Are wildfire management resources in the United States efficiently allocated to protect resources at risk? A case study from Montana

Economic Analysis and Policy

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 318-332

  O'Donnell, Derek T ^a   Venn, Tyron J ^a   Calkin, David E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^b ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Bushfire; Choice experiment; Nonmarket valuation; Wildland urban interface

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908003984     PISSN: 03135926     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eap.2014.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Adamowicz W., Boxall P., Williams M., Louviere J. Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1998, 80(1):64-75.
2. Ager A.A., Finney M.A., Kerns B.K., Maffei H. Modeling wildfire risk to northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) habitat in Central Oregon, USA. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2007, 246:45-56.
3. Ager A.A., Vaillant N.M., Finney M.A. A comparison of landscape fuel treatment strategies to mitigate wildland fire risk in the urban interface and preserve old forest structure. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2010, 259(8):1556-1570.
4. Barrio M., Loureiro M.L. A meta-analysis of contingent valuation forest studies. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69(5):1023-1030.
5. Bateman I.J., Day B.H., Jones A.P., Jude S. Reducing gain-loss asymmetry: a virtual reality choice experiment valuing land use change. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2009, 58:106-118.
6. Ben-Akiva M., Lerman S.R. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand 1985, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Bennett J., Blamey R. The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation 2001, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
8. Bin O., Polasky S. Effects of flood hazards on property values: evidence before and after Hurricane Floyd. Land Econom. 2004, 80(4):490-500.
9. Boxall P., Adamowicz W.L., Moon A. Complexity in choice experiments: choice of the status quo alternative and implications for welfare measurement. Aust. J. Agric. Res. Econom. 2009, 53:503-519.
10. Brown R.N.K., Rosenberger R.S., Kline J.D., Hall T.E., Needham M.D. Visitor preferences for managing wilderness recreation after wildfire. J. Forestry 2008, 106(1):9-16.
11. Carlsson F. Design of stated preference surveys: is there more to learn from behavioral economics. Environ. Res. Econ. 2010, 46:167-177.
12. Dale L. Wildfire policy and fire use on public lands in the United States. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2006, 19(3):275-284.
13. Davis J.B. The wildland-urban interface: paradise or battleground?. J. Forestry 1990, 88(1):29-31.
14. Dickie M., Messman V.L. Parental altruism and the value of avoiding acute illness: are kids worth more than parents?. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2004, 48:1146-1174.
15. Dillman D. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method 2007, Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.
16. Efron B., Tibshirani R. Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Statist. Sci. 1986, 1(1):54-77.
17. FEC (Fire Executive Council) 2009. Guidance for implementation of federal wildland fire management policy. Available at URL: (accessed 5.07.2011). http://www.idahofireplan.org/images/2009_Fed_Fire_Policy_Implementation_Guidance.pdf.
18. Finney M.A. The challenge of quantitative risk analysis for wildland fire. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2005, 211:97-108.
19. Flathead County Planning Board 2008. Minutes of the Meeting June 18, 2008. Flathead County Planning Board, Kalispell.
20. Flathead County Planning and Zoning 2009. Growth policy. Available at: . http://flathead.mt.gov/planning_zoning/growth_resolution2015a.php.
21. Garber-Yonts B., Kerkvliet J., Johnson R. Public values for biodiversity conservation policies in the Oregon Coast Range. For. Sci. 2004, 50(5):589-602.
22. GCS Research, 2005. Flathead community wildfire fuels reduction/mitigation plan. GCS Research, Missoula, p. 139.
23. Gude P., Rasker R., van den Noort J. Potential for future development on fire-prone lands. J. Forestry 2008, 106(4):198-205.
24. Han S.Y., Kwak S.J., Yoo S.H. Valuing environmental impacts of large dam construction in Korea: an application of choice experiments. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2008, 28:256-266.
25. Hesseln H., Loomis J.B., González-Cabán A. The effects of fire on recreation demand in Montana. West. J. Appl. For. 2004, 19:47-53.
26. Hesseln H., Loomis J.B., González-Cabán A., Alexander S. Wildfire effects on hiking and biking demand in New Mexico: a travel cost study. J. Environ. Manag. 2003, 69:359-368.
27. Hirsch, K.G., Fuglem P. (Eds.), 2006. Canadian Wildland Fire Strategy: Background Synthesis, Analyses, and Perspectives. Canadian Council of Forest Ministers, Edmonton, p. 104.
28. Hodzic A., Madronich S., Bohn B., Massie S., Menut L, Wiedinmyer C. Wildfire particulate matter in Europe during summer 2003: meso-scale modelling of smoke emissions, transport and radiative effects. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 2007, 7(2):4705-4760.
