Why forest products companies may need to hold timberland

Forest Products Journal

Volumn 50, Issue 9, 2000, Pages 39-44

  Yin, Runsheng ^a,c   Harris, Thomas G ^b   Izlar, Bob ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^c FOREST PRODUCTS SOCIETY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0013057328     PISSN: 00157473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Berler, M. 1998. Emerging trends in timber investment. Presented at Miller Freeman's World Wood Summit. Miller Freeman Inc., San Francisco, Calif.
2. Brickley, J.A., C.W. Smith, and J.L. Zimmerman. 1997. Managerial Economics and Organizational Architecture. Times Mirror Higher Education Group, Chicago, Ill.
3. Burner, R. and C.E. Stapley. 1997. Capital effectiveness of the paper industry. Tappi J. 80(10):155-165.
4. Coleman, M.J. 1998. Leading the giant. Tappi J. 81(6):50-54.
5. Dixit, A.K. and R.S. Pindyck. 1994. Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, N.Y.
6. Flicker, J.K. 1998. U.S. paper industry: Current and future challenges. Presented at Miller Freeman's World Wood Summit. Miller Freeman Inc., San Francisco, Calif.
7. Finchem, K.J. 1997. Focused capital spending helps paper companies add shareholder value. Pulp & Paper (February), pp. 67-70.
8. Georgia-Pacific Corporation. 1997. Proxy statement and prospectus. In: Notice of special meeting of shareholders to be held on December 16, 1997 (November 11).
9. Hancock Timberland Investor. 1999. Analysis of timberland transactions reveals size discount (3rd quarter). Boston, Mass.
10. International Woodfiber Report. 1998. IP to merge timberlands, fiber supply (June), pp. 6-7.
11. Lynn, E.S. 1998. Timber monetization: The new "hot" topic...but is the concept being oversold? PaperTree Letter (July), pp. 1-6.
12. Milgram, P. and J. Roberts. 1992. Economics, Organization and Management. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
13. Norris Foundation. 1996. Timber-Mart South, Univ. of Georgia, Athens, Ga.
14. Null, D. 1995. New containerboard projects hinge on wastepaper demands, mill designs. Pulp & Paper (April), pp. 52-57.
15. _ and D. Cenatempo. 1997. Paper company strategies should focus on building economic value. Pulp & Paper (September), pp. 66-69.
16. Pace, R.J. 1998. An Issuer's Perspective on Timber Monetization. Goldman, Sachs & Co., New York.
17. Phillips, R.B. 1997. Impact of capital spending on paper industry profitability. Tappi J. 80(10):145-152.
18. Powell, D.S., J.L. Faulkner, D.R. Darr, Z.L. Zhu, and D.W. MacCleery. 1994. Forest Resources of the United States. Gen. Tech. Rept. RM-234. USDA Forest Serv., Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Expt. Sta., Fort Collins, Colo.
19. Pulp and Paper Factbook. 1980-1995. Miller Freeman, Inc., San Francisco, Calif.
20. Rayonier Inc. 1998. Worldwide timber alliance formed by Rayonier and Grantham, Mayo, Van Otterloo & Co. LLC. News Release (April 14).
21. Roberts, D.G. 1998. Is there a right strategy for "tree companies?" Presented at the AIMR Forest Prod. Conf., Vancouver (June 8). AIMR, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
22. Weyerhaeuser. 1998. Weyerhaeuser timberlands. http:/www.weyerhaeuser.com.
23. Yin R.S. 1998. Industry characteristics and investment decision: An alternative to pulp and paper production. Tappi J. 81(1):69-74.
24. _, J. Caufield, M.E. Aronow, and T.G. Harris. 1998. Industrial timberland: Current situation, holding rationale, and future development. Forest Prod. J. 48(10): 43-48.
25. Zaret, J.L., S. Chao, and A.R. Urban. 1998. Value creation through U.S. timberland monetization. Res. Rept. Merrill Lynch, New York.