MRXCAT: Realistic numerical phantoms for cardiovascular magnetic resonance

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Wissmann, Lukas ^a   Santelli, Claudio ^a,c   Segars, William P ^b   Kozerke, Sebastian ^a,c  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Image reconstruction; Numerical phantom; XCAT

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AGENT;

ARTICLE; BREATHING; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; FREE BREATHING; HEART CONTRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEART MUSCLE; HEART MUSCLE BLOOD FLOW; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HEART RIGHT VENTRICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING PHANTOM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE EXTENDED CARDIAC TORSO PHANTOM; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREATH HOLDING; CARDIAC GATED IMAGING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; DEVICES; EVALUATION STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEART RATE; IMAGE QUALITY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY;

BREATH HOLDING; CARDIAC-GATED IMAGING TECHNIQUES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORONARY CIRCULATION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 84908213979     PISSN: 10976647     EISSN: 1532429X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12968-014-0063-3     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Block KT, Frahm J. Spiral imaging: a critical appraisal. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005; 21:657-68.
2. Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM. Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2007; 58:1182-95.
3. Tsao J, Kozerke S. MRI temporal acceleration techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 36:543-60.
4. Deshmane A, Gulani V, Griswold MA, Seiberlich N. Parallel MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 36:55-72.
5. Shepp LA, Logan BF. The Fourier reconstruction of a head section. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1974; 21:21-43.
6. Smith MR, Chen L, Hui Y, Mathews T, Yang J, Zeng X. Alternatives to the use of the DFT in MRI and spectroscopic reconstructions. Int J Imaging Syst Technol. 1997; 8:558-64.
7. Van de Walle R, Barrett HH, Myers KJ, Altbach MI, Desplanques B, Gmitro AF, Cornelis J, Lemahieu I. Reconstruction of MR images from data acquired on a general nonregular grid by pseudoinverse calculation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2000; 19:1160-7.
8. Koay CG, Sarlls JE, Ozarslan E. Three-dimensional analytical magnetic resonance imaging phantom in the Fourier domain. Magn Reson Med. 2007; 58:430-6.
9. Gach HM, Tanase C, Boada F. 2D & 3D Shepp-Logan Phantom Standards for MRI. In: 19th International Conference on Systems Engineering. 2008: p. 521-6.
10. Guerquin-Kern M, Lejeune L, Pruessmann KP, Unser M. Realistic analytical phantoms for parallel magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012; 31:626-36.
11. Caon M. Voxel-based computational models of real human anatomy: a review. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2004; 42:229-35.
12. Segars WP, Tsui BMW. MCAT to XCAT: The evolution of 4-D computerized phantoms for imaging research. Proceed IEEE. 2009; 97:1954-68.
13. Segars WP, Sturgeon G, Mendonca S, Grimes J, Tsui BMW. 4D XCAT phantom for multimodality imaging research. Med Phys. 2010; 37:4902-15.
14. Segars WP, Mahesh M, Beck TJ, Frey EC, Tsui BMW. Realistic CT simulation using the 4D XCAT phantom. Med Phys. 2008; 35:3800-8.
15. The Visible Human Project. [http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/visible/visible-human.html]
16. Ngo TM, Fung GS, Tsui BM, McVeigh E, Herzka DA. Three dimensional digital polyhedral phantom framework with analytical fourier transform and application in cardiac imaging. In: Proc ISMRM. 2011: p. 1310.
17. Aja-Fernandez S, Cordero-Grande L, Albewla-Lopez C. A MRI phantom for cardiac perfusion simulation. In: 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI). 2012: p. 638-41.
