Non-linear aeroelastic prediction for aircraft applications

Progress in Aerospace Sciences

Volumn 43, Issue 4-6, 2007, Pages 65-137

  de C Henshaw, M J ^a   Badcock, K J ^b   Vio, G A ^c   Allen, C B ^d   Chamberlain, J ^e   Kaynes, I ^f   Dimitriadis, G ^c   Cooper, J E ^c   Woodgate, M A ^b   Rampurawala, A M ^b   Jones, D ^d   Fenwick, C ^d   Gaitonde, A L ^d   Taylor, N V ^d   Amor, D S ^a   Eccles, T A ^a   Denley, C J ^a  

^a BAE SYSTEMS   (United Kingdom)

^b Department of Engineering   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^e AIRBUS OPERATIONS LTD   (United Kingdom)

^f QINETIQ   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; HOPF BIFURCATION; INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; MACHINE DESIGN;

AEROELASTIC TOOLS; AIRCRAFT CONFIGURATIONS; CONTROL SURFACE; FLUID STRUCTURE COUPLING;

FLUTTER (AERODYNAMICS);

EID: 35148822843     PISSN: 03760421     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2007.05.002     Document Type: Review

References (183)

1. Lanchester FW. Torsional vibrations of the tail of an aeroplane. Selected reprint series, Aerodynamic flutter. vol. V, New York: AIAA; 1969. p. 12-5.
2. Kaynes IW. Private papers.
3. Haase W, Selmin V, Winzell B (editors.). Progress in computational flow-structure interaction: results of the project UNSI supported by the European Union 1998-2000. Notes on numerical fluid mechanics and multidisciplinary design, vol. 81, New York: Springer; 2002.
4. Farhat C., Geuzaine P., and Brown G. Application of a three-field nonlinear fluid-structure formulation to the prediction of the aeroelastic parameters of an F-16 fighter. Comput Fluids 32 3 (2002) 3-29
5. Bisplinghoff R.L., Ashley H., and Halfman R.L. Aeroelasticity (1955), Dover Publications, New York
6. Fung Y. An introduction to the theory of aeroelasticity (1969), Dover, New York
7. Collar A. The first 50 years of aeroelasticity. Aerospace 1978; 12-20.
8. Garrick I.E., and Read W.H. Historical development of aircraft flutter. J Aircr 18 11 (1981) 897-912
9. Friedmann P.P. Renaissance of aeroelasticity and its future. J Aircr 36 1 (1999) 105-121
10. Bhatia K.G. Airplane aeroelasticity: practice and potential. J Aircr 40 6 (2003) 1010-1018
11. Livne E. Future of airplane aeroelasticity. J Aircr 40 6 (2003) 1066-1092
12. Dowell E.H., and Hall K.C. Modelling of fluid-structure interaction. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 33 (2001) 445-490
13. Kaynes IW. Review of aeroelasticity in the UK. Internal Report, QinetiQ; 2001.
14. Ashley H. Role of shocks in the sub-transonic flutter phenomena. J Aircr 17 (1980) 187-197
15. Shaw J, Stokes S, Lucking M. The rapid and robust generation of efficient hybrid grids for RANS simulations over complete aircraft. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 2003;43(6).
16. Ministry of Defence Standard 00-970 Design and Airworthiness Requirements for Service Aircraft, UK Defence Standardization.
17. Military Specification Airplane Strength and Rigidity Mil-A.
18. Certification Standards For Large Aeroplanes CS-25, European Aviation Safety Agency.
19. Part 25-Airworthiness Standards, Transport Category Airplanes, Federal Aviation Administration Department of Transportation.
20. Bairstow L, Fage A. Oscillations of the tailplane and body of an aircraft in flight. ARC R&M 1916;276(2).
21. Yates E.C. Modified strip analysis method for predicting wing flutter at subsonic to hypersonic speeds. J Aircr 3 1 (1966) 25-29
22. Katz J., and Plotkin A. Low speed aerodynamics. 2nd ed. (2001), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
23. Albino E., and Rodden W.P. A doublet-lattice method for calculating lift distributions on oscillating surfaces in subsonic flows. AIAA J 7 2 (1969) 279-285
24. Yurkovitch R. Status of unsteady aerodynamic prediction for flutter of high performance aircraft. J Aircr 40 5 (2003) 832-842
25. Hassig H.J. An approximate true damping solution of the flutter equation by determinant iteration. J Aircr 8 11 (1971) 885-889
26. Blair M. A compilation of the mathematics leading to the doublet lattice method. Wl-tr-95-3022, Air Force Wright Laboratory, 1994.
