTA. Commentary 111. Toronto, ON: C.D. Howe Institute.
119. Inside US Trade. 1986. USTR Gets Tough on Lumber Dispute, Canadians Reported 'Outraged.' April 4.
120. Inside US Trade. 2002a. U.S. Group Submits Proposed Provincial Reform in Softwood Fight. January 25.
121. Inside US Trade. 2002b. WTO Declines to Rule on U.S. Law Governing Trade Remedy Decisions. June 7.
122. Inside US Trade. 2002c. Canada Sees U.S. Plan as Insufficient to Guarantee Lumber Access. March 15.
123. Inside US Trade. 2002d. Quebec Premier Calls for Canada to Restart Lumber Talks with U.S. August 9.
124. Inside US Trade. 2002e. Commerce Launches Province-Specific Approach to Softwood Fight. August 30.
125. Inside US Trade. 2002f. U.S. Reaches Out to More Canadian Provinces on Softwood Lumber. September 20.
126. Inside US Trade. 2003a. B.C. Lumber Proposal Prompts New U.S. Industry Push for Deal. January 3.
127. Inside US Trade. 2003b. Commerce Issues Second Draft Lumber Paper as Talks End without Deal. February 7.
128. Inside US Trade. 2003c. Commerce Poised to Publish Policy Bulletin on Canadian Lumber. May 9.
129. Inside US Trade. 2003d. U.S. Floats Tax Based on Market Share as Lumber Talks Resume. May 16.
130. Inside US Trade. 2003e. Canada Studying New U.S. Offer to Strike Interim Lumber Deal. June 20.
131. Inside US Trade. 2003f. Government Deal Falls Apart after Coalition Counteroffer. August 1.
132. Inside US Trade. 2003g. U.S. Producers Offer New Deal in Lumber Fight with Canada. November 7.
133. Inside US Trade. 2003h. Canada Offers New Lumber Proposal as Two Sides Edge Closer to Deal. December 5.
134. Inside US Trade. 2003i. Canadian Momentum toward Lumber Deal Appears to Be Slowing. December 12.
135. Inside US Trade. 2004a. Canadian Industry Pressures Government to Change Negotiating Stance. May 7.
136. Inside US Trade. 2004b. Canada Says U.S. Undermines NAFTA by Keeping Softwood Lumber Duties. July 2.
137. Inside US Trade. 2005a. Aldonas Says U.S. Will Not Return Lumber Duty Deposits without Deal. January 28.
138. Inside US Trade. 2005b. U.S., Canada Reengage in Lumber Talks, Industry Meeting Planned. April 1.
139. Inside US Trade. 2005c. U.S., Canadian Industries Make Little Progress in Lumber Talks. April 8.
140. Inside US Trade. 2005d. U.S. Sends Two Lumber Proposals to Canada; No New Talks Planned. May 13.
141. Inside US Trade. 2005e. Softwood Talks End with No Deal, But Possible Signal of Flexibility. July 22.
142. Inside US Trade. 2005f. Commerce Nominee Pledges to Keep Canada Lumber Duty in Place. October 21.
143. Inside US Trade. 2006a. Appellate Body Rules against Zeroing in Administrative Review. April 21.
144. Inside US Trade. 2006b. U.S. Court Dismisses Coalition Challenge of NAFTA Panel System. December 15.
145. ITC (U.S. International Trade Commission). 1982. Conditions Relating to the Importation of Softwood Lumber into the United States. Investigation No. 332-134. Pub. 1241. April.
146. ITC (U.S. International Trade Commission). 1985. Conditions Relating to the Importation of Softwood Lumber into the United States. Investigation No. 332-210. Pub. 1765. October.
147. ITC (U.S. International Trade Commission). 1986. Refined U.S. and Canadian Softwood Lumber Employment Data. Office of Industries. January.
148. ITC (U.S. International Trade Commission). 1991. Softwood Lumber from Canada. Investigation No. 701-TA-312 (Preliminary Affirmative), Pub. 2468. December.
149. ITC (U.S. International Trade Commission). 1992. Softwood Lumber from Canada. Investigation No. 701-TA-312 (Final Affirmative). Pub. 2530. July.
150. ITC (U.S. International Trade Commission). 1993. Softwood Lumber from Canada. Inv. No. 701-TA-312 (Remand), Pub. 2689. October.
151. ITC (U.S. International Trade Commission). 1998. Summary of Statutory Provisions Related to Import Relief. Pub. 3125. August.
152. ITC (U.S. International Trade Commission). 2002. Softwood Lumber from Canada. Inv. Nos. 701-TA-414 and 731-TA-928, Pub. 3509. May.
153. ITC (U.S. International Trade Commission). 2004. View of the Commission in Response to the Panel Decision and Order of August 31, 2004. Submitted to NAFTA Secretariat. September 10. http://www.usitc.gov/pub/reports/opinions/fremand3opin.pdf (accessed on October 1, 2004 ).
