A quality monitoring program for red blood cell components: In vitro quality indicators before and after implementation of semiautomated processing

Transfusion

Volumn 54, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 2534-2543

  Acker, Jason P ^a,b   Hansen, Adele L ^a   Kurach, Jayme D R ^a   Turner, Tracey R ^a   Croteau, Ioana ^a   Jenkins, Craig ^a  

^a CANADIAN BLOOD SERVICES   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

2,3 DIPHOSPHOGLYCERIC ACID; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; HEMOGLOBIN; METHEMOGLOBIN; POTASSIUM; PROTEIN P50; SODIUM;

ARTICLE; BLOOD COMPONENT; BLOOD FILTRATION; BLOOD STORAGE; ERYTHROCYTE; HEMATOCRIT; HEMOLYSIS; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; NORMAL HUMAN; POTASSIUM CELL LEVEL; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY MONITORING PROGRAM; SODIUM CELL LEVEL; SUPERNATANT; APHERESIS; BLOOD; BLOOD BANK; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; CYTOLOGY; ERYTHROCYTE TRANSFUSION; LABORATORY AUTOMATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS;

2,3-DIPHOSPHOGLYCERATE; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; AUTOMATION, LABORATORY; BLOOD BANKS; BLOOD COMPONENT REMOVAL; BLOOD PRESERVATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; ERYTHROCYTE TRANSFUSION; ERYTHROCYTES; HEMATOCRIT; HEMOLYSIS; HUMANS; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84908078228     PISSN: 00411132     EISSN: 15372995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/trf.12679     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Chabanel A, Masse M, Begue S,. National French observatory of the quality of blood components for transfusion. Transfus Clin Biol 2008; 15: 85-90.
2. Cid J, Claparols M, Pinacho A, et al. Comparison of blood component preparation methods from whole blood bags based on buffy coat extraction. Transfus Apher Sci 2007; 36: 243-247.
3. Radwanski K, Garraud O, Cognasse F, et al. The effects of red blood cell preparation method on in vitro markers of red blood cell aging and inflammatory response. Transfusion 2013; 52: 3128-3138.
4. Högman CF, Eriksson L, Hedlund K, et al. The bottom and top system: a new technique for blood component preparation and storage. Vox Sang 1988; 55: 211-217.
5. D'Amici GM, Mirasole C, D'Alessandro A, et al. Red blood cell storage in SAGM and AS3: a comparison through the membrane two-dimensional electrophoresis proteome. Blood Transfus 2012; 10 (Suppl 2): s46-54.
6. Hess JR,. An update on solutions for red cell storage. Vox Sang 2006; 91: 13-19.
7. Högman CF, Meryman HT,. Storage parameters affecting red blood cell survival and function after transfusion. Transfus Med Rev 1999; 13: 275-296.
8. Sweeney J,. Quality assurance and standards for red cells and platelets. Vox Sang 1998; 74 (Suppl 2): 201-205.
9. Levin E, Jenkins C, Culibrk B, et al. Development of a quality monitoring program for platelet components: a report of the first four years' experience at Canadian Blood Services. Transfusion 2012; 52: 810-818.
10. Sheffield WP, Bhakta V, Jenkins C, et al. Conversion to the buffy coat method and quality of frozen plasma derived from whole blood donations in Canada. Transfusion 2010; 50: 1043-1049.
11. Canadian Standards Association. CAN/CSA-Z902-10 Blood and Blood Components. 2010 edition. Mississauga (ON): Canadian Standards Association; 2010.
12. Kurach JD, Hansen AL, Turner TR, et al. Segments from red blood cell units should not be used for quality testing. Transfusion 2014; 54: 451-455.
13. Mastronardi C, Schubert P, Levin E, et al. Process improvement by eliminating mixing of whole blood units after an overnight hold prior to component production using the buffy coat method. J Blood Transfus 2013; 2013: 154838.
14. Hansen A, Yi QL, Acker JP,. Quality of red blood cells washed using the ACP 215 cell processor: assessment of optimal pre- and post-wash storage times and conditions. Transfusion 2013; 53: 1772-1779.
15. Hansen AL, Turner TR, Yi QL, et al. Quality of red blood cells washed using an automated cell processor with and without irradiation. Transfusion. In press 2014.
