Cost-efficiency and outcomes in the treatment of perforated peptic ulcer disease: Laparoscopic versus open approach

Surgery (United States)

Volumn 156, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1003-1008

  Wright, G Paul ^a,b   Davis, Alan T ^a,b   Koehler, Tracy J ^a   Scheeres, David E ^a,b,c  

^a Grand Rapids Medical Education Partners   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SPECTRUM HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CHARLSON DEYO SCORE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY; GROUPS BY AGE; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPEN SURGERY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SEPSIS; SEPTICEMIA; SHOCK; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL MORTALITY; TEACHING HOSPITAL; ULCER PERFORATION; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; EVALUATION STUDY; HOSPITAL CHARGE; LAPAROSCOPY; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL CHARGES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PEPTIC ULCER PERFORATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84909619342     PISSN: 00396060     EISSN: 15327361     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.047     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. H.V. Fineberg, and L.A. Pearlman Surgical treatment of peptic ulcer in the United States. Trends before and after the introduction of cimetidine Lancet 1 1981 1305 1307
2. D.B. McConnell, G.C. Baba, and C.W. Deveney Changes in surgical treatment of peptic ulcer disease within a veterans hospital in the 1970s and the 1980s Arch Surg 124 1989 1164 1167
3. S. Gustavsson, and O. Nyren Time trends in peptic ulcer surgery, 1956 to 1986. A nation-wide survey in Sweden Ann Surg 210 1989 704 709
4. Y.R. Wang, J.E. Richter, and D.T. Dempsey Trends and outcomes of hospitalization for peptic ulcer disease in the United States, 1993 to 2006 Ann Surg 251 2010 51 58
5. A. Tavakkolizadeh, and S.W. Ashley Operations for peptic ulcer R.T. Shackelford, C.J. Yeo, J.H. Peters, Shackelford's surgery of the alimentary tract 6th ed. 2006 Elsevier Saunders Philadelphia 791 810
6. N.T. Kawahara, C. Alster, I. Fujimura, R.S. Poggetti, and D. Birolini Standard examination system for laparoscopy in penetrating abdominal trauma J Trauma 67 2009 589 595
7. C.M. Lam, A.W. Yuen, B. Chik, A.C. Wai, and S.T. Fan Laparoscopic surgery for common surgical emergencies: a population-based study Surg Endosc 19 2005 774 779
8. S. Sauerland, F. Agresta, R. Bergamaschi, G. Borzellino, A. Budzynksi, and G. Champault et al. Laparoscopy for abdominal emergencies: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery Surg Endosc 20 2006 14 29
9. W.Y. Lau, K.L. Leung, K.H. Kwong, I.C. Davey, C. Robertson, and J.J. Dawson et al. A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique Ann Surg 224 1996 131 138
10. W.T. Siu, H.T. Leong, B.K. Law, C.H. Chau, A.C. Li, and K.H. Fung et al. Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial Ann Surg 235 2002 313 319
11. M.J. Bertleff, J.A. Halm, W.A. Bemelman, A.C. van der Ham, E. van der Harst, and H.I. Oei et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of the perforated peptic ulcer: the LAMA Trial World J Surg 33 2009 1368 1373
12. A. Sanabria, M.I. Villegas, and C.H. Morales Uribe Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer disease Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013 CD004778
13. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Overview of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Available from: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/nisoverview.jsp.
14. R.A. Deyo, D.C. Cherkin, and M.A. Ciol Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases J Clin Epidemiol 45 1992 613 619
15. C. Svanes Trends in perforated peptic ulcer: incidence, etiology, treatment, and prognosis World J Surg 24 2000 277 283
16. H. Kemppainen, I. Ralha, and L. Sourander Clinical presentation of peptic ulcer in the elderly Gerontology 43 1997 283 286
17. N. Byrge, R.G. Barton, T.M. Enniss, and R. Nirula Laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis Am J Surg 206 2013 957 963
18. R. Lunevicius, and M. Morkevicius Management strategies, early results, benefits, and risk factors of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer World J Surg 29 2005 1299 1310
19. W.J. Halabi, C.Y. Kang, N. Ketana, K.J. Lafaro, V.Q. Nguyen, and M.J. Stamos et al. Surgery for gallstone ileus: a nationwide comparison of trends and outcomes Ann Surg 259 2014 329 335
20. K.J. Van Arendonk, K.M. Tymitz, S.L. Gearhart, M. Stem, and A.O. Lidor Outcomes and costs of elective surgery for diverticular disease: a comparison with other diseases requiring colectomy JAMA Surg 148 2013 316 321
21. C.Y. Kang, O.O. Chaudhry, W.J. Halabi, V. Nguyen, J.C. Carmichael, M.J. Stamos, and S. Mills Outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample Am J Surg 204 2012 952 957