Efficiency assessment of hydroelectric power plants in Canada: A multi criteria decision making approach

Energy Economics

Volumn 46, Issue , 2014, Pages 112-121

  Wang, Bing ^a,b   Nistor, Ioan ^b   Murty, Tad ^b   Wei, Yi Ming ^a  

^a BEIJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Benchmarking management; Energy saving; Hydropower efficiency; Social responsibility; TOPSIS

Indexed keywords

EFFICIENCY ASSESSMENT; MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING; SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITIES; TOPSIS;

ENERGY CONSERVATION;

BENCHMARKING; DECISION MAKING; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; HYDROELECTRIC POWER PLANT; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; PROFITABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

CANADA;

EID: 84907749983     PISSN: 01409883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Afshar A., Mariño M.A., Saadatpour M., Afshar A. Fuzzy TOPSIS multi-criteria decision analysis applied to Karun reservoirs system. Water Resour. Manag. 2011, 25(2):545-563.
2. Ang B.W. Monitoring changes in economy-wide energy efficiency: from energy-GDP ratio to composite energy efficiency index. Energy Policy 2006, 34:574-582.
3. Ang B.W., Xu X.Y. Tracking industrial energy efficiency trends using index decomposition analysis. Energy Econ. 2013, 40:1014-1021.
4. Barros C.P. Efficiency analysis of hydroelectric generating plants: a case study for Portugal. Energy Econ. 2008, 30(1):59-75.
5. Barros C.P., Antunes O. Performance assessment of Portuguese wind farms: ownership and managerial efficiency. Energy Policy 2011, 39:3055-3063.
6. Barros C.P., Peypoch N. The determinants of cost efficiency of hydroelectric generating plants: a random frontier approach. Energy Policy 2007, 35(9):4463-4470.
7. Barros C.P., Chen Z.F., Managi S., Antunes O.S. Examining the cost efficiency of Chinese hydroelectric companies using a finite mixture model. Energy Econ. 2013, 36:511-517.
8. BC Hydro BC Hydro Annual Report 2013 [online] Available from, (cited 18 January 2014). http://www.bchydro.com/about/accountability_reports/financial_reports/annual_reports.html.
9. Bogan C.E., English M.J. Benchmarking for Best Practices: Winning Through Innovative Adaptation 1994, McGraw-Hill, New York.
10. Brookfield Renewable Power Corporate and Social Responsibility Report Available from, (accessed 18 January 2014). http://brookfieldrenewable.com/_Global/44/documents/relatedlinks/4076.pdf.
11. Canadian Electricity Association Key Canadian Electricity Statistics 2013 Available from, (accessed 18 January 2014). http://www.electricity.ca/media/IndustryData/KeyCanadianElectricityStatistics21May2013.pdf.
12. Canadian Electricity Association Sustainable Electricity 2013 Annual Report: Innovating for a Sustainable Future Available from, (accessed 18 January 2014). http://www.sustainableelectricity.ca/media/AnnualReport2013/2013SustainableElectricityAnnualReport.pdf.
13. Canadian Hydropower Association Hydropower in Canada: Past, Present and Future. Ottawa Available from, (accessed 18 January 2014). https://canadahydro.ca/pages/cha-reports-and-publications.
14. Canadian Hydropower Association Report of Activities 2012-2013 Available from, (accessed 18 January 2014). https://canadahydro.ca/reportsreference/cha-reports-and-publications.
15. Çelen A. Performance evaluation of Turkish electricity distribution market using a combined FAHP/TOPSIS method. Energy Educ. Sci. Technol. Part A: Energy Sci. Res. 2012, 29(2):1263-1276.
16. Çelen A. Efficiency and productivity (TFP) of the Turkish electricity distribution companies: an application of two-stage (DEA&Tobit) analysis. Energy Policy 2013, 63:300-310.
17. Çelen A., Yalçin N. Performance assessment of Turkish electricity distribution utilities: an application of combined FAHP/TOPSIS/DEA methodology to incorporate equality of service. Util. Policy 2012, 23:59-71.
18. Ertugrul I., Karakasoglu N. Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36(1):702-715.
19. Farsi M., Filippini M. Regulation and measuring cost-efficiency with panel data models: application to electricity distribution utilities. Rev. Ind. Organ. 2004, 25(1):1-19.
20. Filippini M., Hunt L.C. US residential energy demand and energy efficiency: a stochastic demand frontier approach. Energy Econ. 2012, 34(5):1484-1491.
21. Flavin C., Aeck M.H. Energy for Development: The Potential Role of Renewable Energy in Meeting the Millennium Development Goals 2005, Worldwatch Institute, New York.
22. GEA, 2012. Global Energy Assessment-Toward a Sustainable Future, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK and New York, NY, USA and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria.
23. Harmsen R., Moth L., Kumar A. Applicability of energy saving obligations to Indian electricity efficiency efforts. Energy Strateg. Rev. 2014, 2:298-306.
24. Hwang C.L., Yoon K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, a State of the Art Survey 1981, Springer-Verlag, New York.
