T-tail flutter: Potential-flow modelling, experimental validation and flight tests

Progress in Aerospace Sciences

Volumn 71, Issue , 2014, Pages 54-84

  Murua, Joseba ^a   Martínez, Pablo ^b   Climent, Héctor ^b   Van Zyl, Louw ^c   Palacios, Rafael ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^b AIRBUS DEFENCE AND SPACE   (Germany)

^c NORTH WEST UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^d IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aeroelasticity; Flutter; Panel methods; Quadratic modes; T tail; Unsteady aerodynamics

Indexed keywords

AEROELASTICITY; AIRCRAFT; ANGLE OF ATTACK; ANGLE OF ATTACK INDICATORS; DIGITAL STORAGE; ELASTIC WAVES; FINS (HEAT EXCHANGE); FLIGHT DYNAMICS; FLUTTER (AERODYNAMICS); FORECASTING; HORIZONTAL WELLS; POTENTIAL FLOW; VERTICAL STABILIZERS; VORTEX FLOW; WAKES; WIND TUNNELS;

CONFIGURATION PARAMETERS; DOUBLET-LATTICE METHOD; EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATIONS; PANEL METHODS; QUADRATIC MODES; T-TAILS; UNSTEADY AERODYNAMICS; UNSTEADY VORTEX-LATTICE METHODS;

HORIZONTAL STABILIZERS;

EID: 84908659512     PISSN: 03760421     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2014.07.002     Document Type: Review

References (145)

1. Baldock J. Determination of the flutter speed of a T-tail unit by calculations, model tests and flight flutter tests. Technical report. AGARD report; 1958. p. 221.
2. E. Albano, and W.P. Rodden A doublet-lattice method for calculating lift distributions on oscillating surfaces in subsonic flow AIAA J 7 2 1969 279 285 10.2514/3.5086
3. Kier TM. Comparison of unsteady aerodynamic modelling methodologies with respect to flight loads analysis. In: AIAA atmospheric flight mechanics conference, AIAA 2005-6027. San Francisco, CA, USA; 2005.
4. K.M.M. Nikbay, and C. Farhat Coupled analytical sensitivity analysis and optimization of three-dimensional nonlinear aeroelastic systems AIAA J 39 11 2001 2051 2061 10.2514/2.1227
5. P. Geuzaine, G. Brown, C. Harris, and C. Farhat Aeroelastic dynamic analysis of a full F-16 configuration for various flight conditions AIAA J 41 3 2003 363 371 10.2514/2.1975
6. M. Henshaw, K.J. Badcock, G.A. Vio, C.B. Allen, J. Chamberlain, and I. Kaynes Non-linear aeroelastic prediction for aircraft applications Prog Aerosp Sci 43 4-6 2007 65 137 10.1016/j.paerosci.2007.05.002
7. MSC. Software Corporation, Santa Ana, CA, USA, MSC Nastran Version 68 aeroelastic analysis user?s guide; 2004.
8. ZONA Technology, Inc., Scottsdale, AZ, USA, ZAERO Version 8.5, theoretical manual; 2011.
9. Raymer DP. Aircraft design: a conceptual approach, 4th ed., AIAA education series. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; 2006.
10. S. Gudmundsson General aviation aircraft design - applied methods and procedures 2014 Butterworth-Heinemann Oxford, UK
11. H. Multhopp The case for T-tails Aero Digest 70 1955 32 35
12. W.P. Rodden Theoretical and computational aeroelasticity 2011 Crest Publishing ISBN: 978-0-692-01241-3
13. Mason FK. The British Bomber Since 1914, Putnam?s British aircraft. Brassey?s: Putnam Aeronautical; 1994.
14. M. Fujino Design and development of the HondaJet J Aircr 42 3 2005 755 764 10.2514/1.12268
15. Edi P, Yusuf K, Ghani ARA, Aljibori HSS. The design of light jet aircraft. In: WSEAS transactions on applied and theoretical mechanics, vol. 4; 2009. p. 85-94.