154. ITC (U.S. International Trade Commission). 2006. Value of U.S. Imports for Consumption, Duties Collected, and Ratios of Duties to Values 1891-2005. Statistical and Editorial Services Division, Office of Information Services. February 2004. http://dataweb.usitc.gov/scripts/ave.pdf (accessed June 7, 2006 ).
155. Jansen , G.W.V. 1984. Canada-United States Trade Relationships: The Lessons of the Softwood Lumber Countervail Case. Executive Bulletin No. 27. The Conference Board of Canada. August 27.
156. Joskow , P. 1972. Determination of the Allowed Rate of Return in a Formal Regulatory Proceeding. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 3(2): 632-644.
157. Kalt , J. 1988. The Political Economy of Protectionism: Tariffs and Retaliation in the Timber Industry. In Trade Policy Issues and Empirical Analysis, edited by R.E. Baldwin . Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 339-368.
158. Kaplan , G.B. 1986a. Memorandum for DOC Under Secretary Bruce Smart. March 8.
159. Kaplan , G.B . 1986b. Memo for Public File. December 5.
160. Kernell , S. , and G.C. Jacobson . 2000. The Logic of American Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
161. Kerr , J.C. 1999. Letter to Tom Stephens. Vancouver Sun. October 15, A1.
162. Kerr , J.C . 2006. Personal communication. February 17.
163. Kinnucan , H. , and D. Zhang . 2004. Canadian Impacts of the 1996 Canada-U.S. Softwood Lumber Agreement. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 52(1): 110-119.
164. Kreps , D. , and R. Wilson . 1982. Reputation and Imperfect Information. Journal of Economic Theory 27: 253-279.
165. Kreps , D. , P. Milgrom , J. Roberts , and R. Wilson . 1982. Rational Cooperation in the Finitely Repeated Prisoners' Dilemma. Journal of Economic Theory 27: 245-252.
166. Kuehne , M.J. 2006. Personal communications between September 1 and September 30.
167. Lange , W. 1986. Lumber Imports and Fair Trade. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Lakehead University Forestry Association Forestry Symposium. Thunder Bay, ON. January.
168. Lange , W . 2003. Personal communication. February 21.
169. Li , Y. , and D. Zhang . 2006. Incidence of the 1996 U.S.-Canada Softwood Lumber Agreement in the Lumber Industry: The Case of the U.S. South. Forest Science 52(4): 422-431.
170. Lindsey , B. , M.A. Groombridge , and P. Loungani . 2000. Nailing the Homeowner: The Economic Impact of Trade Protection of the Softwood Lumber Industry. Center for Trade Policy Analysis No. 11. Washington, DC: CATO Institute.
171. Macrory , P. 2002. NAFTA Chapter 19: A Successful Experiment in International Trade Dispute Resolution. Commentary 168. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute.
172. Madison , J. 1787. The Same Subject Continued: The Union as a Safeguard against Domestic Faction and Insurrection. Federalist No. 10. In The Daily Advertiser, No. 22.
173. Margolick , M. , and R.S. Uhler . 1986. The Economic Impact of Removing Log Export Restrictions in British Columbia. Report 86-2. Forest Economics and Policy Analysis Research Unit. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
174. Martin , P. 2005. Address to the Economic Club of New York. October 6.
175. Mattey , J.P. 1990. The Timber Bubble That Burst: Government Policy and the Bailout of 1984. New York: Oxford University Press.
176. McCallum , M. 1997. The Forest Industry in British Columbia, 1996. In Tenth Annual British Columbia Forest Industry Conference. Vancouver, BC: Price Waterhouse.
177. McCarthy , S. 1992. U.S. Offer on Lumber Rejected. Toronto Star, April 8, F1.
178. McClellan , S. (White House Press Secretary). 2005. Press Brief. October 14.
179. McCloy , B. 1986. Canadian-U.S. Lumber Trade. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Lakehead University Forestry Association Forestry Symposium. Thunder Bay, ON. January.
180. McNabb , L. 2004. A B.C. Perspective on the Softwood Lumber Dispute. Presented at Canadian Institute of Forestry and Society of American Foresters Joint 2004 General Meeting and Convention. Edmonton, Canada. October 1-5.
181. Mehmood , S. , and D. Zhang . 2001. A Roll Call Analysis of Endangered Species Act Amendments. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(3): 501-512.
182. Melrose , M. , J. Elliot , and P. Heard . 1986. Lumber Protectionism Fails to See the Forests from the Trees. Issue Alert 11. Washington, DC: Citizens for a Sound Economy.
183. Milgrom , P. , and J. Roberts . 1982. Predation, Reputation, and Entry Deterrence. Journal of Economic Theory 27: 280-312.
