The global economics of forestry

The Global Economics of Forestry

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-478

  Hyde, William F ^a  

^a CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY RESEARCH   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909328502     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203122693     Document Type: Book

References (183)

1. Molnar, A., S. Scheer, and A. Khare. 2004. Who conserves the world's forests? A new assessment of conservation and investment trends. Washington, DC: Forest Trends.
2. USDA Forest Service. 2010. Forest inventory data online, http://fi atools.fs.fed.us/fi do/standardrpt.html (accessed April 3, 2010).
3. UN Economic Commission for Europe. 2000. Forest resources of Europe, CIS; North America, Australia, Japan, and New Zealand. Geneva: UN Economic Commission for Europe.
4. Barnett, H. J., and C. Morse. 1963. Scarcity and growth: The economics of natural resource availability. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
5. Bhattarai, M., and M. Hammig. 2001. Institutions and the environmental Kuznets curve for deforestation: A crosscountry analysis for Latin America, Africa and Asia. World Development 29(6): 995-1010.
6. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2001a. Global forest resources assessment 2000. Forestry paper 140. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
7. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2001b. Comparison of forest area and forest area change estimates derived from FRA 1990 and FRA 2000. Forest Resources Assessment Programme working paper 59. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
8. Government of Indonesia, Ministry of Forestry and Estate Crops (GOI/MFEC). 1998. 1997-1998 Forest utilization statistical yearbook. Jakarta: DG of Forest Utilization.
9. Krutilla, K., J. Xu, D. Barnes, and W. Hyde. 2000. Estimates of economic supply from physical measures of the forest stock: An example from eight developing countries. In W. Hyde, G. Amacher, and colleagues, Economics of forestry and rural development: An empirical introduction from Asia. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. pp. 103-120.
10. Lyon, K. 1981. Mining of the forest and the time path of the price of timber. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 8(4): 330-334.
11. Morris, D., M. Mulcauley, and R. Sedjo. 2010. Why we need accurate maps of the world's forests. Resources 174: 25-28.
12. Janz, K., and R. Persson. 2002. How to know more about forests? Supply and use of information for forest policy. CIFOR Occasional paper no. 36. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for Forestry Research.
13. Jung, C., K. Krutilla, and R. Boyd. 1997. Aggregation bias in natural resource price composites: the forestry case. Resource and Energy Economics 20(1): 65-73.
14. Lund, H. G. (coord.) 2000. Defi nitions of forest, deforestation, aff orestation, and reforestation. Manassas, VA: Forest Information Services. http://home.comcast.net/gyde/DEFpaper.htm (accessed October 9, 2008).
15. Pandey, D. 2000. Methodologies for estimating wood resources in South Asia. Wood Energy News 15(1). FAO/RWEDP.
16. Singh, K. 2001. Guidelines on national inventory of village forests. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.
17. Sun, C., and D. Zhang. 2006. Timber harvesting margins in the southern United States: temporal and spacial analysis. Forest Science 52(3): 273-280.
18. Toppinnen, A. 1997. Testing for Granger causality in the Finnish roundwood market. Silva Fennica 31(2): 235-232.
19. USDA Forest Service. 2005. Forest Inventory and Analysis webpage: http://fiafsfed.us.(accessed March 5, 2008).
20. Barlow, T., and G. Helfand. 1980. Timber giveaway-a dialogue. The Living Wilderness 44: 38-39.
21. Barlow, T, G. Helfand, T. Orr, and T. Stoel. 1980. Giving away the national forests: An analysis of U.S. Forest Service timber sales below cost. Washington, DC. Natural Resources Defense Council.
