Nuclear physics (of the cell, not the atom)

Molecular Biology of the Cell

Volumn 25, Issue 22, 2014, Pages 3466-3469

  Pederson, Thoru ^a   Marko, John F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NUCLEOPLASMIN; DNA; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; RNA;

CELL NUCLEUS; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CELL STRUCTURE; CHEMICAL BOND; CHROMOSOME; COILED BODY; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NUCLEAR PHYSICS; REVIEW; ANIMAL; BIOPHYSICS; CHEMISTRY; CYTOPLASM; DEVICES; EUKARYOTIC CELL; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; ULTRASTRUCTURE; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

ANIMALS; BIOPHYSICS; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMOSOMES; CYTOPLASM; DNA; EUKARYOTIC CELLS; HUMANS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; RNA; X-RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 84908572905     PISSN: 10591524     EISSN: 19394586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E14-03-0790     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Anderson NG, Wilbur KM (1952). Studies on isolated nuclei. IV. The effect of various solutions on the isolated rat liver nucleus. J Gen Physiol 35, 781-796.
2. Belin BJ, Mullins RD (2013). What we talk about when we talk about nuclear actin. Nucleus 4, 291-297.
3. Belin BJ, Cimini RA, Blackburn EH, Mullins RD (2013). Visualization of actin filaments and monomers in somatic cell nuclei. Mol Biol Cell 24, 982-994.
4. Belmont AS (2010). Estrogen fueled, nuclear kiss. Did it move for you? Nucleus 1, 440-443.
5. Brangwynne CP (2013). Phase transitions and size scaling of membrane-less organelles. J Cell Biol 203, 875-881.
6. Brangwynne CP, Mitchison TJ, Hyman AA (2011). Active liquid-like behavior of nucleoli determines their size and shape in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 4334-4339.
7. Cremer T, Cremer M (2010). Chromosome territories. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2, 003889.
8. Crick FHC (1950). The physical properties of cytoplasm. A study by means of the magnetic particle method. Part II. Theoretical treatment. Exp Cell Res 1, 505-533.
9. Crick FHC, Hughes AFW (1950). The physical properties of cytoplasm. A study by means of the magnetic particle method. Part I. Experimental. Exp Cell Res 1, 37-60.
10. Danielli JF, Davson H (1935). A contribution to the theory of permeability of thin films. J Cell Comp Physiol 5, 495-508.
11. Dekker J, Rippe K, Dekker M, Kleckner N (2002). Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295, 1306-1311.
12. Deryusheva S, Gall JG (2004). Dynamics of coilin in Cajal bodies of the Xenopus germinal vesicle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 4810-4814.
13. Dolan MF (2012). In memoriam: Lynn Margulis (1938-2011). J Eukaryot Microbiol 59, 427-428.
14. Dolan MF, Melnitsky H, Margulis L, Kolnicki R (2002). Motility proteins and the origin of the nucleus. Anat Rec 268, 290-301.
15. Edidin M, Weiss A (1972). Antigen cap formation in cultured fibroblasts: a reflection of membrane fluidity and of cell motility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69, 2456-2450.
16. Fricker M, Hollinshead M, White N, Vaux D (1997). Interphase nuclei of many cell types contain deep, dynamic tubular membrane-bound invaginations of the nuclear envelope. J Cell Biol 136, 531-544.
17. Frye LD, Edidin M (1970). The rapid intermixing of cell surface antigens after formation of mouse-human heterokaryons. J Cell Sci 7, 319-335.
18. Funkhouser CM, Sknepnek R, Shimi T, Goldman AE, Goldman RD, Olvera de la Cruz M (2013). Mechanical model of blebbing in nuclear lamin networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 3248-3253.
19. Gall JG (2006). Exporting actin. Nat Cell Biol 8, 205-207.
20. Goldman RD, Shumaker DK, Erdos MR, Erikkson M, Goldman AE, Gordon LB, Gruenbaum Y, Khuon S, Mendez M, Varga R, et al. (2004). Accumulation of mutant lamin A causes progressive changes in nuclear architecture in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 8963-8968.
21. Gratzer W (2011). Biophysics - whence, whither, wherefore - or hold that hyphen. BMC Biol 9, 12.
22. Han TW, Kato M, Xie S, Wu LC, Mirzaei H, Pei J, Chen M, Xie Y, Allen J, Xiao G, et al. (2012). Cell-free formation of RNA granules: bound RNAs identify features and components of cellular assemblies. Cell 149, 768-779.
23. Hancock R (2014). The crowded nucleus. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 3, 15-26.
24. Hanson J, Huxley HE (1953). Structural basis of the cross-striations in muscle. Nature 172, 53-532.
25. Houtsmuller AB, Rademakers S, Nigg AL, Hoogstraten D, Hoeijmakers JHJ, Vermuelen W (1999). Action of DNA repair endonuclease ERCC1/XPF in living cells. Science 284, 958-961.
26. Jokhi V, Ashley J, Nunnari J, Noma A, Ito N, Wakabayashi-Ito N, Moore MJ, Budnik V (2013). Cell Rep 3, 988-995.
27. Joti Y, Hikima T, Nishino Y, Kamada F, Hihara S, Takata H, Ishikawa T, Maeshima K (2012). Chromosomes without a 30-nm chromatin fiber. Nucleus 3, 404-410.
28. Kaiser TE, Intine RV, Dundr M (2008). De novo formation of a subnuclear body. Science 322, 1713-1717.
29. Kato M, Han TW, Xie S, Shi K, Du K, Wu LC, Mirzaei H, Goldsmith EJ, Longgood J, Pei J, et al. (2012). Cell-free formation of RNA granules: low complexity sequence domains form dynamic fibers within hydrogels. Cell 149, 753-767.