25. Hydro-Quebec Hydro-Quebec Annual Report 2013 [online] Available from, (cited 18 January 2014). http://www.hydroquebec.com/publications/en/annual_report/pdf/annual-report-2013.pdf.
26. IEA World Energy Outlook 2012 2012, (Paris, France).
27. Inglesi-Lotz R., Blignaut J.N. Improving the electricity efficiency in South Africa through a benchmark-and-trade system. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2014, 30:833-840.
28. Jamasb T., Pollitt M. Benchmarking and regulation: international electric experience. Util. Policy 2001, 9(3):107-130.
29. Jamasb T., Nillesen P., Pollitt M. Strategic behaviour under regulatory benchmarking. Energy Econ. 2004, 26(5):825-843.
30. Jha D.K., Shrestha R. Measuring efficiency of hydropower plants in Nepal using data envelopment analysis. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2006, 21(4):1502-1511.
31. Khazaeni G., Khanzadi M., Afshar A. Optimum risk allocation model for construction contracts: fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 2012, 39(7):789-800.
32. Kleit A.N., Terrell D. Measuring potential efficiency gains from deregulation of electricity generation: a Bayesian approach. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2001, 83(3):523-530.
33. Knittel C.R. Alternative regulatory methods and firm efficiency: stochastic frontier evidence the US electricity industry. Rev. Econ. Stat. 2002, 84(3):530-540.
34. Liu N., Ang B.W. Factors shaping aggregate energy intensity trend for industry: energy intensity versus product mix. Energy Econ. 2007, 29(4):609-635.
35. Liu C., Liu L.W. Research of corporate social responsibility in electricity sector: a perspective of human resource management. IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, Sanur Bali, 11-13 June 2012 2012, 10.1109/ICMIT.2012.6225864.
36. Manitoba Hydro Manitoba Hydro-Electric Board 62nd Annual Report [online] Available from, (cited 18 January 2014). http://hydro.mb.ca/corporate/ar/2012/publish/index.html.
37. Minville M., Brissette F., Krau S., Leconte R. Adaptation to climate change in the management of a Canadian water-resources system exploited for hydropower. Water Resour. Manag. 2009, 23(14):2965-2986.
38. Moeini R., Afshar M.H. Arc-based constrained ant colony optimization algorithms for the optimal solution of hydropower reservoir operation problems. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 2011, 38(7):811-824.
39. Mugisha S. Effects of incentive applications on technical efficiencies: empirical evidence from Ugandan water utilities. Util. Policy 2007, 15(4):225-233.
40. Nalcor Energy 2012 Business and Financial Report [online] Available from, (cited 18 January 2014). http://www.nlh.nl.ca/HydroWeb/NLHydroWeb.nsf/0/32AC7A12BCF09B93A3257B870051A8CC/$File/Nalcor2012AnnualReport.pdf.
41. Noailly J. Improving the energy efficiency of buildings: the impact of environmental policy on technological innovation. Energy Econ. 2012, 34(3):795-806.
42. Ontario Power Generation 2013 Ontario Power Generation Annual Report [online] Available from, (cited 18 January 2014). http://www.opg.com/news-and-media/News%20and%20Media%20%20Reports/2013AnnualReport.pdf.
43. REN21 Renewables 2013 Global Status Report 2013, REN21 Secretariat, Paris.
44. Stern D.I. Modeling international trends in energy efficiency. Energy Econ. 2012, 34(6):2200-2208.
45. Vattenfall Towards Sustainable Energy: Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2011 Performance report Available from, (accessed 18 January 2014). http://corporate.vattenfall.com/Global/corporate/sustainability/Reports/corporate_social_responsibility_report_2011_performance:report.pdf.
46. Wang K., Wei Y.M., Zhang X. A comparative analysis of China's regional energy and emission performance: which is the better way to deal with undesirable outputs?. Energy Policy 2012, 46:576-584.
47. Wang K., Wei Y.M., Zhang X. Energy and emissions efficiency patterns of Chinese regions: a multi-directional efficiency analysis. Appl. Energy 2013, 104:105-116.
48. Wang B., Liang X.J., Zhang H., Wang L., Wei Y.M. Vulnerability of hydropower generation to climate change in China: results based on grey forecasting model. Energy Policy 2014, 65:701-707.
49. Wang B., Pan S.Y., Ke R.Y., Wang K., Wei Y.M. An overview of climate change vulnerability: a bibliometric analysis based on Web of Science database. Nat. Hazards 2014, 10.1007/s11069-014-1260-y.
50. Wang B., Ke R.Y., Yuan X.C., Wei Y.M. China's regional assessment of renewable energy vulnerability to climate change. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2014, 40:185-195.
51. Yuan X.C., Wang Q., Wang K., Wang B., Jin J.L., Wei Y.M. China's regional vulnerability to drought and its mitigation strategies under climate change: data envelopment analysis and analytic hierarchy process integrated approach. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2013, 10.1007/s11027-013-9494-7.