Morphology of the cementoenamel junction of primary teeth

Journal of Dentistry for Children

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 252-259

  Francischone, Leda Aparecida ^a   Consolaro, Alberto ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDADE DO SAGRADO CORAÇÃO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cementoenamel junction; Teeth primary

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEMENTUM; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTIN; ENAMEL; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; PRESCHOOL CHILD; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TOOTH CERVIX; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DENTAL CEMENTUM; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTIN; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS;

EID: 56849094750     PISSN: 15518949     EISSN: 19355068     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Choquet M. Notes about the anatomical relationships existent in the human dentition between the enamel and the cementum. L'Odontologie 1899;8:115-25.
2. Neuvald L, Consolaro A. Cementoenamel junction: Microscopy analysis and external cervical resorption. J Endod 2000;26:503-8.
3. Muller CJF, van Wyk CW. The amelocemental junction. J Dent Assoc S Afr 1991;39:799-803.
4. Ceppi E, Dall'Oca S, Rimondini L, Pilloni A, Polimeni A. Cementoenamel junction of deciduous teeth: SEM-morphology. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2006;7:131-4.
5. Akai M, Nakata T, Yamamoto K, Fujiwara J, Tsuji Y, Kitano E. Scanning electron microscopy of cementoenamel junction. J Osaka Univ Dent Sch 1978;18:83-94.
6. Mayhall CW, Rose JC. The relationship of cementum to enamel at the cementoenamel junction. Ala J Med Sci 1984;21:366-73.
7. Leonardi R, Mazzone V, Loreto C, et al. The amelocemental junction ultrastructure in primary teeth: A SEM investigation. Ital J Anat Embryol 1995;100:11-7.
8. Carvalho RB, Rocha MJC, Vieira RS. Structural analysis of cementoenamel junction of primary teeth by scanning electron microscopy analysis. J Bras Clín Estét Odont 2004;4:46-51.
9. nd ed. St. Louis, Mosby ;2000: 224-5.
10. nd ed. Maringá, Paraná, Brazil: Dental Press International; 2005:615.
11. Woofter C. The prevalence and etiology of gingival recession. Periodontal Abstr 1969;17:45-50.
12. Albandar JM, Brunelle JA, Kingman A. Destructive periodontal disease in adults 30 years of age and older in the United States, 1988-1994. J Periodontol 1999;70:13-29.
13. Bosnjak A, Jorgic-Srdjak K, Maricevic T, Plancak D. The width of clinically-defined keratinized gingiva in the mixed dentition. J Dent Child 2002;69:266-70.
14. Bimstein E, Ranly DM, Skjonsby S. Root exposure in the primary dentition studied in human skulls. J Clin Periodontol 1990;17:317-20.
15. Bimstein E, Ranly DM, Skjonsby S, Soskolne WA. The effect of facial growth, attrition, and age on the distance from the cementoenamel junction to the alveolar bone crest in the deciduous dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993;103:521-5.
16. Saario M, Ainamo A, Mattila K, Soumalainen K, Ainamo J. The width of radiologically defined attached gingiva over deciduous teeth. J Clin Periodontol 1995;22:895-8.
17. Goodman LA. Simultaneous confidence intervals for contrasts among multinomial populations. Ann Math Stat 1964;35:716-25.
18. Thorsen G. The gingival region of the tooth, and in particular the anatomical relation between the enamel and the cementum. Dental Cosmos 1917;59:836.
19. Grossman ES, Hargreaves JA. Variable cementoenamel junction in one person. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:93-7.
20. Furseth R. A microradiographic and electron microscopic study of the cementum of human deciduous teeth. Acta Odont Scand 1967;25:613-45.