Multitrophic microbial interactions for eco- and agro-biotechnological processes: Theory and practice

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 32, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 529-537

  Saleem, Muhammad ^a   Moe, Luke A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Agroecology; Bioremediation; Climate and land use changes; Ecology theory; Ecosystem biotechnology; Microbial diversity loss; Multitrophic microbial loop interactions; Plant growth promotion; Sustainable agriculture and ecosystem services; Wastewater treatment

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; ALGORITHMS; BACTERIA; BIOREMEDIATION; BIOTECHNOLOGY; LAND USE; VIRUSES; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

AGRO ECOLOGIES; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; LAND-USE CHANGE; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; MICROBIAL LOOP; PLANT GROWTH PROMOTION;

ECOSYSTEMS;

AGROBIOTECHNOLOGY; BACTERIUM; BIODEGRADATION; BIOREMEDIATION; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CLIMATE; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; LAND USE; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; NONHUMAN; NUTRIENT CYCLING; ORGANISMAL INTERACTION; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT NUTRITION; PROTIST; REVIEW; THEORY; VIRUS; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; AGRICULTURE; MICROBIOLOGY;

AGRICULTURE; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIOTECHNOLOGY; INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY; MICROBIAL INTERACTIONS;

EID: 84908031812     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.08.002     Document Type: Review

References (87)