30. Lever MA, Th'ng JP, Sun X, Hendzel MJ (2000). Rapid exchange of histone H1.1 on chromatin in living cells. Nature 408, 873-876.
31. Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L, Imakaev M, Ragoczy T, Telling A, Amit I, Lajoie BR, Sabo PJ, Dorschner MO, et al. (2009). Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289-293.
32. Linn S, Riggs AD (1975). The general affinity of lac repressor for E. coli DNA: implication for gene regulation in prokaryotes and eucaryotes. Cell 4, 107-111.
33. Loewenstein WR, Kanno Y (1962). Some electrical properties of the membrane of a nucleus. Nature 195, 462-464.
34. Loewenstein WR, Kanno Y (1963). The electrical conductance and potential across the membrane of some cell nuclei. J Cell Biol 16, 421-425.
35. Mao YS, Sunwoo H, Zhang B, Spector DL (2011). Direct visualization of the co-transcriptional assembly of a nuclear body by noncoding RNAs. Nat Cell Biol 13, 95-101.
36. Marko JF (2008). Micromechanical studies of mitotic chromosomes. Chromosome Res 16, 469-497.
37. Marko JF (2012). The liquid drop nature of nucleoli. Nucleus 3, 115-117.
38. Marshall WF, Straight A, Marko JF, Swedlow J, Dernberg A, Belmont A, Murray AW, Agard DA, Sedat JW (1997). Interphase chromosomes undergo constrained diffusional motion in living cells. Curr Biol 7, 930-939.
39. Misteli T, Gunjan A, Hock R, Bustin M, Brown DT (2000). Dynamic binding of histone H1 to chromatin in living cells. Nature 408, 877-881.
40. Mor A, Ben-Yishay R, Shav-Tal Y (2010). On the right track: following the nucleo-cytoplasmic path of an mRNA. Nucleus 1, 492-498.
41. Needham DM (1971). Machina Carnis: The Biochemistry of Muscular Contraction in Its Historical Development, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42. O'Brien TP, Bult CJ, Cremer C, Grunze M, Knowles BB, Langowski J, McNally J, Pederson T, Politz JC, Pombo A, et al. (2003). Genome function and nuclear architecture: from gene expression to nanoscience. Genome Res 13, 1029-1041.
43. Pederson T (2008). As functional nuclear actin come into view, is it globular, filamentous, or both? J Cell Biol 180, 1061-1064.
44. Pederson T (2011). The nucleus introduced. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3, a000521.
45. Pederson T (2013). The persistent plausibility of protein synthesis in the nucleus: process, palimpsest or pitfall? Curr Opin Cell Biol 25, 520-512.
46. Pederson T (2014). The nuclear physique. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 3, 1-13.
47. Portugal FH, Cohen JS (1977). A Century of DNA, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Robbins E, Pederson T, Klein P (1970). Comparison of mitotic phenomena and effects induced by hypertonic solutions in HeLa cells. J Cell Biol 44, 400-416.
49. Rowat AC, Lammerding J, Ipsen JH (2006). Mechanical properties of the cell nucleus and the effect of emerin deficiency. Biophys J 91, 4649-4664.
50. Rowat AC, Jaalouk DE, Zwerger M, Ung WL, Eydelnant IA, Olins DA, Olins AL, Herrmann H, Weitz DA, Lammerding J (2013). Nuclear envelope composition determines the ability of neutrophil-type cells to passage through micron-scale constrictions. J Biol Chem 288, 8610-8618.
51. Saxton MJ (2007). A biological interpretation of transient anomalous subdiffusion. I. Quantitative model. Biophys J 92, 1178-1191.
52. Saxton MJ (2012). Wanted: a positive control for anomalous subdiffusion. Biophys J 103, 2411-2422
53. Shevtsov SP, Dundr M (2011). Nucleation of nuclear bodies by RNA. Nat Cell Biol 13, 167-173.
54. Shimi T, Pfleghaar K, Kojima S, Pack CG, Solovei I, Goldman AE, Adam SA, Shumaker DK, Kinjo M, Cremer T, et al. (2008). The A- and B-type nuclear lamin networks: microdomains involved in chromatin organization and transcription. Genes Dev 22, 3409-3421.
55. Singer SJ, Nicholson GL (1972). The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. Science 175, 720-731.
56. Speese SD, Ashley J, Jokhi V, Nunnari J, Barria R, Li Y, Ataman B, Koon A, Chang YT, Li Q, et al. (2012). Nuclear envelope budding enables large ribonucleoprotein particle export during synaptic Wnt signaling. Cell 149, 832-846.
57. Strick TR, Kawaguchi T, Hirano T (2004). Real-time detection of single-molecule DNA compaction by condensin I. Curr Biol 14, 874-880.
58. Toretsky JA, Wright PE (2014). Assemblages: functional units formed by cellular phase separation. J Cell Biol 206, 579-588.
59. von Hippel PH, Revzin A, Gross CA, Wang AC (1974). Non-specific DNA binding of genome regulating proteins as a biological control mechanism. I. The lac operon: equilibrium aspects. Proc Natl Acad USA 71, 4808-4812.
60. Wachsmuth M, Waldeck W, Langowski J (2000). Anomalous diffusion of fluorescent probes inside living cell nuclei investigated by spatially resolved fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. J Mol Biol 298, 677-689.
61. Weber SC, Brangwynne CP (2012). Getting RNA and protein in phase. Cell 149, 1188-1191.
62. Yguerabide J, Stryer L (1971). Fluorescence spectroscopy of an oriented model membrane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 68, 1217-1221.
63. Zhou H-X, Rivas G, Minton AP (2008). Macromolecular crowding and confinement: biochemical, biophysical, and potential physiological consequences. Annu Rev Biophys 37, 375-397.