Five-year outcome of surgical decompression of the lumbar spine without fusion

European Spine Journal

Volumn 19, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1883-1891

  Mannion, Anne F ^a   Denzler, R ^a   Dvorak, J ^a   Grob, D ^a  

^a SCHULTHESS CLINIC   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Disability; Long term outcome; Lumbar decompression surgery; Pain; Re operation

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BACKACHE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENERAL HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE; HUMAN; LEG PAIN; LONG TERM CARE; LOW BACK PAIN; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT INFORMATION; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RATING SCALE; REOPERATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SPINAL CORD DECOMPRESSION; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE FUSION; STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE;

AGED; BACK PAIN; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL DISEASES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78349309644     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1535-2     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aalto T, Leinonen V, Herno A, Kroger H, Turunen V, Savolainen S, Airaksinen O (2009) Postoperative rehabilitation after spinal stenosis surgery-no effect on outcome in 2-year follow-up. International Society for the Study of the Lumbar Spine, Miami, FL
2. N Adams H Poole C Richardson 2006 Psychological approaches to chronic pain management: part 1 J Clin Nurs 15 290 300 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01304.x 16466478 (Pubitemid 43438128)
3. T Amundsen H Weber HJ Nordal B Magnaes M Abdelnoor F Lilleas 2000 Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management?: A prospective 10-year study Spine 25 1424 1435 10.1097/00007632-200006010-00016 10828926 (Pubitemid 30353829)
4. SJ Atlas RB Keller YA Wu RA Deyo DE Singer 2005 Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: 8 to 10 year results from the Maine Lumbar Spine Study Spine 30 936 943 10.1097/01.brs. 0000158953.57966.c0 15834339 (Pubitemid 40632540)
5. Bartlett C, Doyal L, Ebrahim S, Davey P, Bachmann M, Egger M, Dieppe P (2005) The causes and effects of socio-demographic exclusions from clinical trials. Health Technol Assess 9:iii-iv, ix-x, 1-152
6. SG Chung EM Van Rey Z Bai MW Rogers EJ Roth LQ Zhang 2005 Aging-related neuromuscular changes characterized by tendon reflex system properties Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86 318 327 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.048 15706561 (Pubitemid 40215297)
7. MA Ciol RA Deyo E Howell S Kreif 1996 An assessment of surgery for spinal stenosis: time trends, geographic variations, complications, and reoperations J Am Geriatr Soc 44 285 290 8600197
8. M Cornefjord G Byrod H Brisby B Rydevik 2000 A long-term (4- to 12-year) follow-up study of surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis Eur Spine J 9 563 570 10.1007/s005860000161 11189928 (Pubitemid 32005663)
9. PW Detwiler CB Spetzler SB Taylor NR Crawford RW Porter VK Sonntag 2003 Biomechanical comparison of facet-sparing laminectomy and Christmas tree laminectomy J Neurosurg 99 214 220 12956465
10. R Dullerud T Amundsen H Lie NG Juel B Magnaes 1995 CT-diskography, diskomanometry and MR imaging as predictors of the outcome of lumbar percutaneous automated nucleotomy Acta Radiol 36 613 619 10.3109/ 02841859509176759 8519572
11. V Exner P Keel 2000 Erfassung der Behinderung bei Patienten mit chronischen Rückenschmerzen Schmerz 14 392 400 10.1007/s004820070004 12800012 (Pubitemid 32010399)
12. A Fujiwara K Tamai HS An T Kurihashi TH Lim H Yoshida K Saotome 2000 The relationship between disc degeneration, facet joint osteoarthritis, and stability of the degenerative lumbar spine J Spinal Disord 13 444 450 10.1097/00002517-200010000-00013 11052356 (Pubitemid 32199487)
13. KJ Goh W Khalifa P Anslow T Cadoux-Hudson M Donaghy 2004 The clinical syndrome associated with lumbar spinal stenosis Eur Neurol 52 242 249 10.1159/000082369 15583458
14. M Haefeli A Elfering 2006 Pain assessment Eur Spine J 15 Suppl 1 S17 S24 10.1007/s00586-005-1044-x 16320034 (Pubitemid 43188545)
15. A Hakkinen J Ylinen H Kautiainen O Airaksinen A Herno I Kiviranta 2003 Does the outcome 2 months after lumbar disc surgery predict the outcome 12 months later? Disabil Rehabil 25 968 972 10.1080/0963828031000122258 12851085 (Pubitemid 36889358)
16. A Heiat CP Gross HM Krumholz 2002 Representation of the elderly, women, and minorities in heart failure clinical trials Arch Intern Med 162 1682 1688 10.1001/archinte.162.15.1682 12153370
17. JF Hopp 1993 Effects of age and resistance training on skeletal muscle: a review Phys Ther 73 361 373 8497511
18. R Jagsi AR Motomura S Amarnath A Jankovic N Sheets PA Ubel 2009 Under-representation of women in high-impact published clinical cancer research Cancer 115 3293 3301 10.1002/cncr.24366 19507175
