Image-Guided Surgery and Emerging Molecular Imaging: Advances to Complement Minimally Invasive Surgery

Urologic Clinics of North America

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 567-580

  Mitchell, Christopher R ^a   Herrell, S Duke ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Image guidance; Molecular imaging; Robotics; Surgical navigation; Urologic surgery

Indexed keywords

AMINOLEVULINIC ACID; DEIONIZED WATER; FAST BLUE; FLUORO RUBY; FLUOROGOLD; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; INDOCYANINE GREEN; TRACER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; IMAGE GUIDED SURGERY; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING AND DISPLAY; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MOLECULAR IMAGING; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PROSTATECTOMY; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SAFETY; SOFT TISSUE REGISTRATION; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL ERROR; TARGET REGISTRATION ERROR; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TISSUE DEFORMATION; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WORKFLOW; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; UROLOGIC DISEASES; UROLOGIC SURGERY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; UROLOGIC DISEASES; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84908897418     PISSN: 00940143     EISSN: 1558318X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2014.07.011     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Lee S.L., Lerotic M., Vitiello V., et al. From medical images to minimally invasive intervention: computer assistance for robotic surgery. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2010, 34(1):33-45.
2. Galloway R.L. The process and development of image-guided procedures. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2001, 3:83-108.
3. West J.B., Fitzpatrick J.M., Toms S.A., et al. Fiducial point placement and the accuracy of point-based, rigid body registration. Neurosurgery 2001, 48(4):810-816. [discussion: 816-7].
4. Teber D., Guven S., Simpfendorfer T., et al. Augmented reality: a new tool to improve surgical accuracy during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy? Preliminary invitro and invivo results. Eur Urol 2009, 56(2):332-338.
5. Ukimura O., Gill I.S. Imaging-assisted endoscopic surgery: cleveland clinic experience. JEndourol 2008, 22(4):803-810.
6. Altamar H.O., Ong R.E., Glisson C.L., et al. Kidney deformation and intraprocedural registration: a study of elements of image-guided kidney surgery. JEndourol 2011, 25(3):511-517.
7. Herrell S.D., Kwartowitz D.M., Milhoua P.M., et al. Toward image guided robotic surgery: system validation. JUrol 2009, 181(2):783-789. [discussion: 789-90].
8. Kwartowitz D.M., Miga M.I., Herrell S.D., et al. Towards image guided robotic surgery: multi-arm tracking through hybrid localization. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2009, 4(3):281-286.
9. Su L.M., Vagvolgyi B.P., Agarwal R., et al. Augmented reality during robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: toward real-time 3D-CT to stereoscopic video registration. Urology 2009, 73(4):896-900.
10. Trinh Q.D., Sammon J., Sun M., et al. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. Eur Urol 2012, 61(4):679-685.
11. Ukimura O., Gill I.S. Real-time transrectal ultrasound guidance during nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: pictorial essay. JUrol 2006, 175(4):1311-1319.
12. Ukimura O., Magi-Galluzzi C., Gill I.S. Real-time transrectal ultrasound guidance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: impact on surgical margins. JUrol 2006, 175(4):1304-1310.
13. van der Poel H.G., de Blok W., Bex A., et al. Peroperative transrectal ultrasonography-guided bladder neck dissection eases the learning of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. BJU Int 2008, 102(7):849-852.
14. Han M., Kim C., Mozer P., et al. Tandem-robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy to improve the neurovascular bundle visualization: a feasibility study. Urology 2011, 77(2):502-506.
15. Hung A.J., Abreu A.L., Shoji S., et al. Robotic transrectal ultrasonography during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012, 62(2):341-348.
16. Long J.A., Lee B.H., Guillotreau J., et al. Real-time robotic transrectal ultrasound navigation during robotic radical prostatectomy: initial clinical experience. Urology 2012, 80(3):608-613.
17. Simpfendorfer T., Baumhauer M., Muller M., et al. Augmented reality visualization during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. JEndourol 2011, 25(12):1841-1845.
