Abandoning the Regular Order: Majority Party Influence on Appropriations in the U.S. Senate

Political Research Quarterly

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 519-532

  Hanson, Peter C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

Author keywords

appropriations; Congress; omnibus; parties; Senate

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908667268     PISSN: 10659129     EISSN: 1938274X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1065912914524485     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aldrich JohnWhy Parties? A Second Look. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2011:
2. Aldrich John,Rohde David W.The Republican Revolution and the House Appropriations Committee.The Journal of Politics. 2000;61 (1): 1-33
3. Aldrich John,Rohde David W.Congress Reconsidered. Dodd LawrenceOppenheimer Bruce, ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press; 2001:269-292.
4. Berry William,Feldman StanleyMultiple Regression in Practice. Newbury Park: SAGE; 1985:
5. Binder SarahStalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2003:
6. Brady David,Volden CraigRevolving Gridlock: Politics and Policy from Jimmy Carter to George W. Bush. Boulder: Westview Press; 2006:
7. Carson Jamie,Madonna Anthony.Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association; 2010Washington, DC; 2010.
8. Cox Gary,McCubbins MathewSetting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005:
9. Davidson Roger,Oleszek Walter,Lee FrancesCongress and Its Members. 2012. Congress and Its Members. 13th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Washington, DC: CQ Press; 2012:
10. Den Hartog Chris,Monroe Nathan W.Agenda Setting in the U.S. Senate: Costly Consideration and Majority Party Advantage. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2011:
11. Evans DianaGreasing the Wheels: Using Pork Barrel Projects to Build Majority Coalitions in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2004:
12. Fenno RichardThe Power of the Purse: Appropriations Politics in Congress. Boston: Little, Brown; 1966:
13. Fenno RichardCongressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown; 1973:
14. Fenno Richard.The Senate through the Looking Glass: The Debate over Television.Legislative Studies Quarterly. 1989;14 (3): 313-48
15. Gailmard Sean,Jenkins Jeffrey.Negative Agenda Control in the Senate and House: Fingerprints of Majority Party Power.The Journal of Politics. 2007;69 (3): 689-700
16. Holtz-Eakin DouglasReforming the Federal Budget Process. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office; 2004:
17. Jacobson GaryThe Politics of Congressional Elections. 2009. The Politics of Congressional Elections. 7th ed. New York: Pearson Longman.New York: Pearson Longman; 2009:
18. Kiewiet D. Roderick,McCubbins MathewThe Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1991:
19. Krehbiel KeithPivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1998:
20. Krutz Glen.Getting Around Gridlock: The Effect of Omnibus Utilization on Legislative Productivity.Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2000;25 (4): 533-49
21. Krutz Glen.Tactical Maneuvering on Omnibus Bills in Congress.American Journal of Political Science. 2001;45 (1): 210-23
22. Lee FrancesBeyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2009:
23. Lee FrancesThe U.S. Senate: From Deliberation to Dysfunction. Loomis Burdett, ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press; 2012:110-131.
24. LeLoup LanceParties, Rules and the Evolution of Congressional Budgeting. Columbus: Ohio State University; 2005:
25. Mayhew DavidCongress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1974:
26. Why Not Parties? Party Effects in the United States Senate. Monroe Nathan W.Roberts Jason, ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2008:
27. Nelson Dalmas H.The Omnibus Appropriations Act of 1950.The Journal of Politics. 1953;15 (2): 274-88
28. Oleszek WalterCongressional Procedures and the Policy Process. 2007. Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process. 7th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Washington, DC: CQ Press; 2007:
29. Rae Nicol,Campbell ColtonThe Contentious Senate: Partisanship, Ideology and the Myth of Cool Judgment. Rae NicolCampbell Colton, ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield; 2001:1-18.
30. Riker William H.Liberalism against Populism: A Confrontation between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman; 1982:
31. Schick AllenThe Federal Budget: Politics, Policy, Process. 2007. The Federal Budget: Politics, Policy, Process. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2007:
32. Schickler Eric,Sides John.Intergenerational Warfare: The Senate Decentralizes Appropriations.Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2000;25 (4): 551-75
33. Shepsle Kenneth A.,Bonchek MarkAnalyzing Politics: Rationality, Behavior, and Institutions. New York: W.W. Norton; 1997:
34. Shepsle Kenneth A.,Van Houweling Robert P.,Abrams Samuel J.,Hanson Peter C.The Senate Electoral Cycle and Bicameral Appropriations Politics.American Journal of Political Science. 2009;53 (2): 343-59
35. Shepsle Kenneth A.,Weingast Barry.Political Preference for the Pork Barrel: A Generalization.American Journal of Political Science. 1981;26:86-111
36. Sinclair Barbara.Senate Styles and Senate Decision Making, 1955-1980.The Journal of Politics. 1986;48 (4): 877-908
37. Sinclair BarbaraU.S. Senate Exceptionalism. Oppenheimer Bruce, ed. Columbus: Ohio State University; 2002:241-261.
38. Sinclair BarbaraCongress Reconsidered. Dodd LawrenceOppenheimer Bruce, ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press; 2005:1-22.
39. Sinclair BarbaraThe U.S. Senate: From Deliberation to Dysfunction. Loomis Burdett, ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press; 2012a:85-109.
40. Sinclair BarbaraUnorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress. Washington, DC: CQ Press; 2012b:
41. Smith SteveThe Legislative Branch. Quirk Paul J.Binder Sarah A., ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005:255-278.
42. Smith SteveParty Influence in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007:
43. Smith SteveThe Senate Syndrome. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2010:
44. Wawro Gregory,Schickler EricFilibuster: Obstruction and Lawmaking in the U.S. Senate. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2006:
45. Wildavsky Aaron,Caiden NaomiThe New Politics of the Budgetary Process. 2004. The New Politics of the Budgetary Process. 5th ed. New York: Pearson Longman.New York: Pearson Longman; 2004: