Investigating fishers' preferences for the design of marine Payments for Environmental Services schemes

Ecological Economics

Volumn 108, Issue , 2014, Pages 91-103

  Barr, Rhona F ^a,b   Mourato, Susana ^b  

^a Conservation Strategy Fund ^*  (United States)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Artisanal fisheries; Choice experiments; Participation; Payments for Environmental Services

Indexed keywords

ARTISANAL FISHERY; COMPENSATION SYSTEM; COST; ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; FISHING COMMUNITY; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH;

EID: 84908591002     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.006     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Aas Ø., Haider W., Hunt L. Angler responses to potential harvest regulations in a Norwegian sport fishery: a conjoint-based choice modeling approach. N. Am. J. Fish Manag. 2000, 20:940-950.
2. Agardy T. Effects of fisheries on marine ecosystems: a conservationist's perspective. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2000, 57:761-765.
3. Agardy T., Bridgewater P., Crosby M.P., Day J., Dayton P.K., Kenchington R., Laffoley D., McConney P., Murray P.A., Parks J.E., Peau L. Dangerous targets? Unresolved issues and ideological clashes around marine protected areas. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 2003, 13:353-367.
4. Akpalu W. A dynamic model of mesh size regulatory compliance. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2010, 35:34.
5. Atkinson G., Mourato S. Environmental cost-benefit analysis. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2008, 33:317-344.
6. Bateman I.J., Carson R.T., Day B., Hanemann M., Hanleys N., Hett T., Jones-Lee M., Loomes G., Mourato S., Ozdemiroglu E., Pearce D., Sugden R., Swanson J. Economic Valuation With Stated Preference Techniques: A Manual 2002, Edward Elgar.
7. Bennett J., Blamey R. The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation 2001, Edward Elgar Publishing.
8. Blamey R.K., Bennett J.W., Louviere J.J., Morrison M.D., Rolfe J. A test of policy labels in environmental choice modelling studies. Ecol. Econ. 2000, 32:269-286.
9. Boxall P., Adamowicz W.L., Moon A. Complexity in choice experiments: choice of the status quo alternative and implications for welfare measurement. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2009, 53:503-519.
10. Christie P. Marine protected areas as biological successes and social failures in Southeast Asia. Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 2004, 42:155-164.
11. Cinner J.E. Poverty and the use of destructive fishing gear near East African marine protected areas. Environ. Conserv. 2010, 36:321-326.
12. Cinner J.E., Daw T., McClanahan T.R. Socioeconomic factors that affect artisanal fishers' readiness to exit a declining fishery. Conserv. Biol. 2009, 23:124-130.
13. Cinner J.E., McClanahan T.R., Graham N.A.J., Pratchett M.S., Wilson S.K., Raina J. Gear-based fisheries management as a potential adaptive response to climate change and coral mortality. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46:724-732.
14. Crawford B.R., Siahainenia A., Rotinsulu C., Sukmara A. Compliance and enforcement of community-based coastal resource management regulations in North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Coast. Manag. 2004, 32:39-50.
15. Dobbs T.L., Pretty J. Case study of agri-environmental payments: the United Kingdom. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65:765-775.
16. Engel S., Pagiola S., Wunder S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65:663-674.
17. Espinosa-Goded M., Barreiro-Hurlé J., Ruto E. What do farmers want from agri-environmental scheme design? A choice experiment approach. J. Agric. Econ. 2010, 61:259-273.
18. Ferraro P. Asymmetrical information and contract design for payments for environmental services. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65:810-821.
19. Ferse S.C.A., Costa M.M., Máñez K.S., Adhuri D.S., Glaser M. Allies, not aliens: increasing the role of local communities in marine protected area implementation. Environ. Conserv. 2010, 37:23-34.
20. Fimereli E., Mourato S. Assessing the effect of energy technology labels on preferences. J. Environ. Econ. Policy 2013, 2(3):245-265.
