Erratum to: The use of technology platforms as a policy tool to address research challenges and technology transfer (The Journal of Technology Transfer, (2017), 42, 1, (206-227), 10.1007/s10961-014-9373-8);The use of technology platforms as a policy tool to address research challenges and technology transfer

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 206-227

  Proskuryakova, Liliana ^a   Meissner, Dirk ^a   Rudnik, Pavel ^b  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Russian Federation)

^b Ministry of Economic Development   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; RISK ASSESSMENT; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGIES; MULTI-STAKEHOLDER; POLICY INSTRUMENTS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; RESEARCH CHALLENGES; TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION POLICY; TECHNOLOGY PLATFORMS; THEORETICAL APPROACH;

ENGINEERING RESEARCH;

EID: 84908431085     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-015-9421-z     Document Type: Erratum

References (52)

1. Abashkin, V. L., Boyarov, A. D., & Kutsenko, E. S. (2012). Claster policy in Russia: From theory to practice. Foresight Russia, 6(3), 16–27.
2. Baldwin, C., & Clark, K. (1999). Design rules: The power of modularity (Vol. 1). Cambridge: MIT Press.
3. BDO, Russian Managers Association. (2013). Short horizons. A joint study by BDO and Russian Managers Association: The role and importance of strategy for the Russian business. http://www.bdo.ru/media/publication/korotkie_gorizonty.pdf. Accessed 21 Jan 2014.
4. Biesenbender, S., & Tosun, J. (2014). Domestic politics and the diffusion of international policy innovations: How does accommodation happen? [Special issue]. Global Environmental Change. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.001.
5. Boudreau, K. (2010). Open platform strategies and innovation: Granting access vs. devolving control. Management Science, 56(10), 1849–1872.
6. Camera, R., Yen, D. C., Chou, D. C., & Lee, S. (1997). Information superhighway: Current developments and future analyses. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 97(6), 207–213.
7. Canadian Council for Public–Private Partnerships. (2014). http://www.pppcouncil.ca/resources/about-ppp/definitions.html. Accessed 29 July 2014.
8. Cervantes, M. (1998). Public/Private partnerships in science and technology: An overview. In STI review (Vol. 23). Paris, France. http://www.oecd.org//dsti/sti/prod/intro-23.htm. Accessed 30 Oct 2014.
9. Curwen, P. (1995). Telecommunications policy in the European Union: Developing the information superhighway. Journal of Common Market Studies, 33(3), 331–360.
10. Cusumano, M. (2010a). Staying power: Six enduring ideas for managing strategy and innovation in a changing world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Cusumano, M. (2010b). Technology strategy and management—The evolution of platform thinking. Communications of the ACM, 53, 1.
12. Dezhina, I. (2013). Technology platforms in Russia: A catalyst for cluster development? In Triple Helix Conference 2013. http://www.biginnovationcentre.com/Assets/Docs/Triple%20Helix/Papers/Theme%201/Dezhina.pdf. Accessed 11 Mar 2014.
13. Doroshenko, M., & Skripkin, K. (2013). Developing the national software market: Public policy alternatives. Foresight Russia, 7(1), 44–57.
14. European innovation partnership water. http://www.eip-water.eu/about/partners. Accessed 6 Mar 2014.
15. Eta, E. A. (2014). Policy borrowing and transfer, and policy convergence: Justifications for the adoption of the Bologna Process in the CEMAC region and the Cameroonian higher education system through the LMD reform. Comparative Education (forthcoming).
16. European Commission. (2004). Technology platforms from definition to implementation of a common research agenda. Report compiled by a commission inter-service group on technology platforms. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Commission.
17. European Commission. (2007). Third status report on European technology platforms—At the launch of FP7. Report compiled by a commission inter-service group on technology platforms. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Commission.
18. European Commission. (2010a). Strengthening the role of European technology platforms in addressing Europe’s grand societal challenges. Report of the ETP Expert Group, October 2009, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2010.
19. European Commission. (2010b). Risk management in the procurement of operations. Concepts and Empirical evidence in the European Union. Expert Group Report.
20. FIRST project web-site. (2014). http://www.latin-american-technology-platforms.eu. Accessed 11 Mar 2014.
21. Gawer, A. (Eds.). (2009). Platforms, markets and innovation. Nothampton: Edward Edgar Publishing.
22. Gawer, M. A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2002). Platform leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco drive industry innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
23. Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2008). 2008. How Companies become Platform leaders, MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(2), 29–30.
