Improved consistency in interpretation and management of cardiovascular variables by intensive care staff using a computerised decision-support system

Critical Care and Resuscitation

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 48-53

  Rangappa, Ranganatha ^a   Sondergaard, Soren ^b   Aneman, Anders ^a  

^a LIVERPOOL HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; FEMALE; HEART SURGERY; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; STAFF; VASCULAR RESISTANCE; AGED; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DECISION MAKING; FOLLOW UP; MANPOWER; MEDICAL STAFF; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; STANDARD;

AGED; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE; MALE; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84908256810     PISSN: 14412772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Rajaram SS, Desai NK, Kalra A, et al. Pulmonary artery catheters for adult patients in intensive care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (2): CD003408. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD003408.pub3/full (accessed Sep 2013).
2. Marik PE. Techniques for assessment of intravascular volume in critically ill patients. J Intensive Care Med 2009; 24: 329-37.
3. Kalantari K, Chang JN, Ronco C, Rosner MH. Assessment of intravascular volume status and volume responsiveness in critically ill patients. Kidney Int 2013; 83: 1017-28.
4. Parkin WG. Volume state control – a new approach. Crit Care Resusc 1999; 1: 311-21.
5. Parkin WG, Leaning MS. Therapeutic control of the circulation. J Clin Monit Comput 2008; 22: 391-400.
6. Pellegrino VA, Mudaliar Y, Gopalakrishnan M, et al. Computer based haemodynamic guidance system is effective and safe in management of postoperative cardiac surgery patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 2011; 39: 191-201.
7. Sondergaard S, Wall P, Cocks K, et al. High concordance between expert anaesthetists’ actions and advice of decision support system in achieving oxygen delivery targets in high-risk surgery patients. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 966-72.
8. Parkin G, Wright C, Bellomo R, Boyce N. Use of a mean systemic filling pressure analogue during the closed-loop control of fluid replacement in continuous hemodiafiltration. J Crit Care 1994; 9: 124-33.
9. Maas JJ, Pinsky MR, Geerts BF, et al. Estimation of mean systemic filling pressure in postoperative cardiac surgery patients with three methods. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38: 1452-60.
10. Guyton AC. Cardiac output, venous return, and their regulation. In: Guyton AC, Hall JE, editors. Textbook of medical physiology. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2006: 232-43.
11. Dass B, Shimada M, Kambhampati G, et al. Fluid balance as an early indicator of acute kidney injury in CV surgery. Clin Nephrol 2012; 77: 438-44.
12. Searl CP, Perrino A. Fluid management in thoracic surgery. Anesthesiol Clin 2012; 30: 641-55.
13. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R. Does the central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? An updated meta-analysis and a plea for some common sense. Crit Care Med 2013; 41: 1774-81.