21. Glenk K., Barkmann J., Marggraf R. Locally perceived values of biological diversity in Indonesia-a choice experiment approach. 8th Annual BIOECON Conference on Economic Analysis of Ecology and Biodiversity 2006,15-29.
22. Gong Y., Bull G., Baylis K. Participation in the world's first clean development mechanism forest project: the role of property rights, social capital and contractual rules. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:1292-1302.
23. Graham N.A.J., McClanahan T.R., MacNeill M.A., Wilson S.K., Polunin N.V.C., Jennings Simon, Chabanet P., Clark S., Spalding M.D., Letourneur Y., Bigot L., Galzin R., Ohman M.C., Garpe K.C., Edwards A.J., Sheppard C.R.C. Climate warming, marine protected areas and the ocean-scale integrity of coral reef ecosystems. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e3039. 10.1371/journal.pone.0003039.
24. Gustavson K., Kroeker Z., Walmsley J., Juma S. A process framework for coastal zone management in Tanzania. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2009, 52:78-88.
25. Hanley N., Mourato S., Wright R.E. Choice modelling approaches: a superior alternative for environmental valuation?. J. Econ. Surv. 2001, 15:435-462.
26. Hanley N., MacMillan D., Patterson I., Wright R.E. Economics and the design of nature conservation policy: a case study of wild goose conservation in Scotland using choice experiments. Anim. Conserv. 2003, 6:123-129.
27. Hausman J., McFadden D. Specification tests for the multinomial logit model. Econ. J. Econ. Soc. 1984,1219-1240.
28. Heiss F. Structural choice analysis with nested logit models. Stata J. 2002, 2:227-252.
29. Hensher D.A., Rose J.M., Greene W.H. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer 2005, Cambridge Univ Pr.
30. Hønneland G. Compliance in the Barents Sea fisheries. How fishermen account for conformity with rules. Mar. Policy 2000, 24:11-19.
31. Hoyos D. The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:1595-1603.
32. Ikiara M.M., Odink J.G. Fishermen resistance to exit fisheries. Mar. Resour. Econ. 2000, 14:199-213.
33. Jack B.K., Kousky C., Sims K.R.E. Designing payments for ecosystem services: lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2008, 105:9465-9470.
34. Jae H., DelVecchio D. Decision making by low-literacy consumers in the presence of point-of-purchase information. J. Consum. Aff. 2004, 38:342-354.
35. Kahneman D., Knetsch J.L., Thaler R.H. Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J. Econ. Perspect. 1991, 5:193-206.
36. Lele S., Wilshusen P., Brockington D., Seidler R., Bawa K. Beyond exclusion: alternative approaches to biodiversity conservation in the developing tropics. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2010, 2:94-100.
37. Leslie H.M. A synthesis of marine conservation planning approaches. Conserv. Biol. 2005, 19:1701-1713.
38. Louviere J.J. Analyzing decision-making: metric conjoint analysis. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series 1988, 67. Sage University Papers, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California.
39. Louviere J.J., Hensher D.A., Swait J.D. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications 2000, Cambridge Univ Pr.
40. Lundquist C.J., Granek E.F. Strategies for successful marine conservation: integrating socioeconomic, political, and scientific factors. Conserv. Biol. 2005, 19:1771.
41. Ma S., Swinton S.M., Lupi F., Jolejole C.B. Why Farmers Opt Not to Enroll in Payment-for-Environmental-Services Programs 2010.
42. Malleret D. A Socio-Economic Baseline Assessment of the Mnazi Bay Ruvuma Estuary Marine Park 2004, IUCN EARO, Nairobi, Kenya.
43. Mangham L.J., Hansom K., McPake B. How to do (or not to do). . . Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country. Health Policy Plan. 2009, 24:151-158.
44. McClanahan T.R., Mangi S.C. Gear-based management of a tropical artisanal fishery based on species selectivity and capture size. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 2004, 11:51-60.
45. McClanahan T., Davis J., Maina J. Factors influencing resource users and managers' perceptions towards marine protected area management in Kenya. Found. Environ. Conserv. 2005, 32:42-49.
46. McFadden D. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior, in: Frontiers in Econometrics 1974,105-142. Academic Press, New York.
