ACADEMIC FREEDOM FOR K–12 TEACHERS

Battleground: Schools: Volume 1-2

Volumn 1, Issue , 2007, Pages 1-11

  Petrina, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909404577     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Clarke, P. T., 1998a, Canadian public school teachers and free speech: Part 1—An introduction, Education & Law Journal, 8(3), 295–314
2. Clarke, P. T., 1998b, Canadian public school teachers and free speech: Part II—An employment law analysis, Education & Law Journal, 9(1), 43–96
3. Clarke, P. T., 1999, Canadian public school teachers and free speech: Part III—A constitutional law analysis, Education & Law Journal, 9(3), 315–81
4. Cossett Lent, R., & Pipkin, G., eds., 2003, Silent no more: Voices of courage in American schools, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
5. Daly, K. C., 2001, Balancing act: Teachers’ classroom speech and the First Amendment, Journal of Law & Education, 30(1), 1–62
6. Dolmage, W. R., & Clarke, P. T., 2002, Copyright ownership of teacherprepared teaching materials: An examination of issues in the contemporary context, Education & Law Journal, 11(3), 321–341
7. Findlay, N. M., 2002, Students’ right, freedom of expression and prior restraint: The Hazelwood decision, Education & Law Journal, 11(3), 343–366
8. Horowitz, D., 2004, February 13, In defense of intellectual diversity, Chronicle of Higher Education, 50, B12
9. Kindred, K., 2006, The teacher in dissent: Freedom of expression and the classroom, Education Law Journal, 15(3), 207–31
10. Lacks, C., 2003, Words can never hurt me, in ReLeah Cossett Lent and Gloria Pipkin (eds.), Silent No More: Voices of Courage in American Schools. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
11. Lacks, C. 2001, The teacher’s nightmare: Getting fi red for good teaching, in J. Daly, P. Schall, & R. Skeele (Eds.), Protecting the right to teach and learn (pp. 133–141), New York: Teachers College Press
12. National Education Association (NEA), 1928, Resolutions, Proceedings and Addresses of the National Education Association, 66, 351–352
13. National Education Association (NEA), 1969a, Negotiation agreements: Academic freedom, NEA Research Bulletin, 47(1), 7–10
14. National Education Association (NEA), 1969b, Resolutions, Proceedings and Addresses of the National Education Association, 107, 576
15. Petrina, S., 2006, Review of School commercialism: From democratic ideal to market commodity, Teachers College Record, retrieved Nov. 10, 2007 from http://www.tcrecord.org
16. Pipkin, G., & Cossett Lent, R., 2002, At the schoolhouse gate: Lessons in intellectual freedom, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
17. Russo, C., & Delon, F., 1999, Teachers, school boards, and the curriculum, NASSP Bulletin, 83, 22– 29
18. Smith, H. L., 1936, Report of the committee on academic freedom, Proceedings and Addresses of the National Education Association, 66, 814–816
19. Violas, P., 1971, Fear and the constraints of academic freedom of public school teachers, 1930–1960, Educational Theory, 21(1), 70–80
20. Woods, L. B., 1980, Censorship in the schools, Education Digest, 45(5), 10–12
21. Zirkel, P., 1998, A uniform policy, Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 550–551.