Selective rendering in a multi-modal environment: Scent and graphics

Proceedings - SCCG 2007: 23rd Spring Conference on Computer Graphics

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 147-152

  Ramic, Belma ^a   Chalmers, Alan ^b   Hasic, Jasminka ^a   Rizvic, Selma ^a  

^a SARAJEVO SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Bosnia and Herzegovina)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3D graphics; Olfaction; Scent; Selective ren dering; Smell; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISION; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

3D GRAPHICS; OLFACTION; SCENT; SELECTIVE REN- DERING; SMELL;

RENDERING (COMPUTER GRAPHICS);

EID: 84908613331     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2614348.2614369     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. BARFIELD, W., AND DANAS, E. 1995. Comments on the use of olfactory displays for virtual environments. Presence 5, 1, 109-121.
2. BROADBENT, D. 1958. Perception and Communication. London: Pergamon Press.
3. CARLSON, N. R. 1993. Psychology, The Science of Behavior. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
4. CHALMERS, A., DEBATTISTA, K., AND DOS SANTOS, L. P. 2006. Selective rendering: computing only what you see. In GRAPHITE 06: Proceedings of the 4th international confer-ence on Computer graphics and interactive techniques in Aus-tralasia and Southeast Asia, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 9-18.
5. CHU, S., AND DOWNES, J. J. 2000. Odour-evoked autobio-graphical memories: psychological investigations of proustian phenomena. Chemical Senses 25, 1 (February), 111-116.
6. FILDES, J., 2007. Virtual treatment for us troops. WorldWibeWeb.
7. JACOB, T. 2007. Olfaction. Tech. rep., Cardiff University, UK.
8. JAMES, W., 1890. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. In Principles of Psychology.
9. LUEBKE, D. P., AND HALLEN, B. 2001. Perceptually-driven sim-plification for interactive rendering. In Proceedings of the 12th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering Techniques, Springer-Verlag, London, UK, 223-234.
10. MASTOROPOULOU, G., DEBATTISTA, K., CHALMERS, A., AND TROSCIANKO, T. 2005. Auditory bias of visual attention for perceptually-guided selective rendering of animations. In GRAPHITE 05: Proceedings of the 3rd international confer-ence on Computer graphics and interactive techniques in Aus-tralasia and South East Asia, ACM, New York, NY, USA, 363-369.
11. MILES, C., AND JENKINS, R. 2000. Recency and suffix effects with immediate recall of olfactory stimuli. Memory 8, 3 (May), 195-205.
12. OSULLIVAN, C., HOWLETT, S., MCDONNELL, R., MORVAN, Y., AND OCONOR, K. 2004. State of the art report: Perceptually adaptive graphics. In Eurographics.
13. PETTERSSON, R., 1999. Attention an information design perspec-tive! International Institute for Information Design (IIID), Vi-enna, Austria.
14. TRISENX, 2007. http://www.trisenx.com/products.html.
15. WARD, G. 1994. The radiance lighting simulation and rendering system. In Proceedings of 94 SIGGRAPH conference, vol. 28, 459-72.
16. ZYBURA, M., AND ESKELAND, G. A. 1999. Olfaction for virtual reality. Tech. rep., University of Washington