Access and benefit sharing of Antarctica's Biological Material

Marine Genomics

Volumn 17, Issue , 2014, Pages 73-78

  Puig Marcó, Roser ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Antarctic Treaty; Bioprospecting; Exchange of information; Marine genetic resources; Patents

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL PRODUCT;

ANTARCTICA; BIODIVERSITY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GOVERNMENT; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; MARINE BIOLOGY; PATENT; TRENDS;

ANTARCTIC REGIONS; BIODIVERSITY; BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; GOVERNMENT; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MARINE BIOLOGY; PATENTS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84908152008     PISSN: 18747787     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.margen.2014.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Andersen R., Tvedt M.W., Fauchald O.K., et al. International Agreements and Processes Affecting an International Regime on Access and Benefit Sharing under the Convention on Biological Diversity: Implications for its Scope and Possibilities of a Sectoral Approach 2010, Fridjof Nansen Institute, Lysaker.
2. ATCM XXVIII ATCM Resolution 7 (2005) 'Biological prospecting' 2005.
3. ATCM XXX ATCM UNEP/IP67 'Biological Prospecting in Antarctica: Review, Update and Proposed Tool to Support a Way Forward' 2007.
4. ATCM XXXI ATCM Netherlands/WP4 'Report of the ATCM Intersessional Contact Group to Examine the Issue of Biological Prospecting in the Antarctic Treaty Area' 2008.
5. ATCM XXXII ATCM Resolution 9 (2009) 'Collection and Use of Antarctic Biological Material' 2009.
6. ATCM XXXII ATCM Netherlands-Belgium-Bulgaria-Finland-France-Germany-Spain-Sweden/WP26 'A Gap Analysis of the Antarctic Treaty System Regarding the Management of Biological Prospecting' 2009.
7. ATCM XXXIII ATCM Netherlands/WP24 'Principles for the Access to and Use of Biological Material in the Antarctic Treaty Area' 2009.
8. ATCM XXXIII ATCM Netherlands/WP13 'Report of the ATCM Intersessional Contact Group to Examine the Issue of Biological Prospecting in the Antarctic Treaty Area' 2010.
9. ATCM XXXIII ATCM Netherlands/WP24 'Principles for the Access to and Use of Biological Material in the Antarctic Treaty Area' 2010.
10. ATCM XXXIII ATCM Belgium-UNEP/IP96 'The Role of Ex-Situ Collections in Antarctic Bioprospecting' 2010.
11. ATCM XXXVI ATCM Resolution 6 (2013) 'Biological Prospecting in Antarctica' 2013.
12. ATCM XXXVI ATCM Belgium-Netherlands-Sweden/WP48 'Biological Prospecting in Antarctica - The Need for Improved Information' 2013.
13. ATCM XXXX ATCM Belgium-Netherlands/IP22 'An Update on Status and Trends Biological Prospecting in Antarctica and Recent Policy Developments at the International Level' 2013.
14. Dodds K. Governing Antarctica: contemporary challenges and the enduring legacy of the 1959 Antarctic Treaty. Global Policy 2010, 1(1):108-115.
15. Dodds K. Sovereignty watch: claimant states, resources, and territory in contemporary Antarctica. Polar Rec. 2011, 47:231-243. 10.1017/S0032247410000458.
16. Drankier P., Oude Elferink A.G., Visser B., Takács T. Marine genetic resources in areas beyond national jurisdiction: access and benefit-sharing. Int. J. Mar. Coast. Law 2012, 27(2):375-433.
17. Greiber T. Access and Benefit Sharing in Relation to Marine Genetic Resources from Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction: A Possible Way Forward. BfN-Skripten No. 301 2011, IUCN.
18. Greiber Thomas, Peña Moreno Sonia, Ahrén Mattias, et al. An Explanatory Guide to the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing 2012, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