184. NAFTA Dumping Panel. 2003. Decision of the Panel, In the Matter of Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Final Affirmative Antidumping Determination. Article 1904 Binational Panel Review Pursuant to the North America Free Trade Agreement. Secretariat File No. US-CDA-2002-1904-02. July 17.
185. NAFTA Dumping Panel. 2004. Decision of the Panel Respecting Remand Determination, In the Matter of Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Final Affirmative Antidumping Determination. Article 1904 Binational Panel Review Pursuant to the North America Free Trade Agreement. Secretariat File No. US-CDA-2002-1904-02. March 5.
186. NAFTA Dumping Panel. 2005. Decision of the Panel Following Remand, In the Matter of Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada: Final Affirmative Antidumping Determination. Article 1904 Binational Panel Review Pursuant to the North America Free Trade Agreement. Secretariat File No. US-CDA-2002-1904-02. June 9.
187. NAFTA Extraordinary Challenge Committee (NAFTA ECC). 2005. Opinion and Order of the Extraordinary Challenge Committee: In the Matter of Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada. Article 1904 Extraordinary Challenge Pursuant to the North America Free Trade Agreement. Secretariat File No. ECC-2004-1904-01USA, August 10.
188. NAFTA Injury Panel. 2003. Decision of the Panel, In the Matter of Softwood Lumber from Canada: Final Affirmative Threat of Material Injury Determination. Article 1904 Binational Panel Review Pursuant to the North America Free Trade Agreement. USA-CDA-202-1904-07. September 5.
189. NAFTA Injury Panel. 2004a. Remand Decision of the Panel, In the Matter of Softwood Lumber from Canada: Final Affirmative Threat of Injury Determination. Article 1904 Binational Panel Review Pursuant to the North America Free Trade Agreement. USA-CDA-202-1904-07. April 19.
190. NAFTA Injury Panel. 2004b. Second Remand Decision of the Panel, In the Matter of Softwood Lumber from Canada: Final Affirmative Threat of Injury Determination. Article 1904 Binational Panel Review Pursuant to the North America Free Trade Agreement. USA-CDA-202-1904-07. August 31.
191. NAFTA Subsidy Panel. 2003. Decision of the Panel in the Matter of Certain Softwood Lumber Products from Canada. North America Free Trade Agreement Article 1904 Binational Panel Review, USA-CND-2002-1904-03. August 13.
192. Nagubadi , R. , and D. Zhang . 2006. Competitiveness in the Sawmills and Wood Preservation Industry in the United States and Canada. Forest Science 52(4): 340-352.
193. National Association of Home Builders (NAHB). 2006. Sources of Softwood Lumber Consumed in the United States.
194. National Post. 2000. All-Out War Next Step in Timber Trade Dispute. March 11, D06.
195. National Post. 2001a. Lumber Deal with U.S. Dead. February 2, C04.
196. National Post. 2001b. B.C. Softwood Changes Could Further Irk U.S. November 19, FP4.
197. National Post. 2002. Pettigrew Nixes Idea of Softwood Border Tax. November 21, FP3.
198. National Post. 2003a. U.S. Group Switches Sides on Softwood: Opposing Tariffs. February 12, FP7.
199. National Post. 2003b. U.S. Softwood Duty Payout Angers Ottawa. July 17, FP3.
200. National Post. 2005. New Political Will May Solve Lumber Dispute. March 14, FP3.
201. National Post. 2006. How the Softwood Deal Was Done: Framed by Personal Relationship of Harper and Bush. April 29, A1.
202. Nelson , R.A. 1982. An Empirical Test of the Ramsey Theory and Stegler-Peltzman Theory of Public Utility Pricing. Economic Inquiry 20: 227-290.
203. Noll , R. 1989. Economic Perspectives on the Politics of Regulation. In Handbook of Industrial Organization, vol. II, edited by R. Schmalensee and R. Willig . New York: North-Holland.
204. Nordhaus , W.D. , and R. Litan . 1992. The Impacts of Stumpage Charges on Prices and Trade Flow on Forest Products. February 18.
205. Olson , K.S. 1986. Memorandum on Timber Summit on March 20, 1986. Submitted to Canadian Forest Industries Council. March 20.
206. Olson , M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
207. Olson , M. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth Stagflation and Rigidities. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
208. Oregon Governor's Timber Strategy Panel. 1981. Report by Governor's Timber Strategy Panel. In Forest Products Industry Issues: Joint Hearing before the Subcommittee on International Trade and Subcommittee on Taxation and Debt Management of the Committee on Finance, United States Senate, Ninety-Seventh Congress, First Session, November 24, 1981. Washington, DC: U.S. GPO, 1982, 68-78.
209. Oregonian. 1992a. U.S. Cuts Planned Tariff on Canadian Wood. May 16, D1.
210. Oregonian. 1992b. Bush Gives Pledge to Canada on Disputes. May 21, F1.
211. Oregonian. 1994. High Wood Prices Linked to Tariff. January 26, B1.
212. Oregonian. 1996. U.S., Canada Yet to Reach Timber Pact. January 10, E5.
213. Ottawa Citizen. 1986a. Tariff Price for Talks: U.S. Advisor. June 9, A1.
214. Ottawa Citizen. 1986b. B.C. May Hike Lumber Charge to Avoid Paying Tariffs in U.S. September 8, A11.
215. Ottawa Citizen. 1991. Bush Opposes Changes in Canada Lumber Pact, Says U.S. Trade Official. March 22, B5.
216. Ottawa Citizen. 1992. Canada-U.S. Trade: Bush Envoy Calls for Cooler Talk. March 13, C5.
217. Ottawa Citizen. 1993. Free Trade: U.S. Mounts Challenges to Panel Rulings. November 6, H10.
218. Ottawa Citizen. 1994a. Trade Disputes: White House Divided over Tariffs on Canadian Lumber. March 9, C5.
219. Ottawa Citizen. 1994b. Americans Seek to Keep $800 Million Lumber Duties. August 6, H2.
220. Ottawa Citizen. 2001. Pettigrew Appeals for United Front. March 23, F3.
221. Ottawa Citizen. 2003. U.S. Softwood Proposal "Laughable": Pettigrew Spurns Suggestion of 33% Export Tax. May 17, D1.
222. Ottawa Citizen. 2004. Bush Agrees NAFTA Needs a Fix. December 1, A5.
223. Packwood , R. 1985. Letter to Honorable Clayton Yeutter, U.S. Trade Representative. Signed by 9 other U.S. Senators. October 1.
224. Pareto , V. 1927. Manual of Political Economy. New York: A.M. Kelley.
225. Pearse , P.H. , D. Zhang , and J. Leitch . 1995. Trends in Foreign Investment in Canada's Forest Industry. Canadian Business Economics 3(3): 54-68.
226. Peltzman , S. 1976. Toward a More General Theory of Regulation. Journal of Law and Economics 19(2): 211-240.
227. Peltzman , S. 1984. Constituent Interest and Congressional Voting. Journal of Law and Economics 27(1): 181-210.
228. Percy , M.B. 1986. Forest Management and Economic Growth in British Columbia. Economic Council of Canada. Supply and Services Canada. Ottawa.
229. Percy , M.B. 2004. One Forest under Two Flags: The Context for Sustainable Forests. A Keynote Address at the Canadian Institute of Forestry and Society of American Foresters Joint 2004 General Meeting and Convention. Edmonton, AB. October 2-6.
230. Percy , M.B. , and C. Yoder . 1987. The Softwood Lumber Dispute and Canada-U.S. Trade in Natural Resources. Halifax, NS: The Institute for Research on Public Policy.
231. Peterson , J. 2004. Letter to U.S. Commerce Secretary Donald Evans. June 22.
232. Plecas , R.S. 2006. Personal communication. August 11.
233. Porter , M.E. 1991. Canada at Crossroads: The Reality of the New Competitive Environment. Ottawa: Supply and Services Canada.
234. Ragosta , J. 2003. Personal communication. July 24.
235. Ragosta , J. 2006. Personal communication. November 17.
236. Random Lengths, Inc. 2004. U.S.-Canada Trade Dispute Timeline. http://www.random-lengths.com/base.asp?s1=In_Depth&s2=U.S.-Canada_Trade_Dispute (accessed March 15, 2005 ).
237. Random Lengths, Inc. Various years. Yearbook: Forest Products Market, Prices, and Statistics.
238. Rausser , G.C. , and W.E. Foster . 1990. Political Preference Functions and Public Policy Reform. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72: 290-310.
239. Reagan , R. 1986a. Letter to Senator Steve Symms. April 22.
240. Reagan , R. 1986b. Letter to Senator Robert Packwood. May 8.
241. Reed , F.L.C. 1986. The Timber Supply Context of the Lumber War of 1986. Starker Lecture Series. Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR. November 6.
242. Reed , F.L.C. 2001. Two Centuries of Softwood Lumber War between Canada and the United States: A Chronicle of Trade Barriers Viewed in the Context of Saw Timber Depletion. Prepared for the Free Trade Lumber Council, Montreal.
243. Ritchie , G. 1993. U.S. Protectionism Claims Canadian Casualties. Wall Street Journal. March 6, A8.
244. Ritchie , G. 1997. Wrestling with the Elephant: The Inside Story of the Canada-U.S. Trade Wars. Toronto: Macfarlane Water & Ross.
