Comparative intervention designs

Single Subject Research Methodology in Behavioral Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 329-381

  Wolery, Mark ^a   Gast, David L ^b   Hammond, Diana ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84909046341     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203877937     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Ault, M. J., Gast, D. L., & Wolery, M. (1988). Comparison of progressive and constant time delay procedures in teaching community-sign word reading. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 93, 44-56.
2. Barlow, D. H., & Hayes, S. C. (1979). Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 199-210.
3. Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
4. Billingsley, F. F., White, O. R., & Munson, A. R. (1980). Procedural reliability: A rationale and an example. Behavioral Assessment, 2, 229-241.
5. Birnbrauer, J. S. (1981). External validity and experimental investigation of individual behavior. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 1, 117-132.
6. Birnbrauer, J. S., Peterson, C. R., & Solnick, J. V. (1974). Design and interpretation of studies of single subjects. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 79, 191-203.
7. Browning, R. M. (1967). A same-subject design for simultaneous comparison of three reinforcement contingencies. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 5, 237-243.
8. Cihak, D., Alberto, P. A., Taber-Doughty, T., & Gama, R. I. (2006). A comparison of static picture prompting and video prompting simulation strategies using group instructional procedures. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 21, 89-99.
9. Dunlap, G., Strain, P. S., Fox, L., Carta, J. J., Conroy, M., Smith, B. J., et al. (2006). Prevention and intervention with young children's challenging behavior: Perspective regarding current knowledge. Behavioral Disorders, 32, 29-45.
10. Edgar, E. B., & Billingsley, F. F. (1974). Believability when N = 1. The Psychological Record, 24, 147-160.
11. Falcomata, T. S., Roane, H. S., Hovanetz, A. N., Kettering, T. L., & Keeney, K. M. (2004). An evaluation of response cost in the treatment of inappropriate vocalizations maintained by automatic reinforcement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 83-87.
12. Fiske, K. E. (2008). Treatment integrity of school-based behavior analytic interventions: A review of research. Behavior Analysis and Practice, 1, 2, 19-25.
13. Gast, D. L., & Wolery, M. (1988). Parallel treatments design: A nested single subject design for comparing instructional procedures. Education and Treatment of Children, 11, 270-285.
14. Hains, A. H., & Baer, D. M. (1989). Interaction effects in multi-element designs: Inevitable, desirable, and ignorable. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 57-69.
15. Heal, N. A., & Hanley, G. P. (2007). Evaluating preschool children's preferences for motivational systems during instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 249-261.
16. Herzinger, C. V., & Campbell, J. M. (2007). Comparing functional assessment methodologies: A quantitative synthesis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1430-1445.
17. Holcombe, A., Wolery, M., & Gast, D. L. (1994). Comparative single subject research: Description of designs and discussion of problems. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 14, 119-145.
18. Holcombe, A., Wolery, M., & Snyder, E. (1994). Effects of two levels of procedural fidelity with constant time delay on children's learning. Journal of Behavioral Education, 4, 49-73.
19. Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S. L., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practices in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165-179.
20. Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197-209 (Reprinted from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3-20).
21. Johnston, J. M. (1988). Strategic and tactical limits of comparison studies. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 1-9.
22. Jones, C. D., & Schwartz, I. S. (2004). Siblings, peers, and adults: Differential effects of models for children with autism. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 24, 187-198.
23. Logan, K. R., Jacobs, H. A., Gast, D. L., Murray, A. S., Daino, K., & Skala, C. (1998). The impact of typical peers on the perceived happiness of students with profound multiple disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 23, 309-318.
24. McGonigle, J. J., Rojahn, J., Dixon, J., & Strain, P. S. (1987). Multiple treatment interference in the alternating treatments design as a function of the intercomponent interval length. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 171-178.
25. Neef, N. A., & Peterson, S. M. (2007). Functional behavior assessment. In J. O. Cooper, T. E Heron, & W. L. Heward (Eds.), Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed., pp. 500-524). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
26. Romer, L. T., Billingsley, F. F., & White, O. R. (1988). The behavior equivalence problem in within-subject treatment comparisons. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 9, 305-315.
27. Sindelar, P. T., Rosenberg, M. S., & Wilson, R. J. (1985). An adapted alternating treatments design for instructional research. Education and Treatment of Children, 8, 67-76.
28. Ulman, J. D., & Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1975). Multi-element baseline design in educational research. In E. Ramp & G. Semb (Eds.), Behavior analysis: Areas of research and application (pp. 377-391). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
29. Vollmer, T., Sloman, K., & Pipkin, C. (2008). Practical implications of data reliability and treatment integrity monitoring. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1, 2, 4-11.
30. Werts, M. G., Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., & Frederick, C. (1993). Effects of instructive feedback related and unrelated to the target behaviors. Exceptionality, 4, 81-95.
31. Werts, M. G., Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., & Gast, D. L. (1995). Instructive feedback: Review of parameters and effects. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 55-75.
32. Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Doyle, P. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate and severe disabilities: Use of response prompting strategies. White Plains, NY: Longman.