19. Hemmings A., Rogan-Finnemore M. Access, obligations, and benefits: regulating bioprospecting in the Antarctica. Biodiversity Conservation, Law and Livelihoods 2008, 529-552. Cambridge University Press, New York. M. Jeffery, J. Firestone, K. Bubna-Litic (Eds.).
20. Herber B.P. Bioprospecting in Antarctica: the search for a policy regime. Polar Rec. 2006, 42:139-146.
21. Hughes K.A., Bridge P.D. Potential impacts of Antarctic bioprospecting and associated commercial activities upon Antarctic science and scientists. Ethics Sci. Environ. Polit. 2010, 10:13-18.
22. Jabour-Green J., Nicol D. Bioprospecting in areas outside national jurisdiction: Antarctica and the Southern Ocean. Melb. J. Int. Law. 2003, 4:76-111.
23. Joyner C.C. Governing the Frozen Commons 1998, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia.
24. Joyner C.C. Bioprospecting as a challenge to the Antarctic Treaty. Antarctic Security in the Twenty-First Century 2012, 197-214. Routledge, Abingdon. A.D. Hemmings, D.R. Rothwell, K.N. Scott (Eds.).
25. Leary D. Moving the marine genetic resources debate forward: some reflections. Int. J. Mar. Coast. Law 2012, 27:435-448.
26. Leary D., Walton D. Science for profit. What are the ethical implications of bioprospecting in the Arctic and Antarctica?. Ethics Sci. Environ. Polit. 2010, 10:1-4.
27. Leary D., Vierros M., Hamon G., Arico S., Monagle C. Marine genetic resources: a review of scientific and commercial interest. Mar. Policy 2009, 33(2):183-194.
28. Lefeber R. Marine scientific research in the Antarctic Treaty System. The Law of the Sea and Polar Regions: Interactions Between Global and Regional Regimes 2013, 323-342. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The Netherlands. E.J. Molenaar, A.G.O. Elferink, D.R. Rothwell (Eds.).
29. Lohan D., Johnston S. The International Regime for Bioprospecting: Existing Policies and Emerging Issues for Antarctica 2003, United Nations University of Advanced Studies, Yokohama.
30. Lohan D., Johnston S. Bioprospecting in Antarctica 2005, United Nations University of Advanced Studies, Yokohama.
31. Oldham P., Hall S., Forero O. PLoS One 2013, 8(11):e78737. 10.1371/journal.pone.0078737.
32. Rogan-Finnemore M. What bioprospecting means for Antarctica and the Southern Ocean. International Law Issues in the South Pacific 2005, 199-228. Ashgate, Hampshire. G. Leane, B. von Tigerstrom (Eds.).
33. Rothwell D.R. The IPY and the Antarctic Treaty System: reflections 50years later. Legacies and Change in Polar Sciences 2009, 125-144. Ashgate, Farnham. J.M. Shadian, M. Tennberg (Eds.).
34. Tvedt M.W. Patent law and bioprospecting in Antarctica. Polar Rec. 2010, 47:45-55.
35. Tvedt M.W., Jørem A.E. Bioprospecting in the high seas: regulatory options for benefit sharing. J. World Intellect. Prop. 2013, 16(3-4):150-167. 10.1002/jwip.12010.
36. UNEP UNEP/CBD/WG-ABS/7/INF/3/Part. 3, study on the relationship between an international regime on access and benefit-sharing and other international instruments and forums that govern the use of genetic resources. The Antarctic Treaty System (ATS) and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 2009, (3 march 2009).
37. United Nations A/68/399, Letter Dated 23 September 2013 from the Co-Chairs of the Ad Hoc Open-Ended Informal Working Group to the President of the General Assembly 2013.
38. Vigni P. Antarctic bioprospecting: is it compatible with the value of Antarctica as a natural reserve?. Biotechnology and International Law 2006, 111-145. Hart Publishing, Oxford. F. Francioni, T. Scovazzi (Eds.).