22. Behan, R. 1975. Forestry and the end of innocence. American Forests 81(5):16-19.
23. Clawson, M. 1976. The national forests. Science 191(4227): 762-767.
24. Forest Sense. 2001. Forest service lost 407 million selling trees in 1998. Forest Sense 3(2):1
25. Gould, E. 1962. Forestry and recreation. Harvard Forest Papers No. 6. Petersham, MA: Harvard Forest
26. Davis, L., and K.N. Johnson. 1987. Forest management. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Hanzlik, E. 1922. Determination of the annual cut on a sustained basis for virgin American forests. Journal of Forestry 20(5): 611-625.
28. Hyde, W. 1980. Timber supply, land allocation, and economic effi ciency. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future.
29. Raup, H. 1964. Some problems in ecological theory and their relation to conservation. Journal of Ecology 52 (Supplement).
30. Spurr, S. 1964. Forest ecology. New York: Ronald Press.
31. Sullivan, R, E. Bell, and J. Usher. 1975. Information relating to RPAT timber policy issue 1. Washington, DC: USDA Forest Service Timber Harvest Issues Study Team.
32. USDA Forest Service. 1969. Douglas fi r supply study. Portland, OR: Pacifi c Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.
33. Von Thunen, J. 1826. Der Isolierte Staat in Bezeihung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationalokonomie [The Isolated State]. Berlin: Schmaucher Zarchlin. Translated by Carla M. Wartenberg. Edited with an introduction by Peter Hall. New York: Pergamon Press, 1966.
34. Zimmermann, E., and S. Collier. 2004. Road wrecked: Why the ;10 billion Forest Service road maintenance backlog is bad for taxpayers. Washington, DC: Taxpayers for Common Sense.
35. Aldy, J., A. Krupnick, R. Newell, I. Parry, and W. Pitzer. 2010. Designing climate mitigation policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives XLVIII(4): 903-934.
36. Alemu, T. 1999. Land tenure and soil conservation: Evidence from Ethiopia. Unpublished PhD thesis, Economics Department, Goteborg University, Sweden.
37. Andam, K., P. Ferraro, A. Pfaff, J. Robalino, and A. Sanchez. 2008. Measuring the eff ectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(42): 16089-16094.
38. Angelsen, A. 2011. What does REDD+ really cost? POLEX (July) [Blog].
39. Blackman, A., A Pfaff, J. Robalino, and Y. Zepeda. 2009. Mexico's natural protected areas: enhancing eff ectiveness and equity. Interim narrative report to the Tinker Foundation. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
40. Bowes, M. 1983. Economic foundations of public forestland management. Resources for the Future discussion paper D-104. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
41. Bowes, M., and J. Krutilla. 1989. Multiple use management: The economics of public forestlands. Washington DC: Resources for the Future.
42. CIFOR News. 2007. Forests and climate change: Tough but fair decisions needed. 43: 2-4.
43. CIFOR News. 2007. CIFOR and CPF launch fi rst "forest day" at UN global climate change talks in Bali. 44: 1, 4.
44. Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. 1968. Resource conservation: Economics and policies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45. Clepper, H. 1977. Professional forestry in the United States. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future.
46. Crosson, P. 1985. Impact of erosion on land productivity in the United States. In S. el Swaify, W. Moldenhauer, and A. Lo, eds., Soil erosion and conservation. Ankeny, IA: Soil Conservation Society of America, pp. 217-236.
47. Crosson, P., and T. Stout. 1983. Productivity eff ects of cropland erosion in the United States. Unpublished manuscript, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
48. Cruz, W., H. Francisco, and Z. Conroy. 1988. The onsite and downstream costs of soil erosion in the Magat and Pantabangan watersheds. Journal of Philippine Development 15(1): 48-85.
49. Dangi, R., and W. Hyde. 2001. When does community forestry improve forest management? Nepal Journal of Forestry 12(1): 1-19.
50. Ecosystem Marketplace. 2009. Voluntary carbon markets. http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com/documents/cms_documents/StateOfTheVoluntaryCarbonMarkets_2009.pdf (accessed April 9, 2010).
51. Ehrenfeld, D., 1988. Why put a value on biodiversity. In E. Wilson and F. Peter (eds.), Biodiversity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 212-216.
