Occurrence patterns and niche relationships of sympatric owls in South American temperate forests: A multi-scale approach

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 331, Issue , 2014, Pages 281-291

  Ibarra, José Tomás ^a,b   Martin, Kathy ^a,c   Drever, Mark C ^c   Vergara, Gonzalo ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b THE PEREGRINE FUND   (United States)

^c ENVIRONMENT CANADA   (Canada)

^d PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

^e Centro de Estudio y Conservación del Patrimonio Natural CECPAN   (Chile)

Author keywords

Detectability; Generalists; Glaucidium nana; Habitat suitability models; Specialists; Strix rufipes

Indexed keywords

DETECTABILITY; GENERALISTS; GLAUCIDIUM NANA; HABITAT SUITABILITY MODEL; SPECIALISTS; STRIX RUFIPES;

ENDANGERED SPECIES; FOREST COVER; NICHE BREADTH; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; RAPTOR; RESOURCE USE; SPECIALIST; SPECIES OCCURRENCE; SYMPATRY; TEMPERATE FOREST;

SOUTH AMERICA;

GLAUCIDIUM (AVES); STRIGIFORMES; STRIX RUFIPES;

EID: 84908065887     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.08.027     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Affleck D.L.R., Gregoire T.G., Valentine H.T. Design unbiased estimation in line intersect sampling using segmented transects. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 2005, 122:139-154.
2. Armesto J.J., Rozzi R., Smith-Ramírez C., Arroyo M.T.K. Conservation targets in South American temperate forests. Science 1998, 282:1271-1272.
3. Bailey L.L., Ines J.E., Nichols J.D., MacKenzie D.I. Sampling design trade-offs in occupancy studies with imperfect detection: examples and software. Ecol. Appl. 2007, 17:281-290.
4. Barkae E.D., Scharf I., Abramsky Z., Ovadia O. Jack of all trades, master of all: a positive association between habitat niche breadth and foraging performance in pit-building antlion larvae. PLoS One 2012, 7:e33506.
5. Beaudoin F., Ojeda V. Nesting of rufous-legged owls in evergreen Nothofagus forests. J. Raptor Res. 2011, 45:272-274.
6. Burnham K.P., Anderson D.R. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach 2002, Springer-Verlag, New York, USA. second ed.
7. Caley M.J., Munday P.L. Growth trades off with habitat specialization. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2003, 270:S175-177.
8. Campioni L., Sarasola J.H., Santillán M., Reyes M.M. Breeding season habitat selection by ferruginous pygmy owls Glaucidium brasilianum in central Argentina. Bird Study 2013, 60:35-43.
9. Clavel J., Julliard R., Devictor V. Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization?. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2011, 9:222-228.
10. Devictor V., Clavel J., Julliard R., Lavergne S., Mouillot D., Thuiller W., Venail P., Villéger S., Mouquet N. Defining and measuring ecological specialization. J. Appl. Ecol. 2010, 47:15-25.
11. Díaz I.A., Armesto J.J., Reid S., Sieving K.E., Willson M.F. Linking forest structure and composition: avian diversity in successional forests of Chiloé Island. Chile. Biol. Conserv. 2005, 123:91-101.
12. Díaz I.A., Armesto J.J., Willson M.F. Mating success of the endemic Des murs' wiretail (Sylviorthorhynchus desmursii, Furnariidae) in fragmented Chilean rainforests. Austral. Ecol. 2006, 31:13-21.
13. Dueser R., Hallett J. Competition and habitat selection in a forest-floor small mammal fauna. Oikos 1980, 35:293-297.
14. Eastman, J.R., 2012. IDRISI Selva. Computer software program produced by Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA.
15. Echeverría C., Coomes D., Salas J., Rey-Benayas J., Lara A., Newton A. Rapid deforestation and fragmentation of Chilean temperate forests. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 130:481-494.
16. Farias A.A., Jaksic F.M. Low functional richness and redundancy of a predator assemblage in native forest fragments of Chiloe Island, Chile. J. Anim. Ecol. 2011, 80:809-817.
17. Figueroa R., Corales S., Martínez D., Figueroa R., González-Acuña D. Diet of the rufous-legged owl (Strix rufipes, Strigiformes) in an Andean Nothofagus-Araucaria forest, southern Chile. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ. 2006, 41:179-182.
