Technology, the columbus effect, and the third revolution in learning

The Design of Instruction and Evaluation: Affordances of Using Media and Technology

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 121-142

  Fletcher, J D ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909097296     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410611376     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Atkinson, R. C. (1972). Ingredients for a theory of instruction. American Psychologist, 27, 921-931.
2. Atkinson, R. C., & Fletcher, J. D. (1972). Teaching children to read with a computer. The Reading Teacher, 25, 319-327.
3. Ausubel, D. P. (1960). The use of advanced organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 267-272.
4. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13, 4-16.
5. Burton, R. R. (1982). Diagnosing bugs in a simple procedural skill. In D. Sleeman & J. S. Brown (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 157-183). New York: Academic Press.
6. Carbonell, J. R. (1970). AI in CAI: An artificial intelligence approach to computer-assisted instruction. IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems, 11, 190-202.
7. Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445-459.
8. Dawes, R. M. (1971). A case study of graduate admissions: Application of three principles of human decision-making. American Psychologist, 26, 180-188.
9. Fletcher, J. D. (2002). Evidence for learning from technology-assisted instruction. In H. F. O'Neil, Jr. & R. Perez (Eds.), Technology applications in education: A learning view (pp. 79-99). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Fletcher, J. D., & Atkinson, R. C. (1972). An evaluation of the Stanford CAI program in initial reading (Grades K through 3). Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 597-602.
11. Fletcher, J. D., & Dodds, P. V. W. (2000). All about ADL. Learning Circuits. An Internet publication of the American Society for Training & Development: http://www.learningcircuits.org/may2000/.
12. Fletcher, J. D., Hawley, D. E., & Piele, P. K. (1990). Costs, effects, and utility of microcomputer assisted instruction in the classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 783-806.
13. Fowler, B. T. (1980). The effectiveness of computer-controlled videodisc-based training. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA (University Microfilms No. 8114254).
14. Fox, R. G. (1994). A systems approach to education. Warrenton, VA: Learning Technology Institute.
15. Gettinger, M. (1984). Individual differences in time needed for learning: A review of the literature. Educational Psychologist, 19, 15-29.
16. Gilbert, T. F. (1960). On the relevance of laboratory investigation of learning to self-instructional programming. In A. A. Lumsdaine & R. Glaser (Eds.), Teaching machines and programmed learning: A source book (pp. 475-485). Washington, DC: National Education Association of the United States
17. Gott, S. P., Kane, R. S., & Lesgold, A. (1995). Tutoring for transfer of technical competence (AL/HRTP-1995-0002). Brooks AFB, TX: Armstrong Laboratory, Human Resources Directorate.
18. Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 104-137.
19. Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., & Magliano, J. P. (1995). Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 1-28.
20. Heuston, D. H. (1997). School improvement models: The manual model and the speed of light. Sandy, UT: Waterford Institute.
21. Jamison, D. T., Fletcher, J. D., Suppes, P., & Atkinson, R. C. (1976). Cost and performance of computer-assisted instruction for education of disadvantaged children. In J. T. Froomkin, D. T. Jamison, & R. Radner (Eds.), Education as an industry (pp. 201-240). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
22. Kilgour, F. G. (1998). The evolution of the book. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Krendl, K. A., & Lieberman, D. A. (1988). Computers and learning: A review of recent research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4, 367-389.
24. Kulik, J. A. (1994). Meta-analytic studies of findings on computer-based instruction. In E. L. Baker & H. F. O'Neil, Jr. (Eds.), Technology assessment in education and training (pp. 9-33). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Kurzweil, R. (1999). The age of spiritual machines: When computers exceed human intelligence. New York: Viking Press.
26. Lepper, M. R., & Woolverton, M. (2001). The wisdom of practice: Lessons learned from the study of highly effective tutors. In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Contributions of social psychology (pp. 133-156). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
27. Levin, H. M., Glass, G. V., & Meister, G. R. (1987). Cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction. Evaluation Review, 11, 50-71.
28. Mann, C. C. (2000). The end of Moore's Law? Technology Review. Available: http://www.techreview.com/articles/may00/mann.htm.
29. Noja, G. P. (1991). DVI and system integration: A further step in ICAI/IMS technology. In R. J. Seidel & P. R. Chatelier (Eds.), Advanced technologies applied to training design (pp. 161-189). New York: Plenum.
30. Orlansky, J., & String, J. (1977). Cost effectiveness of computer-based instruction in military training (IDA Paper P-1375). Arlington, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses.
31. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
32. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social contexts. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Schacter, J., & Fagnano, C. (1999). Does computer technology improve student learning and achievement? How, when, and under what conditions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 329-343.
34. Scriven, M. (1975). Problems and prospects for individualization. In H. Talmage (Ed.), Systems of individualized education (pp. 199-210). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
35. Semb, G. B., Ellis, J. A., Fitch, M., & Kuti, M. B. (2000). On-the-job training (OJT): Theory, research, and practice. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Training & retraining: A handbook for business, industry, government, and the military (pp. 289-311). New York: Macmillan Reference.
36. Skinner, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton, Century, Crofts.
37. Sleeman, D., & Brown, J. S. (1982). Intelligent tutoring systems. New York: Academic Press.
38. Suppes, P. (1964). Modern learning theory and the elementary-school curriculum. American Educational Research Journal, 1, 79-93.
39. Suppes, P., Fletcher, J. D., & Zanotti, M. (1975). Performance models of American Indian students on computer-assisted instruction in elementary mathematics. Instructional Science, 4, 303-313.
40. Tobias, S. (1989). Another look at research on the adaptation of instruction to student characteristics. Educational Psychologist, 24, 213-227.
41. van Lehn, K. (1990). Mind bugs: The origins of procedural misconceptions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Verano, M. (1987). Achievement and retention of Spanish presented via videodisc in linear, segmented, and interactive modes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, TX (DTIC No. ADA 185 893).
43. Woolf, B. P., & Regian, J. W. (2000). Knowledge-based training systems and the engineering of instruction. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Training and retraining: A handbook for business, industry, government, and the military (pp. 339-356). New York: Macmillan Reference.