Assessing new technological literacies

Assessing the Effects of ICT in Education: Indicators, Criteria and Benchmarks for International Comparisons

Volumn 9789264079786, Issue , 2010, Pages 121-142

  Quellmalz, Edys S ^a  

^a WestEd   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908923169     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1787/9789264079786-en     Document Type: Chapter

References (20)

1. Baxter, G. P., and Glaser, R. (1998). 'The cognitive complexity of science performance assessments', Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, Vol. 17, No 3, 37-45.
2. Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: raising standards through classroom assessment. London: King's College.
3. Bennett, R. E., Jenkins, F., Persky, H. and Weiss, A. (2003). Assessing complex problem solving performances, Assessment in Education, Vol. 10, 347-373.
4. Burns, T. C. and Ungerleider, C. S. (2002). 'Information and communication technologies in elementary and secondary education', International Journal of Educational Policy, Research, and Practice, Vol. 3, No 4, 27-54.
5. Crawford, V. and Toyama, Y. (2002). Assessment of student technology proficiency and an analysis of the need for technology proficiency assessments: A review of state approaches. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
6. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2007). National educational technology standards for students: Connecting curriculum and technology. Eugene, OR.
7. International Technology in Education Association (ITEA). (2000). Standards for technological literacy.
8. Koomen, M. (2006). The development and implementation of a computer-based assessment of science literacy in PISA 2006. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
9. Kozma, R. (2003). Technology, innovation, and educational change: A global perspective. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
10. Kozma, R., McGhee, R., Quellmalz, E. and Zalles, D. (2004). 'Closing the digital divide: Evaluation of world links', International Journal of Educational Development, Vol. 24, No 4, 361-381.
11. Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J. and Plomp, T. (eds) (2008). Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Fi ndings from the IEA SITES 2006 study. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Center.
12. Mislevy, R. J. and Haertel, G. D. (2006). 'Implications of evidence-centred design for educational testing', Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, Vol. 25, No 4, 6-20.
13. National Assessment Agency (2008). Report on the 2007 key stage ICT test pilot. London: Qualifi cations and Curriculum Authority.
14. Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2005). Assessment of 21st century skills: The current landscape. Tucson, AZ. Available at: Http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/images/stories/otherdocs/Assessment-Landscape.pdf.
15. Pellegrino, J., Chudowsky, N. and Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. Quellmalz, E. S. and Haertel, G. D. (2008). 'Assessing new literacies in science and mathematics', in: D. J. Leu, Jr., J. Coiro, M. Knowbel and C. Lankshear (eds), Handbook of research on new literacies. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Quellmalz, E. S. and Moody, Mark (2004). Models for multi-level state science assessment systems. Report commissioned by the National Research Council Committee on Test Design for K-12 Science Achievement.
18. Quellmalz, E. S. and Pellegrino, J. W. (2009). 'Technology and testing'. Science, Vol. 323, 75-79.
19. Venezky, R. L. and Davis, C. (2002). Quo vademus? The transformation of schooling in a networked world. Paris: OECD. Available at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/48/20/2073054.pdf.
20. Wilson, M., and Sloan, K. (2000). 'From principles to practice: An embedded assessment system', Applied Measurement in Education, Vol. 13, No 2, 181-208.