Chronic TiO2 nanoparticle exposure to a benthic organism, Hyalella azteca: Impact of solar UV radiation and material surface coatings on toxicity

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 499, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 356-362

  Wallis, Lindsay K ^a   Diamond, Stephen A ^b   Ma, Hongbo ^c   Hoff, Dale J ^a   Al Abed, Souhail R ^d   Li, Shibin ^a  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^b NanoSafe   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^d U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

Chronic toxicity; Growth; Hyalella azteca; Nano TiO2; Phototoxicity

Indexed keywords

BENTHIC ORGANISMS; CHRONIC TOXICITY; HYALELLA AZTECA; MATERIAL SURFACE; NANO-TIO; NANOPARTICLE EXPOSURES; PHOTO-TOXICITY; SOLAR UV RADIATION;

GROWTH (MATERIALS);

ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE; REACTIVE OXYGEN METABOLITE; TITANIUM DIOXIDE NANOPARTICLE; NANOPARTICLE; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; WATER POLLUTANT;

AMPHIPOD; BENTHIC ENVIRONMENT; BENTHIC FORAMINIFERA; GROWTH RATE; GROWTH RESPONSE; NANOTECHNOLOGY; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; SOLAR RADIATION; TOXICITY; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; WEATHERING;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BENTHOS; CHRONIC TOXICITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; GROWTH RATE; HYALELLA AZTECA; LONG TERM EXPOSURE; MATERIAL COATING; NONHUMAN; OXIDATIVE STRESS; PHOTOTOXICITY; PROTEIN CONTENT; SEDIMENT; SOLAR RADIATION; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; WEATHERING; WEIGHT GAIN; AMPHIPODA; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; PHOTOCHEMISTRY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOXICITY; TOXICITY TESTING; WATER POLLUTANT;

HYALELLA AZTECA;