16. Z. Huda, P. Edi, A.A. Almajid, and Z.A. Al-Garni New trends in designing markets, configurations, and materials for very light jet aircrafts J Aerosp Eng 25 3 2012 369 375 10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000125
17. Drela M. Simultaneous optimization of the airframe, powerplant, and operation of transport aircraft. In: Second RAeS aircraft structural design conference, London, UK; 2010.
18. Drela M. Development of the D8 transport configuration. In: 29th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, AIAA 2011-3970, Honolulu, USA; 2011.
19. Taylor RT, Ray EJ. Deep-stall aerodynamic characteristics of T-tail aircraft. In: NASA conference on aircraft operating problems; 1965.
20. Lina LJ, Moul MT. A simulator study of T-tail aircraft in deep stall conditions. AIAA paper 65-781; 1965.
21. Kachadourian G, Goldman RL, Roha DM. Flight flutter testing of the P6M. In: 1958 flight flutter testing symposium, NASA SP-385, Washington DC, USA; 1958. p. 91-6.
22. Pengelley CD, Wilson LE, Epperson TB, Ransleben Jr GEJ. Flutter characteristics of a T-tail. WADC technical report 52-162; 1954
23. Ruhlin CL, Sandford MC, Yates EC. Wind-tunnel flutter studies of the sweptback T-tail of a large multijet cargo airplane at Mach numbers to 0.90. NASA TN D-2179; 1964.
24. E. Livne, and T. Weisshaar Aeroelasticity of nonconventional airplane configurations - past and future J Aircr 40 6 2003 1047 1065 10.2514/2.7217
25. Sandford MC, Ruhlin CL. Wind-tunnel study of deflected-elevator flutter encountered on a T-tail aircraft. NASA TN D-5024; 1969.
26. Sandford MC, Ruhlin CL, Yates EC. Subsonic and transonic flutter and flow investigations of the T-tail of a large multijet cargo airplane. NASA TN D-4316; 1968.
27. Ruhlin CL, Sandford MC. Experimental parametric studies of transonic T-tail flutter. NASA TN D-8066; 1975.
28. S.R. Cole, T.E. Noll, and B. Perry Transonic dynamics tunnel aeroelastic testing in support of aircraft development J Aircr 40 5 2003 820 831 10.2514/2.6873
29. Mykytow WJ. A brief overview of transonic flutter problems. In: Unsteady airloads in separated and transonic flow. AGARD-CP-226, Lisbon, Portugal; 1977. p. 11.
30. Schlichting H. Aerodynamics of the mutual interference of aircraft parts. Vølkenrode R. & T. No. 171. R.A.E. Library translation no. 275. A.R.C. 12,669; October, 1948.
31. Flax AH, Lawrence HR. The aerodynamics of low-aspect-ratio wings and wing-body combinations. In: Third Anglo-American Aeronautics conference, Brighton, UK; 1951.
32. Weber J, Kirby DA. Kettle DJ. An extension of Multhopp?s method of calculating the spanwise loading of wing-fuselage combinations. Aeronautical Research Council Reports and Memoranda, no. 2872; 1956.
33. Katzoff S, Mutterpel W. The end-plate effect of a horizontal-tail surface on a vertical-tail surface. NACA TN-797; 1941.
34. Murray HE. Wind-tunnel investigation of end-plate effects of horizontal tails on a vertical tail compared with available theory. NACA TN-1050; 1946.
35. Riley DR. Effect of horizontal-tail span and vertical location on the aerodynamic characteristics of an unswept tail assembly in sideslip. NACA report 1171; 1953.
36. A.L. Byrnes, W.E. Hensleigh, and L.A. Tolve Effect of horizontal stabilizer vertical location on the design of large transport aircraft J Aircr 3 2 1966 97 104 10.2514/3.43712
37. Stark VJE. Calculation of aerodynamic forces on two oscillating finite wings at low supersonic Mach numbers. SAAB TN 53; 1964.