245. Roach , T.R. 1994. Newsprint: Canadian Supply and American Demand. Durham, NC: Forest History Society Issue Series.
246. Rushford , G. 1998. Larry Summers Swats Home Builders with 2x4. Wall Street Journal. July 10, A15.
247. Schattschneider , E.E. 1935. Politics, Pressure, and the Tariff. New York: Prentice-Hall.
248. Schattschneider , E.E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Hindsdale, IL: Dryden Press.
249. Schloss , H. 1998. Letter to the Editor: Lumber Trade Pact Wasn't Circumvented. Wall Street Journal. July 17, 1.
250. Scott , A.D. forthcoming. Evolution of Property Rights in Natural Resources. New York: Oxford University Press.
251. Seattle Post-Intelligencer. 1990. Mosbacher Pledges to Protect U.S. Softwood Lumber Industry. November 16, C1.
252. Seattle Post-Intelligencer. 1991. Import Duties May Be Used against Canadian Timber Trade Subsidy. February 23, B3.
253. Seattle Post-Intelligencer. 1993. Canada Wins Round in Softwood Dispute. December 18, B3.
254. Seattle Post-Intelligencer. 1996. Canada Will Export Less Lumber to U.S.: Tentative Agreement Should Give Relief to Domestic Producers. February 17, B3.
255. Seattle Times. 1986. Canada Eyes Steps to Avoid Tariff. September 24, B4.
256. Seattle Times. 1989. Canada Accused of Smuggling Timber. April 10, D4.
257. Seattle Times. 1991. Senate Urges Lumber Retaliation. September 21, A12.
258. Seattle Times. 1992. Legislators Urge Cut in Timber Subsidies. April 7, F1.
259. Seattle Times. 2005. Canada Cancels Lumber Talks with U.S. August 17, C3.
260. Shapiro , I. 2006. Personal communication. February 25.
261. Shinn , D. 1987. U.S. Response to Canadian Softwood Lumber Imports. Twenty-Ninth Session of the Senior Seminar. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of State Foreign Service Institute.
262. Singleton , M. (Chairman of the Coalition for Fair Lumber Imports). 1995. Fundraising letter. 1775 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20006. June.
263. Smith , W.B. , P.D. Miles , J.S. Vissage , and S.A. Pugh . 2004. Forest Resources of the United States, 2002. General Technical Report NC-241. St. Paul, MN: USDA Forest Service, North Central Research Station.
264. Southworth , C. 1922. The American-Canadian Newsprint Industry and the Tariff. Journal of Political Economy 30: 681-697.
265. Spelter , H. 2000. Softwood Price Declines. Wall Street Journal. August 28, A19.
266. Stanbury , W.T. 2000. Environmental Groups and the International Conflict over the Forests of British Columbia, 1990 to 2000. Vancouver, Canada: SFU-UBC Center for the Study of Government and Business.
267. Statistics Canada. 2003. Historical Statistics of Canada. Catalogue 11-516-XIE. http://www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/11-516-XIE/sectiong/sectiong.htm# Foreign (accessed July 30, 2003 ).
268. Statistics Canada. 2007. http://www.statcan.ca/bsolc/english/bsolc?catno=65C0003 (accessed January 17, 2007 ).
269. Stennes , B. , and B. Wilson . 2005. An Analysis of Lumber Trade Restrictions in North America: Application of a Spatial Equilibrium Model. Forest Policy and Economics 7(3): 297-308.
270. Stephens , T. 1999. Letter to Jake Kerr. Vancouver Sun. October 15, A1.
271. Stigler , G. 1971. The Theory of Economic Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2(1): 3-21.
272. Stone , O. 1996. Hollywood and Our Wood. Vancouver Sun. June 26, A13.
273. Teske , P. , S. Best , and M. Minstrom . 1994. The Economic Theory of Regulation and Trucking Deregulation: Shifting to the State Level. Public Choice 79(2): 247-256.