52. Baldwin, L., R. Marshall, and J-F. Richard. 1997. Bidder collusion at forest service timber sales.Journal of Political Economy 105(4): 657-699.
53. Barlow, T., and G. Helfand. 1980. Timber giveaway - a dialogue. The Living Wilderness 44: 38-39.
54. Barlow, T, G. Helfand, T. Orr, and T. Stoel. 1980. Giving away the national forests: An analysis of U.S. Forest Service timber sales below cost. Washington, DC: Natural Resources Defense Council.
55. Becker, G. 1968. Crime and punishment: an economic approach. Journal of Political Economy 76: 169-217.
56. Brown, D. 1999. Addicted to rent: corporate and spatial distribution of forest resources in Indonesia. Jakarta: DFID/ITFMP.
57. Burlando, A., and A. Motta. 2007. Self reporting reduces corruption in law enforcement. Working paper 0063, Dipartmento di Scienze Economiche "Marco Fanno," University of Padua, Italy
58. Casson, A., and K. Obidzinski. 2001. From new order to regional autonomy: shifting dynamics of 'illegal' logging in Kalimantan, Indonesia.W orld Development 30(12): 2133-2151.
59. Cerutti, P., G. Lescuyer, and S. Mvondo. 2010. The challenges of redistributing forest-related monetary benefi ts: a decade of logging area fees in Cameroon. International Forestry Review 12(2): 130-138.
60. Clawson, M. 1976. The national forests. Science 191(4227): 762-767.
61. Clepper, H. 1971. Professional forestry in the United States. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future.
62. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO/UN). 2001. Governance principles for concessions and contracts in public forests. FAO/UN Forestry Paper 139. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
63. Gautam, M, U. Lele, H. Kartodihardjo, A. Khan, I. Erwinsyah, and S. Rana. 2000. Indonesia: The challenges of World Bank involvement in forests. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
64. Gray, J. 1983. Forest revenue systems in developing countries. FAO/UN Forestry Paper 43. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
65. Grimaldi, J. 2002. Enron pipeline leaves scar on South America. Washington Post (May 5), A01.
66. Gunatilake, H. 2007. Effi cient technology and the conservation of natural forests: evidence from Sri Lanka. ERD Working Paper no. 105. Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
67. Hirschleifer, J. 1974. Sustained yield versus capital theory. In B. Dowdle, ed., Economics of sustained yield forestry. Unpublished conference proceedings. Seattle: College of Forest Resources, University of Washington.
68. Hyde, W. 1981. Timber economics in the Rockies: effi ciency and management options. Land Economics 57(4): 630-639.
69. Hyde, W. 1980. Timber supply, land allocation, and economic effi ciency. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future.
70. IMF (International Monetary Fund). 1998. Memorandum on economic and fi scal policy. Washington, DC: IMF.
71. Jakarta Post. 2000. 'Illegal' logging involves central government offi cials. August 19.
72. Klerman, D., and N Garoupa. Optimal law enforcement with a rent-seeking government. American Law and Economics Review 4(1): 116-140.
73. Kutay, K. 1977. Oregon economic impact assessment of proposed wilderness legislation. In Oregon Omnibus Wilderness Act. Publ. 95-42, part 2:29-63
74. Leffl Er, K., and R. Rucker. 1991. Transaction costs and the effi cient organization of production: a study of timber-harvesting contracts. Journal of Political Economy 99(5): 1060-1087.
75. Magrath, W., R. Grandalski, G. Stuckey, G. Vikanes, and G. Wilkinson. 2007. Timber theft prevention: Introduction to security for forest managers. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
76. Mead, W. 1966. Competition and oligopsony in the Douglas fi r lumber industry. Berkeley: University of California Press.
77. Mookherjee, D., and I. Png. 1995. Corruptible law enforcers: How should they be compensated? Economic Journal 105(1): 145-159.