24. Gershman, M. (2013). Innovation development programmes for the state-owned companies: First results. Foresight Russia, 7(1), 28–43.
25. Goland, M. (2013). Interview with Michael Goland. 14 May 2013 (in Russian). http://innovation.gov.ru/node/14637. Accessed 22 Jan 2014.
26. Goldstein, H. (2005). The role of knowledge infrastructure in regional economic development: The case of the Research Triangle. (Company overview). Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 22, 2005.
27. Gorbatova, A. (2013). Gorbatova A. Selective support. S&T RF, 31.05.2013 (in Russian). http://www.strf.ru/material.aspx?CatalogId=221&d_no=56890#.Ut_L4NLHkUQ. Accessed 22 Jan 2014.
28. Head of Government of the Russian Federation. (2013). Federal program “Research and Development in priority areas of S&T development in Russia for the years 2014–2020” approved by the Head of Government of the Russian Federation No. 736-p from 2 May 2013.
29. Hervás, S. F., & Mulatero, F. (2011). EU research and innovation (R&I) in renewable energies: The role of the strategic energy technology plan (SET-Plan). Energy Policy, 39, 3582–3590.
30. Higher School of Economics. (2014). Russian Technology Platforms portal. http://www.hse.ru/org/hse/tp/catalogue. Last accessed 10 Jan 2014.
31. Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The strategy of economic development. New Heaven: Yale University Press.
32. Justman, M., & Teubal, M. (1995). Technological infrastructure policy (TIP): Creating capabilities and building markets. Research Policy, Elsevier, 24(2), 259–281.
33. Kaminskiy, I., Ogorodova, L., Patrushev, M., & Chulok, A. (2013). Medicine of the future: Opportunities for breakthrough through the prism of technology foresight. Foresight Russia, 7(1), 14–27.
34. Lawther, W. C. (2002): Contracting for the 21st century a partnership model. Arlington, VA. http://www.businessofgovernment.org/sites/default/files/LawtherReport.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2014.
35. Meyer, M. H., & Lehnerd, P. (1997). The power of product platforms. NY: Free Press.
36. Meyer, M. H., & Utterback, J. M. (1993). The product family and the dynamics of core capability. MIT Sloan Management Review, 34(3), 29–47.
37. Mohr, J. J., Sengupta, S., & Slater, S. (2010). Marketing of high technology products and innovations. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice-Hall.
38. O’Dubchair, K., Scott, J. K., & Johnson, T. G. (2001). Building a knowledge infrastructure for learning communities. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 4(4), 1–21.
39. OECD. (2011). OECD reviews of innovation policy: Russian Federation 2011.
40. President of the Russian Federation. (2011). Decree of the President of the Russian Federation on approving the priority development directions for science and technology in the Russian Federation and the list of critical technologies of the Russian Federation #899 dated 7 July 2011.
41. Rochet, C., & Tirole, J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 990–1029.
42. Russian Ministry of Economic Development. (2012). Ministry’s official web-site: http://www.economy.gov.ru/minec/activity/sections/innovations/formation/doc20110405_05. Accessed 10 May 2012.
43. Russian Ministry of Economic Development. (2013). Joint report on measures to advance the technological development governance in the Russian Federation and the outcomes of the innovation programs’ implementation by the state-owned companies and the activity of technology platforms. December 2013.
44. Sanchez-Vegas, S. (1995). David meets Goliath on the information superhighway: Venezuela in the context of the electronic communication networks. Information Technology and Libraries, 14(1), 32–35.
45. Schraer, A. (2011). Schraer A. Technology platforms as an innovation development instrument. Creative Economy, 9(57), 113–118 (in Russian). http://www.creativeconomy.ru/articles/4183. Accessed 22 Jan 2014.
46. SESSA. (2013). The South African solar thermal technology platform (SA-STTP). Sustainable Energy Society Southern Africa News, 6 November. http://www.sessa.org.za/all-news/item/the-south-african-solar-thermal-technology-platform-sa-sttp. Accessed 6 March 2014.
47. Sharif, M. N. (2012). Technological innovation governance for winning the future. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 79, 595–604.
48. Tassey, G. (1991). The functions of technology infrastructure in a competitive economy. Research Policy, 20, 345–361.
49. Ulrich, K. (1995). The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy, 24(3), 419–440.
50. US Congress. (1990). Office of technology assessment, the big picture: HDTV and high-resolution systems, OTA-BP-CI’I’-64. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
51. Working group on PPP in the innovation sphere. (2010). Recommendations on developing a project for establishing a technology platform. Approved by the chair of the working group on PPP in the innovation sphere, Deputy Minister for Economic Development of the Russian Federation A. Klepach (in Russian).
52. Yescombe, E. R. (2007). Public–private partnerships: Principles of policy and finance. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.