The effect of information presentation on beliefs about the benefits of elective percutaneous coronary intervention

JAMA Internal Medicine

Volumn 174, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1623-1629

  Rothberg, Michael B ^a   Scherer, Laura ^b   Kashef, Mohammad Amin ^c   Coylewright, Megan ^d   Ting, Henry H ^d   Hu, Bo ^a   Zikmund Fisher, Brian J ^e,f  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^c BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIOVASCULAR AGENT;

ADULT; ANGINA PECTORIS; ARTICLE; CARDIOLOGIST; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; FEMALE; HEALTH BELIEF; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; INTERNET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICATION THERAPY MANAGEMENT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK REDUCTION; AGED; COMPREHENSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; ELECTIVE SURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PATIENT EDUCATION; RISK; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGINA PECTORIS; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; ELECTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; ODDS RATIO; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84907991943     PISSN: 21686106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3331     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, et al; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;127(1):e6-e245. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e31828124ad.
2. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al; COURAGE Trial Research Group. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(15):1503-1516.
3. Katritsis DG, Ioannidis JP. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus conservative therapy in nonacute coronary artery disease: ameta-analysis. Circulation. 2005;111(22):2906-2912.
4. Stergiopoulos K, Boden WE, Hartigan P, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes in patients with stable obstructive coronary artery disease andmyocardial ischemia: a collaborative meta-analysis of contemporary randomized clinical trials. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(2):232-240.
5. Holmboe ES, Fiellin DA, Cusanelli E, Remetz M, Krumholz HM. Perceptions of benefit and risk of patients undergoing first-time elective percutaneous coronary revascularization. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(9):632-637.
6. Kee F, McDonald P, Gaffney B. Risks and benefits of coronary angioplasty: the patients perspective: a preliminary study. Qual Health Care. 1997;6(3): 131-139.
7. Rothberg MB, Sivalingam SK, Ashraf J, et al. Patients' and cardiologists' perceptions of the benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary disease. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153 (5):307-313.
8. Whittle J, Conigliaro J, Good CB, KelleyME, Skanderson M. Understanding of the benefits of coronary revascularization procedures among patients who are offered such procedures. Am Heart J. 2007;154(4):662-668.
9. Lee JH, Chuu K, Spertus J, et al. Patients overestimate the potential benefits of elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Mo Med. 2012;109(1):79-84.
10. Kolata G. How it happens: it's not a "plumbing problem." New York Times. April 8, 2007. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/08/health/08hside.html?-r=1&. Accessed June 25, 2014.
11. Sanghavi D. Plumber's butt? the right and wrong way to think about heart attacks. The Slate Group, LLC. May 8, 2007. http://www.slate.com/articles/health-and-science/medical-examiner/2007/05/plumbers-butt.html. Accessed June 20, 2014.
12. Krumholz HM. Informed consent to promote patient-centered care. JAMA. 2010;303(12):1190-1191.
13. Coylewright M, Shepel K, Leblanc A, et al. Shared decision making in patients with stable coronary artery disease: PCI choice. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49827. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049827.
14. Rothberg MB. Coronary artery disease as clogged pipes: amisconceptual model. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6(1):129-132.
15. Chan PS, Patel MR, Klein LW, et al. Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA. 2011;306(1):53-61.
16. Joint Commission; American Medical Association-Convened Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement. Proceedings from the National Summit on Overuse. September 24, 2012. http://www.jointcommission.org/overuse-summit/. Accessed June 20, 2014.
17. MorganMW, Deber RB, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of an interactive videodisc decision aid for patients with ischemic heart disease. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15(10):685-693.
18. Liao L, Jollis JG, DeLong ER, Peterson ED, Morris KG, Mark DB. Impact of an interactive video on decision making of patients with ischemic heart disease. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11(6):373-376.
19. Bernstein SJ, Skarupski KA, Grayson CE, Starling MR, Bates ER, Eagle KA. A randomized controlled trial of information-giving to patients referred for coronary angiography: effects on outcomes of care. Health Expect. 1998;1(1):50-61.
20. Cohen DJ, Lavelle TA, Van Hout B, et al. Economic outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents versus bypass surgery for patients with left main or three-vessel coronary artery disease: one-year results from the SYNTAX trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;79 (2):198-209.
21. Fihn SD, Gardin JM, Abrams J, et al; American College of Cardiology Foundation. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2012;126(25):3097-3137.
22. Braddock CH III, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W. Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA. 1999;282(24):2313-2320.
23. Oshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ. Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(1):6-8.