27. Dowell EH, Tang D. Nonlinear aeroelasticity and unsteady aerodynamics. AIAA J 2002;40(9):1697-1707.
28. Dowell E.H., Edwards J., and Strganac T. Nonlinear aeroelasticity. J Aircr 40 5 (2003) 857-874
29. Conner M.D., Tang D.M., Dowell E.H., and Virgin L. Nonlinear behaviour of a typical airfoil section with control surface freeplay: a numerical and experimental study. J Fluids Struct 11 (1997) 89-109
30. Holden M, Brazier R, Cal A. Effects of structural non-linearities on a tailplane flutter model. In: International forum on aeroelasticity and structural dynamics, no. 60, 1995.
31. Denegri C.M. Limit cycle oscillation flight test results of a fighter with external stores. J Aircr 37 5 (2000) 761-769
32. Chen PC, Sulaeman E, Lui DD, Denegri CM. Influence of external store aerodynamics on flutter/LCO of a fighter aircraft. In: Proceedings of the (43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference. Colorado: Denver; 2002.
33. Dunn SA, Farrell PA, Budd PJ, Arms PB, Hardie CA, Rendo CJ. F/A-18A flight flutter testing limit cycle oscillation or flutter? In: International forum of aeroelasticity and structural dynamics, 2001. p. 193-204.
34. Tang D., Attar P., and Dowell E.H. Flutter/limit cycle oscillation analysis and experiment for wing-store model. AIAA J 44 (2006) 1662-1675
35. Dawson KS, Maxwell DL. Limit cycle oscillation prediction using analytic eigenvector descriptors in artificial neural networks. In: International forum on aeroelasticity and structural dynamics. Munich, Germany, 2005.
36. Denegri C.M., and Johnson M.R. Comparison of static and dynamics neural networks for limit cycle oscillation prediction. J Aircr 40 1 (2003) 194-203
37. Dawson KS, Maxwell DL. Limit cycle oscillation prediction of asymmetric external store configurations using neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Newport, RI, 2006.
38. Dawson K.S., and Maxwell D.L. Limit cycle oscillation flight test results for asymmetric store configurations. J Aircr 42 6 (2005) 1589-1596
39. Parker GH, Maple RC, Beran PS. Analysis of store effects on limit cycle oscillations. In: Proceedings of the 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Newport, RI, 2006.
40. Janardhan S, Grandhi RV, Eastep F, Sanders B. Design studies of transonic flutter and limit cycle oscillation of an aircraft wing/tip store. In: 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics & Materials Conference, Norfolk, VA, 2003.
41. Beran P., Khot N., Eastep F., Snyder R., and Zweber J. Numerical analysis of store induced limit cycle oscillation. J Aircr 41 6 (2004) 1315-1326
42. Kim K, Nichkawde C, Strganac T. Effect of external store on nonlinear aeroelastic responses. In: Proceedings of the 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Palm Springs, California, 2004.
43. Kim K, Strganac T. Nonlinear responses of a cantilever wing with an external store. In: Proceedings of the 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Norfolk, Virginia, 2003.
44. Melville R. Nonlinear simulation of F-16 aeroelastic instability. In: 39th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 2001.
45. Pranata BB, Kok JC, Spekreijse SP, Hounjet MHL, Meijer JJ. Simulation of limit cycle oscillation of fighter aircraft at moderate angle of attack. Technical Report NLR-TP-2003-526, National Aerospace Laboratory, Amsterdam, Holland; 2006.
46. Goura G.S.L., Badcock K.J., Woodgate M.A., and Richards B.E. Implicit method for the time marching analysis of flutter. Aeronaut J 105 1046 (2001) 199-214
47. Romanowski MC. Reduced order unsteady aerodynamic and aeroelastic models using Karhunen-Loeve eigenmodes. In: 6th symposium on multidisciplinary analysis and optimization, Bellevue, WA, 1996.
