Hysterectomy-corrected incidence rates of cervical and uterine cancers in Massachusetts, 1995 to 2010

Annals of Epidemiology

Volumn 24, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 849-854

  Stang, Andreas ^a,b   Hawk, Helen ^c   Knowlton, Richard ^c   Gershman, Susan T ^c   Kuss, Oliver ^d,e  

^a MARTIN LUTHER UNIVERSITÄT HALLE WITTENBERG   (Germany)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d Department of Orthopedic Surgery   (Germany)

^e HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Epidemiology; Hysterectomy; Incidence; Massachusetts; Prevalence; United States; Uterine cervical neoplasms; Uterine neoplasms

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLACK PERSON; CANCER INCIDENCE; CAUCASIAN; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; HISPANIC; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; UNITED STATES; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERUS CANCER; AFRICAN AMERICAN; AGED; CANCER REGISTRY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ETHNIC GROUP; ETHNOLOGY; INCIDENCE; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICANS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ETHNIC GROUPS; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HISPANIC AMERICANS; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; INCIDENCE; MASSACHUSETTS; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; SEER PROGRAM; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; UTERINE NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84908290658     PISSN: 10472797     EISSN: 18732585     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.07.018     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Lyon J.L., Gardner J.W. The rising frequency of hysterectomy: its effect on uterine cancer rates. Am J Epidemiol 1977, 105(5):439-443.
2. Lefebvre G., Allaire C., Jeffrey J., Vilos G., Arneja J., Birch C., et al. SOGC clinical guidelines. Hysterectomy. JObstet Gynaecol Can 2002, 24(1):37-61.
3. Stang A., Merrill R.M., Kuss O. Nationwide rates of conversion from laparoscopic or vaginal hysterectomy to open abdominal hysterectomy in Germany. Eur J Epidemiol 2011, 26:125-133.
4. Stang A., Merrill R.M., Kuss O. Hysterectomy in Germany: a DRG-based nationwide analysis, 2005-2006. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2011, 108(30):508-514.
5. Merrill R.M. Hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 1997 through 2005. Med Sci Monit 2008, 14(1):CR24-CR31.
6. Lundholm C., Forsgren C., Johansson A.L., Cnattingius S., Altman D. Hysterectomy on benign indications in Sweden 1987-2003: a nationwide trend analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009, 88(1):52-58.
7. Sherman M.E., Carreon J.D., Lacey J.V., Devesa S.S. Impact of hysterectomy on endometrial carcinoma rates in the United States. JNatl Cancer Inst 2005, 97(22):1700-1702.
8. Merrill R.M. Impact of hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy on race-specific rates of corpus, cervical, and ovarian cancers in the United States. Ann Epidemiol 2006, 16(12):880-887.
9. Simard E.P., Naishadham D., Saslow D., Jemal A. Age-specific trends in black-white disparities in cervical cancer incidence in the United States: 1975-2009. Gynecol Oncol 2012, 127(3):611-615.
10. Siegel R.L., Devesa S.S., Cokkinides V., Ma J., Jemal A. State-level uterine corpus cancer incidence rates corrected for hysterectomy prevalence, 2004 to 2008. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2013, 22(1):25-31.
11. Merrill R.M., Lyon J.L., Wiggins C. Comparison of two methods based on cross-sectional data for correcting corpus uterine cancer incidence and probabilities. BMC Cancer 2001, 1:13.
12. Stang A. Impact of hysterectomy on the age-specific incidence of cervical and uterine cancer in Germany and other countries. Eur J Public Health 2013, 23(5):879-883.
13. Stang A., Merrill R.M., Kuss O. Prevalence-corrected hysterectomy rates by age and indication in Germany 2005-2006. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2012, 286(5):1193-1200.
14. SAS 9.2 2008, SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA.
15. Boyle P., Parkin D.M. Statistical methods for registries. Cancer registration: principles and methods 1991, 136-139. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon. O.M. Jensen, D.M. Parkin, R. MacLennan (Eds.).
16. Wong C.A., Jim M.A., King J., Tom-Orme L., Henderson J.A., Saraiya M., et al. Impact of hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy prevalence on rates of cervical, uterine, and ovarian cancer among American Indian and Alaska Native women, 1999-2004. Cancer Causes Control 2011, 22(12):1681-1689.
17. Howe H.L. Age-specific hysterectomy and oophorectomy prevalence rates and the risks for cancer of the reproductive system. Am J Public Health 1984, 74(6):560-563.
18. Akers A.Y., Newmann S.J., Smith J.S. Factors underlying disparities in cervical cancer incidence, screening, and treatment in the United States. Curr Probl Cancer 2007, 31(3):157-181.
19. Pierce Campbell C.M., Menezes L.J., Paskett E.D., Giuliano A.R. Prevention of invasive cervical cancer in the United States: past, present, and future. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012, 21(9):1402-1408.
20. Benard V.B., Lawson H.W., Eheman C.R., Anderson C., Helsel W. Adherence to guidelines for follow-up of low-grade cytologic abnormalities among medically underserved women. Obstet Gynecol 2005, 105(6):1323-1328.
21. Jacobson G.F., Shaber R.E., Armstrong M.A., Hung Y.Y. Hysterectomy rates for benign indications. Obstet Gynecol 2006, 107(6):1278-1283.
22. Schneider K.L., Clark M.A., Rakowski W., Lapane K.L. Evaluating the impact of non-response bias in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). JEpidemiol Community Health 2012, 66(4):290-295.
23. Stein A.D., Lederman R.I., Shea S. Reproducibility of the women's module of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System questionnaire. Ann Epidemiol 1996, 6(1):47-52.