1. Rodrigues J.L.M., et al. Conversion of the Amazon rainforest to agriculture results in biotic homogenization of soil bacterial communities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:988-993.
2. Philippot L., et al. Loss in microbial diversity affects nitrogen cycling in soil. ISME J. 2013, 7:1609-1619.
3. Cardinale B.J., et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 2012, 486:59-67.
4. Saleem M., et al. Perspective of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) containing ACC deaminase in stress agriculture. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 34:635-648.
5. Arshad M., et al. Perspectives of bacterial ACC deaminase in phytoremediation. Trends Biotechnol. 2007, 25:356-362.
6. Ikeda-Ohtsubo W., et al. Effectiveness of heat treatment to protect introduced denitrifying bacteria from eukaryotic predatory microorganisms in a pilot-scale bioreactor. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2013, 116:722-724.
7. Langenheder S., Jurgens K. Regulation of bacterial biomass and community structure by metazoan and protozoan predation. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2001, 46:121-134.
8. Saleem M., et al. Predator richness increases the effect of prey diversity on prey yield. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3:1305.
9. Saleem M., et al. Diversity of protists and bacteria determines predation performance and stability. ISME J. 2013, 7:1912-1921.
10. Chang C-W., et al. Linking secondary structure of individual size distribution with nonlinear size-trophic level relationship in food webs. Ecology 2013, 95:897-909.
11. Kota S., et al. Influence of protozoan grazing on contaminant biodegradation. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 1999, 29:179-189.
12. Ashelford K.E., et al. Elevated abundance of bacteriophage infecting bacteria in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69:285-289.
13. Zarda B., et al. Analysis of bacterial and protozoan communities in an aquifer contaminated with monoaromatic hydrocarbons. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 1998, 27:141-152.
14. Kinner N.E., et al. Field evidence for a protistan role in an organically-contaminated aquifer. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:4312-4318.
15. Van der Meer J.R. Environmental pollution promotes selection of microbial degradation pathways. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2006, 4:35-42.
16. Papadimitriou C.A., et al. Protozoans as indicators of sequential batch processes for phenol treatment; an autoecological approach. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2013, 98:210-218.
17. Withey S., et al. Bacteriophages - potential for application in wastewater treatment processes. Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 339:1-18.
18. Bonkowski M. Protozoa and plant growth: the microbial loop in soil revisited. New Phytol. 2004, 162:617-631.
19. Jones J.B., et al. Considerations for using bacteriophages for plant disease control. Bacteriophage 2012, 2:208-214.
20. Philippot L., et al. Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11:789-799.
21. Schmitz O.J., et al. Predator control of ecosystem nutrient dynamics. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13:1199-1209.
22. Wang H., et al. Bacterivorous grazers facilitate organic matter decomposition: a stoichiometric modeling approach. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2009, 69:170-179.
23. Mattison R.G., Harayama S. The predatory soil flagellate Heteromita globosa stimulates toluene biodegradation by a Pseudomonas sp. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2001, 194:39-45.
24. Mattison R.G., et al. The soil flagellate Heteromita globosa accelerates bacterial degradation of alkylbenzenes through grazing and acetate excretion in batch culture. Microb. Ecol. 2005, 49:142-150.
25. Zhao X., et al. Oil field wastewater treatment in biological aerated filter by immobilized microorganisms. Process Biochem. 2006, 41:1475-1483.
26. Borja J.Q., et al. Biodegradation of polychlorinated biphenyls using biofilm grown with biphenyl as carbon source in fluidized bed reactor. Chemosphere 2006, 64:555-559.
27. Cunningham J.J., et al. Protistan predation affects trichloroethene biodegradation in a bedrock aquifer. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 75:7588-7593.
28. Badawi N., et al. Protozoan predation in soil slurries compromises determination of contaminant mineralization potential. Environ. Pollut. 2012, 170:32-38.
29. Pernthaler J. Predation on prokaryotes in the water column and its ecological implications. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3:537-546.
30. Corno G., Jürgens K. Direct and indirect effects of protist predation on population size structure of a bacterial strain with high phenotypic plasticity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72:78-86.
31. Friman V-P., et al. Protist predation can favour cooperation within bacterial species. Biol. Lett. 2013, 9:20130548.
32. Tso S-F., Taghon G.L. Protozoan grazing increases mineralization of naphthalene in marine sediment. Microb. Ecol. 2006, 51:460-469.
33. Coupe S.J., et al. Biodegradation and microbial diversity within permeable pavements. Eur. J. Protistol. 2003, 39:495-498.
34. Wolfaardt G.M., et al. Bioaccumulation of the herbicide diclofop in extracellular polymers and its utilization by a biofilm community during starvation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61:152-158.
35. Mauclaire L., et al. Assimilation of toluene carbon along a bacteria-protist food chain determined by 13C-enrichment of biomarker fatty acids. J. Microbiol. Methods 2003, 55:635-649.
36. Ghafari P., et al. Impact of carbon nanotubes on the ingestion and digestion of bacteria by ciliated protozoa. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3:347-351.
37. Poorvin L., et al. Viral release of iron and its bioavailability to marine plankton. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2004, 49:1734-1741.
38. Torsvik V., et al. Prokaryotic diversity - magnitude, dynamics, and controlling factors. Science 2002, 296:1064-1066.
39. Pinheiro M.D.O., et al. Use of Tetrahymena thermophila to study the role of protozoa in inactivation of viruses in water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73:643-649.
40. Akunyili A.A., et al. Ingestion without inactivation of bacteriophages by Tetrahymena. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2008, 55:207-213.
41. Papadimitriou C., et al. The effects of toxic substances on the activated sludge microfauna. Desalination 2007, 211:177-191.
42. Tocchi C., et al. Aerobic treatment of dairy wastewater in an industrial three-reactor plant: Effect of aeration regime on performances and on protozoan and bacterial communities. Water Res. 2012, 46:3334-3344.
43. Tocchi C., et al. Dairy wastewater polluting load and treatment performances of an industrial three-cascade-reactor plant. Process Biochem. 2013, 48:941-944.