38. H. Ashley, M.T. Landhal, and S. Windall New directions in lifting surface theory AIAA J 3 1 1965 3 16 10.2514/3.2780
39. H. Ashley Some considerations relative to the prediction of unsteady air loads on lifting configurations J Aircr 8 10 1971 747 756 10.2514/3.44302
40. H. Ashley, and W.P. Rodden Wing-body aerodynamic interaction Annu Rev Fluid Mech 4 1972 431 472
41. Davies DE. Calculations of generalised airforces on two parallel lifting surfaces oscillating harmonically in subsonic flow. Aeronautical Research Council Reports and Memoranda, no. 3749; 1974.
42. Mazet R. Symposium on unsteady aerodynamics for aeroelastics analyses of interfering surfaces. AGARD-CP-80-71; 1971.
43. Stark VJE. Aerodynamic forces on a combination of a wing and a fin oscillating in subsonic flow. SAAB TN 54; 1964.
44. Davies DE. Generalised aerodynamic forces on a T-tail oscillating in subsonic flow. Aeronautical Research Council Reports and Memoranda, no. 3422; 1966.
45. Yff J, Zwaan RJ. T-tail aeroelastic analysis for Fokker F.28. In: Symposium on unsteady aerodynamics for aeroelastics analyses of interfering surfaces. Tønsberg, Norway; 1970. p. 10.
46. Böhn G, Schmid H. Subsonic unsteady airloads on multiple lifting surfaces. In: Symposium on unsteady aerodynamics for aeroelastics analyses of interfering surfaces. Tønsberg, Norway; 1970. p. 3.
47. W.J. Mykytow, T.E. Noll, L.J. Huttsell, and M.H. Shirk Investigations concerning the coupled wing-fuselage-tail flutter problem J Aircr 9 1 1972 48 54 10.2514/3.58935
48. T.P. Kálmán, W.P. Rodden, and J.P. Giesing Application of the doublet-lattice method to nonplanar configurations in subsonic flow J Aircr 8 6 1971 406 413 10.2514/3.59117
49. Giesing JP, Kalman TP, Rodden WP. Subsonic unsteady aerodynamics for general configurations. Direct application of the nonplanar doublet-lattice method. AFFDL-TR-71-5, Part I, vol. I; 1971.
50. Giesing JP, Kalman TP, Rodden WP. Subsonic unsteady aerodynamics for general configurations. Application of the doublet-lattice method and the method of images to lifting-surface/body interference. AFFDL-TR-71-5, Part II, vol. I; 1972.
51. Giesing JP, Kalman TP, Rodden WP. Subsonic unsteady aerodynamics for general configurations. Computer program N5KA. AFFDL-TR-71-5, Part II, vol. II; 1972.
52. W.P. Rodden, P.F. Taylor, and S.C. McIntosh Jr Further refinement of the subsonic doublet-lattice method J Aircr 35 5 1998 720 726 10.2514/2.2382
53. Rodden WP, Baker ML. Improving the convergence of the doublet-lattice method through tip corrections. In: Ninth international forum on aeroelasticity and structural dynamics, Williamsburg, VA, USA; 1999.
54. W.P. Rodden, P.F. Taylor, S.C. McIntosh Jr., and M.L. Baker Further convergence studies of the enhanced subsonic doublet-lattice oscillatory lifting surface method J Aircr 36 4 1999 682 688 10.2514/2.2511
55. Blair M. A compilation of the mathematics leading to the doublet-lattice method. USAF WL-TR-95-3022; 1994.
56. Rodden WP. The development of the doublet-lattice method. In: Seventh international forum on aeroelasticity and structural dynamics. Rome, Italy; 1997.
57. K. Isogai, and T. Ichikawa Lifting-surface theory for a wing oscillating in yaw and sideslip with an angle of attack AIAA J 11 5 1973 599 606 10.2514/3.6804
58. K. Isogai Lifting-surface theory for a an oscillating T-tail AIAA J 12 1 1974 28 37 10.2514/3.49149
59. Watkins CE, Runyan HL, Cunninghman HJ. A systematic kernel function procedure for determining aerodynamic forces on oscillating or steady finite wings at subsonic speeds. NASA Report R-48; 1959.