48. Romanowski MC, Dowell EH. Reduced order Euler equations for unsteady aerodynamic flows: numerical techniques. In: 34th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 1996.
49. Hall KC, Thomas JP, Dowell EH. Reduced-order modelling of unsteady small disturbance flows using a frequency domain proper orthogonal decomposition technique. In: 37th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 1999.
50. Hall K.C., Thomas J.P., and Dowell E.H. Proper orthogonal decomposition technique for transonic unsteady aerodynamic flows. AIAA J 38 10 (2000) 1853-1862
51. Willcox K, Peraire J. Balanced model reduction via proper orthogonal decomposition. In: 15th AIAA computational fluid dynamics conference, Anaheim, CA, 2001.
52. Schmidt R, Glauser M. Improvements in low dimensional tools for flow structure interaction problems using global POD. In: 42nd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 2004.
53. Lieu T, Farhat C. POD-based aeroelastic analysis of a complete F-16 configuration: ROM adaptation and demonstration. In: Proceedings of the 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Austin, Texas, 2005.
54. Silva W, Strganac T, Hajj M. Higher-order spectral analysis of a nonlinear pitch and plunge apparatus. In: Proceedings of the 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Austin, Texas, 2005.
55. Silva W, Dunn S. Higher-order spectral analysis of F-18 flight flutter data. In: Proceedings of the 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Austin, Texas, 2005.
56. Thomas J, Dowell EH, Hall K, Denegri C. Modelling limit cycle oscillation behavior of the F-16 fighter using a harmonic balance approach. In: Proceedings of the 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Palm Springs, California, 2004.
57. Liu L, Dowell EH, Thomas J. Higher order harmonic balance analysis for limit cycle oscillations in an airfoil with cubic restoring forces. In: Proceedings of the 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Austin, Texas, 2005.
58. Baldelli D, Chen P, Liu D, Lind R, Brenner M. Nonlinear aeroelastic modeling by block-oriented identification. In: Proceedings of the 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Palm Springs, California, 2004.
59. Richards C, Brenner M, Singh R. Identification of a nonlinear aeroelastic aircraft wing model. In: Proceedings of the 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Palm Springs, California, 2004.
60. Popescu C, Wong Y, Lee B. System identification for nonlinear aeroelastic models. In: Proceedings of the 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Austin, Texas, 2005.
61. Lind R, Prazenica R, Brenner M. Identifying parameter-dependent Volterra kernels to predict aeroelastic instabilities. In: Proceedings of the 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Palm Springs, California, 2004.
62. Chabalko C, Hajj M, Silva W. Time/frequency analysis of the flutter of the flexible HSCT semispan model. In: Proceedings of the 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Palm Springs, California, 2004.
63. Raveh D.E. Reduced-order models for nonlinear unsteady aerodynamics. AIAA J 39 8 (2001) 1417-1429
64. Silva WA. Discrete-time linear and nonlinear aerodynamic impulse responses for efficient CFD analyses. PhD thesis, College of William and Mary, Virginia, USA; 1997.
65. Munteanu S, Rajadas J, Nam C, Chathopadhyay A. An efficient approach for solving nonlinear aeroelastic phenomenon using reduced-order modelling. In: Proceedings of the 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Palm Springs, California, 2004.
66. Munteanu S., Rajadas J., Nam C., and Chattopadhyay A. Reduced-order-model approach for aeroelastic analysis involving aerodynamic and structural nonlinearities. AIAA J 43 3 (2005) 560-571
67. Prazenica AKR, Reisenthel P, Brenner M. Volterra kernel identification and extrapolation for the F/A-18 active aeroelastic wing. In: Proceedings of the 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Palm Springs, California, 2004.
68. Pettit C, Beran P. Polynomial chaos expansion applied to airfoil limit cycle oscillations. In: Proceedings of the 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Palm Springs, California, 2004.
69. Beran P, Pettit C. A direct method for quantifying limit-cycle oscillation response characteristics in the presence of uncertainties. In: Proceedings of the 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Palm Springs, California, 2004.