16. Semple E, Bowes-Schmidt A, Yi QL, et al. Transfusion reactions: a comparative observational study of blood components produced before and after implementation of semiautomated production from whole blood. Transfusion 2012; 52: 2683-2691.
17. Webster J, Croteau IM, Acker JA,. Evaluation of the Canadian Blood Services red blood cell shipping container. Can J Med Lab Sci 2008; 70: 167-176.
18. Zwart A, van Assendelft OW, Bull BS, et al. Recommendations for reference method for haemoglobinometry in human blood (ICSH standard 1995) and specifications for international haemiglobinocyanide standard (4th edition). J Clin Pathol 1996; 49: 271-274.
19. Sowemimo-Coker SO,. Red blood cell hemolysis during processing. Transfus Med Rev 2002; 16: 46-60.
20. DiaSys Diagnostic Systems GmbH. ATP Hexokinase FS∗. Holzheim, Germany: DiaSys Diagnostic Systems GmbH; 2004 [cited 2013 Aug 26]. Available from: http://btclab.com/media/2674/atp-4.pdf
21. Roche Diagnostics GmbH. 2,3-Diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG) UV-test for the determination of 2,3-DPG in blood research samples. Mannheim, Germany: Roche Diagnostics GmbH; 2010 [cited 2013 Aug 26]. Available from: https://cssportal.roche.com/LFR-PublicDocs/ras/10148334001-en-22.pdf
22. Benesch RE, Benesch R, Yung S,. Equations for the spectrophotometric analysis of hemoglobin mixtures. Anal Biochem 1973; 55: 245-248.
23. Guarnone R, Centenara E, Barosi G,. Performance characteristics of Hemox-Analyzer for assessment of the hemoglobin dissociation curve. Haematologica 1995; 80: 426-430.
24. Harmening DM,. Clinical hematology and fundamentals of hemostasis. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company; 1997. p. 606.
25. Usry RT, Moore GL, Manalo FW,. Morphology of stored, rejuvenated human erythrocytes. Vox Sang 1975; 28: 176-183.
26. Högman CF,. What quality of red blood cells shall we offer the transfused patient? ISBT Sci Ser 2006; 1: 120-126.
27. Högman CF, Meryman HT,. Red blood cells intended for transfusion: quality criteria revisited. Transfusion 2006; 46: 137-142.
28. Thibault L, Dion J, Tremblay M, et al. Red blood cell hemolysis at the end of storage: challenging the new standard. Transfusion 2011; 51: 9A.
29. van der Meer PF, Cancelas JA, Cardigan R, et al. Evaluation of overnight hold of whole blood at room temperature before component processing: effect of red blood cell (RBC) additive solutions on in vitro RBC measures. Transfusion 2011; 51 (Suppl 1): 15S-24S.
30. Hurtado C, Bonanad S, Soler M, et al. Quality analysis of blood components obtained by automated buffy-coat layer removal with a top & bottom system (Optipress (R)II). Haematologica 2000; 85: 390-395.
31. de Korte D, Verhoeven AJ,. Quality determinants of erythrocyte destined for transfusion. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 2004; 50: 187-195.
32. Heaton WA,. Evaluation of posttransfusion recovery and survival of transfused red cells. Transfus Med Rev 1992; 6: 153-169.
33. Gulliksson H, Vesterinen M, Payrat JM, et al. Extended storage of whole blood before the preparation of blood components: in vitro effects on red blood cells in Erythro-Sol environment. Vox Sang 2009; 96: 199-205.
34. Thomas S,. Ambient overnight hold of whole blood prior to the manufacture of blood components. Transfus Med 2010; 20: 361-368.
35. Sparrow RL,. Time to revisit red blood cell additive solutions and storage conditions: a role for "omics" analyses. Blood Transfus 2012; 10 (Suppl 2): s7-11.
36. Heaton WA, Keegan T, Holme S, et al. Evaluation of 99mtechnetium/51chromium post-transfusion recovery of red cells stored in saline, adenine, glucose, mannitol for 42 days. Vox Sang 1989; 57: 37-42.
37. Podlosky L, Poirier A, Nahirniak S, et al. Viability of AS-3 and SAG-M red cells stored in plastic syringes for pediatric transfusion. Transfusion 2008; 48: 1300-1307.
38. Dzik W,. Fresh blood for everyone? Balancing availability and quality of stored RBCs. Transfus Med 2008; 18: 260-265.
39. Koch CG, Li L, Sessler DI, et al. Duration of red-cell storage and complications after cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1229-1239.
40. Pavenski K, Saidenberg E, Lavoie M, et al. Red blood cell storage lesions and related transfusion issues: a Canadian blood services research and development symposium. Transfus Med Rev 2012; 26: 68-84.