A Growth Factor-Induced, Spatially Organizing Cytoskeletal Module Enables Rapid and Persistent Fibroblast Migration

Developmental Cell

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 701-716

  Martin, Katrin ^a   Vilela, Marco ^b,d   Jeon, NooLi ^c   Danuser, Gaudenz ^b,d   Pertz, Olivier ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIN; F ACTIN; FIBRONECTIN; MYOSIN; PLATELET DERIVED GROWTH FACTOR;

ARTICLE; CELL MIGRATION; CYTOSKELETON; FIBROBLAST; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; POLARIZATION; STEADY STATE; TIME LAPSE IMAGING; ANIMAL; CELL LINE; CELL MOTION; DRUG EFFECTS; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; RAT;

ANIMALS; CELL LINE; CELL MOVEMENT; CYTOSKELETON; FIBROBLASTS; FIBRONECTINS; MYOSINS; PLATELET-DERIVED GROWTH FACTOR; RATS;

EID: 84908215930     PISSN: 15345807     EISSN: 18781551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.07.022     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Albiges-Rizo C., Destaing O., Fourcade B., Planus E., Block M.R. Actin machinery and mechanosensitivity in invadopodia, podosomes and focal adhesions. J.Cell Sci. 2009, 122:3037-3049.
2. Box G.E.P., Jenkins G.M., Reinsel G.C. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control 1994, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. Third Edition.
3. Burridge K., Wennerberg K. Rho and Rac take center stage. Cell 2004, 116:167-179.
4. Calle Y., Burns S., Thrasher A.J., Jones G.E. The leukocyte podosome. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2006, 85:151-157.
5. Collin O., Tracqui P., Stephanou A., Usson Y., Clément-Lacroix J., Planus E. Spatiotemporal dynamics of actin-rich adhesion microdomains: influence of substrate flexibility. J.Cell Sci. 2006, 119:1914-1925.
6. Doyle A.D., Wang F.W., Matsumoto K., Yamada K.M. One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration. J.Cell Biol. 2009, 184:481-490.
7. Friedl P., Wolf K. Plasticity of cell migration: a multiscale tuning model. J.Cell Biol. 2010, 188:11-19.
8. Fritz R.D., Letzelter M., Reimann A., Martin K., Fusco L., Ritsma L., Ponsioen B., Fluri E., Schulte-Merker S., van Rheenen J., Pertz O. A versatile toolkit to produce sensitive FRET biosensors to visualize signaling in time and space. Sci. Signal. 2013, 6:rs12.
9. Guilluy C., Swaminathan V., Garcia-Mata R., O'Brien E.T., Superfine R., Burridge K. The Rho GEFs LARG and GEF-H1 regulate the mechanical response to force on integrins. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:722-727.
10. Hotulainen P., Lappalainen P. Stress fibers are generated by two distinct actin assembly mechanisms in motile cells. J.Cell Biol. 2006, 173:383-394.
11. Kim D.H., Provenzano P.P., Smith C.L., Levchenko A. Matrix nanotopography as a regulator of cell function. J.Cell Biol. 2012, 197:351-360.
12. Machacek M., Danuser G. Morphodynamic profiling of protrusion phenotypes. Biophys. J. 2006, 90:1439-1452.
13. Machacek M., Hodgson L., Welch C., Elliott H., Pertz O., Nalbant P., Abell A., Johnson G.L., Hahn K.M., Danuser G. Coordination of Rho GTPase activities during cell protrusion. Nature 2009, 461:99-103.
14. Murphy D.A., Courtneidge S.A. The 'ins' and 'outs' of podosomes and invadopodia: characteristics, formation and function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 12:413-426.
15. Nock R., Nielsen F. On weighting clustering. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2006, 28:1223-1235.
16. Nolen B.J., Tomasevic N., Russell A., Pierce D.W., Jia Z., McCormick C.D., Hartman J., Sakowicz R., Pollard T.D. Characterization of two classes of small molecule inhibitors of Arp2/3 complex. Nature 2009, 460:1031-1034.
17. Oikawa T., Itoh T., Takenawa T. Sequential signals toward podosome formation in NIH-src cells. J.Cell Biol. 2008, 182:157-169.
18. Palazzo A.F., Cook T.A., Alberts A.S., Gundersen G.G. mDia mediates Rho-regulated formation and orientation of stable microtubules. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001, 3:723-729.
19. Parsons J.T., Horwitz A.R., Schwartz M.A. Cell adhesion: integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:633-643.
20. Pertz O., Hodgson L., Klemke R.L., Hahn K.M. Spatiotemporal dynamics of RhoA activity in migrating cells. Nature 2006, 440:1069-1072.
21. Pestonjamasp K.N., Forster C., Sun C., Gardiner E.M., Bohl B., Weiner O., Bokoch G.M., Glogauer M. Rac1 links leading edge and uropod events through Rho and myosin activation during chemotaxis. Blood 2006, 108:2814-2820.
22. Petrie R.J., Doyle A.D., Yamada K.M. Random versus directionally persistent cell migration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10:538-549.
23. Pollard T.D., Borisy G.G. Cellular motility driven by assembly and disassembly of actin filaments. Cell 2003, 112:453-465.
24. Ponti A., Machacek M., Gupton S.L., Waterman-Storer C.M., Danuser G. Two distinct actin networks drive the protrusion of migrating cells. Science 2004, 305:1782-1786.
25. Riedl J., Crevenna A.H., Kessenbrock K., Yu J.H., Neukirchen D., Bista M., Bradke F., Jenne D., Holak T.A., Werb Z., et al. Lifeact: a versatile marker to visualize F-actin. Nat. Methods 2008, 5:605-607.
26. Roussos E.T., Condeelis J.S., Patsialou A. Chemotaxis in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2011, 11:573-587.
27. Straight A.F., Cheung A., Limouze J., Chen I., Westwood N.J., Sellers J.R., Mitchison T.J. Dissecting temporal and spatial control of cytokinesis with a myosin II Inhibitor. Science 2003, 299:1743-1747.
28. Svitkina T.M., Verkhovsky A.B., McQuade K.M., Borisy G.G. Analysis of the actin-myosin II system in fish epidermal keratocytes: mechanism of cell body translocation. J.Cell Biol. 1997, 139:397-415.
29. Theveneau E., Mayor R. Neural crest delamination and migration: from epithelium-to-mesenchyme transition to collective cell migration. Dev. Biol. 2012, 366:34-54.
30. Weiner O.D., Marganski W.A., Wu L.F., Altschuler S.J., Kirschner M.W. An actin-based wave generator organizes cell motility. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e221.
31. Wu Z., Huang N.E., Long S.R., Peng C.K. On the trend, detrending, and variability of nonlinear and nonstationary time series. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104:14889-14894.
32. Wu C., Asokan S.B., Berginski M.E., Haynes E.M., Sharpless N.E., Griffith J.D., Gomez S.M., Bear J.E. Arp2/3 is critical for lamellipodia and response to extracellular matrix cues but is dispensable for chemotaxis. Cell 2012, 148:973-987.
33. Zamir E., Katz B.Z., Aota S., Yamada K.M., Geiger B., Kam Z. Molecular diversity of cell-matrix adhesions. J.Cell Sci. 1999, 112:1655-1669.