70. Pettit C, Beran P. Wiener-Haar expansion of airfoil limit cycle oscillations. In: Proceedings of the 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Austin, Texas, 2005.
71. Attar P, Dowell EH. A stochastic analysis of the limit cycle behavior of a nonlinear aeroelastic model using the response surface method. In: Proceedings of the 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Austin, Texas, 2005.
72. Marzocca P, Librescu L, Kim D-H, Lee I, Coppotelli G. Unified analytical/CFD approach of linear/nonlinear aeroelastic response and flutter via aerodynamic indicial function concept. In: International forum on aeroelasticity and structural dynamics, Munich, Germany, 2005.
73. Marzocca P, Librescu L, Kim D, Lee I. Supersonic flutter and LCO of airfoils via CFD/analytical combined approach. In: Proceedings of the 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Austin, Texas, 2005.
74. Kim D, Lee I, Marzocca P. Linear/nonlinear aeroelastic computation of 2-D lifting surfaces using a combined CFD/analytical approach. In: Proceedings of the 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Palm Springs, California, 2004.
75. Rodden WP, Harder RL, Bellinger ED. Aeroelastic additions to NASTRAN. Technical Report Contractor Report 3094, NASA; 1979.
76. Rodden WP, Johnson EH. MSC/NASTRAN aeroelastic analysis user's guide, version 68. Technical Report, The MacNeal Schwendler Corporation; 2004.
77. Lucia D.J., Beran P.S., and Silva W.A. Reduced-order modelling: new approaches for computational physics. Progr Aerosp Sci 40 1-2 (2004) 51-117
78. Allwright S. MDO process and specification for the primary sensitivity study. Technical Report D.2.4.S., MDO/SPEC/BAE/SA960430; 1996.
79. Allwright S. Reference aircraft performance and primary sensitivities. Technical Report D.3.12.R., MDO/TR/BAE/SA970530/1; 1997.
80. Girodroux-Lavigne P, Grisval JP, Guillemot S, Henshaw M, Karlsson A, Selmin V et al. Comparative study of advanced fluid-structure interaction methods in the case of a highly flexible wing (results from the UNSI program). In: International forum on aeroelasticity and structural dynamics, Madrid, Spain, 2001.
81. Girodroux-Lavigne P., Grisval J.P., Guillemot S., Henshaw M., Karlsson A., Selmin V., et al. Comparison of static ad dynamic fluid-structure interaction solutions in the case of a highly flexible modern transport aircraft wing. J Aerosp Sci Technol 7 (2003) 121-133
82. Yates EC. AGARD standard aeroelastics configurations for dynamic response 1: Wing 445.6. Technical Report 765, AGARD; 1988.
83. Bennett RM, Scott RC, Wieseman CD. Test cases for the benchmark active controls model: spoiler and control surface oscillations and flutter. Technical Report RTO-TR-26 AC/323(AVT)TP/19, 8E, RTO; 2000.
84. Scott RC, Hoadley ST, Wieseman CD, Durham MH. The benchmark active controls technology model aerodynamic data. In: 35th aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit. Reno, NV; AIAA; 1997.
85. Waszak MR. Modelling the benchmark active control technology wind-tunnel model for application to flutter suppression. In: Atmospheric flight mechanics conference. San Diego, CA: AIAA; 1996.
86. Tamayama M, Saitoh K, Matsushita, J. Nakamichi. NAL. SST arrow wing with oscillating flap. In: Verification and validation data for computational unsteady aerodynamics. RTO Technical Report-26; 2000. p. 295-318.
87. Tamayama M, Miwa H, Nakamichi J. Unsteady aerodynamics measurements on an elastic wing model of SST. In: 35th Aerosp Sci Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, 1997.
88. Tamayama M, Saitoh K, Matsushita H. Measurements of unsteady pressure distributions and dynamic deformations on an SST elastic wing model. In: CEAS international forum on aeroelasticity and structural dynamics, vol. 3, Rome, Italy, 1997. p. 231-8.
89. Chen P.C., and Jadic I. Interfacing of fluid and structural models via innovative structural boundary element method. AIAA J 36 2 (1998) 282-287
90. Chen PC, Hill LR. A three dimensional boundary element method for CFD/CSD grid interfacing. In: 40th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference and exhibit, vol. 1, St. Louis, MO, 1999.