18. Finn S.P., Marzluff J.M., Varland D.E. Effects of landscape and local habitat attributes on northern goshawk site occupancy in western Washington. For. Sci. 2002, 48:427-436.
19. Fiske I.J., Chandler R.B. Unmarked: an R package for fitting hierarchical models of wildlife occurrence and abundance. J. Stat. Softw. 2011, 43:1-23.
20. Flesch A.D., Steidl R.J. Importance of environmental and spatial gradients on patterns and consequences of resource selection. Ecol. Appl. 2010, 20:1021-1039.
21. Gajardo R. La vegetación natural de Chile: clasificación y distribución geográfica 1993, Editorial Universitaria, Santiago, Chile.
22. Gustafsson L., Baker S.C., Bauhus J., Beese W.J., Brodie A., Kouki J., Lindenmayer D.B., Löhmus A., Martínez Pastur G., Messier C., Neyland M., Palik B., Sverdrup-Thygeson A., Volney W.J.A., Wayne A., Franklin J.F. Retention forestry to maintain multifunctional forests: a world perspective. Bioscience 2012, 62:633-645.
23. Henneman C., Andersen D.E. Occupancy models of nesting-season habitat associations of red-shouldered hawks in Central Minnesota. J. Wildlife Manage. 2009, 73:1316-1324.
24. Hinam H.L., St.Clair C.C. High levels of habitat loss and fragmentation limit reproductive success by reducing home range size and provisioning rates of northern saw-whet owls. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141:524-535.
25. Hirzel A.H., Le Lay G. Habitat suitability modelling and niche theory. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45:1372-1381.
26. Hutto R.L. Habitat selection by nonbreeding, migratory, land birds. Habitat Selection in Birds 1985, 455-476. Academic Press, San Diego, California, U.S.A. M.L. Cody (Ed.).
27. Ibarra J.T., Gálvez N., Gimona A., Altamirano T.A., Rojas I., Hester A., Laker J., Bonacic C. Rufous-legged owl (Strix rufipes) and austral pygmy owl (Glaucidium nanum) stand use in a gradient of disrupted and old growth Andean temperate forests. Chile. Stud. Neotrop. Fauna Environ. 2012, 47:33-40.
28. Ibarra J.T., Martin K., Altamirano T.A., Vargas F.H., Bonacic C. Factors associated with the detectability of owls in South American temperate forests: implications for nocturnal raptor monitoring. J. Wildlife Manage. 2014, 78:1078-1086.
29. Jiménez J.E., Jaksic F.M. Biology of the austral pygmy owl. Wilson Bull. 1989, 101:377-389.
30. Lõhmus A. Do ural owls (Strix uralensis) suffer from the lack of nest sites in managed forests?. Biol. Conserv. 2003, 110:1-9.
31. MacKenzie D.I., Nichols J.D., Hines J.E., Knutson M.G., Franklin Alan B. Estimating site occupancy, colonization, and local extinction when a species is detected imperfectly. Ecology 2003, 84:2200-2207.
32. Martínez D.R. El concón (Strix rufipes) y su hábitat en los bosques templados australes. Historia, Biodiversidad y Ecología de Los Bosques Costeros de Chile 2005, 477-484. Editorial Universitaria, Santiago, Chile. C. Smith-Ramírez, J.J. Armesto, C. Valdovinos (Eds.).
33. Martínez D.R., Jaksic F.M. Habitat, relative abundance, and diet of rufous-legged owls (Strix rufipes King) in temperate forest remnants of southern Chile. Ecoscience 1996, 3:259-263.
34. Martínez J.A., Serrano D., Zuberogoitía I. Predictive models of habitat preferences for the Eurasian eagle owl Bubo bubo: a multiscale approach. Ecography 2003, 26:21-28.
35. McElhinny C., Gibbons P., Brack C., Bauhus J. Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: its definition and measurement. For. Ecol. Manage. 2005, 218:1-24.
36. McGarigal, K., Cushman, S.A., Neel, M.C., Ene, E., 2002. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps.
37. Moore J.E., Swihart R.K. Modeling patch occupancy by forest rodents: incorporating detectability and spatial autocorrelation with hierarchically structured data. J. Wildlife Manage. 2005, 69:933-949.
38. Moran P.A.P. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 1950, 37:17-23.
39. Myers N., Mittermeier R.A., Mittermeier C.G., da Fonseca G.A.B., Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 2000, 403:853-858.
