Communication and effectiveness in a US nursing home quality-improvement collaborative

Nursing and Health Sciences

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 291-297

  Arling, Priscilla A ^a   Abrahamson, Kathleen ^b   Miech, Edward J ^c   Inui, Thomas S ^c   Arling, Greg ^c  

^a BUTLER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c REGENSTRIEF INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative; Fall reduction; Mixed methods approach; Nursing home; Quality improvement

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COOPERATION; EDUCATION; EVALUATION STUDY; FALLING; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; MALE; MANPOWER; MASS COMMUNICATION; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; NURSING HOME; NURSING STAFF; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PUBLIC RELATIONS; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

ACCIDENTAL FALLS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMMUNICATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINNESOTA; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; NURSING HOMES; NURSING STAFF; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84907976867     PISSN: 14410745     EISSN: 14422018     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12098     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abrahamson KA, Arling PA, Arling GW. A state-sponsored approach to quality improvement in nursing homes: insights from providers. Ann. Long-Term Care 2013; 21: 2-6.
2. Arling GW, Cooke V, Lewis T, Perkins A, Grabowski D, Abrahamson KA. Minnesota's provider-initiated approach yields care quality gains at participating nursing homes. Health Aff. 2013; 32: 1631-1638.
3. Chan YE, Dekker AR, Ramsden DJ. Information systems and health care III: diffusing healthcare knowledge: a case study of the care delivery network. Commun. Assoc. Inform. Syst. 2005; 15: 225-241.
4. Cooke V, Arling GW, Lewis T, Abrahamson KA, Mueller C, Edstrom L. Minnesota's nursing facility performance-based incentive payment program: an innovative model for promoting care quality. Gerontologist 2010; 50: 556-563.
5. Cooperrider DL, Srivastva S. Appreciative inquiry in organizational life. Res. Organ. Change Dev. 1987; 1: 129-169.
6. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2011.
7. Cretin S, Shortell SM, Keeler EB. An evaluation of collaborative interventions to improve chronic illness care. Eval. Rev. 2004; 28: 28-51.
8. Gould J. The role of regional collaboratives: the California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative model. Clin. Perinatol. 2010; 37: 71-86.
9. Hicks L, O'malley A, Lieu T etal. Impact of health disparities collaboratives on racial/ethnic and insurance disparities in US community health centers. Arch. Intern. Med. 2010; 170: 279-286.
10. Ibm Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (20.0 edn). Armonk, NY: IBM Corp, 2011.
11. Jackson G, Powell A, Ordin D etal. Developing and sustaining quality improvement partnerships in the VA. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2010; 25: 38-43.
12. Kane RL, Arling G, Mueller C, Held R, Cooke V. A quality-based payment strategy for nursing home care in Minnesota. Gerontologist 2007; 47: 108-115.
13. Katz D, Kahn RL. The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York: Wiley, 1978.
14. Kilo CM. A framework for collaborative improvement: lessons from the institute for healthcare imrpovements breakthrough series. Qual. Manag. Health Care 1998; 6: 1-13.
15. Lindenauer PK. Effects of quality improvement collaboratives. Brit. Med. J. 2008; 336: 1448-1449.
16. Mdh. 2009. Minnesota NH Report Card Technical User Guide [Online]. [Cited 9 Sep 2013.] Available from URL: http://nhreportcard.dhs.mn.gov/technicaluserguide.pdf
17. Mittman B. Creating the evidence base for quality improvement collaboratives. Ann. Intern. Med. 2004; 140: 897-901.
18. Nembhard IM. Learning and improving in quality improvement collaboratives: which collaborative features do participants value most? Health Serv. Res. 2009; 44: 358-378.
19. Ovretveit J. How to run an effective improvement collaborative. Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur. 2002; 15: 192-196.
20. Sas Institute. SAS (9.3 edn). Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 2011.
21. Schouten LMT, Hulscher MEJL, Van Everdingen JJE, Huijsman R, Niessen LW, Grol RPTM. Short- and long-term effects of a quality improvement collaborative on diabetes management. Implement. Sci. (Serial online). [Cited 1 Sept 2013.] Available from URL: http://www.implementationscience.com/content/5/1/94/abstract
22. Shah R, Goldstein SM, Unger BT, Henry TD. Explaining anomalous high performance in a health care supply chain. Decis. Sci. 2008; 39: 759-789.
23. Singer JD, Willett JB. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
24. Versteeg MH, Laurant MG, Franx GC, Jacobs AJ, Wensing MJ. Factors associated with the impact of quality improvement collaboratives in mental healthcare: an exploratory study. Implement. Sci. (Serial online). [Cited 9 Sept 2013.] Available from URL: http://www.implementationscience.com/content/7/1/1
25. Vos L, Dückers ML, Wagner C, Van Merode GG. Applying the quality improvement collaborative method to process redesing: a multiple case study. Implement. Sci. (Serial online). [Cited 1 Sept 2013]. Available from URL: http://www.implementationscience.com/content/5/1/19
26. Werner RM, Konetzka RT, Polsky D. The effect of pay-for-performance in nursing homes: evidence from state Medicaid programs. Health Serv. Res. 2013; 48: 1393-1414