U.S. Charter Schools and Ethnic Segregation: Inspecting the Evidence1

International Journal of Educational Reform

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 381-395

  Cobb, Casey D ^a   Glass, Gene V ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650628285     PISSN: 10567879     EISSN: 26319675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/105678790101000407     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Arizona Republic. (1998, May 14). Charter school ad targets Mormons, p. A1.
2. Becker H. J., Nakagawa K., & Corwin R. G., (1996). Parent involvement contracts in California's charter schools: Strategy for educational improvement or method of exclusion. Teachers College Record, 98(3), 511–536.
3. Buechler M., (1996). Charter schools: Legislation and results after four years (Indian Education Policy Center, Policy Rep. PR-B13). Bloomington, IN: School of Education Office.
4. Cobb C. D., (1999). Charter schools as schools of choice: Ethnic and racial separation in Arizona.
5. Cobb C. D., & Glass G. V, (1999). Ethnic segregation in Arizona charter schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 7(1). Retrieved from http://olam.ed.asu.edu/v7n1.
6. Corwin R. G., & Flaherty J. F., (Eds.) (1995, November). Freedom and innovation in California's charter schools. Los Alamitos, CA: Southwest Regional Laboratory.
7. Crockett C., (1999). California charter schools: The issue of racial/ethnic segregation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe.
8. Elmore R. F., (1988). Choice in public education. In Boid W. L., & Kerchner C. T., Politics of excellence and choice in education: 1981 yearbook of the politics of education association (pp. 79–98) New York: Falmer Press.
9. Fitzgerald J., Harris P., Huidekoper P., & Mani M., (1998, January). 1997 Colorado charter schools evaluation study: The characteristics, status and student achievement data of Colorado charter schools. Denver: Clayton Foundation.
10. Henig J. R., (1995). Race and choice in Montgomery county, Maryland, magnet schools. Teachers College Record, 96(4), 729–734.
11. Horn J., & Miron G., (1999, January). Evaluation of the Michigan Public School Academy initiative: Executive summary. Evaluation Center of Western Michigan University. Retrieved from http://www.wmich.edu/evalctr/.
12. Lee V, & Croninger R. G., (1994). Parental choice of schools and social stratification in education: The paradox of Detroit. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(4), 434–457.
13. Moore D., & Davenport S., (1990). School choice: The new, improved sorting machine. In Boyd W., & Walberg H., (Eds.), Choice in education (pp. 187–223). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
14. O'Neil J., (1996). New options, old concerns. Educational Leadership, 54(2), 6–8.
15. SRI International. (1997). Evaluation of charter school effectiveness. Menlo Park, CA. Report prepared for the State of California Office of Legislative Analyst. Written by Powell J., Blackorby J., Marsh J., Finnegan K., & Anderson L..
16. Thrupp M., (1999). Schools making a difference: Let's be realistic! School mix, school effectiveness and the social limits of reform. Buckingham, PA: Open University Press.
17. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1997). A study of charter schools: First-year report 1997. RPP International and the University of Minnesota.
18. U.S. Department of Education & RPP. (1999). A comparison of charter legislation: Thirty-three states and the District of Columbia incorporating legislative changes through October, 1998. Retrieved from http://www.uscharterschools.org.
19. U.S. Department of Education. (2000). The state of charter schools 2000—Fourth-year report, January 2000. Retrieved from http://www.uscharterschools.org.
20. Wells A. S., (1993a). The sociology of school choice: Why some win and others lose in the educational marketplace. In Rassel E., & Rothstein R., (Eds.), School choice: Examining the evidence (pp. 29–48). Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
21. Wells A. S., (1993b). Time to choose: America at the crossroads of school choice policy. New York: Hill and Wang.
22. Wells A. S., (1999). Beyond the rhetoric of charter school reform: A study often California school districts. UCLA Charter School Study.
23. Wells A. S., & Crain R. L., (1992). Do parents choose school quality or school status? A sociological theory of free market education. In Cookson P. W., Jr. (Ed.), The choice controversy, (pp. 65–82). Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
24. Wells A. S., Holme J. J., Lopez A., & Cooper C. W., (2000). Charter schools and racial and social class segregation: Yet another sorting machine? In Kahlenberg Richard D., (Ed.), A notion at risk: Preserving public education as an engine for social mobility (pp. 169–221). New York: Century Foundation Press.
25. Whitty G., (1997). Creating quasi-markets in education: A review of recent research on parental choice and school autonomy in three countries. Review of Research in Education, 22, 3–47.
26. Willms D. J., (1986). Social class segregation and its relationship to pupils’ examination results in Scotland. American Sociological Review, 51, 224–241.
27. Willms D. J., (1996). School choice and community segregation. In Kerckhoff A. C., (Ed.), Generating social stratification: Toward a new research agenda. Boulder, CO: Westview.