Differences in silvicultural investment under various types of forest tenure in British Columbia

Forest Science

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 442-449

  Zhang, Daowei ^a   Pearse, Peter H ^b  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Economic incentives; policy; property rights; timber

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030456711     PISSN: 0015749X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. BINKLEY, C.S. 1980. Economic analysis of the allowable cut effect. For. Sci. 26(4):633-642.
2. COOTER, R., AND T. ULEN, 1988. Law and economics. Scott, Foresman, Glenview, IL.
3. FEDER, G., T. ONCHAN, Y. CHALAMWONG, AND C. HONGLADAROM. 1988. Land policies and farm productivity in Thailand. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.
4. HALEY, D., AND J. LEITCH. 1992. The future of our forests - report of the British Columbia Forest Resources Commission: A critique. Can. Publ. Policy 18(1):47-56.
5. HALVORSEN. R., AND R. PALMQUIST. 1980. The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. Am. Econ. Rev. 70(3):474-75.
6. JUDGE, G.G., R.C. HILL, W.E. GRIFFITHS, H. LUTKEPOHL, AND TSOUNG-CHAO LEE. 1988. Introduction to the theory and practice of econometrics. Ed. 2. Wiley, New York.
7. LARDARO, P. 1993. Applied econometrics. Harper Collins College Publishers, New York.
8. LUCKERT, M.K. 1988. The effect of some British Columbia forest tenures on the distribution of economic rents, the allocation of resources, and investment in silviculture. Ph.D. Diss , Univ of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.
9. LUCKERT, M.K., AND D. HALEY. 1990. The implications of various silvicultural funding arrangements for privately managed public forest land in Canada. New For. 4:1-12.
10. 2 and consistent measures of explained variation. Am. J. Agric. Econ. (5): 319-328.
11. MINISTRY OF FORESTS. 1987. News release. Victoria, B.C. September 15.
12. MINISTRY OF FORESTS. 1991. Major licence silviculture information system: Guide to completing FS 708 forms. Silviculture Branch, Victoria, B.C.
13. PEARSE, P.H. 1965. Distortions in the market for forest land. For. Chron. 41(4):406-418.
14. PEARSE, P.H. 1976. Timber rights and forest policy in British Columbia. Report of the Royal Comm. on For. Resour. of British Columbia (2 vols). Queen's Printer, Victoria, B.C.
15. PEARSE, P.H. 1988. Property rights and the development of natural resource policies in Canada. Can. Publ. Pol. 14(3):307-320.
16. PEARSE, P.H 1990a. Forest tenure policy in Canada: The interface of private and public interests. Proc. of the IUFRO XIXth World Congress. Montreal, Canada.
17. PEARSE, P.H. 1990b. Introduction to forestry economics. Univ. of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, B.C.
18. PEARSE, P.H. 1992. Evolution of forest tenure arrangements in British Columbia. Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.
19. PEARSE, P.H. 1993. Forest tenure, management incentives and the search for sustainable development policies. P. 77-96 in Forestry and the environment: Economic perspectives, Adamowicz, W.L., et al. (eds.). CAB International, Wallingford, U.K.
20. POSNER, R.A. 1977. Economic analysis of law Ed. 2. Little, Brown, Boston, MA.
21. ZHANG,D. 1994. Implications of tenure on forest land value and management in British Columbia. Ph.D. Diss., Univ. of British Columbia. Vancouver, B.C.
22. ZHANG, D. 1996. Forest tenure and land value in British Columbia. J.For.Econ. 2(1):7-30.
23. ZHANG, D., AND P.H. PEARSE. 1994. The influence of the form of tenure on forest practices in British Columbia. Working pap. #206. For. Econ. and Pol. Res. Unit, Univ. of British Columbia. Vancouver, B.C.