78. Niquidet, K., and C. Van Kooten. 2006. Transaction evidence appraisal: Competition in British Columbia's stumpage markets. Forest Science 52: 451-459.
79. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. 2002. State of the forest report, 2001. OMNR Forest Information series. Toronto, Canada: The Queen's Printer for Ontario.
80. Paris, R., I. Ruzicka, and H. Speechly. 1994. Performance guarantee bonds for commercial management of natural forests-early experience from the Philippines. Commonwealth Forestry Review 73(2): 106-112.
81. Paudel, D., S. Keeling, and D. Khanal. 2006. Forest products verifi cation in Nepal and the work of the commission to investigate the abuse of authority. Country case study 10, VERIFOR. Forest Policy and Environment Programme. London: Overseas Development Institute.
82. Robinson, E., and R. Lokina. 2008. To bribe or not to bribe. Working paper, Department of Economics, University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
83. Sizer, N. 2005. Halting the theft of Asia's forests. Far Eastern Economic Review 168(5): 50-53.
84. USDA Forest Service. 2005. USDA Forest Service Forest inventory and analysis webpage: http://fi a.fs.fed.us (accessed July 18, 2008).
85. Vincent, J., and M. Gillis. 1998. Deforestation and forest land use: A comment. World Bank Research Observer 13(1): 133-140.
86. Walker, J. 1974. Timber management planning. San Francisco: Western Timber Association.
87. Weintraub, S. 1959. Price-making in Forest Service timber sales. American Economic Review 49(4): 628-637.
88. Wolfe, R. 1989. Managing a forest and making it pay. University of Colorado Law Review. 60(4): 1037-1078
89. World Bank. 1995. The economics of long-term management of Indonesia's natural forests. Draft forestry report. Washington, DC: World Bank.
90. Zimmermann, E., and S. Collier. 2004. Road wrecked: Why the ;10 billion Forest Service road maintenance backlog is bad for taxpayers. Washington, DC: Taxpayers for Common Sense.
91. Amacher, G., W. Hyde, and B. Joshee. 1993. Joint production and consumption in traditional households: Fuelwood and agricultural residues in two districts in Nepal. Journal of Development Economics 17: 93-105.
92. Arnold, M., G. Kohlin, R. Persson, and G. Shepherd. 2003. Fuelwood revisited: What has changed in the last decade? Occasional paper 39. Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.
93. Barlow, T., and G. Helfand. 1980. Timber giveaway - a dialogue. The Living Wilderness 44: 38-39.
94. Barlow, T, G. Helfand, T. Orr, and T. Stoel. 1980. Giving away the National Forests: An analysis of U.S. Forest Service timber sales below cost. Washington, DC: Natural Resources Defense Council.
95. Binkley, C. 1999. Accounting for forest assets. In W. Nordhaus and E. Kokkelenburg, eds., Nature's numbers: Expanding the national economic accounts to include the environment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 202-206.
96. Boyd, R., and W. Hyde. 1989. Forest sector intervention. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
97. Cooke, P. 1998. The eff ect of environmental good scarcity on own-farm labor allocation: The case of agricultural households in rural Nepal. Environment and Development Economics 3(4): 443-469.
98. El Sarafy, S. 1989. The proper calculation of income from depletable natural resources. In Y. Ahmad, S. El Sarafy, and E. Lutz, eds., Environmental accounting for sustainable development. Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 10-18.
99. Hyde, W., and S. Daniels. 1988. Balancing market and nonmarket outputs on public forest lands. In V. Smith, ed., Environmental resources and applied welfare economics: Essays in honor of John V. Krutilla. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. 135-163.
100. Hyde, W., D. Newman, and B. Seldon. 1992. The economic benefi ts of forestry research. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
101. IRG with Edgevale Associates. 1994. The Philippine environment and natural resource accounting project (ENRAP Phase II). Washington, DC: IRG.
102. Katila, M. 1995. Accounting for market and non-market production of timber, fuelwood and fodder in national income framework: A case study. IUFRO XX World Congress, Tampere, Finland, August.