91. Jones DP. Force transfer in aeroelastic calculations. Technical Report, Department of Aerospace Engineering Report AE046, University of Bristol; 2002.
92. Smith MJ, Hodges DH, Cesnik CES. An evaluation of computational algorithms to interface between CFD and CSD methodologies. Technical Report WL-TR-3055, Wright Laboratory; November 1995.
93. Cebral J.R., and Lohner R. Conservative load projection and tracking for fluid-structure problems. AIAA J 35 9 (1997) 687-692
94. Maman N., and Farhat C. Matching fluid and structure meshes for aeroelastic computations: a parallel approach. Comput Struct 54 4 (1995) 779-785
95. Jiao X., and Heath M.T. Common-refinement-based data transfer between non-matching meshes in multiphysics simulations. Int J Numer Methods Eng 61 (2004) 2402-2427
96. Badcock K.J., Richards B.E., and Woodgate M.A. Elements of computational fluid dynamics on block structured grids using implicit solvers. Progr Aerosp Sci 36 (2000) 351-392
97. Haase W, Brandsma E, Elsholz E, Leschziner M, Schwamborn D, editors. Notes on numerical fluid mechanics, vol. 42. Friedr, Vieweg & Sohn; 1992.
98. Vlachos N. Aero-structural coupling in transonic flow; comparison of strong and weak coupling schemes. Technical Report DERA/ASF/3662U-AERO.RK5615, DERA; 1999.
99. Taylor NV, Allen CB, Gaitonde AL, Jones DP, Hill GFJ. Investigation of structural modelling methods for aeroelastic calculations. In: Proceedings AIAA 22nd applied aerodynamics conference, Rhode Island, 2004.
100. Goura GSL. Time marching analysis of flutter using computational fluid dynamics. PhD thesis, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; November 2001.
101. Woodgate M.A., Badcock K.J., Rampurawala A.M., Richards B.E., Nardini C., and Henshaw M.J. Aeroelastic calculations for the hawk aircraft using the Euler equations. J Aircr 40 4 (2005) 1005-1012
102. Goura GSL, Badcock KJ, Woodgate MA, Richards BE. A data-exchange method for fluid-structure interaction problems, Aeronaut J 2001; 199-214.
103. Rampurawala AM. An assessment of inter-grid transformation for a whole aircraft. Master's thesis, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; 2002.
104. Duchon J. Splines minimising rotation-invariant semi-norms in sobolev spaces. Constructive theory of functions of several variables, Germany: Springer; 1976.
105. Frank R. Scattered data interpolation: test of some methods. J Math Comput 38 (1982) 181-199
106. Gaitonde A.L., and Fiddes S.P. A three-dimensional moving mesh method for the calculation of unsteady transonic flows. Aeronaut J 99 984 (1995) 150-160
107. Gaitonde AL. A dual time method for the solution of the 2D unsteady Navier-Stokes equations on structured moving meshes. In: Proceedings of the 13th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, San Diego, USA, 1995.
108. Batina JT. Unsteady Euler aerofoil solutions using unstructured dynamic meshes. AIAA J 1990;28(8):1381-1388.
109. Jones DP, Gaitonde AL, Fiddes SP. Moving mesh generation for deforming complex configurations using a multiblock method. In: Comput Fluid Dyn J-Japan Society of CFD (Special Issue).: The proceedings (II) of ISCFD'99, vol. 9, Bremen, 1999. p. 287-96.
110. Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A., Vetterling W.T., and Flannery B.P. Numerical recipes in fortran: the art of scientific computing. 2nd ed. (1992), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA
111. Lee-Rausch E.M., and Batina J.T. Wing flutter boundary prediction using unsteady Euler aerodynamic method. J Aircr 32 2 (1995) 416-422
112. Gordnier R.E., and Melville R.B. Transonic flutter simulations using an implicit aeroelastic solver. J Aircr 37 5 (2000) 872-879
113. Fenwick CL. Consideration of control surfaces in time-domain aeroelastic simulations. Technical Report, Department of Aerospace Engineering Report AE045, University of Bristol; 2003.
