A comparison between blending and surface deposition methods for the preparation of iron oxide/polysulfone nanocomposite membranes

Desalination

Volumn 354, Issue , 2014, Pages 125-142

  Homayoonfal, Maryam ^a   Mehrnia, Mohammad Reza ^a   Shariaty Niassar, Mojtaba ^a   Akbari, Ahmad ^b   Ismail, Ahmad Fauzi ^c   Matsuura, Takeshi ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KASHAN   (Iran)

^c UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Blending method; Interfacial polymerization; Iron oxide nanoparticles; Photopolymerization; Surface deposition method

Indexed keywords

INTERFACIAL POLYMERIZATION; IRON OXIDE NANOPARTICLE; NANO-COMPOSITE MEMBRANES; SURFACE DEPOSITION;

PHOTOPOLYMERIZATION;

FILTRATION; FTIR SPECTROSCOPY; IRON OXIDE; MEMBRANE; POLYMERIZATION; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

EID: 84907983471     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.09.031     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Shirazi M.J.A., Bazgir S., Shirazi M.M.A., Ramakrishna S. Coalescing filtration of oily wastewaters: characterization and application of thermal treated, electrospun polystyrene filters. Desalin. Water Treat. 2013, 51:5974-5986.
2. Shirazi M.M.A., Kargari A., Tabatabaei M., Ismail A.F., Matsuura Takeshi Concentration of glycerol from dilute glycerol wastewater using sweeping gas membrane distillation. Chem. Eng. Process. 2014, 78:58-66.
3. Baker R.W. Membrane Technology and Applications 2004, John Wiley and Sons, Menlo Park, California. 2nd edition.
4. Hausmanns S., Laufenberg G., Kunz B. Rejection of acetic acid and its improvement by combination with organic acids in dilute solutions using reverse osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 104(1-2):95-98.
5. Cath T.Y., Adams V.D., Childress A.E. Experimental study of desalination using direct contact membrane distillation: a new approach to flux enhancement. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 228(1):5-16.
6. Emadzadeh D., Lau W.J., Ismail A.F. Synthesis of thin film nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane with enhancement in water flux without sacrificing salt rejection. Desalination 2013, 330:90-99.
7. Chen X.N., Wan L.S., Wu Q.Y., Zhi S.H., Xu Z.K. Mineralized polyacrylonitrile-based ultrafiltration membranes with improved water flux and rejection towards dye. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 441:112-119.
8. Ng L.Y., Mohammad A.W., Leo C.P., Hilal N. Polymeric membranes incorporated with metal/metal oxide nanoparticles: a comprehensive review. Desalination 2013, 308:15-33.
9. Kim J., Van der Bruggen B. The use of nano particles in polymeric and ceramic membrane structures: review of manufacturing procedures and performance improvement for water treatment. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158:2335-2349.
10. Homayoonfal M., Mehrnia M.R., Mojtahedi Y.M., Ismail A.F. Effect of metal and metal oxide nanoparticle impregnation route on structure and liquid filtration performance of polymeric nanocomposite membranes: a comprehensive review. Desalin. Water Treat. 2013, 51:3295-3316.
11. Homayoonfal M., Mehrnia M.R., Rahmani S., Mohades Mojtahedi Y. Fabrication of alumina/polysulfone nanocomposite membranes with biofouling mitigation approach in membrane bioreactors. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, (in press).
12. 2 nanocomposite hollow fiber membranes with extremely high water flux and improved antifouling property. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 432:25-32.
13. Johnson J.R., Koros William J. Utilization of nanoplatelets in organic-inorganic hybrid separation materials: separation advantages and formation challenges. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2009, 40(3):268-275.
14. Yang H.L., Lin J.C.T., Huang C. Application of nanosilver surface modification to RO membrane and spacer for mitigating biofouling in seawater desalination. Water Res. 2009, 43:3777-3786.
15. Zodrow K., Brunet L., Mahendra S., Li D., Zhang A. Polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes impregnated with silver nanoparticles show improved biofouling resistance and virus removal. Water Res. 2009, 43:715-723.
16. Li L.H., Deng J.C., Deng H.R., Liu Z.L., Xin L. Synthesis and characterization of chitosan/ZnO nanoparticle composite membranes. Carbohydr. Res. 2010, 345:994-998.
17. 2/PES membrane for wastewater filtration. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 352:222-230.
18. Xu J., Bhattacharyya D. Fe/Pd nanoparticle immobilization in microfiltration membrane pores: synthesis, characterization, and application in the dechlorination of polychlorinated biphenyls. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46:2348-2359.
19. 2 nanoparticle addition on the characteristics of a new organic-inorganic hybrid membrane. Polymer 2009, 50:553-559.
