Cellulose nanoparticles are a biodegradable photoacoustic contrast agent for use in living mice

Photoacoustics

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 119-127

  Jokerst, Jesse V ^a   Van de Sompel, Dominique ^a   Bohndiek, Sarah E ^a   Gambhir, Sanjiv S ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biodegradation; Cellulose; Nanoparticle; Optoacoustic; Ovarian cancer; Photoacoustic imaging

Indexed keywords

BIODEGRADATION; CELLULOSE; DISEASES; MAMMALS; MICROBIOLOGY; MOLECULAR IMAGING; ULTRASONIC APPLICATIONS; NANOPARTICLES;

CELLULOSE NANOPARTICLES; LIMIT OF DETECTION; OPTOACOUSTIC; OVARIAN CANCERS; PHOTO-ACOUSTIC IMAGING; PHOTOACOUSTIC SIGNALS; SMALL MOLECULES; SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL RESOLUTIONS; CONTRAST AGENT;

NANOPARTICLES; BIODEGRADATION;

EID: 84907858636     PISSN: 22135979     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2014.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Agarwal A. Targeted gold nanorod contrast agent for prostate cancer detection by photoacoustic imaging. J Appl Phys 2007, 102. 064701-064701-064704.
2. Manohar S., Kharine A., van Hespen J.C., Steenbergen W., van Leeuwen T.G. Photoacoustic mammography laboratory prototype: imaging of breast tissue phantoms. J Biomed Opt 2004, 9:1172-1181.
3. Aguirre A., Ardeshirpour Y., Sanders M.M., Brewer M., Zhu Q. Potential role of coregistered photoacoustic and ultrasound imaging in ovarian cancer detection and characterization. Transl Oncol 2011, 4:29-37.
4. Xu M., Wang L.V. Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine. Rev Sci Instrum 2006, 77:041101.
5. Wang L.V., Hu S. Photoacoustic tomography in vivo imaging from organelles to organs. Science 2012, 335:1458-1462.
6. Ntziachristos V., Razansky D. Molecular imaging by means of multispectral optoacoustic tomography (MSOT). Chem Rev 2010, 110:2783-2794.
7. Lutz A.M. Early diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma: is a solution in sight?. Radiology 2011, 259:329-345.
8. Bast R.C., Hennessy B., Mills G.B. The biology of ovarian cancer: new opportunities for translation. Nat Rev Cancer 2009, 9:415-428.
9. Kim C., Erpelding T.N., Jankovic L., Wang L.V. Performance benchmarks of an array-based hand-held photoacoustic probe adapted from a clinical ultrasound system for non-invasive sentinel lymph node imaging. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Eng Sci 2011, 369:4644-4650.
10. Kim C., Song K.H., Gao F., Wang L.V. Sentinel lymph nodes and lymphatic vessels: noninvasive dual-modality in vivo mapping by using indocyanine green in rats-volumetric spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging and planar fluorescence imaging. Radiology 2010, 255:442-450.
11. Razansky D. Multispectral opto-acoustic tomography of deep-seated fluorescent proteins in vivo. Nat Photonics 2009, 3:412-417.
12. van de Ven S.M.W.Y. Molecular imaging using light-absorbing imaging agents and a clinical optical breast imaging system-a phantom study. Mol Imaging Biol 2011, 13:232-238.
13. Levi J. Design, synthesis, and imaging of an activatable photoacoustic probe. J Am Chem Soc 2010, 132:11264-11269.
14. Zerda A., Kim J.W., Galanzha E.I., Gambhir S.S., Zharov V.P. Advanced contrast nanoagents for photoacoustic molecular imaging, cytometry, blood test and photothermal theranostics. CMMI 2011, 6:346-369.
15. Kircher M.F. A brain tumor molecular imaging strategy using a new triple-modality MRI-photoacoustic-Raman nanoparticle. Nat Med 2012, 18:829-834.
16. Chen Y.S. Silica-coated gold nanorods as photoacoustic signal nanoamplifiers. Nano Lett 2011, 11:348-354.
17. De la Zerda A. Carbon nanotubes as photoacoustic molecular imaging agents in living mice. Nat Nanotechnol 2008, 3:557-562.
18. Wu L. A green synthesis of carbon nanoparticles from honey and their use in real-time photoacoustic imaging. Nano Res 2013, 6(5):312-325.
19. Lovell J.F. Porphysome nanovesicles generated by porphyrin bilayers for use as multimodal biophotonic contrast agents. Nat Mater 2011, 10:324-332.
20. Ku G. Copper sulfide nanoparticles as a new class of photoacoustic contrast agent for deep tissue imaging at 1064-nm. ACS Nano 2012, 6:7489-7496.
21. Kim G. Indocyanine-green-embedded PEBBLEs as a contrast agent for photoacoustic imaging. J Biomed Opt 2007, 12:044020.
22. Wilson K., Homan K., Emelianov S. Biomedical photoacoustics beyond thermal expansion using triggered nanodroplet vaporization for contrast-enhanced imaging. Nat Commun 2012, 3:618.
23. Tam J.M. Controlled assembly of biodegradable plasmonic nanoclusters for near-infrared imaging and therapeutic applications. ACS Nano 2010, 4:2178-2184.