47. Meyerhoff J., Liebe U. Status quo effect in choice experiments: empirical evidence on attitudes and choice task complexity. Land Econ. 2009, 85:515-528.
48. Mitchell R.C., Carson R.T. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resources for the Future 1993.
49. Mogas J., Riera P., Bennett J. A comparison of contingent valuation and choice modelling with second-order interactions. J. For. Econ. 2006, 12:5-30.
50. Mohammed E.Y. Payments for coastal and marine ecosystem services: prospects and principles. IIED Briefing 2012, IIED, London.
51. Neill H.R., Cummings R.G., Ganderton P.T., Harrison G.W., McGuckin T. Hypothetical surveys and real economic commitments. Land Econ. 1994,145-154.
52. Newton P., Nichols E.S., Endo W., Peres C.A. Consequences of actor level livelihood heterogeneity for additionality in a tropical forest payment for environmental services programme with an undifferentiated reward structure. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2012, 22:127-136.
53. Pagiola S., Arcenas A., Platais G. Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Dev. 2005, 33:237-253.
54. Petheram L., Campbell B.M. Listening to locals on payments for environmental services. J. Environ. Manag. 2010, 91:1139-1149.
55. Pomeroy, Katon B.M., Harkes I. Conditions affecting the success of fisheries co-management: lessons from Asia. Mar. Policy 2001, 25:197-208.
56. Pradhan N.C., Leung P. Modeling entry, stay, and exit decisions of the longline fishers in Hawaii. Mar. Policy 2004, 28:311-324.
57. Qin P., Carlsson F., Xu J. Forest tenure reform in China: a choice experiment on farmers' property rights preferences. Land Econ. 2011, 87:473-487.
58. Robinson E.J.Z., Albers H.J., Kirama S.L. The role of incentives for sustainable implementation of marine protected areas: an example from Tanzania. Environment for Development Discussion Paper Series 2012, Environment for Development.
59. Ruto E., Garrod G. Investigating farmers' preferences for the design of agri-environment schemes: a choice experiment approach. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 2009, 52:631-647.
60. Samuelson W., Zeckhauser R. Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk Uncertain. 1988, 1:7-59.
61. Schläpfer F. Survey protocol and income effects in the contingent valuation of public goods: a meta-analysis. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 57:415-429.
62. Shao F., Mlay E., Mushi V. Review for marine fisheries for Kenya. Report for DFID Study: Understanding Fisheries Associated Livelihoods and the Constraints to Their Development in Kenya and Tanzania (Project R8196) 2003.
63. Silva P. Exploring the Linkages Between Poverty, Marine Protected Area Management, and the Use of Destructive Fishing Gear in Tanzania 2006.
64. Teh L., Cheung W.W.L., Cornish A., Chu C., Sumaila U.R. A survey of alternative livelihood options for Hong Kong's fishers. Int. J. Soc. Econ. 2008, 35:380-395.
65. Wattage P., Mardle S., Pascoe S. Evaluation of the importance of fisheries management objectives using choice-experiments. Ecol. Econ. 2005, 55:85-95.
66. Wattage P., Glenn H., Mardle S., Van Rensburg T., Grehan A., Foley N. Economic value of conserving deep-sea corals in Irish waters: a choice experiment study on marine protected areas. Fish. Res. 2011, 107:59-67.
67. Worm B., Hilborn R., Baum J.K., Branch T.A., Collie J.S., Costello C., Fogarty M.J., Fulton E.A., Hutchings J.A., Jennings S., Jensen O.P., Lotze H.K., Mace P.M., McClanahan T.R., Minto C., Palumbi S.R., Parma A.M., Ricard D., Rosenberg A.A., Watson R., Zeller D. Rebuilding global fisheries. Science 2009, 325:578-585.
68. Wunder S. Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper 2005, 42. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor.
69. Wunder S. The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2007, 21:48-58.
70. WWF The Eastern African Marine Ecoregion Vision: A Large-Scale Conservation Approach to the Management of Biodiversity 2004, WWF, Dar er Salaam, Tanzania.
71. Zbinden S., Lee D.R. Paying for environmental services: an analysis of participation in Costa Rica's PSA program. World Dev. 2005, 33:255-272.
72. Zilberman D., Lipper L., McCarthy N. When could payments for environmental services benefit the poor?. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2008, 13:255-278.