Comparison of two accelerometer filter settings in individuals with Parkinson's disease

Physiological Measurement

Volumn 35, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 2287-2296

  Wallén, Martin Benka ^a   Nero, Håkan ^a   Franzén, Erika ^a,b   Hagströmer, Maria ^a,b  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

ActiGraph; elderly; gait; low frequency extension filter; movement sensor; Parkinson's disease

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETERS; BANDPASS FILTERS;

ACTIGRAPH; ELDERLY; FREE LIVINGS; GAIT; LOW FREQUENCY EXTENSION FILTER; LOW-INTENSITY; LOWER FREQUENCIES; MOVEMENT SENSORS; PARKINSON'S DISEASE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY;

NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES;

ACCELEROMETRY; AGED; AMBULATORY MONITORING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PARKINSON DISEASE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SIGNAL PROCESSING; WALKING;

ACCELEROMETRY; ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; PARKINSON DISEASE; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; WALKING;

EID: 84908456229     PISSN: 09673334     EISSN: 13616579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/11/2287     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ActiGraph 2012 ActiGraph web site. What is the low frequency extension?. (Available from: http://support.theactigraph.com/faq/frequency-extension)
2. Behrens T K and Dinger M K 2011 Comparisons of accelerometer and pedometer determined steps in free living samples J Phys. Act. Health 8 390-7
3. Bland J M and Altman D G 1986 Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1 307-10
4. Boslaugh S E and Andresen E M 2006 Correlates of physical activity for adults with disability Prev. Chronic Dis. 3 A78
5. Chen K Y and Bassett D R Jr 2005 The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 37 S490-500
6. Choi L, Liu Z, Matthews C E and Buchowski M S 2011 Validation of accelerometer wear and nonwear time classification algorithm Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 43 357-64
7. Conradsson D, Löfgren N, Ståhle A, Hagströmer M and Franzén E 2012 A novel conceptual framework for balance training in Parkinson's disease-study protocol for a randomised controlled trial BMC Neurol. 12 111
8. Folstein M F, Folstein S E and Mchugh P R 1975 'Mini-mental state'. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician J. Psychiatr. Res. 12 189-98
9. Gibb W R and Lees A J 1989 The significance of the Lewy body in the diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 15 27-44
10. Hale L A, Pal J and Becker I 2008 Measuring free-living physical activity in adults with and without neurologic dysfunction with a triaxial accelerometer Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 89 1765-71
11. Harris T J, Owen C G, Victor C R, Adams R, Ekelund U and Cook D G 2009 A comparison of questionnaire, accelerometer, and pedometer: measures in older people Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 41 1392-402
12. Hausdorff J M 2009 Gait dynamics in Parkinson's disease: common and distinct behavior among stride length, gait variability, and fractal-like scaling Chaos 19 026113
13. Hausdorff J M, Cudkowicz M E, Firtion R, Wei J Y and Goldberger A L 1998 Gait variability and basal ganglia disorders: stride-to-stride variations of gait cycle timing in Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease Mov. Disord. 13 428-37
14. Hoehn M M and Yahr M D 1967 Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality Neurology 17 427-42
15. Hughes A J, Daniel S E, Kilford L and Lees A J 1992 Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 55 181-4
16. John D and Freedson P 2012 ActiGraph and actical physical activity monitors: a peek under the hood Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 44 S86-9
17. Lee I M, Shiroma E J, Lobelo F, Puska P, Blair S N, Katzmarzyk P T and Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group 2012 Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy Lancet 380 219-29
18. Lee J, Koh D and Ong C N 1989 Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable Comput. Biol. Med. 19 61-70
19. Matthew C E 2005 Calibration of accelerometer output for adults Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 37 S512-22
20. Morris M E, Iansek R, Matyas T A and Summers J J 1996 Stride length regulation in Parkinson's disease. Normalization strategies and underlying mechanisms Brain 119 551-68
21. Naci H and Ioannidis J P 2013 Comparative effectiveness of exercise and drug interventions on mortality outcomes: metaepidemiological study BMJ 347 f5577
22. Ried-Larsen M, Brond J C, Brage S, Hansen B H, Grydeland M, Andersen L B and Moller N C 2012 Mechanical and free living comparisons of four generations of the ActiGraph activity monitor Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 9 113
23. Sallis J F and Saelens B E 2000 Assessment of physical activity by self-report: status, limitations, and future directions Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 71 S1-14
24. Speelman A D, Van De Warrenburg B P, Van Nimwegen M, Petzinger G M, Munneke M and Bloem B R 2011 How might physical activity benefit patients with Parkinson disease? Nat. Rev. Neurol. 7 528-34
25. Thorp A A, Owen N, Neuhaus M and Dunstan D W 2011 Sedentary behaviors and subsequent health outcomes in adults a systematic review of longitudinal studies, 1996-2011 Am. J. Prev. Med. 41 207-15
26. Troiano R P, Berrigan D, Dodd K W, Masse L C, Tilert T and Mcdowell M 2008 Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 40 181-8
27. Tudor-Locke C, Ainsworth B E, Thompson R W and Matthews C E 2002 Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of free-living physical activity Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 34 2045-51 www.ijbnpa.org/content/8/1/80
28. Tudor-Locke C et al 2011 How many steps/day are enough? For older adults and special populations Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 8 80
29. Wallén M B, Dohrn I M, Ståhle A, Franzén E and Hagströmer M 2013 Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer derived steps in elderly individuals with Parkinson's disease or osteoporosis under free-living conditions J. Aging Phys. Act. (at press)
30. Wanner M, Martin B W, Meier F, Probst-Hensch N and Kriemler S 2013 Effects of filter choice in GT3X accelerometer assessments of free-living activity Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 45 170-7
31. Warren J M, Ekelund U, Besson H, Mezzani A, Geladas N and Vanhees L 2010 Assessment of physical activity - a review of methodologies with reference to epidemiological research: a report of the exercise physiology section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation Eur. J. Cardiovasc. Prev. Rehabil. 17 127-39
32. Wilmot E G, Edwardson C L, Achana F A, Davies M J, Gorely T, Gray L J, Khunti K, Yates T and Biddle S J 2012 Sedentary time in adults and the association with diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: systematic review and meta-analysis Diabetologia 55 2895-905