60. Vivian HT, Andrew LV. Unsteady aerodynamics for advanced configurations. Part I: application of the subsonic kernel function to nonplanar lifting surfaces. USAF FDL-TDR-64-452; 1965.
61. Laschka B, Schmidt H. Unsteady aerodynamic forces on coplanar lifting surfaces in subsonic flow (wing-horizontal tail interference). In: AGARD structures and materials panel meeting. Ottawa, Canada; 1967.
62. Berman JH, Shyprykevich P, Smedfeld JB, Kelly RF. Unsteady aerodynamic forces for general wing/control-surface configurations in subsonic flow. USAF FDL-TR-67-117; 1968.
63. Queijo MJ. Theory for computing span loads and stability derivatives due to sideslip, yawing, and rolling for wings in subsonic compressible flow. NASA TN D-4929; 1968.
64. McCuE DJ, Gray R, Drane DA. The effect of steady tailplane lift on the subcritical response of a subsonic T-tail flutter model. Aeronautical Research Council Reports and Memoranda, no. 3652; 1971.
65. Gray R, Drane DA. The effect of steady tailplane lift on the oscillatory behaviour of a T-tail flutter model at high subsonic speeds. Aeronautical Research Council Reports and Memoranda, no. 3745; 1974.
66. Land NS, Fox AG. An experimental investigation of the effects of Mach number, stabilizer dihedral, and fin torsional stiffness on the transonic flutter characteristics of a Tee-tail. NASA TN D-924.
67. K. Washizu, T. Ichikawa, and T. Adachi A note on T-tail flutter J Jpn Soc Aeronaut Space Sci 18 200 1970 327 330 10.2322/jjsass1969.18.327 R.A.E. Library Translation no. 1546; 1971
68. W.P. Jennings, and M.A. Berry Effect of stabilizer dihedral and static lift on T-tail flutter J Aircr 14 4 1977 364 367 10.2514/3.58785
69. Queijo MJ. Theoretical span load distributions and rolling moments for sideslipping wings of arbitrary plan form in incompressible flow. NACA report 1269; 1956.
70. Martínez P, García-Fogeda P, Claverías S, Arévalo, F, Climent H. Aeroelastic characteristics of T-tail configurations. In: 15th international forum of aeroelasticity and structural dynamics, IFASD 2011-119. Paris, France; 2011.
71. Greenberg JM. Airfoil in sinusoidal motion in a pulsating stream. NACA TN-1326; 1947.
72. W.P. Rodden Comment on "effect of stabilizer dihedral and static lift on T-tail flutter" J Aircr 15 7 1978 447 448 10.2514/3.58387
73. Suciu E. MSC/NASTRAN flutter analyses of T-tails including horizontal stabilizer static lift effects and T-tail transonic dip. In: MSC/NASTRAN world users? conference. Newport Beach, CA, USA; 1996.
74. Quaranta G, Ricci S, Scotti A, Vaccaro V, Calvi N. Aeroelastic investigation and design improvements on a three surface transport airplane. In: XVIII Congresso Nazionale AIDAA, Volterra, Italy; 2005.
75. V.D. Chuban Influence of angle of attack and stabilizer deflection on T empennage flutter J Aircr 42 1 2005 264 268 10.2514/1.4213
76. Meijer JJ, Hounjet MHL, Eussen BJG, Prananta BB. NLR-TUDelft experience in unsteady aerodynamics and aeroelastic simulations. AGARD report 822; 1998.
77. H. Arizono, H.R. Kheirandish, and J. Nakamichi Flutter simulations of a T-tail configuration using non-linear aerodynamics Int J Numer Methods Eng 72 2007 1513 1523 10.1002/nme.2047
78. A. Attorni, L. Cavagna, and G. Quaranta Aircraft T-tail flutter predictions using computational fluid dynamics J Fluids Struct 27 2011 161 174 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2010.11.003
79. Fichera S, Quaranta G, Ricci S. Behaviour of an aeroelastic T-tail model with rudder?s freeplay: experimental and numerical investigation. In: XX Congresso Nazionale AIDAA, Milan, Italy; 2009.
80. Fichera S, Ricci S. High order harmonic balance applied to an aeroelastic T-tail model with a control surface freeplay. In: 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Boston, USA; 2013.