274. The Economist. 2003. A Simple Lesson in Economics: The Softwood Lumber Dispute. February 1, 366(8309): 49.
275. Time. 1986. Warning Shot: The White House Gets Tough on Trade. June 2.
276. Toronto Star. 1986. How Lumber Became Free Trade Obstacle. April 13, A18.
277. Toronto Star. 1988a. Canada Sells Its Soul on Softwood Lumber Deal. July 13, A25.
278. Toronto Star. 1988b. U.S. Complains Canadian Actions Break Lumber Deal. July 28, E1.
279. Toronto Star. 1989a. Key U.S. Senator Charges Violations of Lumber Pact. April 7, C2.
280. Toronto Star. 1989b. Crosbie Says U.S. Unyielding on Softwood. April 11, B3.
281. Toronto Star. 1991. Soviet Events Change Agenda for Meeting of PM, Bush, August 27, A4.
282. Toronto Star. 1992a. Lumber Tax Called Threat to Free Trade. February 14, B1.
283. Toronto Star. 1992b. Lumber Duty Just Another Reason Why Canada Should Rely on GATT. March 8, H4.
284. Toronto Star. 1994a. Americans Challenge Ruling on Lumber. February 25, E1.
285. Toronto Star. 1994b. U.S. Congress's Lumber-Duty Threat 'Debases and Dilutes' Free Trade Deal. August 27, B1.
286. Toronto Star. 1994c. Spat Called Threat to Tree Trade; Battle over Softwood Lumber Goes to Court. September 16, B1.
287. Toronto Star. 1994d. U.S. Lobby Ends Suit Aimed at Our Lumber. December 16, E1.
288. Toronto Star. 1996. Losing on Lumber. February 21, A8.
289. Toronto Star. 2001a. Trade Minister Defends Forestry Management. March 20, D1.
290. Toronto Star. 2001b. American Lumber Lobby Ready to Ignite Trade War: Threaten to Use 'Dirty Secrets' against Canada. March 8, D12.
291. Toronto Star. 2001c. PM Says He Gave Bush "Hell" on Lumber. August 22, A10.
292. Toronto Star. 2003. Talks Break Off with U.S. on Softwood Lumber Duties; Demands by U.S. Lumber Industry Called 'Excessive', Pettigrew Says. February 26, E2.
293. Trudeau , P.E. 1991. Towards a Just Society. Montreal: Viking Adult.
294. Truman , D.B. 1951. The Government Process. New York: Knopf.
295. Uhler , R.S. (ed.) 1991. Canada-United States Trade in Forest Products. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
296. Ulrich , A.H. 1990. U.S. Timber Production, Trade, Consumption, and Price Statistics 1960-88. Miscellaneous Publication No. 1486. Madison, WI: USDA Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory.
297. U.S. Bureau of Census. 1975. Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970. Bicentennial Edition, Part 1. Washington, DC.
298. U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2006. U.S. International Transactions Data. http://www.bea.gov/bea/international/bp_web/simple.cfm?anon=202&table_id=2&area_id=3 (accessed August 1, 2006 ).
299. U.S. Embassy to Canada. 1986. Fax to Secretary of State and U.S. Department of Commerce (Subject: Softwood Lumber CVD Case: Canada Will Contest the Decision But Supports Continuing Trade Negotiations). October 17.
300. USTR (U.S. Trade Representative). 1991. Initiation of Section 302 Investigation and Request for Public Comment on Determinations Involving Expeditious Action: Canadian Exports of Softwood Lumber. Federal Register 56: 50738-50740.
301. USTR (U.S. Trade Representative). 1994. News Release. December 15.
302. USTR (U.S. Trade Representative). 2006. News Release. October 13.
303. Van Kooten , G.C. 2002. Economic Analysis of the Canada-United States Softwood Lumber Dispute: Playing the Quota Game. Forest Science 48: 712-721.
304. Vancouver Sun. 1982. Go for Import Restraints, U.S. Mill Urged. April 22, C7.
305. Vancouver Sun. 1983. U.S. No-Subsidy Ruling Gives a Lift in Spirits to B.C.'s Mill Workers. March 9, A2.
306. Vancouver Sun. 1987a. Kempf: From Mavick to Minister. January 15, B4.
307. Vancouver Sun. 1987b. Kempf Spent Years on Socred Backbench. March 7, A13.
308. Vancouver Sun. 1987c. Kempf Reveals Secret U.S. Talks. April 2, A1.
309. Vancouver Sun. 1987d. Did Kempf Trip Tip Faltering Standard? April 28, B4.
310. Vancouver Sun. 1988a. Settling Fights: What Happens When We Disagree. March 15, A7.
311. Vancouver Sun. 1988b. Loophole for a Knotty B.C. Problem. March 16, B3.
312. Vancouver Sun. 1988c. Forest Ministry Agrees to Stumpage Fee Cuts. June 8, A13.
313. Vancouver Sun. 1988d. B.C. Accused of Wood Fee Violations. July 15, D4.
314. Vancouver Sun. 1989. Premier Upset by Allegations That He Lied. November 25, A1.
315. Vancouver Sun. 1991a. Canada Taking Swing at Costly U.S. Softwood Tariff: Trade Minister Marshals Case to Repeal Pact. March 1, C5.
316. Vancouver Sun. 1991b. Softwood Deal Must Be Retained, U.S. Senators Say. March 8, B5.
317. Vancouver Sun. 1991c. Deputy Washington-Bound to Launch Forestry Concerns. August 7, D2.
318. Vancouver Sun. 1991d. Begin Lumber Talks with U.S., Premier Says: Mulroney Asked to Ensure Fast Start to Negotiations. August 15, D2.
