Verification of the usability of a navigation method in dental implant surgery: In vitro comparison with the stereolithographic surgical guide template method

Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 42, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1530-1535

  Kang, Sang Hoon ^a,b   Lee, Jae Won ^a   Lim, Se Ho ^a   Kim, Yeon Ho ^a   Kim, Moon Key ^a,b  

^a National Health Insurance Corporation   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University College of Dentistry   (South Korea)

Author keywords

CAD CAM; Computer assisted surgery; Dental implant; Image guided surgery; Surgical guide template

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EDENTULOUSNESS; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; SIMULATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM; TOOTH IMPLANT; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CANINE TOOTH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEVICES; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MANDIBLE; MOLAR TOOTH; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; STANDARDS; STEREOTACTIC PROCEDURE; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING; TOOTH ARCH; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

TOOTH IMPLANT;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; CUSPID; DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; HUMANS; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MANDIBLE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; MOLAR; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRINTING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84908250573     PISSN: 10105182     EISSN: 18784119     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.04.025     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. C. Bettschart, A. Kruse, F. Matthews, W. Zemann, J.A. Obwegeser, and K.W. Gratz Point to-point registration with mandibulo-maxillary splint in open and closed jaw position. Evaluation of registration accuracy for computer-aided surgery of the mandible J Craniomaxillofac Surg 40 2012 592 598
2. N. Casap, S. Nadel, E. Tarazi, and E.I. Weiss Evaluation of a navigation system for dental implantation as a tool to train novice dental practitioners J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69 2011 2548 2556
3. J. Collyer Stereotactic navigation in oral and maxillofacial surgery Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48 2010 79 83
4. G. Eggers, E. Patellis, and J. Muhling Accuracy of template-based dental implant placement Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24 2009 447 454
5. A. Gaggl, G. Schultes, and H. Karcher Navigational precision of drilling tools preventing damage to the mandibular canal J Craniomaxillofac Surg 29 2001 271 275
6. S.H. Kang, M.K. Kim, J.H. Kim, H.K. Park, S.H. Lee, and W. Park The validity of marker registration for an optimal integration method in mandibular navigation surgery J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71 2013 366 375
7. M. Naitoh, E. Ariji, S. Okumura, C. Ohsaki, K. Kurita, and T. Ishigami Can implants be correctly angulated based on surgical templates used for osseointegrated dental implants? Clin Oral Implants Res 11 2000 409 414
8. H.J. Nickenig, and S. Eitner Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates J Craniomaxillofac Surg 35 2007 207 211
9. H.J. Nickenig, M. Wichmann, J. Hamel, K.A. Schlegel, and S. Eitner Evaluation of the difference in accuracy between implant placement by virtual planning data and surgical guide templates versus the conventional free-hand method - a combined in vivo - in vitro technique using cone-beam CT (Part II) J Craniomaxillofac Surg 38 2010 488 493
10. S. Nokar, E. Moslehifard, T. Bahman, M. Bayanzadeh, F. Nasirpouri, and A. Nokar Accuracy of implant placement using a CAD/CAM surgical guide: an in vitro study Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 26 2011 520 526
11. A. Pettersson, T. Kero, L. Gillot, B. Cannas, J. Faldt, and R. Soderberg Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I J Prosthet Dent 103 2010 334 342
12. R. Rossi, R.S. Morales, M. Frascaria, R. Benzi, and N. Squadrito Planning implants in the esthetic zone using a new implant 3D navigation system Eur J Esthet Dent 5 2010 172 188
13. M. Rubio Serrano, S. Albalat Estela, and M. Penarrocha Diago Software applied to oral implantology: update Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 13 2008 E661 E665
14. J. Ruppin, A. Popovic, M. Strauss, E. Spuntrup, A. Steiner, and C. Stoll Evaluation of the accuracy of three different computer-aided surgery systems in dental implantology: optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems Clin Oral Implants Res 19 2008 709 716
15. D. Schneider, P. Marquardt, M. Zwahlen, and R.E. Jung A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template-based implant dentistry Clin Oral Implants Res 20 4 2009 73 86
16. R. Seeberger, G. Kane, J. Hoffmann, and G. Eggers Accuracy assessment for navigated maxillo-facial surgery using an electromagnetic tracking device J Craniomaxillofac Surg 40 2012 156 161
17. M. Siessegger, B.T. Schneider, R.A. Mischkowski, F. Lazar, B. Krug, and B. Klesper Use of an image-guided navigation system in dental implant surgery in anatomically complex operation sites J Craniomaxillofac Surg 29 2001 276 281
18. Y. Sun, H.T. Luebbers, J.O. Agbaje, S. Schepers, L. Vrielinck, and I. Lambrichts Validation of anatomical landmarks-based registration for image-guided surgery: an in-vitro study J Craniomaxillofac Surg 41 2013 522 526
19. G. Widmann, R. Stoffner, and R. Bale Errors and error management in image-guided craniomaxillofacial surgery Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107 2009 701 715