81. van Zyl, LH. A DLM for T-tails. In: 13th international forum on aeroelasticity and structural dynamics. IFASD 2007-33, Stockholm, Sweden; 2007.
82. van Zyl LH, Sutherland AN, Rossow PS. Parabolic mode shapes: what they are, where to get them and what to do with them. In: 14th international forum on aeroelasticity and structural dynamics. IFASD 2009-150, Seattle, USA; 2009.
83. M. Mattaboni, G. Quaranta, and P. Mantegazza Active flutter suppression for a three-surface transport aircraft by recurrent neural networks J Guid Control Dyn 32 4 2009 1295 1307 10.2514/1.40774
84. Suciu E, Stathopoulos N, Dickinson M, Glaser J. The T-tail mechanism revisited. In: 15th international forum of aeroelasticity and structural dynamics, IFASD 2011-121, Paris, France; 2011.
85. Climent H, Lindenau O, Claverías S, Viana JT, Oliver M, Benítez L, et al. Flight test validation of wake vortex encounter loads. In: 16th international forum on aeroelasticity and structural dynamics, IFASD 2013-27B, Bristol, UK; 2013.
86. Claverías S, Cerezo J, Torralba MA, Reyes M, Climent H, Karpel M. Wake vortex encounter loads numerical simulation. In: 16th international forum on aeroelasticity and structural dynamics, IFASD 2013-30B, Bristol, UK; 2013.
87. N.G.V. Vittala, A.C. Pankaj, and D.V. Venkatasubramanyam Design sensitivity studies on the T-tail flutter of a transport aircraft J Aerosp Sci Technol 62 1 2010 11 20
88. J. Qiu, and Q. Sun Structural optimization technique of a T-tail J Aerosp Eng 227 6 2012 1009 1020 10.1177/0954410012448280
89. J. Qiu, and S. Qin Rear fuselage stiffness design of T-tail Compos Struct 100 2013 163 172 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.12.041
90. Qiu J, Qin S. T-tail flutter analysis with simulated fuselage stiffness. J Aerosp Eng http:dx.doi.org./10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000328.
91. Hanashima M, Ueda T. An application of non-planar doublet-point-method for T-tail flutter analysis. In: JSASS/JSME structures conference, vol. 47; 2005. p. 135-7.
92. B. Lu, S.G. Tang, Z.Q. Wan, and C. Yang Optimization design for aeroelastic dynamics of T-tail J Beijing Univ Aeronaut Astronaut 33 4 2007 409 413
93. B. Lu, Z. Wu, and C. Yang Analysis of T-tail flutter Eng Mech 25 2 2008 230
94. J. Qiu, and Q. Sun Flutter analysis of T-tail according to the different supporting stiffness Aeronaut Comput Tech 3 2009 22 24
95. F. Yang, and Z. Yang Effects of mode localization on T-tail flutter characteristics J Vib Shock 29 8 2010 221 223
96. F. Yang, and Z. Yang Some key issues to the analysis of aircraft T-tail flutter J Vib Shock 30 5 2011 136 139
97. Martínez P. Caracterización aeroelástica de empenajes con cola en T ("Aeroelastic characterisation of T-tail empennages") [Master?s thesis]. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid; 2010.
98. L.H. van Zyl, and E.H. Mathews Aeroelastic analysis of T-tails using an enhanced doublet lattice method J Aircr 48 3 2011 823 831 10.2514/1.C001000
99. van Zyl LH. A framework for T-tail flutter analysis. In: 15th international forum of aeroelasticity and structural dynamics, IFASD 2011-122, Paris, France; 2011.
100. van Zyl LH. Advanced linear methods for T-tail aeroelasticity [Ph.D. thesis]. North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa; 2011.
101. J. Murua, R. Palacios, and J.M.R. Graham Applications of the unsteady vortex-lattice method in aircraft aeroelasticity and flight dynamics Prog Aerosp Sci 55 2012 46 72 10.1016/j.paerosci.2012.06.001
102. Murua J. Flexible-aircraft dynamics with a geometrically-nonlinear description of the unsteady aerodynamics [Ph.D. thesis]. Imperial College London, London, UK; 2012.
