Moving beyond the treatment package approach to developing behavioral interventions: addressing questions that arose during an application of the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST)

Translational Behavioral Medicine

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 252-259

  Wyrick, David L ^a   Rulison, Kelly L ^a   Fearnow Kenney, Melodie ^b   Milroy, Jeffrey J ^a   Collins, Linda M ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

^b AxNano   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Experimental design; Intervention development; Multiphase Optimization Strategy; Substance use prevention

Indexed keywords

ADOPTION; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; COLLEGE STUDENT; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; MULTIPHASE OPTIMIZATION STRATEGY; POWER ANALYSIS; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS; SCIENTIST; SUBSTANCE USE;

EID: 84907710584     PISSN: 18696716     EISSN: 16139860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13142-013-0247-7     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Collins LM, Murphy SA, Nair VN, Strecher VJ. A strategy for optimizing and evaluating behavioral interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2005; 30: 65-73.
2. Collins LM, Murphy SA, Strecher VJ. The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): new methods for more potent eHealth interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2007; 32(5 Suppl): S112-S118.
3. Collins LM, Baker TB, Mermelstein RJ, et al. The multiphase optimization strategy for engineering effective tobacco use interventions. Ann Beh Med. 2011; 41(2): 208-226.
4. Collins LM, Chakraborty B, Murphy SA, Strecher V. Comparison of a phased experimental approach and a single randomized clinical. Clin Trials. 2009; 6(1): 5-15.
5. Strecher VJ, McClure JB, Alexander GL, et al. Web-based smoking-cessation programs: results of a randomized trial. Am J Prev Med. 2008; 34(5): 373-381.
6. Caldwell LL, Smith EA, Collins LM, et al. Translational research in South Africa: evaluating implementation quality using a factorial design. Child Youth Care Forum. 2012; 41: 119-136.
7. McClure J, Derry H, Riggs K, et al. Questions about quitting (Q2): design and methods of a multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) randomized screening experiment for an online, motivational smoking cessation intervention. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012; 33(5): 1094-1102.
8. Doumas DM, Haustveit T, Coll KM. Reducing heavy drinking among first year intercollegiate athletes: a randomized controlled trial of web-based normative feedback. J Appl Sport Psych. 2010; 22(3): 247-261.
9. Turrisi R, Larimer M, Mallett K, et al. A randomized clinical trial evaluating a combined alcohol intervention for high-risk college students. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009; 70(4): 555-567.
10. Yusko DA, Buckman JF, White HR, Pandina RJ. Alcohol, tobacco, illicit drugs, and performance enhancers: a comparison of use by college student athletes and nonathletes. J Am Coll Health. 2008; 57(3): 281-290.
11. Yusko DA, Buckman JF, White HR, Pandina RJ. Risk for excessive alcohol use and drinking-related problems in college student athletes. Addict Beh. 2008; 33(12): 1546-1556.
12. Hansen W, Dusenbury L, Bishop D, Derzon J. Substance abuse prevention program content: systematizing the classification of what programs target for change. Health Educ Res. 2007; 22(3): 351-360.
13. Berkowitz AD. An overview of the social norms approach. In: Lederman LC, Stewar LP, eds. Changing the culture of college drinking. Cresskill: Hampton; 2004: 193-214.
14. Perkins HW. The emergence and evolution of the social norms approach to substance abuse prevention. In: Perkins HW, ed. The social norms approach to preventing school and college age substance abuse: a handbook for educators, counselors, and clinicians. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2003: 3-18.
15. Becker MH, Radius SM, Rosenstock IM, Drachman RH, Schuberth KC, Teets KC. Compliance with a medical regimen for asthma: a test of the health belief model. Public Health Rep. 1978; 93(3): 268-277.
16. Rosenstock IM. Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Educ Behav. 1974; 2(4): 328-335.
17. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, vol. 278. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1980.
18. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley; 1975.
19. Neighbors C, Lewis MA, Atkins DC, et al. Efficacy of web-based personalized normative feedback: a two-year randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psych. 2010; 78(6): 898.
20. Collins LM, Dziak JJ, Li R. Design of experiments with multiple independent variables: a resource management perspective on complete and reduced factorial designs. Psych Methods. 2009; 14(3): 202-224.
21. Wu C-F, Hamada M. Experiments: planning, analysis, and parameter design optimization. New York: Wiley; 2000.
22. Chakraborty B, Collins LM, Strecher VJ, Murphy SA. Developing multicomponent interventions using fractional factorial designs. Stat Med. 2009; 28(21): 2687-2708.
23. Nair V, Strecher V, Fagerlin A, et al. Screening experiments and the use of fractional factorial designs in behavioral intervention research. Am J Pub Health. 2008; 98(8): 1354-1359.
24. Dziak JJ, Nahum-Shani I, Collins LM. Multilevel factorial experiments for developing behavioral interventions: power, sample size, and resource considerations. Psych Methods. 2012; 17(2): 153-175.
25. FactorialPowerPlan [computer program]. Version 1.0. University Park: The Methodology Center, The Pennsylvania State University; 2013.
26. Chiauzzi E, Green TC, Lord S, Thum C, Goldstein M. My student body: a high-risk drinking prevention web site for college students. J Am Coll Health. 2005; 53(6): 263-274.
27. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press; 2003.