18. Gao Q., Chang P.L., Rueckert D., et al. Modeling of the bony pelvis from MRI using a multi-atlas AE-SDM for registration and tracking in image-guided robotic prostatectomy. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2013, 37(2):183-194.
19. Thompson S., Penney G., Billia M., et al. Design and evaluation of an image-guidance system for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2013, 111(7):1081-1090.
20. Phelps M.E. Positron emission tomography provides molecular imaging of biological processes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000, 97(16):9226-9233.
21. De Santis M., Becherer A., Bokemeyer C., et al. 2-18fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography is a reliable predictor for viable tumor in postchemotherapy seminoma: an update of the prospective multicentric SEMPET trial. JClin Oncol 2004, 22(6):1034-1039.
22. Hinz S., Schrader M., Kempkensteffen C., et al. The role of positron emission tomography in the evaluation of residual masses after chemotherapy for advanced stage seminoma. JUrol 2008, 179(3):936-940. [discussion: 940].
23. Giovacchini G., Picchio M., Coradeschi E., et al. Predictive factors of [(11)C]choline PET/CT in patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010, 37(2):301-309.
24. Mitchell C.R., Lowe V.J., Rangel L.J., et al. Operational characteristics of (11)c-choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for prostate cancer with biochemical recurrence after initial treatment. JUrol 2013, 189(4):1308-1313.
25. Kibel A.S., Dehdashti F., Katz M.D., et al. Prospective study of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for staging of muscle-invasive bladder carcinoma. JClin Oncol 2009, 27(26):4314-4320.
26. Davila H.H., Mamcarz M., Nadelhaft I., et al. Visualization of the neurovascular bundles and major pelvic ganglion with fluorescent tracers after penile injection in the rat. BJU Int 2008, 101(8):1048-1051.
27. Zaak D., Sroka R., Khoder W., et al. Photodynamic diagnosis of prostate cancer using 5-aminolevulinic acid-first clinical experiences. Urology 2008, 72(2):345-348.
28. Adam C., Salomon G., Walther S., et al. Photodynamic diagnosis using 5-aminolevulinic acid for the detection of positive surgical margins during radical prostatectomy in patients with carcinoma of the prostate: a multicentre, prospective, phase 2 trial of a diagnostic procedure. Eur Urol 2009, 55(6):1281-1288.
29. Jeschke S., Lusuardi L., Myatt A., et al. Visualisation of the lymph node pathway in real time by laparoscopic radioisotope- and fluorescence-guided sentinel lymph node dissection in prostate cancer staging. Urology 2012, 80(5):1080-1086.
30. Manny T.B., Patel M., Hemal A.K. Fluorescence-enhanced robotic radical prostatectomy using real-time lymphangiography and tissue marking with percutaneous injection of unconjugated indocyanine green: the initial clinical experience in 50 patients. Eur Urol 2014, 65(6):1162-1168.
31. van der Poel H.G., Buckle T., Brouwer O.R., et al. Intraoperative laparoscopic fluorescence guidance to the sentinel lymph node in prostate cancer patients: clinical proof of concept of an integrated functional imaging approach using a multimodal tracer. Eur Urol 2011, 60(4):826-833.
32. Brouwer O.R., Buckle T., Bunschoten A., et al. Image navigation as a means to expand the boundaries of fluorescence-guided surgery. Phys Med Biol 2012, 57(10):3123-3136.
33. Hoda M.R., Popken G. Surgical outcomes of fluorescence-guided laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced protoporphyrin IX. JSurg Res 2009, 154(2):220-225.
34. Krane L.S., Manny T.B., Hemal A.K. Is near infrared fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green dye useful in robotic partial nephrectomy: a prospective comparative study of 94 patients. Urology 2012, 80(1):110-116.
35. Manny T.B., Krane L.S., Hemal A.K. Indocyanine green cannot predict malignancy in partial nephrectomy: histopathologic correlation with fluorescence pattern in 100 patients. JEndourol 2013, 27(7):918-921.
36. Tobis S., Knopf J., Silvers C., et al. Near infrared fluorescence imaging with robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial clinical experience for renal cortical tumors. JUrol 2011, 186(1):47-52.
37. Tobis S., Knopf J.K., Silvers C.R., et al. Near infrared fluorescence imaging after intravenous indocyanine green: initial clinical experience with open partial nephrectomy for renal cortical tumors. Urology 2012, 79(4):958-964.
38. Tobis S., Knopf J.K., Silvers C., et al. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with near infrared fluorescence imaging. JEndourol 2012, 26(7):797-802.
39. Borofsky M.S., Gill I.S., Hemal A.K., et al. Near-infrared fluorescence imaging to facilitate super-selective arterial clamping during zero-ischaemia robotic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2013, 111(4):604-610.