20. Homayoonfal M., Mehrnia M.R., Shariaty-Niassar M., Akbari A., Sarrafzadeh M.H., Ismail A.F. Fabrication of magnetic nanocomposite membrane for separation of organic contaminant from water. Desalin. Water Treat. 2014, 1-7.
21. Nunes S.P., Peinemann K.V., Ohlrogge K., Alpers A., Keller M., Pires A.T.N. Membranes of poly(ether imide) and nanodispersed silica. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 157:219-226.
22. 2 self-assembled nanocomposite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 275:1-5.
23. Lee S.Y., Kim H.J., Patel R., Im S.J., Kim J.H., Min B.R. Silver nanoparticles immobilized on thin film composite polyamide membrane: characterization, nanofiltration, antifouling properties. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2007, 18:562-568.
24. 2 photo-catalyst: performance, characterization and fouling-resistant capability. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 330:297-306.
25. 2 nanoparticles with UV irradiation for modification of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 313:158-169.
26. 2 nanoparticles. Desalination 2013, 313:176-188.
27. 2 nanocomposite substrate for water desalination. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 237:70-80.
28. 3/PSf nanocomposite membranes: efficiency comparison of coating and blending methods in modification of filtration performance. Desalin. Water Treat. 2013, 51:6736-6742.
29. Homayoonfal M., Akbari A., Mehrnia M.R. Preparation of polysulfone nanofiltration membranes by UV-assisted grafting polymerization for water softening. Desalination 2010, 263:217-225.
30. Haizeng W., Jian W., Xing H., Congjie G. Surface-modified PSf UF membrane by UV-assisted graft polymerization of capsaicin derivative moiety for fouling and bacterial resistance. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 445:146-155.
31. Homayoonfal M., Mehrnia M.R. Amoxicillin separation from pharmaceutical solution by pH sensitive nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 130:74-83.
32. Saleh T.A., Gupta V.K. Synthesis and characterization of alumina nano-particles polyamide membrane with enhanced flux rejection performance. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 89:245-251.
33. Fathizadeh M., Aroujalian A., Raisi A. Effect of added NaX nano-zeolite into polyamide as a top thin layer of membrane on water flux and salt rejection in a reverse osmosis process. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 375(1-2):88-95.
34. Kim S.G., Hyeon D.H., Chun J.H., Chun B.H., Kim S.H. Nanocomposite poly(arylene ether sulfone) reverse osmosis membrane containing functional zeolite nanoparticles for seawater desalination. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 443:10-18.
35. 4 composite ultrafiltration membrane and its behavior in magnetic field. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:9-16.
36. Huang Z.Q., Guo X.P., Guo C.L., Zhang Z. Magnetization influence on the performance of ferrosoferric oxide: polyacrylonitrile membranes in ultrafiltration of pig blood solution. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2006, 28:415-421.
37. 4 magnetic composite membranes. Chin. Sci. Bull. 2011, 56(18):1951-1956.
38. 4 mixed matrix nanocomposite membrane: application studies in water purification. Polym. Compos. 2013, 34(11):1870-1877.
39. Akbari A., Homayoonfal M., Jabbari V. Effect of solution chemistry and operating conditions on the nanofiltration of acid dyes by a nanocomposite membrane. Water Sci. Technol. 2011, 64(12):2404-2409.
40. Yamagishi H., Crivello J.V., Belfort G. Development of a novel photochemical technique for modifying poly(arylsulfone) ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1995, 105:237-247.
41. Derakhsheshpoor R., Homayoonfal M., Akbari A., Mehrnia M.R. Amoxicillin separation from pharmaceutical wastewater by high permeability polysulfone nanofiltration membrane. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2013, 11(9):1-10.
42. 2 nanoparticles. Desalination 2008, 219(1-3):48-56.
43. Khulbe K.C., Feng C.Y., Matsuura T. Synthetic polymeric membranes characterization by atomic force microscopy. Springer Laboratory Manuals in Polymer Science 2007.
44. Shirazi M.M.A., Kargari A., Bazgir S., Tabatabaei M., Shirazi M.J.A., Abdullah M.S., Matsuura T., Ismail A.F. Characterization of electrospun polystyrene membrane for treatment of biodiesel's water-washing effluent using atomic force microscopy. Desalination 2013, 329:1-8.
45. Shirazi M.M.A., Bastani D., Kargari Ali, Tabatabaei M. Characterization of polymeric membranes for membrane distillation using atomic force microscopy. Desalin. Water Treat. 2013, 51:6003-6008.
46. Johnson D., Hilal N. Characterisation and quantification of membrane surface properties using atomic force microscopy: a comprehensive review. Desalination 2014, (in press).
47. Sabde A.D., Trivedi M.K., Ramachandhran V., Hanra M.S., Misra B.M. Casting and characterization of cellulose acetate butyrate based UF membranes. Desalination 1997, 114:223-232.
