Wetland habitat patches as ecological components of landscape memory in a highly modified floodplain

River Research and Applications

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 874-886

  Ortmann Ajkai, A ^a   Loczy D ^a   Gyenizse, P ^a   Pirkhoffer, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS   (Hungary)

Author keywords

DCCA; Eco geomorphology; Ecological memory; Floodplain vegetation; Geomorphometric indices; Landscape memory; Wetland reconstruction

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FLOODPLAIN; FLUVIAL GEOMORPHOLOGY; GEOMORPHOLOGICAL RESPONSE; GEOMORPHOLOGY; HABITAT STRUCTURE; HOLISTIC APPROACH; LANDSCAPE EVOLUTION; MORPHOMETRY; RECONSTRUCTION; VEGETATION COVER; WETLAND;

HUNGARY;

EID: 84908466753     PISSN: 15351459     EISSN: 15351467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rra.2685     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Allan JD. 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35: 257-284. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.120202.110122
2. Apan AA, Raine SR, Paterson MS. 2002. Mapping and analysis of change in the riparian landscape structure of the Lockyer Valley Catchment, Queensland, Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning 59: 43-47. DOI:10.1016/S0169-20460100246-8 DOI:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00246-8
3. Bándi G, Petres F, Maráz B. 1979. Baranya megye az oskorban. (Baranya county in the prehistoric). In Baranya Megye Története az Oskortól a Honfoglalásig, Bándi G (ed.). Baranya Megyei Levéltár: Pécs (in Hungarian).
4. Bengtsson J, Angelstam P, Elmquist T, Emanuelsson U, Folke C, Ihse M, Moberg F, Nyström M. 2003. Reserves, resilience and dynamic landscapes. Ambio 32: 389-396. DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447-32.6.389
5. Bölöni J, Molnár Zs, Illyés E, Kun A. 2007. A new habitat classification and manual for standardized habitat mapping. Annali di Botanica (nuova serie) 7: 55-76.
6. Borhidi A, Kevey B, Lendvai G. 2012. Plant Communities of Hungary. Akadémiai: Budapest.
7. Bornette G, Amoros C, Piegay H, Tachet J, Hein T. 1998. Ecological complexity of wetlands within a river landscape. Biological Conservation 85: 35-45. DOI:10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00166-3 DOI:10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00166-3
8. ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P. 2002. CANOCO 4.5. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User's Guide. Software for Canonical Community Ordination Version 4.5. Wageningen and Ceske Budejovice: Biometris.
9. Brierley GJ. 2010. Landscape memory: the imprint of the past on contemporary landscape forms and processes. Area 42: 76-85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00900.x
10. Church M. 2002. Geomorphological thresholds in riverine landscapes. Freshwater Biology 47: 541-557.
11. Corenblit D, Tabacchi E, Steiger J, Gurnell AM. 2007. Reciprocal interactions and adjustments between fluvial landforms and vegetation dynamics in river corridors: a review of complementary approaches. Earth-Science Reviews 84: 56-86. DOI:10.1016/j.earscirev.2007.05.004
12. Corenblit D, Steiger J, Gurnell AM, Naiman RJ 2009. Plants intertwine fluvial landform dynamics with ecological succession and natural selection: a niche construction perspective for riparian systems. Global Ecology and Biogeography 18: 507-520. DOI: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00461
13. Csontos L, Magyari Á, Van Vliet-Lanoë B, Musitz B. 2005. Neotectonics of the Somogy Hills (part II): evidence from seismic sections. Tectonophysics 410(1-4): 63-80. DOI:10.1016/j.tecto.2005.05.049
14. Gillarova H, Trpák P, Trpáková I, Sykorová Z, Pecharová E. 2008. Landscape memory as a solution of the ecological stability of the territory after mining. Gospodarska surowcami mineralnymi 24: 289-298. downloaded from: http://meeri.eu/Wydawnictwa/GSM2431/10-gillarova-i-inni.pdf, accessed 30.01.2013.
15. Gunderson LH. 2000. Ecological resilience - in theory and application. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 425-39
16. Gurnell AM, Bertoldi W, Corenblit D. 2012. Changing river channels: the roles of hydrological processes, plants and pioneer fluvial landforms in humid temperate, mixed load, gravel bed rivers. Earth-Science Reviews 111: 129-141. DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.11.005
17. Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PDT. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontologia Electronica 4: 1-9. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm, accessed on 30.02.2013.
18. Hanski I. 2001. Spatially realistic theory of metapopulation ecology. Naturwissenschaften 88: 372-381. DOI: 10.1007/s001140100246
19. Horváth F, Polgár L. 2008. MÉTA SQL expert interface and access service. Acta Botanica Hungarica 50(Suppl): 35-45. DOI: 10.1556/ABot.50.2008.Suppl.3
