Comparative study of fuzzy C means and K means algorithm for requirements clustering

Indian Journal of Science and Technology

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 853-857

  Sheshasayee, Ananthi ^a   Sharmila, P ^b  

^a Quaid E Millath Government College for Women   (India)

^b Vivekananda Institute of Information and Management Studies Elayampalayam (PO)   (India)

Author keywords

Clustering; Data mining; Fuzzy C means; K means; Library; Requirements

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909602414     PISSN: 09746846     EISSN: 09745645     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Laurent P, Cleland-Huang J. Lessons learned from open source projects for facilitating online requirements processes. Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2009. p. 240-55.
2. Lim SL, Quercia D, Finkelstein A. Stake Net: using social networks to analyse the stakeholders of large-scale software projects. Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering 2010 May. 295-304.
3. Lim SL. Social networks and collaborative filtering for largescale requirements elicitation [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of New South Wales; 2011.
4. Karlsson J, Ryan K. A cost-value approach for prioritizing requirements. Software. 1997; 14(5):67-74.
5. Robertson S, Robertson J. Mastering the requirements process. Harlow, UK: Addison Wesley; 1999.
6. Wiegers K. First things first: prioritizing requirements. Software Development. 1999; 7(9):48-53.
7. Guedalia ID, London M, Werman M. An on-line agglomerative clustering method for nonstationary data. Neural Computation. 1999; 11(2):521-40.
8. Barbará D, Chen P. Using self-similarity to cluster large data sets. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. 2003; 7(2):123-52.
9. Wei CP, Lee YH, Hsu CM. Empirical comparison of fast partitioning-based clustering algorithms for large data sets. Expert Systems with applications. 2003; 24(4):351-63.
10. Veerappa V, Letier E. Clustering stakeholders for requirements decision making. Requirements Engineering Foundation for Software Quality; 2011. p. 202-08.
11. Dunn JC. A fuzzy relative of the ISODATA process and its use in detecting compact well-separated clusters. 1973.
12. Bezdek JC. Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1981.
13. Rao VS, Vidyavathi DS. Comparative Investigations and Performance Analysis of FCM and MFPCM Algorithms on Iris data. Indian Journal of Computer Science and Engineering. 2010; 1(2):145-51.
14. Asuncion A, Newman DJ. UCI Machine Learning Repository. University of California, School of Information and Computer Science, Irvine, CA; 2007.