Current trends and directions in achieving sustainability in the biofuel and bioenergy supply chain

Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering

Volumn 6, Issue , 2014, Pages 55-60

  Seay, Jeffrey R ^a   Badurdeen, Fazleena F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOENERGY SUPPLIES;

EID: 84908143140     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22113398     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.coche.2014.09.006     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. National Science Board (NSB): Building a Sustainable Energy Future: U.S. Actions for an Effective Energy Economy Transformation. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation; 2009, .
2. USDOE, USDA: Sustainability of Biofuels: Future Research Opportunities, Report from the October 2008 Workshop. 2009.
3. EISA: Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. 2007 http://energy.senate.gov/public/-files/RL342941.pdf. (accessed 07.12.11).
4. Regalbuto J: Next generation hydrocarbon biorefineries. In Design for Energy and the Environment, Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on the Foundations of Computer-Aided Process Design. NY, New York: CRC Press; 2009, . CD-Volume.
5. Daoutidis P, Kelloway A, Marvin W, Rangarajan S, Tores A: Process systems engineering for biorefineries: new research vistas. Curr Opin Chem Eng 2013, 2:442.
6. Daoutidis P, Marvin W, Rangarajan S, Tores A: Engineering biomass conversion processes: a systems perspective. AIChE J 2013, 59:3-18.
7. National Academy of Science: In Computing Research for Sustainability. Edited by Millett LI, Estrin DL. Committee on Computing Research for Environmental and Societal Sustainability, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, National Research Council; 2012.
8. Bojarski AD, Lainez J, Espuna A, Puigjaner L: Incorporating environmental impacts and regulations in a holistic supply chain modeling: an LCA approach. Comput Chem Eng 2009, 33:1747-1759.
9. Labuschagne C, Brent A: Social indicators for sustainable project and technology life cycle management in the process industry. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2006, 11:3-15.
10. Metta H: A Multi-stage Decision Support Model for Coordinated Sustainable Product and Supply Chain Design. . (Ph.D. dissertation) University of Kentucky; 2011.
11. Metta H, Badurdeen F: Environmental and societal assessments for sustainable product and supply chain design. In Proceedings of the 2011 Industrial Engineering Research Conference; Reno, NV: 2011.
12. Metta H, Badurdeen F: Sustainable product and supply chain design: optimization and multi life-cycle analysis. In Proceedings of the 44th CIRP International Conference on Manufacturing Systems; Madison, WI: 2011.
13. Metta H, Badurdeen F: Integrating sustainable product and supply chain design: modeling issues and challenges. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 2012, 60:438-446.
14. Wang PC, Halim I, Adhitya A, Srinivasan R: Integrating economic, environmental and social indicators for sustainable supply chains. Comput Aided Chem Eng 2011, 29:1220-1224.
15. Min H, Zhou G: Supply chain modeling: past, present and future. Comput Ind Eng 2002, 43:231-249.
16. You F, Tao L, Graziano DJ, Snyder S: Optimal design of sustainable cellulosic biofuel supply chains: multiobjective optimization coupled with life cycle assessment and input-output analysis. AIChE J 2012, 58:1157-1180.
17. Zamboni A, Shah N, Bezzo F: Spatially explicit static model for the strategic design of future bioethanol production systems: 1. Cost minimization. Energy Fuels 2009, 23:5121-5133.
18. Zamboni A, Shah N, Bezzo F: Spatially explicit static model for the strategic design of future bioethanol production systems: 2. Multi-objective environmental optimization. Energy Fuels 2009, 23:5134-5143.
19. Mele FD, Guillén-Gosálbez G, Jimenez L: Optimal planning of supply chains for bioethanol and sugar production with economic and environmental concerns. Comput Aided Chem Eng 2009, 26:997-1002.
20. You F, Wang B: Life cycle optimization of biomass-to-liquid supply chains with distributed-centralized processing networks. Ind Eng Chem Res 2011, 50:10102-10127.
21. ISO 26000: Discovering ISO 26000. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2010, .
22. GRI: Sustainability Reporting Guidelines, Version 3.0. Amsterdam: GRI; 2006, .
23. IChemE: The Sustainability Metrics: Sustainable Development Progress Metrics Recommended for Use in the Process Industries. 2012 http://www.icheme.org/communities/subject-groups/sustainability/resources/~/media/Documents/Subject%20Groups/Sustainability/Newsletters/Sustainability%20Metrics.ashx. (accessed 02.08.12).
24. Benoit C, Vickery-Niederman G: Social sustainability assessment literature review, The Sustainability Consortium, White Paper #102. 2010.
25. Hutchins M, Sutherland J: An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. J Clean Prod 2008, 16:1688-1698.
26. Benoit C, Norris G, Valdivia S, Ciroth A, Moberg A, Bos U, Prakash S, Ugaya C, Beck T: The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time! Int J LCA 2010, 15: 156-163.
27. Pulzl H, Prokofieva I, Berg S, Rametsteiner E, Aggestam F, Wolfslehner B: Indicator development in sustainability impact assessment: balancing theory and practice. Eur J For Res 2012, 131:35-46.
28. Lindner M, Werhahn-Mees W, Suominen T, Votter D, Zudin S, Pekkanen M, Paivinen R, Roubalova M, Kneblik P, Bruchert F, Valinger E, Guinard L, Pizzirani S: Conducting sustainability impact assessments of forestry-wood chains: examples of ToSIA applications. Eur J For Res 2012, 131:21-34.