18. Veress AI, Segars WP, Weiss JA, Tsui BMW, Gullberg GT. Normal and pathological NCAT image and phantom data based on physiologically realistic left ventricle finite-element models. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006; 25:1604-16.
19. Sharif B, Bresler Y. Physiologically Improved NCAT Phantom (PINCAT) Enables In-Silico Study of the Effects of Beat-To-Beat Variability on Cardiac MR. In: Proc ISMRM. 2007: p. 3418.
20. Sharif B, Derbyshire JA, Faranesh AZ, Bresler Y. Patient-adaptive reconstruction and acquisition in dynamic imaging with sensitivity encoding (PARADISE). Magn Reson Med. 2010; 64:501-13.
21. Tobon-Gomez C, Sukno FM, Butakoff C, Huguet M, Frangi AF. Simulation of late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance studies. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). 2010: p. 1469-72.
22. Tobon-Gomez C, Sukno FM, Bijnens BH, Huguet M, Frangi AF. Realistic simulation of cardiac magnetic resonance studies modeling anatomical variability, trabeculae, and papillary muscles. Magn Reson Med. 2011; 65:280-8.
23. Veress AI, Segars WP, Tsui BMW, Gullberg GT. Incorporation of a left ventricle finite element model defining infarction into the XCAT imaging phantom. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011; 30:915-27.
24. Wissmann L, Schmidt JFM, Kozerke S. A Realistic 4D numerical phantom for quantitative first-pass myocardial perfusion MRI. Proc ISMRM. 2013; 21:1322.
25. Tang J, Hall N, Rahmim A. MRI assisted motion correction in dual-gated 5D myocardial perfusion PET imaging. In: Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).; 2012: p. 4054-7.
26. MRXCAT - Numerical Phantoms for Cardiac MRI. [http://www.biomed.ee.ethz.ch/mrxcat]
27. Oppelt A, Graumann R, Barfuss H, Fischer H, Hartl W, Schajor W. FISP - A new fast MRI sequence. Electromedica. 1986; 54:15-8.
28. Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ. Basic pulse sequences. In: Handbook of MRI Pulse Sequences. 2004: p. 594.
29. Brix G, Schad LR, Deimling M, Lorenz WJ. Fast and precise T1 imaging using a TOMROP sequence. Magn Reson Imaging. 1990; 8:351-6.
30. Jerosch-Herold M, Wilke N, Stillman AE. Magnetic resonance quantification of the myocardial perfusion reserve with a Fermi function model for constrained deconvolution. Med Phys. 1998; 25:73-84.
31. Goldstein TA, Jerosch-Herold M, Misselwitz B, Zhang H, Gropler RJ, Zheng J. Fast mapping of myocardial blood flow with MR first-pass perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2008; 59:1394-400.
32. Neyran B, Janier MF, Casali C, Revel D, Canet Soulas EP. Mapping myocardial perfusion with an intravascular MR contrast agent: robustness of deconvolution methods at various blood flows. Magn Reson Med. 2002; 48:166-79.
33. Fessler JA, Sutton BP. Nonuniform fast fourier transforms using min-max interpolation. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 2003; 51:560-74.
34. Fessler JA. Image reconstruction toolbox. [http://web.eecs.umich.edu/~fessler/code/index.html]
35. Lustig M. SparseMRI V0.2. [http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~mlustig/Software.html]
36. ISMRM Raw Data Format (ISMRMRD). [http://ismrmrd.sourceforge.net/]
37. Vitanis V, Manka R, Giese D, Pedersen H, Plein S, Boesiger P, Kozerke S. High resolution three-dimensional cardiac perfusion imaging using compartment-based k-t principal component analysis. Magn Reson Med. 2011; 65:575-87.
38. Bernstein MA, King KF, Zhou XJ. Table of constants and conversion factors. In: Handbook of MRI Pulse Sequences. 2004: p. 961.
39. Pedersen H, Kozerke S, Ringgaard S, Nehrke K, Kim WY. k-t PCA: temporally constrained k-t BLAST reconstruction using principal component analysis. Magn Reson Med. 2009; 62:706-16.
40. Lustig M, Santos JM, Donoho DL, Pauly JM. k-t SPARSE: high frame rate dynamic MRI exploiting spatio-temporal sparsity. In: Proc ISMRM. 2006: p. 2420.
41. Gatehouse PD, Elkington AG, Ablitt NA, Yang G-Z, Pennell DJ, Firmin DN. Accurate assessment of the arterial input function during high-dose myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004; 20:39-45.
42. Bond J, Frush D, Samei E, Segars WP. Simulation of anatomical texture in voxelized XCAT phantoms. In: Proc SPIE 8668, Medical Imaging. 2013. 86680N.