Institutional entrepreneurs' social mobility in organizational fields

Journal of Business Venturing

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 131-149

  Waldron, Theodore L ^a   Fisher, Greg ^b   Navis, Chad ^c  

^a BAYLOR UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Activists; Institutional entrepreneurs; Institutional work; Rhetoric; Social mobility

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909602741     PISSN: 08839026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.06.006     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Battilana J., Leca B., Boxenbaum E. How actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2009, 3:377-419.
2. Bennett W.L. Branded political communication: lifestyle politics, logo campaigns, and the rise of global citizenship. Politics, Products and Markets: Exploring Political Consumerism, Past and Present 2004, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ. M. Micheletti, A. Follesdal, D. Stolle (Eds.).
3. Berg B.L. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences 2004, Pearson, Boston, MA.
4. Berkenkotter C., Huckin T.N. Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power 1995, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ.
5. Bingham C.B., Davis J.P. Learning sequences: their existence, effect, and evolution. Acad. Manag. J. 2012, 55:611-641.
6. Bitzer L.F. The rhetorical situation. Philos. Rhetor. 1992, 25:1-14.
7. Blumer H. Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method 1986, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
8. Bourdieu P. Language and Symbolic Power 1991, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
9. Carlton J. Against the grain: how Home Depot and activists joined to cut logging abuse. Wall Str. J. 2000, 26. (September).
10. Corley K.G., Gioia D.A. Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Adm. Sci. Q. 2004, 49:173-208.
11. David R.J., Sine W.D., Haveman H.A. Seizing opportunity in emerging fields: how institutional entrepreneurs legitimated the professional form of management consulting. Organ. Sci. 2012, 24:1-22.
12. den Hond F., de Bakker F.G.A. Ideologically motivated activism: how activists groups influence corporate social change activities. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2007, 32:901-924.
13. DiMaggio P.J. State expansion and organizational fields. Organization Theory and Public Policy 1983, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA. R.H. Hall, R.E. Quinn (Eds.).
14. DiMaggio P. Interest and agency in institutional theory. Institutional Patterns and Culture 1988, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA. L.G. Zucker (Ed.).
15. Eisenhardt K.M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1989, 14:532-550.
16. Eisenstadt S.N. The Protestant Ethic and Modernization: A Comparative View 1968, Basic Books, New York, NY.
17. Fligstein N. Social skill and institutional theory. Am. Behav. Sci. 1997, 40:397-405.
18. Garud R., Jain S., Kumaraswamy A. Institutional entrepreneurship and the sponsorship of common technological standards: the case of Sun Microsystems and Java. Acad. Manag. J. 2002, 45:196-214.
19. Gephart R.P. The textual approach: risk and blame in disaster sensemaking. Acad. Manag. J. 1993, 36:1465-1514.
20. Green S.E. A rhetorical theory of diffusion. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2004, 29:653-669.
21. Green S.E., Li Y., Nohria N. Suspended in self-spun webs of significance: a rhetorical model of institutionalization and institutionally embedded agency. Acad. Manag. J. 2009, 52:11-36.
22. Greenwood R., Suddaby R. Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields: the big five accounting firms. Acad. Manag. J. 2006, 49:27-48.
23. Greenwood R., Suddaby R., Hinings C.R. Theorizing change: the role of professional service associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Acad. Manag. J. 2002, 45:58-80.
24. Heracleous L., Barrett M. Organizational change as discourse: communicative actions and deep structures in the context of information technology implementation. Acad. Manag. J. 2001, 44:755-778.
25. Herman N.J., Reynolds L.T. Symbolic Interaction: An Introduction to Social Psychology 1994, Rowman & Littlefield, Dix Hills, NY.
26. Hornblower M. Next stop, Home Depot. Time Mag. 1998, 70. (October 19).
27. Langley A. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1999, 24:691-710.
28. Langley A. Process thinking in strategic organization. Strateg. Organ. 2007, 5:271-282.
29. Lawrence T.B. Institutional strategy. J. Manag. 1999, 25:161-187.
30. Lawrence T.B., Phillips N. From Moby Dick to Free Willy: macro-cultural discourse and institutional entrepreneurship in emerging institutional fields. Organization 2004, 11(5):689-711.
31. Lawrence T.B., Suddaby R. Institutions and institutional work. Handbook of Organizational Studies 2006, Sage, London. S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T.B. Lawrence (Eds.).
32. Leblebici H., Salancik G.R., Copay A., King T. Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: an organizational history of the U.S. radio broadcasting industry. Adm. Sci. Q. 1991, 36:333-363.
33. Leigh J.H., Gabel T.G. Symbolic interactionism: its effects on consumer behavior and implications for marketing strategy. J. Consum. Mark. 1992, 9:27-38.
34. Maguire S., Hardy C., Lawrence T.B. Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Acad. Manag. J. 2004, 47:657-679.
35. Marshall C., Rossman G. Designing Qualitative Research 1995, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
36. Meindl J.R., Ehrlich S.B., Dukerich J.M. The romance of leadership. Adm. Sci. Q. 1985, 30:78-102.
37. Miles M.B., Huberman A.M. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods 1984, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
38. Miller C.R. Rhetorical community: the cultural basis of genre. Genre and the New Rhetoric 1994, Taylor & Francis, London, UK. A. Freedman, P. Medway (Eds.).
39. Orlikowski W.J., Yates J. Genre repertoire: the structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Adm. Sci. Q. 1994, 39:541-574.
40. Phillips D.J., Zuckerman E.W. Middle-status conformity: theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. Am. J. Sociol. 2001, 107:379-429.
41. Rao H., Morrill C., Zald M.N. Power plays: how social movements and collective action create new organizational forms. Res. Organ. Behav. 2000, 22:237-282.
42. Scott W.R. Institutions and Organizations 1995, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
43. Sherer P.D., Lee K. Institutional change in large law firms: a resource dependency and institutional perspective. Acad. Manag. J. 2002, 45:102-119.
44. Shils E. Center and Periphery 1975, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
45. Snow D.A. Extending and broadening Blumer's conceptualization of symbolic interactionism. Symb. Interact. 2001, 24:367-377.
46. Strauss A.L., Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research 1990, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
47. Strauss A., Corbin J. Grounded theory methodology: an overview. Handbook of Qualitative Research 1994, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. N.K. Denzin, Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.).
48. Suddaby R. Challenges for institutional theory. J. Manag. Inq. 2010, 19:14-20.
49. Suddaby R. How communication institutionalizes: a response to Lammers. Manag. Commun. Q. 2011, 25:183-190.
50. Suddaby R., Greenwood R. Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Adm. Sci. Q. 2005, 50:35-67.
51. Suddaby R., Viale T. Professionals and field-level change: institutional work and the professional project. Curr. Sociol. 2011, 59:423-442.
52. Vaara E., Tienari J. On the narrative construction of multinational corporations: an antenarrative analysis of legitimation and resistance in a cross-border merger. Organ. Sci. 2011, 22:370-390.
53. Van de Ven A.H. Suggestions for studying strategy process: a research note. Strateg. Manag. J. 1992, 13:169-188.
54. Waldron T., Navis C., Fisher G. Explaining differences in firms' responses to activism. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2013, 38:397-417.
55. Yin R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods 2003, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
56. Zietsma C., Lawrence T.B. Institutional work in the transformation of an organizational field: the interplay of boundary work and practice work. Adm. Sci. Q. 2010, 55:189-221.