29. Jarvis, L.A., 2008. Residential development patterns in Flathead County, Montana. Master of Arts in Geography Thesis, The University of Montana, Missoula, MT, p. 88.
30. Kaval P. Perceived and actual wildfire danger: an economic and spatial analysis study in Colorado (USA). J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90(5):1862-1867.
31. Kaval P., Loomis J. The relationship between well-being and wildfire. Int. J. Ecol. Econ. Stat. 2007, 7(W07):29-43.
32. Kaval P., Loomis J., Seidl A. Willingness to pay for prescribed fire in the Colorado (USA) wildland urban interface. For. Policy Econom. 2007, 9(8):928-937.
33. Kim Y.S., Wells A. The impact of forest density on property values. J. Forestry 2005, 103:146-151.
34. Kochi I., Donovan G.H., Champ P.A., Loomis J.B. The economic cost of adverse health effects from wildfire-smoke exposure: a review. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2010, 19(7):803-817.
35. Kuhfeld, W.F., 2004. Orthogonal arrays. Advanced Analytics Division, SAS. Available at: (accessed 27.06.2011). http://support.sas.com/techsup/technote/ts723.html.
36. Lancaster K.J. A new approach to consumer theory. J. Polit. Econ. 1966, 74(2):132-157.
37. Liang J., Calkin D.E., Gebert K.M., Venn T.J., Silverstein R.P. Factors influencing large wildland fire suppression expenditures. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2008, 17(5):650-659.
38. Loomis J. Do nearby forest fires cause a reduction in residential property values?. J. For. Econom. 2004, 10(3):149-157.
39. Loomis J.B., González-Cabán A. A willingness-to-pay function for protecting acres of spotted owl habitat from fire. Ecol. Econ. 1998, 25:315-322.
40. Loomis J.B., González-Cabán A., Englin J.E. Testing the differential effects of forest fires on hiking and mountain biking demand and benefits. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2001, 26:508-522.
41. Loomis J.B., Le H.G., González-Cabán A. Testing transferability of willingness to pay for forest fire prevention among three states of California, Florida and Montana. J. For. Econom. 2005, 11:125-140.
42. Loomis J.B., Le H.G., González-Cabán A. Willingness ro pay function for two fuel treatments to reduce wildfire acreage burned: a scope test and comparison of White and Hispanic households. For. Policy Econom. 2009, 11(3):155-160.
43. Louviere J.J., Hensher D.A., Swait J. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
44. McAneney J., Chen K., Pitman A. 100-years of Australian bushfire property losses: is the risk significant and is it increasing?. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90(8):2819-2822.
45. McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics 1974, 105-142. Academic Press, New York. P. Zarembka (Ed.).
46. MDEQ (Montana Department of Environmental Quality), 2008. Wildfire smoke updates. Available at: (accessed 5.07.2011). http://www.deq.mt.gov/FireUpdates/default.mcpx.
47. Meyerhoff J., Liebe U. Status quo effect in choice experiments: empirical evidence on attitudes and choice task complexity. Land Econom. 2009, 85(3):515-528.
48. Morgan A. The impact of Hurricane Ivan on expected flood losses, perceived flood risk, and property values. J. Housing Res. 2007, 16(1):47-60.
49. Morgan, T., 2009. Director, Forest Industry Research. Bureau of Business and Economic Research. The University of Montana, Missoula, October (personal communication).
50. Mueller J., Loomis J., González-Cabán A. Do repeated wildfires change homebuyers' demand for homes in high risk areas? A hedonic analysis of the short and long-term effects of repeated wildfires on house prices in southern California. J. Real Estate Finance Econ. 2009, 38:155-172.
51. Mutch R.W., Rogers M.J., Stephens S.L., Gill A.M. Protecting lives and property in the wildland-urban interface: communities in Montana and southern California adopt Australian paradigm. Fire Technol. 2011, 47(2):357-377.
52. NPS (National Park Service), 2009. Glacier National Park. Available at: (accessed 18.02.2010). http://www.nps.gov/glac/.
53. NRIS, c2007. State of Montana Natural Resource Information System. Available at URL: (accessed 22.02.2008). http://nris.mt.gov/gis/gisdatalib/gisDataList.aspx.
54. O'Donnell, D.T., 2009. Social values for attributes at risk from wildfire in northwest Montana. Master of Science in Resource Conservation Thesis, The University of Montana, Missoula, p. 241.
55. Onboard Informatics, 2010. Flathead County, Montana (MT) City-data.com. Available at URL: (accessed 10.03.2011). http://www.city-data.com/county/Flathead_County-MT.html.