103. Noll TE, Ishmael SD, Henwood B, Perez-Davis ME, Tiffany GC, Gaier M, et al. Technical findings, lessons learned, and recommendations resulting from the Helios prototype vehicle mishap. In: NATO/RTO AVT-145 workshop on design concepts, processes and criteria for UAV structural integrity, Florence, Italy; 2007.
104. D. Tang, E.H. Dowell, and K.C. Hall Limit cycle oscillations of a cantilevered wing in low subsonic flow AIAA J 37 3 1999 364 371 10.2514/2.717
105. Schulze B. T-tail flutter. Airbus EGLG4-B044/03; June 2003.
106. Theodorsen T. General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter. NACA report no. 496; 1935.
107. Ashley H. Engineering analysis of flight vehicles. Addison-Wesley Aerospace Series. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. Reading, 1974.
108. L. Meirovitch Hybrid state equations of motion for flexible bodies in terms of quasi-coordinates J Guid Control Dyn 14 5 1991 1008 1013 10.2514/3.20743
109. J.C. Simo, and L. Vu-Quoc The role of non-linear theories in transient dynamic analysis of flexible structures J Sound Vib 119 3 1987 487 508 10.1016/0022-460X(87)90410-X
110. M.J. Patil, D.H. Hodges, and C.E.S. Cesnik Limit-cycle oscillations of high-aspect-ratio wings J Fluids Struct 15 1 2001 107 132 10.1006/jfls.2000.0329
111. D.M. Tang, and E.H. Dowell Effects of geometric structural nonlinearity on flutter and limit cycle oscillations of high-aspect-ratio wings J Fluids Struct 19 3 2004 291 306 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2003.10.007
112. T.R. Beal Dynamic stability of a flexible missile under constant and pulsating thrusts AIAA J 3 3 1965 486 494 10.2514/3.2891
113. Henrik Hesse, Rafael Palacios, Joseba Murua. Consistent structural linearization in flexible aircraft dynamics with large rigid-body motion, AIAA J 2014;52(3):528-38. 10.2514/1.J052316
114. Segalman DJ, Dorhmann CR. Dynamics of rotating flexible structures by a method of quadratic modes. Technical report. Sandia National Laboratories; 1990.
115. D.J. Segalman, and C.R. Dorhmann A method for calculating the dynamics of rotating flexible structures. Part 1 derivation J Vib Acoust 118 3 1996 313 317 10.1115/1.2888183
116. D.J. Segalman, C.R. Dorhmann, and A.M. Slavin A method for calculating the dynamics of rotating flexible structures. Part 2 example calculations J Vib Acoust 118 3 1996 318 322 10.1115/1.2888184
117. Jung KJ, Lee J, Kwon JH, Kang I. The quadratic mode method for fluid-structure coupling of high aspect ratio wing. In: 12th AIAA/ISSMO multidisciplinary analysis and optimization conference, AIAA 2008-5864, Victoria, Canada; 2008.
118. M. Karpel Procedures and models for aeroservoelastic analysis and design ZAMM - J Appl Math Mech/Z Angew Math Mech 81 9 2001 579 592 10.1002/1521-4001(200109)81:9579::AID-ZAMM5793.0.CO;2-Z
119. L.H. van Zyl, and E.H. Mathews Quadratic mode shape components from linear finite element analysis J Vib Acoust 134 1 2011 014501 10.1115/1.4004681
120. L.H. van Zyl, and E.H. Mathews Quadratic mode shape components from ground vibration testing J Vib Acoust 134 3 2012 034504 10.1115/1.4005843
121. C.R. Dohrmann, and D.J. Segalman Use of quadratic components for buckling calculations J Sound Vib 208 2 1997 339 344 10.1006/jsvi.1997.1180
122. K. Karamcheti Principles of ideal-fluid aerodynamics 1966 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York
123. J. Moran An introduction to theoretical and computational aerodynamics 1984 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
124. Anderson JD. Fundamentals of aerodynamics. In: Aeronautical and aerospace engineering series, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001.