20. Király G. 1998. Adatok a Délkelet-Dunántúl flórájához. (Floristical data concerning South-East Transdanubia, Hungary). Somogyi Múzeumok Kōzleményei 13: 211-215.
21. Király G. 2006. Kiegészítések Külso-Somogy edényes flórájának ismeretéhez. (Additions to the vascular flora of Külsõ-Somogy region, Hungary). Somogyi Múzeumok Közleményei 17: 31-40.
22. Leps J, Smilauer P. 2003. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data Using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge
23. Lóczy D. 2013. Hydromorphological-Geoecological Foundations of Floodplain Management: Case Study from Hungary. Lambert Academic Publishing: Saarbrücken
24. Lóczy D, Pirkhoffer E, Gyenizse P. 2011. Geomorphometric floodplain classification in a hill region of Hungary. Geomorphology 147-48: 61-72. DOI:10.1016/j.geomorph.2011.06.040
25. Magyari Á, Musitz B, Csontos L, van Vliet-Lanoë B. 2005. Quaternary neotectonics of the Somogy Hills, Hungary (part I): evidence from field observations. Tectonophysics 410: 43-62. DOI:10.1016/j.tecto.2005.05.044
26. Marston RA, Girel J, Pautou G, Piegay H, Bravard JP, Arneson, C. 1995. Channel metamorphosis, floodplain disturbance, and vegetation development: Ain River, France. Geomorphology 13: 121-131. DOI:10.1016/0169-555X(95)00066-E
27. Molnár Zs, Bartha S, Seregélyes T, Illyés E, Botta-Dukát Z, Tímár G, Horváth F, Révész A, Kun A, Bölöni J, Biró M, Bodonczi L, Deák ÁJ, Fogarasi P, Horváth A, Isépy I, Karas L, Kecskés F, Molnár Cs, Ortmann-né Ajkai A, Rév Sz. 2007. A grid-based, satellite-image supported, multi-attributed vegetation mapping method (MÉTA). Folia Geobotanica 42: 225-247. DOI: 10.1007/BF02806465
28. Nakamura F, Kawaguchi Y, Nakano D, Yamada H. 2008. Ecological responses to anthropogenic alterations of gravel-bed rivers in Japan, from floodplain river segments to microhabitat scale: a review. In Gravel-bed Rivers VI: From Process Understanding to River Restoration, Habersack H, Piegay H, Rinaldi M (eds). Elsevier: Amsterdam
29. Orr HG, Large ARG, Newson MD, Walsh CL. 2008. A predictive typology characterizing hydromorphologyGeomorphology 100: 32-40. DOI:10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.10.022
30. Ortmann-Ajkai A, Horváth F. 2010. Green corridors or degradation routes? Effects of waterside habitats on landscape health. In Botta-Dukát Z, Salamon-Albert É (eds): 19th International Workshop of European Vegetation Survey, Book of Abstracts, p.111. University of Pécs: Pécs
31. Padisák J. 1992. Seasonal succession of phytoplankton in a large shallow lake (Balaton, Hungary) - a dynamic approach to ecological memory, its possible role and mechanisms. Journal of Ecology 80: 217-230.
32. Peterson GD. 2002. Contagious disturbance, ecological memory, and the emergence of landscape pattern. Ecosystems 5: 329-338.
33. Pulliam HR. 1988. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. American Naturalist 132: 652-661.
34. Renschler CS, Doyle MW, Thoms MC. 2007. Geomorphology and ecosystems: challenges and keys for success in bridging disciplines. Geomorphology 89: 1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.07.011
35. Schaefer V. 2009. Alien invasions, ecological restoration in cities and the loss of ecological memory. Restoration Ecology 17: 171-176. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00513.x
36. Stallins JA. 2006. Geomorphology and ecology: unifying themes for complex systems in biogeomorphology. Geomorphology 77: 207-216. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.01.005.
37. Szilárd J. 1967. A Külso-Somogy Kialakulása és Felszínalaktana (Development and Geomorphology of the Outer Somogy Hills), Földrajzi Tanulmányok/Geographical Studies 7. Akadémiai: Budapest.
38. Thompson JN, Reichman OJ, Morin PJ, Polis GA, Power ME, Sterner EW, Couch CA, Gough L, Holt R, Hooper DU, Keesing F, Lovell CR, Milne T, Molles MC, Roberts DW, Strauss SY. 2001. Frontiers of ecology. BioScience 51: 15-24.
39. Thoms MC, Parsons M. 2002. Eco-geomorphology: an interdisciplinary approach to river science. The structure, function and management implications of fluvial sedimentary systems. Publications of the International Association of Hydrological Science 276: 113-120
40. Thorp JH, Thoms MC, Delong MD. 2006. The riverine ecosystem synthesis: biocomplexity in river networks across space and time. River Research and Applications 22: 123-147. DOI: 10.1002/rra.901
41. Vaughan IP, Diamond M, Gurnell AM, Hall KA, Jenkins A, Milner NJ, Naylor, JA, Sear DA, Woodward G, Ormerod SJ. 2009. Integrating ecology with hydromorphology: a priority for river science and management. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 19: 113-25. DOI: 10.1002/aqc.895
42. Ward JV, Tockner K, Arscott DB, Claret C. 2002. Riverine landscape diversity. Freshwater Biology 47: 517-539. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00893.x
43. Wu J, Hobbs R. 2002. Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: an idiosyncratic synthesis. Landscape Ecology 17: 355-365