114. Rampurawala AM. Aeroelastic analysis of aircraft with control surfaces using CFD. PhD thesis, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; June 2006.
115. Benek JA, Steger JL, Dougherty FC. A flexible grid embedding technique with application to the Euler equations. In: 6th computational fluid dynamics conference, 1983.
116. Rampurawala AM, Badcock KJ. Response of a flexible arrow wing in transonic flow to flap motions. J Aircr, accepted for publication.
117. Rampurawala AM, Badcock KJ. Treatment of forced flap motions for aeroelastic simulations of an arrow wing. In: 23rd AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, Toronto, Ontario, 2005.
118. Rampurawala AM, Badcock KJ. Buzz prediction on an arrow wing configuration using computational fluid dynamics. Aerosp Sci Technol, submitted for publication.
119. Rampurawala AM, Badcock KJ. Buzz simulation for a supersonic transport configuration. In: International forum on aeroelasticity and structural dynamics, Munich, Germany, 2005.
120. Tang H.S., and Zhou T. On nonconservative algorithms for grid interfaces. SIAM J Numer Anal 37 1 (1999) 173-193
121. Berger M.J. On conservation at grid interfaces. SIAM J Numer Anal 24 5 (1987) 967-984
122. Rai MM. A relaxation approach to patched-grid calculations with the Euler equations. In: 23rd Aerosp Sci Meeting, Reno, NV, 1985.
123. Rai M.M. A conservative treatment of zonal boundaries for Euler equation calculations. J Comput Phys 62 2 (1986) 472-503
124. Lerat A., and Wu Z. Stable conservative multi-domain treatments for implicit Euler solvers. J Comput Phys 123 (1996) 45-64
125. Bohbot J, Grondin G, Corjon A, Darracq D. A parallel multigrid conservative patched/sliding mesh algorithm for turbulent flow computation of 3D complex aircraft configurations. In: 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, 2001.
126. Fenwick CL, Allen CB. Development and validation of sliding and non-matching grid technology for control surface representation. Proc inst mech eng, Part G: J Aerosp Eng 2006;220(4):299-315.
127. Fenwick CL. Development of sliding grid methods for unsteady CFD with application to control surfaces in aeroservoelastic simulations. PhD thesis, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; 2006.
128. Taylor NV, Gaitonde AL, Jones DP, Allen CB. Modelling the BACT wing through linear and coupled CFD-CSD moving mesh analysis. J Aircr, 2007, to appear.
129. Taylor NV, Allen CB, Gaitonde AL, Jones DP. A comparison of linear and moving mesh CFD-CSD aeroelastic modelling of the BACT wing. In: Proceedings of 24th applied aerodynamics conference, San Francisco, 2006.
130. Lee B.H.K., Price S.J., and Wong Y.S. Nonlinear aeroelastic analysis of airfoils: bifurcation and chaos. Progr Aerosp Sci 35 (1999) 205-334
131. Hancock GJ, Wright JR, Simpson A. On the teaching of the principle of wing flexure-torsion flutter, Aeronaut J 1985; 285-305.
132. Dimitriadis G. Investigation of nonlinear aeroelastic systems. PhD thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; 1999.
133. Juang J.-N., and Pappa R.S. An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction. J Guidance Control Dyn 8 5 (1985) 620-627
134. Ho B.L., and Kalman R.E. Effective construction of linear state-variable models from input/output functions. Regelungstechnik 12 14 (1966) 545-548
135. Antoulas AC, Sorensen DC, Gugercin S. A survey of model reduction methods for large systems. Contemporary mathematics. AMS Publications, vol. 280, 2001, p. 193-219.
136. Grimme EJ. Krylov projection methods for model reduction PhD thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champagne, Illinois; 1997.
137. Willcox KE. Reduced-order aerodynamic models for aeroelastic control of turbomachines. PhD thesis, MIT; 2000.
138. Chen J., Kang S., Liu J.Z.C., and Schutt-Aine J.E. Reduced-order modelling of weakly non-linear MEMS devices with Taylor-series expansion and Arnoldi approach. J Microelectromech Systems 13 3 (2004) 441-451
139. Gaitonde AL, Jones DP. System identification and reduction from the pulse responses of a linearised Euler scheme. In: CEAS aerospace aerodynamics research conference, Cambridge, UK, 2002.