103. Peskin, H., and E. Lutz. 1993. A survey of resource and environmental accounting practices industrialized countries. In E. Lutz, ed., Toward improved accounting for the environment. Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 144-176.
104. Prince, R. 1996. The challenge of incorporating environmental quality and natural resource availability into the national accounts. Washington, DC: Global Planetary Change.
105. Repetto, R. 1992. Accounting for environmental assets. Scientifi c American 66: 94-100.
106. Repetto, R., and M. Gillis (Eds.) 1988. Public policy and the misuse of forest resources. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
107. Seroa Da Motta, R., and C. Ferraz Do Amaral. 2000. Estimating timber depreciation in the Brazilian Amazon. Environment and Development Economics 5: 129-142.
108. Toppinen, A. 2002. An environmental accountant's agony: Are stumpage prices reliable indicators of the scarcity of national forest resources? Draft manuscript, Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki.
109. UN Economic Commission for Europe. 2000. Forest resources of Europe, CIS; North America, Australia, Japan, and New Zealand. Geneva: UN.
110. United Nations, European Commission, International Monetary Fund, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, and World Bank. 2003. Handbook of national accounting, integrated environmental and economic accounting. New York: UN.
111. U.S. Department of Commerce. N.d Bureau of Economic Analysis website http://www.bea.gov/bea/dn/home/gdp.htm (accessed July 14, 2006).
112. Zhang, Y. 2007. Green wealth: Assessing and accounting for social benefi t of forest. Beijing: China's Environmental Science Publisher. (in Chinese)
113. Abt, R., and S. Ahn. 2003. Timber demand: Aggregation and substitution. In E. Sills and K. Abt, eds., Forests in a market economy. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, pp. 133-152.
114. Baardsen, S. 2000. An econometric analysis of Norwegian sawmilling, 1974-1991, based on milllevel data. Forest Science 46: 537-574.
115. Bermstein, J. 1992. Price margins and capital adjustment: Canadian mill products and pulp and paper industries. International Journal of Industrial Organization 10(3): 491-510.
116. Brannlund, R., P.-O. Johansson, and K.-G. Lofgren. 1985. An econometric analysis of aggregate sawtimber and pulpwood supply in Sweden. Forest Science 31: 395-406.
117. Buongiorno, J., S. Zhu, D. Zhang, J. Turner, and D. Tomberlin. 2003. The global forest products model. Waltham, MA: Academic Press.
118. Butner, R., and C. Stapley. 1997. Capital eff ectiveness of the paper industry. Tappi Journal 80(10): 155-165.
119. De Hoop, C., A. Egan, W. Greene, and J. Mayo. 2002. Surveys of the logging contractor population-8 southern states and Maine. Working paper 55. Baton Rouge: Louisiana Forest Products Development Center.
120. Gilless, J., and J. Buongiorno. 1987. PAPYRUS: A model of the North American pulp and paper industry. Forest Science Monograph 28.
121. Hagenstein, P. 1963. The location decision for primary wood-using industries in the northern Appalachians. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
122. Hyberg, B., and D. Holthausen. 1989. The behavior of non-industrial landowners. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19(8): 1014-1023.
123. Kallio, M. 2001. Analyzing the Finnish pulpwood market under alternative hypothesis of competition. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 31: 236-245.
124. International Institute for Environment and Development. 1996. Towards a sustainable paper cycle. London: IIED.
125. Latta, G., and D. Adams. 2000. An econometric analysis of output supply and input demand in the Canadian softwood lumber industry. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30: 1419-1428.
126. LeBel, L., and W. Stuart. 1998. Technical effi ciency evaluation of logging contractors using a nonparametric model. Journal of Forest Engineering 9(2): 15-24.
127. Lewandrowski, J. 1990. A regional model of the US softwood plywood industry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. North Carolina State University, Raleigh.
