CO2 deserts: Implications of existing CO2 supply limitations for carbon management

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 48, Issue 19, 2014, Pages 11713-11720

  Middleton, Richard S ^a   Clarens, Andres F ^b   Liu, Xiaowei ^b   Bielicki, Jeffrey M ^c,d   Levine, Jonathan S ^e  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b University of Virginia   (United States)

^c The Ohio State University   (United States)

^d OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Independent Technology Consultant   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARID REGIONS; ARTIFICIAL LIFE; CARBON FOOTPRINT; CLIMATE CHANGE; DIGITAL STORAGE; ENHANCED RECOVERY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; LIFE CYCLE; PETROLEUM PROSPECTING;

CARBON MANAGEMENT; ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY; INDUSTRIAL SECTOR; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; PIPELINE NETWORKS; STORAGE TECHNOLOGY; SUPPLY LIMITATIONS; U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; OIL;

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CLIMATE CHANGE; DATA SET; DESERT; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS;

AIR POLLUTION; AIR POLLUTION CONTROL; ARTICLE; CARBON FOOTPRINT; CARBON SINK; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DESERT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PIPELINE; UNITED STATES; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GOVERNMENT; INDUSTRY; PROCEDURES;

UNITED STATES;

CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON FOOTPRINT; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; INDUSTRY; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY;

EID: 84907943780     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es5022685     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Lashof, D. A.; Ahuja, D. R. Relative contributions of greenhouse gas emissions to global warming Nature 1990, 344 (5) 529-531
2. 2. IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage, 2005; Chapter 4 (http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/srccs/srccs-wholereport.pdf).
3. Jaramillo, P. A life cycle comparison of coal and natural gas for electricity generation and the production of transportation fuels; Carnegie Mellon University: Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2007.
4. Mikkelsen, M.; Jørgensen, M.; Krebs, F. C. The teraton challenge. A review of fixation and transformation of carbon dioxide Energy Environ. Sci. 2010, 3 (1) 43-81
5. Jun, Y. S.; Giammar, D. E.; Werth, C. J. Impacts of geochemical reactions on geologic carbon sequestration Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47 (1) 3-8
6. Dufour, A. Geological sequestration of biomass char to mitigate climate change Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47 (18) 10106-10107
7. Aycaguer, A.-C.; Lev-On, M.; Winer, A. Reducing carbon dioxide emissions with enhanced oil recovery projects: A life cycle assessment approach Energy Fuels 2001, 15, 303-308
8. NETL Carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery: Untapped domestic energy supply and long term carbon storage solution; 2010, (http://www.netl.doe.gov/file%20library/research/oil-gas/CO2-EOR-Primer.pdf).
9. 2-EOR); U.S. Department of Energy: Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
10. Leach, A.; Mason, C. F.; Veld, K. v. t. Co-optimization of enhanced oil recovery and carbon sequestration Resour. Energy Econ. 2011, 33 (4) 893-912
11. U.S. EPA Inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-2006; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2008, (http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/ghgemissions/08-CR.pdf).
12. 2 Flooding Conference, Midland, TX, 2010.
13. 2 now eclipses steam in US EOR production. http://www.ogj.com/articles/print/vol-110/issue-4/general-interest/special-report-eor-heavy-oil-survey/survey-miscible-co-2.html (May 2013).
14. 2 recovery and sequestration Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40 (12) 4016-4024
15. Tao, Z.; Clarens, A. F. Estimating the carbon sequestration capacity of shale formations using methane production rates Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47 (19) 11318-11325
16. 2 sequestration through enhanced oil recovery Energy Procedia 2013, 37, 6909-6919
17. Metz, B.; Davidson, O.; Coninck, H. d.; Loos, M.; Meyer, L. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 2005.
18. Liu, X.; Clarens, A. F.; Colosi, L. M. Algae biodiesel has potential despite inconclusive results to date Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 104, 803-806
19. Clarens, A. F.; Nassau, H.; Resurreccion, E. P.; White, M. A.; Colosi, L. M. Environmental Impacts of Algae-Derived Biodiesel and Bioelectricity for Transportation Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (17) 7554-7560
20. Liu, X.; Saydah, B.; Eranki, P.; Colosi, L. M.; Mitchell, B. G.; Rhodes, J.; Clarens, A. F. Pilot-scale data provide enhanced estimates of the life cycle energy and emissions profile of algae biofuels produced via hydrothermal liquefaction Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 148, 163-171
21. Stephenson, A. L.; Kazamia, E.; Dennis, J. S.; Howe, C. J.; Scott, S. A.; Smith, A. G. Life-cycle assessment of potential algal biodiesel production in the United Kingdom: A comparison of raceways and air-lift tubular bioreactors Energy Fuels 2010, 24 (7) 4062-4077
22. The Global Status of CCS: 2013; Global CCS Institute: Docklands, Australia, 2013.
23. U.S. EPA. Draft inventory of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990-2012; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2014.
24. Nelson, K.; Carr, T. National carbon sequestration database and geographic information system (NatCarb); University of Kansas Center for Research: Lawrence, KS, USA, 2009.
25. EPA Facility Level GHG Emissions Data; U.S. EPA: Washington, DC, USA, 2013.
26. Overcash, M.; Li, Y.; Griffing, E.; Rice, G. A life cycle inventory of carbon dioxide as a solvent and additive for industry and in products J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2007, 82 (11) 1023-1038
27. Xu, Y.; Isom, L.; Hanna, M. A. Adding values to carbon dioxide from ethanol fermentations Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 3311-3319
28. Eggleston, S.; Buendia, L.; Miwa, K.; Ngara, T.; Tanabe, K. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
29. U.S. EPA, U. S. 2012 Greenhouse gas emissions from large facilities; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, USA, 2014).
30. Environmental management-Life cycle assessment-Requirements and guidelines, ISO 14044:2006; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
31. Luo, D.; Hu, Z.; Choi, D. G.; Thomas, V. M.; Realff, M. J.; Chance, R. R. Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas emissions for an ethanol production process based on blue-green algae Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44 (22) 8670-8677
32. Venteris, E. R.; Skaggs, R. L.; Coleman, A. M.; Wigmosta, M. S. A GIS cost model to assess the availability of freshwater, seawater, and saline groundwater for algal biofuel production in the United States Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47. (9) 4840-4849
33. Bielicki, J. M. Spatial clustering and carbon capture and storage deployment Energy Procedia 2009, 1 (1) 1691-1698
34. Hill, J.; Polasky, S.; Nelson, E.; Tilman, D.; Huo, H.; Ludwig, L.; Neumann, J.; Zheng, H.; Bonta, D. Climate change and health costs of air emissions from biofuels and gasoline Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106 (6) 2077-2082
35. 2 pipeline transport Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2013, 16, 241-270
36. 2 Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2 (4) 448-467