140. Gaitonde A.L., and Jones D.P. Reduced order state-space models from the pulse responses of a linearised CFD scheme. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 42 6 (2003) 581-606
141. Roberts I, Gaitonde AL, Jones DP, Lieven NAJ. Identification of limit-cycles for piecewise nonlinear aeroelastic systems in transonic regimes. In: CEAS aerospace aerodynamics research conference, Cambridge, UK; 2002.
142. Doetsch G. Guide to the application of the Laplace and Z-transforms. 2nd ed. (1971), Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New York
143. McGillem C.D., and Cooper G.R. Continuous and discrete signal and system analysis (1984), CBS Publishing Japan Ltd
144. Aplevich J.D. The essentials of linear state-space systems (2000), Wiley, New York
145. Morton S.A., and Beran P.S. Hopf-bifurcation analysis of airfoil flutter at transonic speeds. J Aircr 36 (1999) 421-429
146. Badcock K.J., Woodgate M., and Richards B.E. The application of sparse matrix techniques for the CFD based aeroelastic bifurcation analysis of a symmetric aerofoil. AIAA J 42 5 (2004) 883-892
147. Woodgate M.A., and Badcock K.J. Aeroelastic damping model derived from discrete Euler equations. AIAA J 44 11 (2006) 2601-2611
148. Golub G.H., and Loan C.F.V. Matrix computations (1996), The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD
149. Woodgate MA, Badcock KJ. Fast prediction of transonic aeroelastic stability and limit cycles. AIAA J 2007;45(6):1370-1381.
150. Badcock K.J., Woodgate M.A., and Richards B.E. Direct aeroelastic bifurcation analysis of a symmetric wing based on the Euler equations. J Aircr 42 3 (2005) 731-737
151. Yang Z.C., and Zhao L.C. Analysis of limit cycle flutter of an airfoil in incompressible flow. J Sound Vibr 123 1 (1988) 1-13
152. Price S.J., Alighanbari H., and Lee B.H.K. The aeroelastic behaviour of a two-dimensional airfoil with bilinear and cubic structural nonlinearities. J Fluids Struct 9 (1995) 175-193
153. Lee B.H.K., Liu L., and Chung K.W. Airfoil motion in subsonic flow with strong cubic restoring forces. J Sound Vib 281 (2005) 699-717
154. Lee C.L. An iterative procedure for nonlinear flutter analysis. AIAA J 24 3 (1986) 833-840
155. Thomas J.P., Dowell E.H., and Hall K.C. Modelling viscous transonic limit-cycle oscillation behavior using a harmonic balance approach. J Aircr 41 6 (2004) 1266-1274
156. Kholodar D.B., Dowell E.H., Thomas J.P., and Hall K.C. Limit-cycle oscillations of a typical airfoil in transonic flow. J Aircr 41 5 (2004) 1067-1072
157. Attar P.J., Dowell E.H., and White J.R. Modelling delta wing limit-cycle oscillations using a high-fidelity structural model. J Aircr 42 5 (2005) 1209-1217
158. Kim D.-H., Lee I., Marzocca P., Librescu L., and Schober S. Nonlinear aeroelastic analysis of an airfoil using CFD-based indicial approach. J Aircr 42 5 (2005) 1340-1343
159. Dimitriadis G., and Cooper J.E. Characterization of the behaviour of a simple aeroservoelastic system with control nonlinearities. J Fluids Struct 14 8 (2000) 1173-1193
160. Patil M.J., Hodges D.H., and Cesnik C.E.S. Nonlinear aeroelasticity and flight dynamics of high-altitude long-endurance aircraft. J Aircr 38 1 (2001) 88-94
161. Ding Q., Cooper J.E., and Leung A.Y.T. Application of an improved cell mapping method to bilinear stiffness aeroelastic systems. J Fluids Struct 20 1 (2005) 35-49
162. Raghothama A., and Narayanan S. Non-linear dynamics of a two-dimensional airfoil by incremental harmonic balance method. J Sound Vibr 226 3 (1999) 493-517
163. Liu L., Wong Y.S., and Lee B.H.K. Application of the centre manifold theory in non-linear aeroelasticity. J Sound Vibr 234 4 (1999) 641-659
164. Vio G.A., and Cooper J.E. Limit cycle oscillation prediction for aeroelastic systems with discrete bilinear stiffness. Int J Appl Math Mech 3 (2005) 100-119
165. Roberts I., Jones D.P., Lieven N.A.J., Bernado M.D., and Champneys A.R. Analysis of piecewise linear aeroelastic systems using numerical continuation. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part G: J Aerosp Eng 216 1 (2002) 1-11
166. Dimitriadis G, Vio G, Cooper J. Stability and LCO amplitude prediction for aeroelastic systems with structural and aerodynamic nonlinearities using numerical continuation. In: AVT symposium on flow-induced unsteady loads and the impact on military applications, Budapest, Hungary; 2005.