128. Munn, I., and R. Rucker. 1994. The value of information services for factors of production with multiple attributes: The role of consultants in private timber sales. Forest Science 40(3): 474-496.
129. Mead, W. 1966. Competition and oligopsony in the Douglas fi r lumber region. Berkeley: University of California Press.
130. Nurminen, T., and J Heinonen. 2007. Characteristics and time consumption of timber trucking in Finland. Silva Fennica 41(3): 471-487.
131. Nyrud, A., and S. Baardsen. 2003. Production effi ciency and productivity growth in Norwegian sawmilling. Forest Science 49: 89-97.
132. Nyrud, A., and E. Bergseng. 2002. Production effi ciency and size in Norwegian sawmilling. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 17: 566-575.
133. U.S. Census Bureau. 2005. Wood offi ce furniture manufacturing: 2002. EC02-311-337211 (RV). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Offi ce.
134. U.S. Census Bureau. 2005. Wood television, radio, and sewing machine cabinet manufacturing: 2002. EC02-311-337129 (RV). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Offi ce.
135. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2002. Profile of the pulp and paper industry, 2nd edition. EPA/310-R-95-015. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Offi ce.
136. Williamson, T., G. Hauer, and M. Luckert. 2004. A restricted Leontief profi t function model of the Canadian lumber and chip industry. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 34(9): 1833-1844.
137. Xu, J., G. Amacher, and W. Hyde. 2003. China's paper industry: growth and environmental policy during economic reform. Journal of Economic Development 28(1): 49-79.
138. Xu, J., and W. Hyde. 2007. Shadow pricing pollutants for China's paper industry. Unpublished working paper. Peking University.
139. Yin, R. 1998. DEA: a new methodology for evaluating the performance of forest products producers. Forest Products Journal 48(1): 29-34.
140. Yin, R. 1999. Production effi ciency and cost competitiveness of pulp producers in the Pacifi c Rim. Forest Products Journal 49(7/8): 43-49.
141. Yin, R., T. Harris, and B. Izlar. 2000. Why forest products companies may need to hold timberland. Forest Products Journal 50(9): 39-44.
142. Lintner, J. 1965. The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky assets in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics 47: 13-37.
143. Roll, R., and S. Ross. An empirical investigation of arbitrage pricing theory. Journal of Finance 35: 1073-1103.
144. Ross, S. 1976. The arbitrage pricing theory of capital assets pricing. Journal of Economic Theory 12: 341-360.
145. Sharpe, W. 1964. Capital asset pricing: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance 19: 425-442.
146. Alemu. T. 1999. Land tenure and soil conservation: Evidence from Ethiopia. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Environmental Economics Unit, Gothenborg University, Sweden.
147. Amacher, G., W. Hyde, and B. Joshee. 1993. Joint production and consumption in traditional households: Fuelwood and agricultural residues in two districts of Nepal. Journal of Development Studies 30(1) 206-225.
148. Amacher, G., W. Hyde, and K. Kanel. 1999. Nepali fuelwood consumption and production: Regional and household distinctions, substitution, and successful intervention. Journal of Development Studies 35(4): 138-163.
149. Binkley, C. 1981. Timber supply from private nonindustrial forests. Bulletin no. 92. New Haven, CT: Yale University School of Forestry and Environmental Studies.
150. Boyd, R. 1984. Government support of nonindustrial production: the case of private forests. Southern Economic Journal 59: 89-107.
151. Butler, B. 2008. Family forest owners of the United States, 2006. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NRS-27.
152. Carter, D. D. Newman, and C. Moss. 1996. The relative effi ciency of NIPF and industry timberland ownerships in the southern U.S. In J. Greene, ed., Redefi ning roles in forest economics research: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Southern Forest Economics Workshop. Starkville, MS: Mississippi State University, pp. 359-368.
153. Hyde, W., and G. Kohlin. 2000. Social forestry reconsidered. Silva Fennica 34(3): 285-315.
154. Karppinen, H. 1998. Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland. Silva Fennica 32(1): 43-59.
155. Nyrud, A. 2002. Analyzing Norwegina forest management using a stochastic Euler equation approach. Unpublished research paper. Department of Forest Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway, Aas.
156. Schultz, T. 1964. Transforming traditional agriculture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
157. Schultz, T. 1968. Economic growth and agriculture. New York: McGraw-Hill.
158. Shively, G. 1998. Economic policies and the environment: tree planting on low income farms in the Philippines. Environment and Development Economics 3(1): 83-104.
159. Barlow, T., and G. Helfand. 1980. Timber giveaway - a dialogue. The Living Wilderness 44: 38-39.
160. Barlow, T, G. Helfand, T. Orr, and T. Stoel. 1980. Giving away the national forests: An analysis of U.S. Forest Service timber sales below cost. Washington, DC: Natural Resources Defense Council.
161. Borrell, B. 2011. Free-ranging market could save to wolves. Denver Post (August 28) 1D, 6D.
162. Boyd, R., and W. Hyde. 1989. Forestry sector intervention: The impacts of public regulation on social welfare. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
163. Brookings Institution. 2008. 2007 U. S. Forest Service & Department of Interior large wildfi re cost review. A report on 2007 wildland fi res by the independent large wildfi re cost panel. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
164. Brown, D. 2006. Under fl aming sky: The great Hinkley fi restorm of 1894. Guilford, CT: Lyons Press.
165. Chomitz, K., and K. Kumari. 1998. The domestic benefi ts of tropical forests: A critical review. World Bank Research Observer 13(1): 13-35.
166. Daniels, S. 1986. Marginal cost pricing and effi cient resource allocation: the case of public campgrounds. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Duke University, Durham, NC.
167. Fare, R., S. Grosshopf, C. Lovell, and C. Pasurka. 1989. Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A nonparametric approach. Review of Economics and Statistics 71: 90-98.
168. ForestRe. 2009. http://www.forestre.com/main.php (accessed June 14, 2009).
169. Freeman, A. 1979. The benefi ts of environmental improvement: Theory and practice. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
170. Freeman, A. 1993. The measurement of environmental and resource values: Theory and methods. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
171. Glover, D., and T. Jessup (Eds.). 1999. Indonesia's fi res and haze: The cost of catastrophe. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
172. Greene, W., 1993. The econometric approach to effi ciency analysis. In H. Fried, ed., The measurement of productive effi ciency. London: Oxford University Press, pp. 68-119.
173. Gess, D., and W. Lutz. 2002. Firestorm at Peshtigo. New York: Henry Holt.
174. Gregory. G. 1955. An economic approach to multiple use. Forest Science 1(1): 6-13.
175. Hyde, W. 1980. Timber supply, land allocation, and economic effi ciency. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future.
176. Hyde, W. 1981. Timber economics in the Rockies: Effi ciency and management options. Land Economics 57(4): 630-639.
177. Hyde, W., and S. Daniels. 1988. Balancing market and nonmarket outputs on public forestlands. In V. Smith, ed., Environmental resources and applied welfare economics: Essays in honor of John V. Krutilla. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, pp. 135-161.
178. Hyde, W., D. Newman, and B. Seldon. 1992. The economic benefi ts of forestry research. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
179. Johnson, N., A. White, and D. Perrot-Maitre. n.d. Developing markets for water services from forests: issues and lessons for innovators. Washington, DC: Forest Trends.
180. Kao, C., and C. Yong. 1991. Measuring the effi ciency of forest management. Forest Science 37(5): 1239-1252.
181. Kenny, A. 2009. Ecosystem services in the New York City watershed. Available at http://www.ecosystemmarketplace.com (accessed June 27, 2009).
182. Krutilla. J. 1958. Multiple purpose river development. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future.
183. Daniels, S., W. Hyde, and D. Wear. 1991. Distributive eff ects of Forest Service attempts to maintain community stability. Forest Science 37(1): 245-260.