125. Katz J, Plotkin A. Low-speed aerodynamics. In: Cambridge aerospace series, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2001.
126. Hess JL. Calculation of potential flow about arbitrary three-dimensional lifting bodies. Final technical report MDC J5679-01, Douglas Aircraft Co., Long Beach, CA, USA; October 1972.
127. Palacios R, Climent H, Karlsson A, Winzell B. Assessment of strategies for correcting linear unsteady aerodynamics using CFD or experimental results. In: Progress in computational flow-structure interaction. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2003. p. 209-24 [chapter 8].
128. Voss R, Tichy L, Thormann R. A ROM based flutter prediction process and its validation with a new reference model. In: 15th international forum of aeroelasticity and structural dynamics. IFASD 2011-036, Paris, France; 2011.
129. J.R. Wright, and J.E. Cooper Introduction to aircraft aeroelasticity and loads 2007 John Wiley & Sons Ltd Chichester, UK
130. D.H. Hodges, and G.A. Pierce Introduction to structural dynamics and aeroelasticity 2002 Cambridge University Press New York
131. W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, and B.P. Flannery Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing 3rd ed. 2007 Cambridge University Press New York
132. J.C. Massa, S. Preidikman, and M.F. Bandi Relaciones cinemáticas entre el modelo estructural y el modelo aerodinámico del ala flexible de un micro-vehículo aéreo de alas batientes. ("Kinematic relations between the structural and aerodynamic models of the flexible wing of a flapping-wing micro air vehicle") Mec Comput XXV 2006 2311 2331
133. O.A. Bauchau, and J.I. Craig Structural analysis - with applications to aerospace structures 2009 Springer Berlin
134. B.D. Hall, D.T. Mook, A.H. Nayfeh, and S. Preidikman Novel strategy for suppressing the flutter oscillations of aircraft wings AIAA J 39 10 2001 1843 1850 10.2514/2.1190
135. Wang Z, Chen PC, Liu DD, Mook DT, Patil MJ. Time domain nonlinear aeroelastic analysis of HALE wings. In: 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. AIAA 2006-1640, AIAA, Newport, RI, USA; 2006.
136. Z. Wang, P.C. Chen, D.D. Liu, and D.T. Mook Nonlinear-aerodynamics/nonlinear-structure interaction methodology for a high altitude long endurance wing J Aircr 47 2 2010 556 566 10.2514/1.45694
137. B.K. Stanford, and P.S. Beran Formulation of analytical design derivatives for nonlinear unsteady aeroelasticity AIAA J 49 3 2011 598 610 10.2514/1.53411
138. J. Murua, R. Palacios, and J.M.R. Graham Assessment of wake-tail interference effects on the dynamics of flexible aircraft AIAA J 50 7 2012 1575 1585 10.2514/1.J051543
139. K.C. Hall Eigenanalysis of unsteady flows about airfoils, cascades, and wings AIAA J 32 12 1994 2426 2432 10.2514/3.12309
140. R. Simpson, R. Palacios, and J. Murua Induced drag calculations in the unsteady vortex lattice method AIAA J 51 7 2013 1775 1779 10.2514/1.J052136
141. M.J. Lighthill A new approach to thin airfoil theory Aeronaut Quart 3 1951 193 210
142. Murua J, Palacios R, Graham JMR. Open-loop stability and closed-loop gust alleviation on flexible aircraft including wake modeling. In: 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference. Honolulu, HI, USA; 2012.
143. Hesse H, Palacios R. Dynamic load alleviation in wake vortex encounters. J Guid Control Dyn; 2014, submitted for publication.
144. H. Hesse, and R. Palacios Consistent structural linearisation in flexible-body dynamics with large rigid-body motion Comput Struct 110-111 2012 1 14 10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.05.011
145. Murua J, Martínez P, Climent H, van Zyl LH, Palacios R. T-tail flutter: potential-flow modelling and experimental validation. In: 16th international forum on aeroelasticity and structural dynamics. IFASD 2013-22A, Bristol, UK; 2013.