319. Vancouver Sun. 1991e. Wilson Says Lumber Issue Still Irritant. August 19, D8.
320. Vancouver Sun. 1991f. U.S. Anger Feared after Lumber Tax Cancelled. September 4, D1.
321. Vancouver Sun. 1992a. U.S. to Face Challenge on Ruling, Wilson Vows. March 7, A1.
322. Vancouver Sun. 1992b. Kempf's New Clothes Cloak of Scorn. March 26, B1.
323. Vancouver Sun. 1993. Canada Hails Major Move towards Axing Lumber Duty. March 7, D1.
324. Vancouver Sun. 1994a. U.S. Consents to Obey Order to Drop Duties: Trade Row over Softwood Lumber Far from Over, Says IWA Economist. January 7, A1.
325. Vancouver Sun. 1994b. Way Cleared for U.S. Softwood Challenge. February 24, D9.
326. Vancouver Sun. 1994c. U.S. Waves Stick on Softwood Lumber-Duty Refund. December 7, D1.
327. Vancouver Sun. 1994d. U.S. Tariff Refunds Gift-Wrapped for Softwood Industry. December 16, E1.
328. Vancouver Sun. 1995a. Canada Keeping Softwood System. July 12, D3.
329. Vancouver Sun. 1995b. Softwood Talk Fraying Nerves of Top U.S. Negotiator. October 13, D3.
330. Vancouver Sun. 1996. B.C. Wants Equity in Softwood Deal: Softwood: Talks Scheduled. January 23, D1.
331. Vancouver Sun. 1998a. Clark Plans to Defend Stumpage Cuts: B.C.'s Premier Is Taking to Washington, D.C. July 7, A1.
332. Vancouver Sun. 1998b. Drilled-Studs Puzzles Canadians. December 18, F4.
333. Vancouver Sun. 1999a. Marchi No Fan of Softwood Deal: Existing Canada-U.S. Softwood Lumber Agreement Expires in 2001 and Could Be Abandoned, Says Concerned Canadian Trade Minister. March 9, D2.
334. Vancouver Sun. 1999b. Forest Firms Split on Trade Deal. April 9, A1.
335. Vancouver Sun. 1999c. B.C. Won't Sign New Softwood Deal with U.S. June 16, D1.
336. Vancouver Sun. 2000. Divided Approach to Softwood Deal Won't Wash, Minister Says. September 13, D2.
337. Vancouver Sun. 2001a. Ambassador Goads U.S. in Softwood Scrap. March 3, F2.
338. Vancouver Sun. 2001b. U.S. Tax Payers' Group Backs Canada in Trade War. March 9, F7.
339. Vancouver Sun. 2001c. Energy Shouldn't Be Part of Lumber Trade War, Minister Says. March 10, C1.
340. Vancouver Sun. 2001d. Quebec Stand in Lumber Dispute 'Is a Threat to B.C.' March 14, A1.
341. Vancouver Sun. 2001e. Put All Trade Issues on the Table. April 3, A1.
342. Vancouver Sun. 2001f. Softwood Is 'Top Priority': PM. November 9, A1.
343. Vancouver Sun. 2001g. Forest Reform No Guarantee U.S. Will Stop Trade Action. December 14, C1.
344. Vancouver Sun. 2003. Despite Rejection, Softwood Deal Still Possible. December 15, D3.
345. Vancouver Sun. 2004. B.C. Seeks Separate Lumber Pact. April 2, F1.
346. Vancouver Sun. 2005a. NAFTA at Stake in the New Round of Lumber Talks. July 13, D3.
347. Vancouver Sun. 2005b. Canada and U.S. as Far Apart as Ever on Softwood. July 27, D4.
348. Vancouver Sun. 2006. Emerson Must Get Debate with U.S. on NAFTA. February 15, D5.
349. Waddell , D. 2003. Letter to Grant Aldonas. November 14.
350. Wall Street Journal. 1988. U.S. Group May Seek Duty on Some Lumber Imports. June 28, 1.
351. Wall Street Journal. 1991. Canada Ends Lumber Pact with U.S.; 1980's Trade Dispute May Be Rekindled. September 4, A14.
352. Wall Street Journal. 1992. Mulroney Protests against U.S. Stance on Trade Issues. May 21, A8
353. Wall Street Journal. 1999. U.S. Officials Inform Canada It Intends to Let Lumber-Import Accord Wither. October 1, A4.
354. Wall Street Journal. 2003. Canada-U.S. Lumber Talks Set Back: British Columbia Producer Opposes a Proposed Deal to Settle Trade Dispute. December 12, B7.
355. Washington Post. 2001. Canada Bristles at U.S. Tariff on Lumber. February 28, E3.
356. Washington Times. 2003. Eluding Tariffs; Firms Look at Options in Steel, Lumber Trade. January 20, C13.
357. Wear , D.N. , and K.J. Lee . 1993. U.S. Policy and Canadian Lumber: Effects of the 1996 Memorandum of Understanding. Forest Science 39:799-815.
