Measuring Representative Communication in Young Children With Developmental Delay

Topics in Early Childhood Special Education

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 133-141

  Sandbank, Micheal ^a   Yoder, Paul ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

children; communication; decision studies; developmental delay; generalizability studies

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909582496     PISSN: 02711214     EISSN: 15384845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0271121414528052     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Abidin R. R. (1995). Parenting Stress Index Manual, 3rd ed. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
2. Algina J., Penfield R. (2009). Classical Test Theory. In Millsap R., Maydeu-Olivares A. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (pp. 93–122.). London, England: SAGE.
3. Bayley N. (2006). Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
4. Cardinet J., Johnson S., Pini G. (2012). Applying generalizability theory using EduG. New York, NY: Routledge Academic.
5. Cronbach L., Gleser G., Nanda H., Rajaratnam N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability of scores and profiles. New York, NY: Wiley.
6. Dissanayake C., Crossley S. A. (1996). Proximity and sociable behaviors in autism: Evidence for attachment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 149-156.
7. Feldman H., Dollaghan C., Campbell T., Kurs-Lasky M., Janosky J., Paradise J. (2000). Measurement properties of the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories at ages one and two years. Child Development, 71, 310-322.
8. Fey M., Warren S., Fairchild M., Sokol S., Yoder P. (2006). Early effects of responsivity education/prelinguistic milieu teaching for children with developmental delays and their parents. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 526-547.
9. Fey M., Warren S., Yoder P., Bredin-Oja S. (2013). Is more better? Milieu Communication Teaching in toddlers with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 679-693.
10. Graham S., Sandbank M., Lane K. (2014). Examining the stability of writing assessments for students with writing difficulties. Manuscript in preparation.
11. McCormick K., Nellis L. (2004). Assessing cognitive development. In McLean M., Wolery M., Bailey D.B. (Eds.), Assessing infants and preschoolers with special needs (pp. 197–198). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
12. Mundy P., Sigman M. (1989). The theoretical implications of joint-attention deficits in autism. Development and Psychopathology, 1, 173-183.
13. Neisworth J. T., Bagnato S. J. (2004). The mismeasure of young children: The authentic assessment alternative. Infants & Young Children, 17, 198-212.
14. Nunnally J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
15. Shavelson R. J., Webb N. M. (1991). Generalizability theory: A primer. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
16. Shavelson R. J., Webb N. M., Rowley G. L. (1989). Generalizability theory. American Psychologist, 44, 922-932.
17. Stone W., Coonrad E., Oosley O. (2000). Brief report: Screening Tool for Autism in Two-year olds (STAT): Development and preliminary data. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30, 607-612.
18. Swiss Society for Research in Education Working Group. (2012). EduG (Version 6.1) [Computer software]. Unpublished instrument. Retrieved from http://www.irdp.ch/edumetrie/englishprogram.htm
19. Tapp J., Walden T. A. (1993). PROCODER: A professional tape control, coding, and analysis system for behavioral research using videotape. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 25, 53-56.
20. Webb N. M., Shavelson R. J. (2005). Generalizability theory: Overview. In Everitt B. S., Howell D. C. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science (Vol. 2, pp. 717–719). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
21. Wetherby A. M., Prizant B. M. (2002). Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales: Developmental profile. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.