44. Chabaud S., et al. Bacteria removal in septic effluent: Influence of biofilm and protozoa. Water Res. 2006, 40:3109-3114.
45. Papadimitriou C.A., et al. Investigation of protozoa as indicators of wastewater treatment efficiency in constructed wetlands. Desalination 2010, 250:378-382.
46. Ravva S.V., et al. Altered protozoan and bacterial communities and survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in monensin-treated wastewater from a dairy lagoon. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e54782.
47. Artz R.R., Killham K. Survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in private drinking water wells: influences of protozoan grazing and elevated copper concentrations. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2002, 216:117-122.
48. Sih A., et al. Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1998, 13:350-355.
49. Duffy J.E., et al. The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:522-538.
50. Battistini R., et al. Ciliate-adenovirus interactions in experimental co-cultures of Euplotes octocarinatus and in wastewater environment. Eur. J. Protistol. 2013, 49:381-388.
51. Calvo L., et al. A new pentaplex-nested PCR to detect five pathogenic bacteria in free living amoebae. Water Res. 2013, 47:493-502.
52. Sterner R.W., Elser J.J. Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere 2002, Princeton University Press.
53. Rosenberg K., et al. Soil amoebae rapidly change bacterial community composition in the rhizosphere of Arabidopsis thaliana. ISME J. 2009, 3:675-684.
54. Krome K., et al. Protozoan grazing increases mineralization of naphthalene in marine sediment. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2009, 41:1866-1873.
55. Koller R., et al. Protozoa stimulate N uptake and growth of arbuscular mycorrhizal plants. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013, 65:204-210.
56. Koller R., et al. Protozoa enhance foraging efficiency of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for mineral nitrogen from organic matter in soil to the benefit of host plants. New Phytol. 2013, 199:203-211.
57. Koller R., et al. Litter quality as driving factor for plant nutrition via grazing of protozoa on soil microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2013, 85:241-250.
58. Krome K., et al. Soil bacteria and protozoa affect root branching via effects on the auxin and cytokinin balance in plants. Plant Soil 2010, 328:191-201.
59. Kreuzer K., et al. Grazing of a common species of soil protozoa (Acanthamoeba castellanii) affects rhizosphere bacterial community composition and root architecture of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Soil Biol. Biochem. 2006, 38:1665-1672.
60. Jousset A., et al. Predator-prey chemical warfare determines the expression of biocontrol genes by rhizosphere-associated Pseudomonas fluorescens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76:5263-5268.
61. Bonkowski M., Brandt F. Do soil protozoa enhance plant growth by hormonal effects?. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2002, 34:1709-1715.
62. Cortés-Pérez S., et al. Trophic structure of amoeba communities near roots of Medicago sativa after contamination with fuel oil no. 6. Microb. Ecol. 2014, 67:430-442.
63. Fierer N., et al. Comparative metagenomic, phylogenetic and physiological analyses of soil microbial communities across nitrogen gradients. ISME J. 2012, 6:1007-1017.
64. Swanson M.m., et al. Viruses in soils: morphological diversity and abundance in the rhizosphere. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2009, 155:51-60.
65. Williamson K.E., et al. Sampling natural viral communities from soil for culture-independent analyses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69:6628-6633.
66. Bowatte S., et al. High frequency of virus-infected bacterial cells in a sheep grazed pasture soil in New Zealand. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2010, 42:708-712.
67. D'Alessandro M., et al. Volatiles produced by soil-borne endophytic bacteria increase plant pathogen resistance and affect tritrophic interactions. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37:813-826.
68. Estes J.A., et al. Trophic downgrading of planet earth. Science 2011, 333:301-306.
69. Winter C., et al. Effects of environmental variation and spatial distance on bacteria, archaea and viruses in sub-polar and arctic waters. ISME J. 2013, 7:1507-1518.
70. Srinivasiah S., et al. Direct assessment of viral diversity in soils by random PCR amplification of polymorphic DNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 79:5450-5457.
71. Bates S.T., et al. Global biogeography of highly diverse protistan communities in soil. ISME J. 2013, 7:652-659.
72. Cotterill F.P.D., et al. Conservation of protists: is it needed at all?. Biodivers. Conserv. 2007, 17:427-443.
73. Desai M.S., Brune A. Bacteroidales ectosymbionts of gut flagellates shape the nitrogen-fixing community in dry-wood termites. ISME J. 2012, 6:1302-1313.
74. Krashevska V., et al. Moderate changes in nutrient input alter tropical microbial and protist communities and belowground linkages. ISME J. 2014, 8:1126-1134.
75. Stallforth P., et al. A bacterial symbiont is converted from an inedible producer of beneficial molecules into food by a single mutation in the gacA gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:14528-14533.
76. Oliver K.M., et al. Bacteriophages encode factors required for protection in a symbiotic mutualism. Science 2009, 325:992-994.
77. Blower T.R., et al. Viral evasion of a bacterial suicide system by RNA-based molecular mimicry enables infectious altruism. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8:e1003023.
78. Slimani M., et al. Amoebae as battlefields for bacteria, giant viruses, and virophages. J. Virol. 2013, 87:4783-4785.
79. Chow C-E.T., et al. Top-down controls on bacterial community structure: microbial network analysis of bacteria, T4-like viruses and protists. ISME J. 2014, 8:816-829.
80. Vellend M. Conceptual synthesis in community ecology. Q. Rev. Biol. 2010, 85:183-206.
81. Prosser J.I., et al. The role of ecological theory in microbial ecology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 5:384-392.
82. Azam F., et al. The ecological role of water column microbes in the sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1983, 10:257-263.
83. Lidicker W.Z. A clarification of interactions in ecological systems. BioScience 1979, 29:475-477.
84. Faust K., Raes J. Microbial interactions: from networks to models. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2012, 10:538-550.
85. Thebault E., Loreau M. Food-web constraints on biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:14949-14954.
86. Sugihara G., et al. Detecting causality in complex ecosystems. Science 2012, 338:496-500.
87. Deyle E.R., et al. Predicting climate effects on Pacific sardine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:6430-6435.