Bilateral neurological deficits following unilateral minimally invasive TLIF: A review of four patients

Surgical Neurology International

Volumn 5, Issue 7Supplement, 2014, Pages S317-S323

  Nixon, Alexander ^a   Smith, Zachary ^a   Lawton, Cort ^a   Wong, Albert ^a   Dahdaleh, Nader ^a   Koht, Antoun ^b   Fessler, Richard ^c  

^a Advocate Illinois Masonic   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c RUSH MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Complications; lumbar; minimally invasive; spine; transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Indexed keywords

BLOOD CLOTTING FACTOR 5 LEIDEN;

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MEDICAL HISTORY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PELVIS SURGERY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROTEIN DEFICIENCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPINE FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; VERY ELDERLY; CASE REPORT; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEUROMONITORING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT MONITORING; POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; WEAKNESS; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84908418908     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21527806     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.139619     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Adogwa O, Parker SL, Bydon A, Cheng J, McGirt MJ. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: 2-year assessment of narcotic use, return to work, disability, and quality of life. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011;24:479-84.
2. Bhardwaj A, Long DM, Ducker TB, Toung TJ. Neurologic deficits after cervical laminectomy in the prone position. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2001;13:314-9.
3. Bruggmann D, Tchartchian G, Wallwiener M, Munstedt K, Tinneberg HR, Hackethal A. Intra-abdominal adhesions: Definition, origin, significance in surgical practice, and treatment options. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2010;107:769-75.
4. Dawson DM, Krarup C. Perioperative nerve lesions. Arch Neurol 1989;46:1355-60.
5. Duncan JW, Bailey RA, Baena R. Intraoperative decrease in amplitude of somatosensory-evoked potentials of the lower extremities with interbody fusion cage placement during lumbar fusion surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:E1290-5.
6. Hamilton DK, Smith JS, Sansur CA, Glassman SD, Ames CP, Berven SH, et al. Rates of new neurological deficit associated with spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: A report of the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality committee. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:1218-28.
7. Harms J, Rolinger H. A one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: Dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion (author's transl). Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 1982;120:343-7.
8. Jayson MI. The role of vascular damage and fibrosis in the pathogenesis of nerve root damage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992;279:40-8.
9. Khoo LT, Palmer S, Laich DT, Fessler RG. Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery 2002;51 (5 Suppl):S166-1.
10. Kitab SA, Miele VJ, Lavelle WF, Benzel EC. Pathoanatomic basis for stretch-induced lumbar nerve root injury with a review of the literature. Neurosurgery 2009;65:161-7.
11. Lall RR, Lall RR, Hauptman JS, Munoz C, Cybulski GR, Koski T, et al. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: Indications, efficacy, and role of the preoperative checklist. Neurosurg Focus 2012;33:E10.
12. Lau D, Lee JG, Han SJ, Lu DC, Chou D. Complications and perioperative factors associated with learning the technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). J Clin Neurosci 2011;18:624-7.
13. Lawton CD, Smith ZA, Barnawi A, Fessler RG. The surgical technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Sci 2011;55:259-64.
14. Lee KH, Yue WM, Yeo W, Soeharno H, Tan SB. Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 2012;21:2265-70.
15. Lo D, Vallee JN, Spelle L, Cormier E, Saillant G, Rancurel G, et al. Unusual origin of the artery of Adamkiewicz from the fourth lumbar artery. Neuroradiology 2002;44:153-7.
16. Martirosyan NL, Feuerstein JS, Theodore N, Cavalcanti DD, Spetzler RF, Preul MC. Blood supply and vascular reactivity of the spinal cord under normal and pathological conditions. J Neurosurg Spine 2011;15:238-51.
17. Postoperative Visual Loss Study Group. Risk factors associated with ischemic optic neuropathy after spinal fusion surgery. Anesthesiology 2012;116:15-24.
18. Peng CW, Yue WM, Poh SY, Yeo W, Tan SB. Clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 2009;34:1385-9.
19. Petraco DM, Spivak JM, Cappadona JG, Kummer FJ, Neuwirth MG. An anatomic evaluation of L5 nerve stretch in spondylolisthesis reduction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:1133-8.
20. Rosen DS, Ferguson SD, Ogden AT, Huo D, Fessler RG. Obesity and self-reported outcome after minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Neurosurgery 2008;63:956-60.
21. Smith ZA, Fessler RG. Paradigm changes in spine surgery: Evolution of minimally invasive techniques. Nat Rev Neurol 2012;8:443-50.
22. Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Bulsara KR, Thramann JJ. Perioperative complications in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior reconstruction for lumbar disc degeneration and instability. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006;19:92-7.
23. Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Roeca CM, Nelson EL, Mason A. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Surg Neurol Int 2010;1:12.
24. Weibel MA, Majno G. Peritoneal adhesions and their relation to abdominal surgery. A postmortem study. Am J Surg 1973;126:345-53.
25. Wu WJ, Liang Y, Zhang XK, Cao P, Zheng T. Complications and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of one- or two-level degenerative disc diseases of the lumbar spine in patients older than 65 years. Chin Med J (Engl) 2012;125:2505-10.