56. Power T.M., Barrett R.N. Post-Cowboy Economics: Pay and Prosperity in the New American West 2001, Island Press, Washington, DC.
57. Rittmaster R., Adamowicz W.L., Amiro B., Pelletier R.T. Economic analysis of health effects from forest fires. Can. J. For. Res. 2006, 36:868-877.
58. Rittmaster R., Adamowicz W.L., Amiro B., Pelletier R.T. Erratum: economic analysis of health effects from forest fires. Can. J. For. Res. 2008, 38:908.
59. Samuelson W., Zeckhauser R. Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk Uncertain. 1988, 1:7-59.
60. Statistics Canada, 2003. 2001 Census of Canada, Statistics Canada, Ottawa.
61. Steelman T.A., Burke C.A. Is wildfire policy in the United States sustainable?. J. Forestry 2007, 105(2):67-72.
62. Stetler K.M., Venn T.J., Calkin D.E. The effects of wildfire and environmental amenities on property values in northwest Montana, USA. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69(11):2233-2243.
63. Stewart S.I., Radeloff V.C., Hammer R.B., Hawbaker T.J. Defining the wildland-urban interface. J. Forestry 2007, 105(2):67-72.
64. Swanson L.D., Nickerson N., Lathrop J. Gateway to Glacier: The Emerging Economy of Flathead County 2003, National Parks Conservation Association, Washington, DC.
65. Thaler R. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 1980, 1:39-60.
66. Theobald T.M., Romme W.H. Expansion of the US wildland-urban interface. Landsc. Urban Plann. 2007, 83(4):340-354.
67. Thompson M.P., Calkin D.E., Finney M.A., Ager A.A., Gilbertson-Day J.W. Integrated national-scale assessment of wildfire risk to human and ecological values. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2011, 25(6):761-780. 10.1007/s00477-011-0461-0.
68. Thompson M.P., Calkin D.E., Gilbertson-Day J.W., Ager A.A. Advancing effects analysis for integrated, large-scale wildfire risk assessment. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2010, 10.1007/s10661-010-1731-x.
69. United States Census Bureau, c2009. 2006-2008 American community survey 3-year estimates. Flathead County, Montana. Available at URL: (accessed 30.06.2011). http://www.census.gov/acs/www/.
70. USDA, White House Council on Environmental Quality, USDI, 2002. Administrative actions to implement the President's healthy forests initiative', Fact Sheet S-0504.02, December 11, (USDA, White House Council on Environmental Quality and USDI: Washington, DC). Available at URL: (accessed 5.07.2011). http://www.blm.gov/pgdata/etc/medialib/blm/nifc/fuels/ea.Par.62163.File.dat/g_CEQbriefing.pdf.
71. USDA OIG (United States Department of Agriculture, Office of Inspector General), 2006. Forest service large fire suppression costs. Report No. 08601-44-SF, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, p. 47.
72. USDOI, USDA, 2000. Managing the impact of wildfires on communities and the environment, (USDI and USDA: Washington, DC). Available at URL: (accessed 5.07.2011). http://clinton4.nara.gov/CEQ/firereport.pdf.
73. Urban-wildland interface communities within vicinity of federal lands are at high risk from wildland fire. Fed. Regist. 2001, 66(3):751-777. USDOI and USDA (United States Department of the Interior and United States Department of Agriculture).
74. USDOI, USDA, Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of Commerce, US Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Association of State Foresters, 2001. Review and update of the 1995 federal wildland fire management policy. Bureau of land Management, Office of Fire and Aviation: Boise. Available at URL: (accessed 5.07.2011). http://www.nwcg.gov/branches/ppm/fpc/archives/fire_policy/index.htm.
75. USDOI, USDA, NASF, (United States Department of the Interior, United States Department of Agriculture, National Association of State Foresters), 2005. Quadrennial fire and fuels review report. National Advanced Fire and Resource Institute: Tucson.
76. US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), 1999. The benefits and costs of the clean air act 1990 to 2010. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
77. Venn T.J., Calkin D.E. Accommodating non-market values in evaluation of wildfire management in the United States: challenges and opportunities. Int. J. Wildland Fire 2011, 20(3):327-339.
78. Walker S.H., Rideout D.B., Loomis J.B., Reich R. Comparing the value of fuel treatment options in northern Colorado's urban and wildland interface areas. For. Policy Econom. 2007, 9(6):694-703.
79. Western Governors' Association, 2001. A collaborative approach for reducing wildland fire risks to communities and the environment: 10-year comprehensive strategy (Western Governors' Association: Denver) Available at URL: (accessed 5.07.2011). http://www.westgov.org/wga/publicat/TYIP.pdf.