Erratum: Noblesse oblige? Social status and economic inequality maintenance among politicians (PLoS ONE (2014) 9:1 (e85293) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085293);Noblesse oblige? Social status and economic inequality maintenance among politicians

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Kraus, Michael W ^a   Callaghan, Bennett ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ECONOMIC INEQUALITY; FEMALE; GENDER; GOVERNMENT; HUMAN; INCOME; MALE; POLICY; POLITICAL SYSTEM; PUBLIC FIGURE; RACE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIAL JUSTICE; SOCIAL SECURITY; SOCIAL STATUS; SOCIAL STRUCTURE; SOCIOECONOMICS; UNITED STATES;

DISSENT AND DISPUTES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; POLITICS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84908093808     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117892     Document Type: Erratum

References (40)

1. Carnegie A (1889) Wealth. North American Review 148: 653-665.
2. Kraus MW, Piff PK, Keltner D (2009) Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97: 992-1004. doi: 10.1037/a0028756.
3. Norton MI, Ariely D (2011) Building a better America: One wealth quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science 6: 9-12. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393524.
4. Phillips K (2002) Wealth and democracy: A political history of the American rich. New York: Broadway Books.
5. Domhoff GW (1998) Who rules America? Power and politics in the year 2000. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
6. Wilkinson R (1996) Unhealthy societies: The afflictions of inequality. London: Routledge.
7. Brandt MJ (2013) Do the disadvantaged legitimize the social system? A large-scale test of the status-legitimacy hypothesis. Journal of Social and Personality Psychology 104: 765-785. doi: 10.1037/a0031751.
8. Kraus MW, Keltner D (2013) Social class rank, essentialism, and punitive judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 105: 247-261.
9. Sidanius J, Pratto F (2001) Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Fiske ST (2010) Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. In: Fiske ST, Gilbert DT, Lindzey G, editors. Handbook of social psychology, 5th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. 941-982.
11. Kraus MW, Stephens NM (2012) A road map for an emerging psychology of social class. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 6: 642-656. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00453.x.
12. Ridgeway CL (1993) Gender, status, and the social psychology of expectations. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
13. Croizet J, Claire T (1998) Extending the concept of stereotype threat to class: The intellectual underperformance of students from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24: 588-594. doi:10.1177/0146167298246003.
14. Steele CM, Aronson J (1995) Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69: 797-811.
15. Walton GM, Cohen GL (2011) A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science 331: 1447-1451.doi: 10.1126/science.1198364.
16. Stephens NM, Markus HR, Fryberg SA (2012) Social class disparities in health and education: Reducing inequality by applying a sociocultural self model of behavior. Psychological Review 119: 723-744. doi: 10.1037/a0029028.
17. Jost JT, Banaji MR, Nosek BA (2004) A decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25: 881-919. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004. 00402.x. (Pubitemid 40004514)
18. Napier JL, Jost JT (2008) Why are conservatives happier than liberals? Psychological Science 19: 565-572. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02124.x.
19. O'Brien LT, Major B (2005) System justifying beliefs and psychological well-being: The roles of group status and identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31: 1718-1729. doi: 10.1177/0146167205278261. (Pubitemid 41703653)
20. Messick D, Sentis K (1979) Fairness and preference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 15: 418-434.
21. Straka GM (1962) The final phase of Divine Right theory in England, 1688-1702. English Historical Review 77: 638-658.
22. Degler CN (1991) In search of human nature: The decline and revival of Social Darwinism in American thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Gould SJ (1981) The mismeasure of man. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
24. Gramsci A (1992) Prison notebooks (J. A. Buttigieg, trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
25. Campbell DT (1965) Ethnocentric and other altruistic motives. Nebraska symposium on motivation 13: 283-311.
26. Blumer H (1958) Race prejudice as a sense of group position. The Pacific Sociological Review 1: 3-7.
27. Bobo LD (1999) Prejudice as group position: Microfoundations of a sociological approach to racism and race relations. Journal of Social Issues 55: 445-472.
28. Kane E, Kyyro E (2001) For whom does education enlighten? Race, gender, education, and beliefs about social inequality. Gender & Society 15: 710-733. doi: 10.1177/089124301015005005.
29. Crosby FJ, Iyer A, Clayton S, Downing RA (2003) Affirmative action: Psychological data and the policy debates. American Psychologist 58: 93-115. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.2.93. (Pubitemid 37177545)
30. Eberhardt JL, Fiske ST (1994) Affirmative action in theory and practice: Issues of power, ambiguity, and gender vs. race. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 15: 201-220.
31. Parker CP, Baltes BB, Christiansen ND (1997) Support for affirmative action, justice perceptions, and work attitudes: A study of gender and racial-ethnic group differences, Journal of Applied Psychology 82: 376-389. (Pubitemid 127372478)
32. Anderson C, Kraus MW, Galinksy AD, Keltner D (2012) The local ladder effect: Sociometric status and subjective well-being. Psychological Science 23: 764-771. doi: 10.1177/0956797611434537.
33. Boyce CJ, Brown GDA, Moore SC (2010) Money and happiness: Rank of income, not income, affects life satisfaction. Psychological Science 21: 471-475.
34. Kraus MW, Piff PK, Mendoza-Denton R, Rheinschmidt ML, Keltner D (2012) Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review 119: 546-572.
35. Moody J, Mucha PJ (2013) Portrait of political party polarization. Network Science 1: 119-121. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/nws.2012.3.
36. Anderson S, Collins C, Klinger S, Pizzigati S (2012) A congressional report card for the 99%. Available: http://www.ips-dc.org/files/5290/Inequality- Report- Card.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2013.
37. Graham J, Haidt J, Nosek BA (2009) Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96: 1029-1046. doi: 10.1037/a0015141.
38. Cross SE, Madson L (1997) Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin 122: 5-37. (Pubitemid 127705302)
39. Boykin AW, Jagers RJ, Ellison CM, Albury A (1997) Communalism: Conceptualization and measurement of an Afrocultural social orientation. Journal of Black Studies 27: 409-418.
40. Kraus MW, Tan JJX, Tannenbaum MB (2013) The social ladder: A rank-based perspective on social class. Psychological Inquiry 24: 81-96.