167. Doedel EJ, Champneys AR, Fairgrieve TF, Kuznetsov YA. Continuation and bifurcation software for ordinary differential equations (with HomCont): user's guide: Technical Report, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada; 2000.
168. Govaerts W., Dhooge A., and Kuznetsov Y.A. MATCONT: a Matlab package for numerical bifurcation of ODEs. ACM Trans Math Software 29 2 (2003) 141-164
169. Beran P.S., Strganac T.W., Kim K., and Nichkawde C. Studies of store-induced limit-cycle oscillations using a model with full system nonlinearities. Nonlinear Dyn 37 (2004) 323-339
170. Dimitriadis G. Bifurcation analysis for subsonic nonlinear aircraft using numerical continuation, J Aircr, 2006; Submitted for publication.
171. Kuznetsov YA, Levitin VV. CONTENT: integrated environment for analysis of dynamical systems. Technical Report, CWI, Amsterdam; 1997.
172. Doedel E., Keller H.B., and Kernevez J.P. Numerical analysis and control of bifurcation problems (i) bifurcation in finite dimensions. Int J Bifurcation and Chaos 1 3 (1991) 493-520
173. Beyn W.J., Champneys A., Doedel E., Govaerts W., Kuznetsov Y.A., and Sandstede B. Numerical continuation and computation of normal forms. In: Fiedler B. (Ed). Handbook of dynamical systems vol. 2 (2002), Elsevier, Amsterdam
174. Eversman W., and Tewari A. Consistent rational-function approximation for unsteady aerodynamics. J Aircr 28 9 (1991) 545-552
175. Roger KL. Airplane math modelling methods for active control design. Technical Report AGARD-CP-228, AGARD; 1977.
176. Snyder RD, Beran PS, Zweber JV. Predictions of store-induced limit cycle oscillations using Euler and Navier-Stokes fluid dynamics. In: Proceedings of the 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Norfolk, Virginia; 2003.
177. Knot NS, Beran PS, Zweber JV, Eatsep FE. Influence of tip store mass location on wing limit-cycle oscillation. In: Proceedings of the 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Norfolk, Virginia; 2003.
178. Parker GH, Maple RC, Berans PS. Analysis of store effects on limit cycle oscillation. In: Proc 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics & materials conference, Newport, Rhode Island; 2006.
179. Nissim E, Gilyard GB. Method for experimental determination of flutter speed by parameter identification. Technical Report, Technical Paper 2923, NASA; June 1989.
180. Lisandrin P, Carpentieri G, van Tooren M. Open issues in system identification of CFD based aerodynamic models for aeroelastic applications. In: International forum on aeroelasticity and structural dynamics, Munich, Germany, 2005.
181. Rampurawala A, Badcock K. Treatment of complex configurations for flutter calculations. In: Proceedings of the 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, Newport, Rhode Island; 2006.
182. Fuglsang DF, Brase LO, Agarwal S. A numerical study of control surface buzz using computational fluid dynamics methods. In: 10th AIAA applied aerodynamics conference, Palo Alto, CA; 1992.
183. Haase W, Selmin V, Winzell B. editors., Notes on numerical fluid and multidisciplinary design. Progress in computational flow-structure interaction, Springer, Berlin; 2003.