Relative Performance of Commonly Used Physical Function Questionnaires in Rheumatoid Arthritis and a Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computerized Adaptive Test

Arthritis and Rheumatology

Volumn 66, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 2900-2908

  Oude Voshaar, Martijn A H ^a   Ten Klooster, Peter M ^a   Glas, Cees A W ^a   Vonkeman, Harald E ^a   Krishnan, Eswar ^b   Van De Laar, Mart A F J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTING; EFFECT SIZE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEALTH ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE DISABILITY INDEX; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEASUREMENT PRECISION; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SHORT FORM 36; DISABILITY; DISABLED PERSON; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISABLED PERSONS; HUMANS; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84908374492     PISSN: 23265191     EISSN: 23265205     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/art.38759     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Wolfe F, Lassere M, van der Heijde D, Stucki G, Suarez-Almazor M, Pincus T, et al. Preliminary core set of domains and reporting requirements for longitudinal observational studies in rheumatology. J Rheumatol 1999; 26: 484-9.
2. Van der Heijde D,. Impact of rheumatoid arthritis on physical function during the first five years. No longer a question mark? Rheumatology (Oxford) 2000; 39: 579-80.
3. Kalyoncu U, Dougados M, Daures JP, Gossec L,. Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in recent trials in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68: 183-90.
4. Fries JF, Spitz P, Kraines RG, Holman HR,. Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1980; 23: 137-45.
5. Oude Voshaar MA, ten Klooster PM, Taal E, van de Laar MA,. Measurement properties of physical function scales validated for use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of the literature. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2011; 9: 99.
6. Stucki G, Stucki S, Bruhlmann P, Michel BA,. Ceiling effects of the Health Assessment Questionnaire and its modified version in some ambulatory rheumatoid arthritis patients. Ann Rheum Dis 1995; 54: 461-5.
7. Ni P, McDonough CM, Jette AM, Bogusz K, Marfeo EE, Rasch EK, et al. Development of a computer-adaptive physical function instrument for Social Security Administration disability determination. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94: 1661-9.
8. Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, Rothrock N, Reeve B, Yount S, et al, PROMIS Cooperative Group. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 1179-94.
9. Haley SM, Ni P, Hambleton RK, Slavin MD, Jette AM,. Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 1174-82.
10. Hambleton RK, Swaminathan H, Rogers HJ,. Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications; 1991.
11. Van der Linden WJ, Glas CA,. Computerized adaptive testing: theory and practice. Dordrecht (The Netherlands): Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000.
12. Oude Voshaar MA, ten Klooster PM, Glas CA, Vonkeman HE, Taal E, Krishnan E, et al. Calibration of the PROMIS physical function item bank in Dutch patients with rheumatoid arthritis. PLoS One 2014; 9: e92367.
13. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD,. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-83.
14. Terwee CB, Roorda LD, de Vet HC, Dekker J, Westhovens R, van Leeuwen J, et al. Dutch-Flemish translation of 17 item banks from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Qual Life Res 2014; 23: 1733-41.
15. Muraki E,. A generalized partial credit model: application of an EM algorithm. Appl Psychol Meas 1992; 16: 159-76.
16. Choi SW, Reise SP, Pilkonis PA, Hays RD, Cella D,. Efficiency of static and computer adaptive short forms compared to full-length measures of depressive symptoms. Qual Life Res 2010; 19: 125-36.
17. Van der Linden W,. Bayesian item selection criteria for adaptive testing. Psychometrika 1998; 63: 201-16.
18. Han KT,. WinGen: Windows software that generates item response theory parameters and item responses. Appl Psychol Meas 2007; 31: 457-9.
19. Choi SW,. Firestar: computerized adaptive testing simulation program for polytomous item response theory models. Appl Psychol Meas 2009; 33: 644-5.
20. Barra L, Ha A, Sun L, Fonseca C, Pope J,. Efficacy of biologic agents in improving the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score in established and early rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis with indirect comparisons. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2014; 32: 333-41.
21. Glas CA,. Preliminary manual of the software program Multidimensional Item Response Theory (MIRT). 2010. URL: http://www.utwente.nl/gw/omd/Medewerkers/temp-test/mirt-manual.pdf.
22. Martin M, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, Ware JE Jr, MacLean R, Li T,. Item response theory methods can improve the measurement of physical function by combining the modified health assessment questionnaire and the SF-36 physical function scale. Qual Life Res 2007; 16: 647-60.
23. Bruce B, Fries JF,. The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire: a review of its history, issues, progress, and documentation. J Rheumatol 2003; 30: 167-78.
24. Rose M, Bjorner JB, Becker J, Fries JF, Ware JE,. Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). J Clin Epidemiol 2008; 61: 17-33.
25. Welsing PM, Fransen J, van Riel PL,. Is the disease course of rheumatoid arthritis becoming milder? Time trends since 1985 in an inception cohort of early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 52: 2616-24.
26. Van Herwaarden N, Den Broeder A, Jacobs W, Bijlsma JW, Van Vollenhoven RF, Van den Bemt BJ,. Down titration and discontinuation strategies of tumor necrosis factor blocking agents for rheumatoid arthritis in patients with low disease activity (protocol). The Cochrane Library, 2013. URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD010455/pdf.
27. O'Mahony R, Richards A, Deighton C, Scott D,. Withdrawal of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69: 1823-6.
28. Fries JF, Krishnan E, Rose M, Lingala B, Bruce B,. Improved responsiveness and reduced sample size requirements of PROMIS physical function scales with item response theory. Arthritis Res Ther 2011; 13: R147.
29. Glas CA, Geerlings H, van de Laar MA, Taal E,. Analysis of longitudinal randomized clinical trials using item response models. Contemp Clin Trials 2009; 30: 158-70.
30. Revicki DA, Sloan J,. Practical and philosophical issues surrounding a national item bank: if we build it will they come?. Qual Life Res 2007; 16 Suppl 1: 167-74.
31. Rothrock NE, Hays RD, Spritzer K, Yount SE, Riley W, Cella D,. Relative to the general US population, chronic diseases are associated with poorer health-related quality of life as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 1195-204.
32. Veldkamp BP, van der Linden WJ,. Multidimensional adaptive testing with constraints on test content. Psychometrika 2002; 67: 575-88.
33. Makransky G, Mortensen EL, Glas CA,. Improving personality facet scores with multidimensional computer adaptive testing: an illustration with the NEO PI-R. Assessment 2013; 20: 3-13.