358. Westbrook , T.J. 1981. Statement of Tom Westbrook, Representing Northwest Independent Forest Manufacturers Association. In Forest Products Industry Issues: Joint Hearing before the Subcommittee on International Trade and Subcommittee on Taxation and Debt Management of the Committee on Finance, United States Senate, Ninety-Seventh Congress, First Session, November 24, 1981. Washington, DC: U.S. GPO, 1982, 149-162.
359. Weyerhaeuser Company. 2002. Weyerhaeuser Offers Solution to Bring Down Lumber Trade Wall between U.S and Canada. News Release. November 20.
360. Whiteley , D. 2006. Personal communication. September 28.
361. Widman Management. 1982. U.S. Protectionism and the Issue of Countervailing Duties. Executive Summary. Vancouver, BC: Wideman Management Consultant.
362. Wolff , A.W. 1986. To Mac Baldrige-Today's Oxymoron: Canadian Government Credibility on Lumber. September 12.
363. WTO Dumping Panel. 2004. Report of the Panel: United States-Final Dumping Determination on Softwood Lumber from Canada. WT/DS264/R. April 13.
364. WTO Injury Compliance Appellate Panel. 2006. Report of the Appellate Body: United States-Investigation of the International Trade Commission in Softwood Lumber from Canada, Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Canada. WT/DS277/AB/RW. April 13.
365. WTO Injury Compliance Panel. 2005. Report of the Panel: United States-Investigation of the International Trade Commission in Softwood Lumber from Canada, Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by Canada. WT/DS277/RW. November 15.
366. WTO Injury Panel. 2004. Report of the Panel: United States-Investigation of the International Trade Commission in Softwood Lumber from Canada. WT/DS277/R. March 22.
367. WTO Subsidy Panel. 2003. Report of the Panel: United States-Final Countervailing Duty Determination with Respect to Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada. WT/DS257R. August 29.
368. WTO Subsidy Appellate Panel. 2004. Report of the Appellate Body: United States-Final Countervailing Duty Determination with Respect to Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada. AB-2003-6. WTT/DS257/AB/R. January 19.
369. WTO Subsidy Compliance Appellate Panel. 2005. Report of the Appellate Body: United States-Final Countervailing Duty Determination with Respect to Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada, Recourse by Canada to Article 21.5 of the DSU. AB-2005-8. WTT/DS257/AB/RW. December 5.
370. WTO Subsidy Compliance Panel. 2005. Report of the Panel: United States-Final Countervailing Duty Determination with Respect to Certain Softwood Lumber from Canada, Recourse by Canada to Article 21.5 (DS257). WT/DS257/RW. August 1.
371. Yandle , B. 1989. The Political Limits of Environmental Regulation: Tracking the Unicorn. New York: Quorum Books.
372. Yeutter , C. 1985a. Memorandum for the Economic Policy Council (Subject: Canadian Softwood Lumber Imports). October 22.
373. Yeutter , C. 1985b. Letter to ITC Chairwoman Paula Stern. October 24.
374. Yeutter , C. 1986. Letter to Senator David H. Pryor. April 17.
375. Yin , R. , and J. Baek . 2004. The US-Canada Softwood Lumber Trade Dispute: What We Know and What We Need to Know. Forest Policy and Economics 6: 129-143.
376. Zhang , D. 1995. An Economic Analysis of Log Export Restrictions in British Columbia. In Proceedings of the 25th Southern Forest Economics Workshop: A World of Forestry, edited by J. Caulfield . New Orleans. April 17-19, 168-178.
377. Zhang , D. 1997. Inward and Outward Foreign Investment: The Case of U.S. Forest Industry. Forest Products Journal 47(5): 29-35.
378. Zhang , D. 2001. Welfare Impacts of the 1996 U.S.-Canada Softwood Lumber (Trade) Agreement. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31(11): 1958-1967.
379. Zhang , D. 2003. A Proposal to End the U.S.-Canada Softwood Lumber Trade Dispute. In Society of American Foresters 2003 Convention Proceedings. Buffalo, NY. October 25-30.
380. Zhang , D. 2006. Welfare Impacts of the 1996 U.S.-Canada Softwood Lumber Agreement: An Update. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36(1): 255-261.
381. Zhang , D. , and J. Bliss . 1998. Alabama Stumpage Price Trends. Alabama Treasured Forests 18(2): 20-22.
382. Zhang , D. , and D. Laband . 2005. From Senators to the President: Solving the Lumber Problem or Else. Public Choice 123(3-4): 393-410.
383. Zhang , D. , and P.H. Pearse . 1996. Differences in Silvicultural Investment under Various Types of Forest Tenure in British Columbia. Forest Science 44(4): 442-449.
384. Zhang , D. , and C. Sun . 2001. U.S.-Canada Trade Disputes and Softwood Lumber Price Volatility. Forest Products Journal 51(4): 21-27.
385. Zusman , P. 1976. The Incorporation and Measurement of Social Power in Economic Models. International Economic Review 17: 447-462.