19. MJ Javid EJ Hadar 1998 Long-term follow-up review of patients who underwent laminectomy for lumbar stenosis: a prospective study J Neurosurg 89 1 7 10.3171/jns.1998.89.1.0001 9647165
20. KE Johnsson I Redlund-Johnell A Uden S Willner 1989 Preoperative and postoperative instability in lumbar spinal stenosis Spine 14 591 593 10.1097/00007632-198906000-00008 2749373 (Pubitemid 19157181)
21. B Jonsson M Annertz C Sjoberg B Stromqvist 1997 A prospective and consecutive study of surgically treated lumbar spinal stenosis Part II: five-year follow-up by an independent observer Spine 22 2938 2944 10.1097/00007632-199712150-00017 9431630 (Pubitemid 28070639)
22. JN Katz SJ Lipson LC Chang SA Levine AH Fossel MH Liang 1996 Seven- to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis Spine 21 92 98 10.1097/00007632-199601010-00022 9122770 (Pubitemid 26031838)
23. FS Kleinstuck D Grob F Lattig V Bartanusz F Porchet D Jeszenszky D O'Riordan AF Mannion 2009 The influence of preoperative back pain on the outcome of lumbar decompression surgery Spine 34 1198 1203 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819fcf35 19407677
24. JL Klosky VL Tyc J Lawford J Ashford S Lensing J Buscemi 2009 Predictors of non-participation in a randomized intervention trial to reduce environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure in pediatric cancer patients Pediatr Blood Cancer 52 644 649 10.1002/pbc.21946 19156856
25. AF Mannion R Denzler J Dvorak M Muntener D Grob 2007 A randomised controlled trial of post-operative rehabilitation after surgical decompression of the lumbar spine Eur Spine J 16 1101 1117 10.1007/s00586-007-0399-6 17593405 (Pubitemid 350104624)
26. AF Mannion A Elfering 2006 Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment Eur Spine J 15 Suppl 1 S93 S108 10.1007/s00586-005-1045-9 16320033 (Pubitemid 43188553)
27. AF Mannion A Junge A Elfering J Dvorak F Porchet D Grob 2009 Great expectations: really the novel predictor of outcome after spinal surgery? Spine 34 1590 1599 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819fcd52 19521272
28. AF Mannion M Müntener S Taimela J Dvorak 1999 A randomised clinical trial of three active therapies for chronic low back pain Spine 24 2435 2448 10.1097/00007632-199912010-00004 10626305 (Pubitemid 30002979)
29. AF Mannion F Porchet F Kleinstück F Lattig D Jeszenszky V Bartanusz J Dvorak D Grob 2009 The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective: Part 1. The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in clinical practice Eur Spine J 18 367 373 10.1007/s00586-009-0942-8 19319578
30. AF Mannion F Porchet FS Kleinstuck F Lattig D Jeszenszky V Bartanusz J Dvorak D Grob 2009 The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective: Part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index Eur Spine J 18 374 379 10.1007/s00586-009-0931-y 19296136
31. AH McGregor SPF Hughes 2002 The evaluation of the surgical management of nerve root compression in patients with low back pain. Part 1: The assessment of outcome Spine 27 1465 1470 10.1097/00007632-200207010-00018 12131748 (Pubitemid 34747838)
32. F Postacchini G Cinotti 1992 Bone regrowth after surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis J Bone Joint Surg Br 74 862 869 1447247
33. F Postacchini G Cinotti S Gumina D Perugia 1993 Long-term results of surgery in lumbar stenosis. 8-year review of 64 patients Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 251 78 80 8451996
34. Roder C, Chavanne A, Mannion AF, Grob D, Aebi M, El-Kerdi A (2005) SSE Spine Tango-content, workflow, set-up. Eur Spine J 14:920-924. http://www.eurospine.org, Spine Tango
35. M Roland R Morris 1983 A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1:development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain Spine 8 141 144 10.1097/00007632-198303000-00004 6222486
36. M Scholz R Firsching WR Lanksch 1998 Long-term follow up in lumbar spinal stenosis Spinal Cord 36 200 204 10.1038/sj.sc.3100567 9554022
37. DM Spengler 1987 Degenerative stenosis of the lumbar spine (current concepts review) J Bone Joint Surg 69A 305 308
38. M Szpalski R Gunzburg C Melot M Aebi 2003 The aging of the population: a growing concern for spine care in the twenty-first century Eur Spine J 12 Suppl 2 S81 S83 10.1007/s00586-003-0592-1 12955606 (Pubitemid 37409923)
39. E Truumees 2005 Spinal stenosis: pathophysiology, clinical and radiologic classification Instr Course Lect 54 287 302 15948457
40. G Waddell EG Kummel WN Lotto JD Graham H Hall JA McCulloch 1979 Failed lumbar disc surgery and repeat surgery following industrial injuries J Bone Joint Surg Am 61 201 207 422604
41. JN Weinstein TD Tosteson JD Lurie AN Tosteson E Blood B Hanscom H Herkowitz F Cammisa T Albert SD Boden A Hilibrand H Goldberg S Berven H An 2008 Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis N Engl J Med 358 794 810 10.1056/NEJMoa0707136 18287602 (Pubitemid 351281641)
42. F Zhao P Pollintine BD Hole P Dolan MA Adams 2005 Discogenic origins of spinal instability Spine 30 2621 2630 10.1097/01.brs.0000188203.71182.c0 16319748 (Pubitemid 41780372)