Economies of scale and scope in Australian urban water utilities

Utilities Policy

Volumn 31, Issue , 2014, Pages 52-62

  Worthington, Andrew C ^a   Higgs, Helen ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Australia; Economies of scale; Economies of scope; Urban water utilities

Indexed keywords

CAPITAL PROVISION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMY OF SCALE; NUMERICAL MODEL; URBAN ECONOMY;

AUSTRALIA;

EID: 84907820361     PISSN: 09571787     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2014.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abbott M., Cohen B. Industry structure issues in the water and wastewater services sectors in Australia. Econ. Pap. 2009, 29:48-63.
2. Abbott M., Cohen B. Productivity and efficiency in the water industry. Util. Pol. 2009, 17:233-244.
3. Anwandter L., Ozuna T. Can public sector reforms improve the efficiency of public water utilities. Env. Dev. Econ. 2002, 7:687-700.
4. Aubert C., Reynaud A. The impact of regulation on cost efficiency: an empirical analysis of Wisconsin water utilities. J. Prod. Anal. 2005, 23:383-409.
5. Bhattacharya A., Harris T., Narayanan R., Raffiee K. Specification and estimation of the effect of ownership on the economic efficiency of the water utilities. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 1995, 25:759-784.
6. Bottasso A., Conti M. Scale economies, technology and technical change in the water industry: evidence from the English water only sector. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 2009, 39:138-147.
7. Byrnes J., Crase L., Dollery B.E., Villano R. The relative economic efficiency of urban water utilities in regional New South Wales and Victoria. Res. Energy Econ. 2010, 32:439-455.
8. Coelli T., Walding S. Performance measurement in the Australian water supply industry: a preliminary analysis. Performance Measurement and Regulation of Network Utilities 2006, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. T. Coelli, D. Lawrence (Eds.).
9. da Silva e Souza G., Coelho de Faria R., Belchiar S., Moreira T. Estimating the relative efficiency of Brazilian publicly and privately owned water utilities: a stochastic cost frontier approach. J. Am. Water Res. Assoc. 2007, 43:1237-1244.
10. Erbetta F., Cave M. Regulation and efficiency incentives: evidence from the England and Wales water and sewerage industry. Rev. Net. Econ. 2006, 6:425-452.
11. Estache A., Trujillo L. Efficiency effects of 'privatization' in Argentina's water and sanitation services. Water Pol. 2003, 5:369-380.
12. Fabbri P., Fraquelli G. Costs and structure of technology in the Italian water industry. Empire 2000, 27:65-82.
13. Filippini M., Hrovatin N., Zorić J. Cost efficiency of Slovenian water distribution utilities: an application of stochastic frontier methods. J. Prod. Anal. 2008, 29:169-182.
14. Fraquelli G., Moiso V. Cost Efficiency and Economies of Scale in the Italian Water Industry 2005, Società Italiana di Economia Pubblica (SIEP), Dipartimento di Economia Pubblica e Territoriale - Università di Pavia, Available at:, (accessed July 2014). http://www-3.unipv.it/.
15. Fraquelli G., Piacenza M., Vannoni D. Scope and scale economies in multiutilities: evidence from gas, water and electricity combinations. App. Econ. 2004, 36:2045-2057.
16. García-Valiñas M.A., Muniz M.A. Is DEA useful in the regulation of water utilities? A dynamic efficiency evaluation. App. Econ. 2007, 39:245-252.
17. Glustoff E., Wickham E. Negative marginal cost and disposal: some implications for the theory of the firm. Aust. Econ. Pap. 1991, 30:64-69.
18. Kirkpatrick C., Parker D., Zhang Y.F. State versus private sector provision of water services in Africa: an empirical analysis. World Bank. Econ. Rev. 2006, 20:143-163.
19. Munisamy S. Efficiency and ownership in water supply: evidence from Malaysia. Proceedings of the 12th International Business Research Conference, 8-9 April, Dubai, United Arab Emirates 2010, Available at:, (accessed July 2014). http://www.wbiconpro.com/.
20. National Water Commission National Performance Report 2006-07 Urban Water Utilities 2008, Available at:, (accessed July 2014). http://www.nwc.gov.au/.
21. National Water Commission National Performance Report 2007-08 Urban Water Utilities 2009, Available at:, (accessed July 2014). http://www.nwc.gov.au/.
22. National Water Commission National Performance Report 2008-09 Urban Water Utilities, Indicators and Definitions Handbook and Auditing Requirements 2010, Available at:, (accessed July 2014). http://www.nwc.gov.au/.
23. National Water Commission National Performance Report 2008-09 Urban Water Utilities 2010, Available at:, (accessed July 2014). http://www.nwc.gov.au/.
24. Nauges C., van den Berg C. Economies of density, scale and scope in the water supply and sewerage sector: a study of four developing and transition economies. J. Reg. Econ. 2008, 34:144-163.
25. Norman M., Stoker B. Data Envelopment Analysis: the Assessment of Performance 1991, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester NY.
26. Ofwat Relative Efficiency Assessment 2007-08 Supporting Information 2010, Available at:, (accessed July 2014). http://www.ofwat.gov.uk/.
27. Ofwat Relative Efficiency Assessment 2007-08-Water Operating Expenditure Model Data 2010, Available at:, (accessed July 2014). http://www.ofwat.gov.uk/.
28. Ofwat Water and Sewerage Relative Efficiency Assessments 2010, Available at:, (accessed July 2014). http://www.ofwat.gov.uk/.
29. Renzetti S. Environmental conditions and the cost of water supply. AWRA/IWLRI/University of Dundee International Specialty Conference 2001 on Globalization and Water Resources Management, 6-8 August 2001.
30. Saal D.S., Parker D. Assessing the performance of water operations in the English and Welsh water industry: a lesson in the implications of inappropriately assuming a common frontier. Performance Measurement and Regulation of Network Utilities 2006, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. T. Coelli, D. Lawrence (Eds.).
31. Shih J.-S., Harrington W., Pizer W.A., Gillingham K. Economies of scale in community water systems. J. Am. Water World Assoc. 2006, 98:100-108.
32. Thanassoulis E. The use of data envelopment analysis in the regulation of UK water utilities: water distribution. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2000, 126:436-453.
33. Thanassoulis E. Comparative performance measurement in regulation: the case of English and Welsh sewerage services. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2002, 53:292-302.
34. Tupper H.C., Resende M. Efficiency and regulatory issues in the Brazilian water and sewage sector: an empirical study. Util. Pol. 2004, 12:29-40.
35. Woodbury K., Dollery B.E. Efficiency measurement in Australian local government: the case of New South Wales municipal water services. Rev. Pol. Res. 2004, 21:615-636.
36. Worthington A.C. Efficiency, Technology, and Productivity Change in Australian Urban Water Utilities 2011, Griffith Business School Discussion Papers in Economics, No. 2011-08.
37. Worthington A.C. Productivity, Efficiency, and Technological Progress in Australia's Urban Water Utilities 2011, Waterlines Report No. 62, National Water Commission, Canberra.
38. Worthington A.C. A review of frontier approaches to efficiency and productivity measurement in urban water utilities. Urban Water J. 2014, 11:55-73.