48. 4 nanoparticles incorporated within mesoporous silicon. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2010, 157(7):145-151.
49. Belfer S., Purinson Y., Kedem O. Surface modification of commercial polyamide reverse osmosis membranes by radical grafting: an ATR-FTIR study. Acta Polym. 1998, 49:574-582.
50. Dubinsky Stanislav, Grader Gideon S., Shter Gennady E., Silverstein Michael S. Thermal degradation of poly(acrylic acid) containing copper nitrate. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2004, 86:171-178.
51. 4 nanoplates between two carbon films. Carbon 2007, 45(9):1839-1846.
52. 2 nanoparticles. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 103:3623-3629.
53. 2 nanoparticle nanocomposite films with high transparency and efficient photodegradability. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2007, 92:1255-1264.
54. 2 nanoparticles for organic solvent nanofiltration. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 241:155-166.
55. Rivaton A., Gardette J.L. Photodegradation of polyethersulfone and polysulfone. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1999, 66(3):385-403.
56. Lau W.J., Ismail A.F., Misdan N., Kassim M.A. A recent progress in thin film composite membrane: a review. Desalination 2012, 287:190-199.
57. Veríssimo S., Peinemann K.V., Bordado J. Influence of the diamine structure on the nanofiltration performance, surface morphology and surface charge of the composite polyamide membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 279(1-2):266-275.
58. Tarboush B.J.A., Rana D., Matsuura T., Arafat H.A., Narbaitz R.M. Preparation of thin-film-composite polyamide membranes for desalination using novel hydrophilic surface modifying macromolecules. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325(1):166-175.
59. Lejnieks J., Mourran A., Tillmann W., Keul H., Möller M. Thin film of poly(acrylic acid-co-allyl acrylate) as a sacrificial protective layer for hydrophilic self cleaning glass. Materials 2010, (3):3369-3384.
60. Zhao C., Nie S., Tang M., Sun S. Polymeric pH-sensitive membranes-a review. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2011, 36(11):1499-1520.
61. Mansourpanah Y., Momeni Habili E. Preparation and modification of thin film PA membranes with improved antifouling property using acrylic acid and UV irradiation. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 430(1):158-166.
62. Lu A.H., Salabas E.L., Schuth F. Magnetic nanoparticles: synthesis, protection, functionalization, and application. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46:222-1244.
63. 2 composite membranes. Desalination 2002, 146:35-40.
64. Taurozzi J.S., Arul H., Bosak V.Z., Burban A.F., Voice T.C., Bruening M.L., Tarabara V.V. Effect of filler incorporation route on the properties of polysulfone-silver nanocomposite membranes of different porosities. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 325:58-68.
65. Sadrzadeh M., Bhattacharjee S. Rational design of phase inversion membranes by tailoring thermodynamics and kinetics of casting solution using polymer additives. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 441:31-44.
66. 2 nanoparticles on morphology and performance of crosslinked polyimide organic solvent nanofiltration (OSN) membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 343:189-198.
67. 2 organic-inorganic composite membranes for fouling resistance improvement. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 345:13-20.
68. Ismail A.F., Lai P.Y. Effects of phase inversion and rheological factors on formation of defect-free and ultrathin-skinned asymmetric polysulfone membranes for gas separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2003, 33(2):127-143.
69. 3-particle addition on PVDF ultrafiltration membrane performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 276:162-167.
70. 2 nanoparticles on the surface morphology and performance of microporous PES membrane. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255(9):4725-4732.
71. Hołda A.K., Aernouts B., Saeys W., Vankelecom I.F.J. Study of polymer concentration and evaporation time as phase inversion parameters for polysulfone-based SRNF membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 442:196-205.
72. 2 nanoparticle self-assembled aromatic polyamide thin-film-composite (TFC) membrane. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35(11):2388-2394.
73. 2 nanoparticle self-assembled aromatic polyamide thin-film composite (TFC) membrane as an approach to solve biofouling problem. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 211:157-165.
74. Semblante G.U., Tampubolon S.D.R., You S.J., Lin Y.F., Chang T.C., Yen F.C. Fouling reduction in membrane reactor through magnetic particles. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 435:62-70.