29. Wolfslehner B, Bruchert F, Fischbach J, Rammer W, Becker G, Lindner M, Lexer MJ: Exploratory multi-criteria analysis in sustainability impact assessment of forest-wood chains: the example of a regional case study in Baden-Wurttemberg. Eur J For Res 2012, 131:47-56.
30. Tang O, Musa SN: Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management. Int J Prod Econ 2010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.06.01.
31. Zhang S, Li Q: A review of supply chain risk management (from the perspective of default correlation). International Conference on Management of e-Commerce and e-Government; Chengdu, China: 2010.
32. Vanny I, Zailani S, Pujawan N: Supply chain risk management: literature review and future research. Int J Inform Syst Supply Chain Manage 2009, 2:16-33.
33. Gebreslassie BH, Yao Y, You F: Design under uncertainty of hydrocarbon biorefinery supply chains: multiobjective stochastic programming models, decomposition algorithm, and a comparison between CVaR and downside risk. AIChE J 2012, 58:2155-2179.
34. Hytoenen E, Stuart PR: Biofuel production in an integrated forest biorefinery-technology identification under uncertainty. J Biobased Matter Bioenergy 2010, 4:58-67.
35. Dal Mas M, Giarola S, Zamboni A, Bezzo F: Capacity planning and financial optimisation of the bioethanol supply chain under price uncertainty. Comput Aided Chem Eng 2010, 28:97-102.
36. Marvin W, Schmidt L, Benjaafar S, Tiffany D, Daoutidis P: Economic optimization of a lignocellulosic biomass-to-ethanol supply. Chem Eng Sci 2012, 67:68-79.
37. Oliva GM, Weber P, Simon C, Iung B: Bayesian networks applications on dependability, risk analysis and maintenance. 2nd IFAC Workshop on Dependable Control of Discrete Systems (DCDS); Bari, Italy: 2009.
38. Mittal A, Kassim A: Bayesian Network Technologies: Applications and Graphical Models. Hershey, NY: IGI Publishing; 2007, .
39. Yen BP-C, Zeng B: A hierarchical assessment method using Bayesian network for risk detection on green supply chain, industrial engineering and engineering management. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference ; Macao, China: 2010.
40. Fenton N, Neil M, Caballero J: Using ranked nodes to model qualitative judgment in Bayesian networks. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 2007, 19:1420-1432.
41. Lockamy A III: Benchmarking supplier risks using Bayesian networks. Benchmarking 2011, 18:409-427.
42. Badurdeen F, Shuaib M, Liyanage JP: Risk modeling and analysis for sustainable asset management. In Engineering Asset Management and Infrastructure Sustainability. Edited by Mathew J, Ma L, Tan A, Weijnen M, Lee J. 2012:61-75.
43. Badurdeen F, Shuaib M, Wijekoon K, Brown A, Faulkner W, Amundson J, Jawahir IS, Goldsby TJ, Iyengar D, Boden B: Quantitative modeling and analysis of supply chain risks using Bayesian theory. J Manuf Technol Manage 2014, 25:631-654.
44. Kelloway A, Daoutidis P: Process synthesis of biorefineries: optimization of biomass conversion to fuels and chemicals. Ind Eng Chem Res 2014, 53:5261-5273.
45. Tako A, Robinson S: The application of discrete event simulation and system dynamics in the logistics and supply chain context. Decis Support Syst 2012, 52:802-815.
46. Zhang F, Johnson DM, Johnson MA: Development of a simulation model of biomass supply chain for biofuel production. Renew Energy 2012, 44:380-391.
47. McCormick K, Kaberger T: Key barriers for bioenergy in Europe: economic conditions, know-how and institutional capacity and supply chain co-ordination. Biomass Bioenergy 2007, 31:443-452.
48. GBEP: Analytical Tools to Assess and Unlock Sustainable Bioenergy Potential, A Global Bioenergy Partnership (GBEP) Report. 2010 http://www.globalbioenergy.org/uploads/media/1005-GBEP---Bioenergy-analytical-tools.pdf. (accessed 07.12.11).
49. Sukumara S, Faulkner W, Amundson J, Badurdeen F, Seay J: Multidisciplinary optimization model for region specific sustainable biorefining. Clean Technol Environ Policy 2014, 16:1027-1044.
50. Sammons N Jr, Eden M, Yuan W, Cullinan H, Aksoy B: A flexible framework for optimal biorefinery product allocation. J Environ Prog 2007, 26:349-354.
51. Elia JA, Baliban RC, Xiao X, Floudas CA: Optimal energy supply network determination and life cycle analysis for hybrid coal, biomass and natural gas to liquid (CBGTL) Plants using carbon-based hydrogen production. Comput Chem Eng 2011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2011.01.019.
52. 2 emissions reduction. AIChE J 2012, 58:2142-2154.
53. Elia JA: Optimization Frameworks for the Design, Synthesis, Supply Chain and Strategic Planning of Novel Hybrid Energy Processes. . (Ph.D. Dissertation) NJ: Princeton University; 2013, :. 299 pp..
54. Floudas CA, Elia JA, Baliban RC: Hybrid and single feedstock energy processes for liquid transportation fuels: a critical review. Comput Chem Eng 2012, 41:24-51.
55. Amundson J, Faulkner W, Sukumara S, Seay J, Badurdeen F: A Bayesian network based approach for risk modeling to aid in development of sustainable biomass supply chains. Comput Aided Chem Eng 2012, 30:152-156.
56. Sukumara S, Amundson J, Faulkner W, Badurdeen F, Seay J: Multidisciplinary approach in developing region specific optimization tool for sustainable biorefining. Comput Aided Chem Eng 2012, 30:157-161.
57. Sukumara S, Seay J: A novel model for evaluating the viability of strategies for biorefining processes from various stakeholder perspectives: case study on marginal land utilization. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Foundations of Computer-Aided Process Design. Oxford, UK: Elsevier; 2014, 627-632.