Impacts of geochemical reactions on geologic carbon sequestration

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 3-8

  Jun, Young Shin ^a   Giammar, Daniel E ^a   Werth, Charles J ^b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

^b United States of America   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE EFFECT; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; ENERGY DEMANDS; ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS; ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY; GEOCHEMICAL REACTION; INTERDISCIPLINARY COLLABORATIONS; REACTIVE TRANSPORT;

CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

GEOCHEMISTRY;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; GEOCHEMICAL METHOD; INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; UNDERGROUND STORAGE;

ARTICLE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GEOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS; MINERALOGY; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; POROSITY; PRECIPITATION; PRESSURE; SALINITY; SUPERCRITICAL FLUID; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY; THERMODYNAMICS;

AIR POLLUTANTS; AIR POLLUTION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CLIMATE CHANGE; GEOLOGICAL PHENOMENA;

EID: 84871810726     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: 15205851     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es3027133     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; IPCC: New York, 2005.
2. 2 capture and storage: From pore scale to regional scale Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5 (6) 7328-7345
3. 2 transportation and geological storage Environ. Sci. echnol. 2012, 10.1021/es301292n
4. 2 pressure Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 10.1021/es301231n
5. 2 in a sandstone formation Chem. Geol. 2007, 242 (3-4) 319-346
6. 2 injection at the Frio-I Brine Pilot Chem. Geol. 2010, 271 (3-4) 153-164
7. Hu, Y.; Ray, J. R.; Jun, Y.-S. Biotite-brine interactions under acidic hydrothermal conditions: Fibrous illite, goethite, and kaolinite formation and biotite surface cracking Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (14) 6175-6180
8. 2-brine-biotite interactions: Ion exchange, biotite dissolution, and illite precipitation Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 10.1021/es301273g
9. 2-brine-phlogopite interactions Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44 (15) 5999-6005
10. 2-induced phlogopite dissolution and secondary mineral formation Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (4) 1737-1743
11. 2 sequestration conditions Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 4596-4606
12. 2 storage in sedimentary rocks Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4 (1) 73-89
13. 2 sequestration in the Frio Formation, Texas, USA J. Geochem. Explor. 2006, 89 (1-3) 183-186
14. 2-injection enhanced oil recovery site, Saskatchewan, Canada Appl. Geochem. 2005, 20 (6) 1131-1157
15. 2 injection site, Japan Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2 (3) 309-318
16. 2 sequestration site, Mississippi, U.S.A Chem. Geol. 2012, 291 (0) 269-277
17. 2 solubility in pure water and aqueous NaCl solutions from 273 to 533 K and from 0 to 2000 bar Chem. Geol. 2003, 193 (3-4) 257-271
18. 2: An in situ high pressure X-ray diffraction study Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 10.1021/es301126f
19. Kharaka, Y. K.; Hanor, J. S.; Heinrich, D. H.; Karl, K. T., Deep fluids in the continents: I. Sedimentary basins. In Treatise on Geochemistry; Pergamon: Oxford, 2007; pp 1-48.
20. Brantley, S. L., Kinetics of Mineral Dissolution. In Kinetics of Water-Rock Interaction; Brantley, S. L.; Kubicki, J. D.; White, A. F., Eds. Springer: New York, 2008; pp 151-196.
21. 2-saturated water through a siliceous sandstone plug from the Hontomin test site (N Spain). Experiment and modeling Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 10.1021/es-30012222
22. 2 and brine: Pore-Scale studies in micromodels Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46 (7) 4228-4235
23. Marini, L. Geological Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide: Thermodynamics, Kinetics, And Reaction Path Modeling; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006.
24. Drummond, C.; Israelachvili, J. Fundamental studies of crude oil-surface water interactions and its relationship to reservoir wettability J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2004, 45 (1-2) 61-81
25. 2 Capture and Storage project (CCP); Thomas, D. C.; Benson, S. M., Eds.; Elsevier: New York, 2005; Vol. II.
26. 2 storage by fluorescence in situ hybridisation Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4 (6) 981-989
27. 2-water displacement in a homogeneous pore network Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 10.1021/es3014503
28. 2 geological storage in deep saline formations Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5 (2) 241-256
29. 2 displacement of water in a dual-permeability pore network micromodel Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (17) 7581-7588
30. 2 intrusion and associated geochemical transformations in a shallow gorundwater system using complex electric methods Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 10.1021/es301260e
31. Newell, D. L.; Carey, J. W. Experimental evaluation of wellbore integrity along the cement-rock boundary Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 10.1021/es3011404
32. Stauffer, P. H.; Viswanathan, H. S.; Pawar, R. J.; Guthrie, G. D.; System, A Model for geologic sequestration of carbon dioxide Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43 (3) 565-570
33. 2 releases from deep formations; effect of dissolution kinetics Energy Convers. Manage. 2004, 45 (18-19) 2833-2848
34. 2 injection experiment Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 7, 202-217
35. 2 geological storage: What do we know? Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5 (4) 826-840
36. Mitchell, A. C.; Dideriksen, K.; Spangler, L. H.; Cunningham, A. B.; Gerlach, R. Microbially enhanced carbon capture and storage by mineral-trapping and solubility-trapping Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44 (13) 5270-5276
37. 2 intrusion in deeper freshwater aquifers Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 9 (0) 262-271
38. Klusman, R. W. Comparison of surface and near-surface geochemical methods for detection of gas microseepage from carbon dioxide sequestration Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5 (6) 1369-1392
39. Birkholzer, J. T.; Daley, T. M.; Jordan, P.; Oldenburg, C.; Rutqvist, J. National Risk Assessment Partnership (NRAP). e sd.lbl.gov/research/programs/gcs/ projects/nrap/ (accessed June 9, 2012).
40. 2) Geologic Sequestration (GS) Wells, EPA-HQ-OW-200-0390 FRL-9232-7; Environmental Protection Agency, Fedral Register,.
41. Gray, W. G.; Miller, C. T. Thermodynamically constrained averaging theory approach for modeling flow and transport phenomena in porous medium systems: 8. Interface and common curve dynamics Adv. Water Resour. 2010, 33 (12) 1427-1443
42. Xu, M.; Sullivan, K.; VanNess, G. F.; Knauss, K.; Higgins, S. R. Dissolution kinetics and mechanisms at dolomite-water interfaces: Effects of electrolyte specific ionic strength Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 10.1021/es301284h
43. Jung, H. B.; Jansik, D.; Um, W. Imaging wellbore cement degradation by carbon dioxide under geologic sequestration condition using X-ray computed microtomography Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 10.1021/es3012707
44. 3 precipitation and permeability reduction in a model subsurface sedimentary system Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44 (20) 7833-7838
45. 13C NMR Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 10.1021/es301287n
46. 2 Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45 (14) 6204-6210
47. 2-water interface J. Phys. Chem. B 2011, 115 (19) 6076-6087
48. Molins, S.; Trebotich, D.; Steefel, C. I.; Shen, C. An investigation of the effect of pore scale flow on average geochemical reaction rates using direct numerical simulation Water Resour. Res. 2012, 48, W03527
49. 2 storage: Capacity and regulatory implications Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2009, 3, 745-756