40. Newton I. Population Limitation in Birds 1998, Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA.
41. Newton A.C. Forest Ecology and Conservation: A Handbook of Techniques 2007, Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
42. Olden J.D., LeRoy Poff N., Douglas M.R., Douglas M.E., Fausch K.D. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of biotic homogenization. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19:18-24.
43. Oliver M.A., Webster R. Kriging: a method of interpolation for geographical information systems. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst. 1990, 4:313-332.
44. Peers M.J.L., Thornton D.H., Murray D.L. Reconsidering the specialist-generalist paradigm in niche breadth dynamics: resource gradient selection by Canada lynx and bobcat. PLoS One 2012, 7:1-10.
45. Piorecky M.D., Prescott D.R.C. Multiple spatial scale logistic and autologistic habitat selection models for northern pygmy owls, along the eastern slopes of Alberta's Rocky Mountains. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 129:360-371.
46. Reid S., Díaz I., Armesto J. Importance of native bamboo for understory birds in Chilean temperate forests. Auk 2004, 121:515-525.
47. Richards C.L., Bossdorf O., Muth N.Z., Gurevitch J., Pigliucci M. Jack of all trades, master of some? on the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9:981-993.
48. Sberze M., Cohn-Haft M., Ferraz G. Old growth and secondary forest site occupancy by nocturnal birds in a Neotropical landscape. Anim. Conserv. 2010, 13:3-11.
49. Seamans M.E., Gutiérrez R.J. Habitat selection in a changing environment: the relationship between habitat alteration and spotted owl territory occupancy and breeding dispersal. Condor 2007, 109:566.
50. Sergio F., Newton I. Occupancy as a measure of territory quality. J. Anim. Ecol. 2003, 72:857-865.
51. Sergio F., Pedrini P., Marchesi L. Adaptive selection of foraging and nesting habitat by black kites (Milvus migrans) and its implications for conservation: a multi-scale approach. Biol. Conserv. 2003, 112:351-362.
52. Sergio F., Newton I., Marchesi L., Pedrini P. Ecologically justified charisma: preservation of top predators delivers biodiversity conservation. J. Appl. Ecol. 2006, 43:1049-1055.
53. Singleton P.H., Lehmkuhl J.F., Gaines W.L., Graham S.A. Barred owl space use and habitat selection in the eastern Cascades, Washington. J. Wildlife Manage. 2010, 74:285-294.
54. Smith-Ramírez C. The Chilean coastal range: a vanishing center of biodiversity and endemism in South American temperate rainforests. Biodivers. Conserv. 2004, 13:373-393.
55. Sutherland, G.D., Smith, J.R., O'Brien, D.T., Waterhouse, F.L., Harestad, A.S., 2010. Validation of modelled habitat classifications for the northern spotted owl in British Columbia using patterns of historical occupancy. B.C. Ministry of Forest Range, Forest Science Program, Victoria, BC, Canada.
56. Trejo A., Figueroa R.A., Alvarado S.A. Forest-specialist raptors of the temperate forests of southern South America: a review. Rev. Bras. Ornitol. 2006, 14:317-330.
57. Trejo A., Beaudoin F., Ojeda V. Response of rufous-legged owls to broadcast of conspecific calls in southern temperate forests of Argentina. J. Raptor Res. 2011, 45:71-74.
58. Van Den Meersschaut, D., Vandekerkhove, K., 2000. Development of a stand-scale forest biodiversity index based on the State Forest Inventory. In: Hansen, M., Burk, T. (Eds.), Integrated Tools for Natural Resources Inventories in the 21st Century. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA, pp. 340-350.
59. Veblen T.T. Growth patterns of Chusquea bamboos in the understory of Chilean Nothofagus forests and their influences in forest dynamics. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 1982, 109:474-487.
60. Wiens J.A. Habitat fragmentation: island v. landscape perspectives on bird conservation. Ibis. 1994, 137:97-104.
61. Zuberogoitia I., Campos L.F. Censusing owls in large areas: a comparison between methods. Ardeola 1998, 45:47-53.