AMPHIPODA; ANIMALS; NANOPARTICLES; PHOTOCHEMICAL PROCESSES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; TOXICITY TESTS, CHRONIC; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 84908116204     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.068     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Al-Reasi HA, Wood CM, Scott Smith D. Physicochemical and spectroscopic properties of natural organic matter (NOM) fromvarious sources and implications for ameliorative effects on metal toxicity to aquatic biota. Aquat Toxicol 2011;103:179-190.
2. 2 to Daphnia magna under UVA irradiation. Environ Toxicol Chem 2012;31:2564-2566.
3. 2-based nanomaterial used in cosmetics. Environ Sci Technol 2010;44:2689-2694.
4. 2-based nanoparticles released in water from commercialized sunscreens in a life-cycle perspective: structures and quantities. Environ Pollut 2011;159:1543-1550.
5. Buchalska M, Kras G, Oszajca M, Lasocha W, Macyk W. Singlet oxygen generation in the presence of titanium dioxide materials used as sunscreens in suntan lotions. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 2010;213:158-163.
6. 2 in combination with ambient UV-irradiation on a leaf shredding amphipod. Chemosphere 2011;85:1563-1567.
7. 2) to earthworms (Eisenia fetida). J Environ Monit 2011;13:3351-3357.
8. 2 under different experimental conditions: methodological aspects for nanoecotoxicology investigations. Sci Total Environ 2013;463-464:647-656.
9. 2 nanomaterial from sunscreen on Daphnia magna exposed by dietary route. Environ Pollut 2012;163:55-61
10. Froggett SJ, Clancy SF, Boverhof DR, Canady RA. A review and perspective of existing research on the release of nanomaterials from solid nanocomposites. Part Fibre Toxicol 2014;11:17.
11. Galloway T, Lewis C, Dolciotti I, Johnston BD, Moger J, Regoli F. Sublethal toxicity of nanotitanium dioxide and carbon nanotubes in a sediment dwelling marine polychaete. Environ Pollut 2010;158:1748-1755.
12. 2 nanoparticles from sunscreens into surface waters: a one-year survey at the Old Danube Recreational Lake. Environ Sci Technol 2014;48:5415-5422.
13. 2, ZnO, Ag, CNT, fullerenes) for different regions. Environ Sci Technol 2009;43:9216-9222.
14. Handy RD, Von Der Kammer F, Lead JR, Hassellöv M, Owen R, Crane M. The ecotoxicity and chemistry of manufactured nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology 2008;17:287-314.
15. Handy RD, Cornelis G, Fernandes T, Tsyusko O, Decho A, Sabo-Attwood T, et al. Ecotoxicity test methods for engineered nanomaterials: practical experiences and recommendations from the bench. Environ Toxicol Chem 2011;31:15-31.
16. Hanna SK, Miller RJ, Zhou D, Keller AA, Lenihan HS. Accumulation and toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles in a soft-sediment estuarine amphipod. Aquat Toxicol 2013; 142-143:441-446.
17. Hendren CO, Mesnard X, Dröge J, Wiesner MR. Estimating production data for five engineered nanomaterials as a basis for exposure assessment. Environ Sci Technol 2011;45:2562-2569.
18. 2-nanoparticles on the predator-prey interaction of gammarids and mayfly nymphs. Environ Pollut 2014;186:136-140.
19. Klaine SJ, Alvarez PJ, Batley GE, Fernandes TF, Handy RD, Lyon DY, et al. Nanomaterials in the environment: behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 2008;27:1825-1851.
20. Lee L, KimK, Shon HK, Kim SD, Cho J. Biotoxicity of nanoparticles: effect of natural organic matter. J Nanoparticle Res 2011;13:3051-61.
21. 2 nanoparticles to a freshwater benthic amphipod: are benthic systems at risk? Sci Total Environ 2014a;466-467: 800-808.
22. 2 nanoparticles to benthic organisms. Environ Toxicol Chem 2014b;33:1563-1569.
23. 2 nanoparticle composite phototoxicity to Daphnia magna and Oryzias latipes. Chemosphere 2014c;112:62-69.
24. 2 nanoparticles under solar radiation to two aquatic species: Daphnia magna and Japanese medaka. Envirol Toxicol Chem 2012a;31:1621-1629.
25. Ma H, Brennan A, Diamond SA. Photocatalytic reactive oxygen species production and phototoxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles are dependent on the solarv ultraviolet radiation spectrum. Environ Toxicol Chem 2012b;31:2099-2107.
26. Maul JD, Brennan AA, Harwood AD, Lydy MJ. Effect of sediment-associated pyrethroids, fipronil, and metabolites on Chironomus tentans growth rate, body mass, condition index, immobilization and survival. Environ Toxicol Chem 2008;27:2582-2590.
27. 2. Review of in vivo data. Environ Pollut 2011;159:677-684.
28. Mueller NC, Nowack B. Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 2008;42:4447-4453.
29. Nowack B, Bucheli TD. Occurrence, behavior and effects of nanoparticles in the environment. Environ Pollut 2007;150:5-22.
30. Petosa AR, Jaisi DP, Quevedo IR, Elimelech M, Tufenkji N. Aggregation and deposition of engineered nanomaterials in aquatic environments: role of physicochemical interactions. Environ Sci Technol 2010;44:6532-6549.
31. 2 nanoparticles in the Rhine River; 2012.
32. 2 production as a basis for exposure assessment. Environ Sci Technol 2009;43:4227-4233.
33. Setsukinai K, Urano Y, Kakinuma K, Majima H, Nagano T. Development of novel fluorescence probes that can reliably detect reactive oxygen species and distinguish specific species. J Biol Chem 2003;278:3170-3175.
34. Sharma VK. Aggregation and toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in aquatic environment-A review. J Environ Sci Health Part A 2009;44:1485-1495.
35. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Methods of measuring the toxicity and bioaccumulation of sediment-associated contaminants with freshwater invertebrates. 2nd ed. Duluth, MN: Office of Research and Development; 2000 [EPA 600/R-99/064].
36. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. State of the science literature review. Nano titanium dioxide environmental matters. Washington D.C.: Office of Research and Development; 2010a [EPA/600/R-10/089].
37. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. National case studies. Nanoscale titanium dioxide in water treatment and in topical sunscreen; 2010b [EPA/600/R-09/057 F, Washington, DC.].
38. 2-based sunscreens by swimming pool water ingredients. Chem Eng J 2012;191:95-103.
39. Weir A, WesterhoffP, Fabricius L, Hristovski K, Von Goetz N. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles in food and personal care products. Environ Sci Technol 2012;46:2242-2250.
40. Weisner MR, Lowry GV, Jones KL, Hochella MF, Di Giulio RT, Casman E, et al. Decreasing uncertainties in assessing environmental exposure, risk, and ecological implications of nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 2009;43:6458-6462.
41. 2 nanoparticle aggregates in Daphnia magna. Chemosphere 2010;78:209-215.