24. Yoon S.J. Utility of biodegradable plasmonic nanoclusters in photoacoustic imaging. Opt Lett 2010, 35:3751-3753.
25. de Souza Lima M.M., Borsali R. Rodlike cellulose microcrystals: structure, properties, and applications. Macromol Rapid Commun 2004, 25:771-787.
26. Capadona J.R. Polymer nanocomposites with nanowhiskers isolated from microcrystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10:712-716.
27. Samir M.A.S.A., Alloin F., Dufresne A. Review of recent research into cellulosic whiskers, their properties and their application in nanocomposite field. Biomacromolecules 2005, 6:612-626.
28. Atalla R.H., Vanderhart D.L. Native cellulose: a composite of two distinct crystalline forms. Science (New York, NY) 1984, 223:283.
29. Siqueira G., Bras J., Dufresne A. Cellulosic bionanocomposites: a review of preparation, properties and applications. Polymers 2010, 2:728-765.
30. Braun B., Dorgan J.R., Chandler J.P. Cellulosic nanowhiskers. Theory and application of light scattering from polydisperse spheroids in the Rayleigh-Gans-Debye regime. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9:1255-1263.
31. Tingaut P., Eyholzer C., Zimmermann Functional polymer nanocomposite materials from microfibrillated cellulose 2011.
32. Bohndiek S.E., Bodapati S., Van De Sompel D., Kothapalli S.-R., Gambhir S.S. Development and application of stable phantoms for the evaluation of photoacoustic imaging instruments. PLOS ONE 2013, 8:e75533.
33. Jokerst J.V., Cole A.J., Van de Sompel D., Gambhir S.S. Gold nanorods for ovarian cancer detection with photoacoustic imaging and resection guidance via raman imaging in living mice. ACS Nano 2012, 6:10366-10377.
34. Needles A. Development of a combined photoacoustic micro-ultrasound system for estimating blood oxygenation. IEEE, 2010 2010, 390-393.
35. Jokerst J.V., Thangaraj M., Kempen P., Sinclair R., Gambhir S.S. Photoacoustic imaging of mesenchymal stem cells in living mice via silica-coated gold nanorods. ACS Nano 2012, 6:5920-5930.
36. Al-Nasiry S., Geusens N., Hanssens M., Luyten C., Pijnenborg R. The use of Alamar Blue assay for quantitative analysis of viability, migration and invasion of choriocarcinoma cells. Hum Reprod 2007, 22:1304-1309.
37. Moss D., Bergmeyer H. Methods of enzymatic analysis 1984, Academic Press, New York, NY.
38. Wang Y., Xing D., Zeng Y., Chen Q. Photoacoustic imaging with deconvolution algorithm. Phys Med Biol 2004, 49:3117.
39. Loening A.M., Gambhir S.S. AMIDE: a free software tool for multimodality medical image analysis. Mol Imaging 2003, 2:131-137.
40. Lozano J., Rotstein E., Urbicain M. Total porosity and open-pore porosity in the drying of fruits. J Food Sci 2006, 45:1403-1407.
41. Orendorff C.J., Murphy C.J. Quantitation of metal content in the silver-assisted growth of gold nanorods. J Phys Chem B 2006, 110:3990-3994.
42. Link S., Burda C., Nikoobakht B., El-Sayed M. Laser-induced shape changes of colloidal gold nanorods using femtosecond and nanosecond laser pulses. J Phys Chem B 2000, 104:6152-6163.
43. Pu K. Semiconducting polymer nanoparticles as photoacoustic molecular imaging probes in living mice. Nat Nanotechnol 2014, 9:233-239.
44. Wolford S.T. Reference range database for serum chemistry and hematology values in laboratory animals. J Toxicol Environ Health 1986, 18:161-188.
45. Derelanko M.J., Hollinger M.A. Handbook of toxicology 2001, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida USA.
46. Åkerholm M., Hinterstoisser B., Salmén L. Characterization of the crystalline structure of cellulose using static and dynamic FT-IR spectroscopy. Carbohydr Res 2004, 339:569-578.
47. Querejeta-Fernández A., Chauve G., Methot M., Bouchard J., Kumacheva E. Chiral plasmonic films formed by gold nanorods and cellulose nanocrystals. J Am Chem Soc 2014, 136(12):4788-4793.
48. Dong S., Roman M. Fluorescently labeled cellulose nanocrystals for bioimaging applications. J Am Chem Soc 2007, 129:13810-13811.
49. Yang H., Yan R., Chen H., Lee D.H., Zheng C. Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 2007, 86:1781-1788.
50. Jain P.K., Lee K.S., El-Sayed I.H., El-Sayed M.A. Calculated absorption and scattering properties of gold nanoparticles of different size, shape, and composition: applications in biological imaging and biomedicine. J Phys Chem B 2006, 110:7238-7248.
51. Choi H.S. Renal clearance of quantum dots. Nat Biotechnol 2007, 25:1165-1170.
52. Nacke H. Identification and characterization of novel cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic genes and enzymes derived from German grassland soil metagenomes. Biotechnol Lett 2012, 34:663-675.
53. Luxenhofer R. Doubly amphiphilic poly (2-oxazoline) s as high-capacity delivery systems for hydrophobic drugs. Biomaterials 2010, 31:4972-4979.