Quantification of left atrial strain and strain rate using Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance myocardial feature tracking: A feasibility study

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Kowallick, Johannes Tammo ^a,f   Kutty, Shelby ^b   Edelmann, Frank ^c,f   Chiribiri, Amedeo ^d   Villa, Adriana ^d   Steinmetz, Michael ^c,f   Sohns, Jan Martin ^a,f   Staab, Wieland ^a,f   Bettencourt, Nuno ^d,e   Unterberg Buchwald, Christina ^a,c,f   Hasenfuß, Gerd ^c,f   Lotz, Joachim ^a,f   Schuster, Andreas ^c,d,f  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA AT OMAHA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^d ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e CENTRO HOSPITALAR DE VILA NOVA DE GAIA ESPINHO   (Portugal)

^f DZHK GERMAN CENTRE FOR CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Atrial physiology; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Diastolic dysfunction; Feature tracking; Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; Strain; Strain rate

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CINERADIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HEART FAILURE WITH PRESERVED EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT ATRIUM; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE RELAXATION; HUMAN; HYPERTROPHIC CARDIOMYOPATHY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; BIOMECHANICS; CARDIOMYOPATHY, HYPERTROPHIC; CASE CONTROL STUDY; EVALUATION STUDY; HEART ATRIUM FUNCTION; HEART CONTRACTION; HEART FAILURE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEART VENTRICLE FUNCTION; MECHANICAL STRESS; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATRIAL FUNCTION, LEFT; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CARDIOMYOPATHY, HYPERTROPHIC; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HEART FAILURE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL CONTRACTION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; STROKE VOLUME; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84907710318     PISSN: 10976647     EISSN: 1532429X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12968-014-0060-6     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Left atrial size and function: role in prognosis. BD Hoit, J Am Coll Cardiol 2014 63 493 505 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.055 24291276
2. Left atrial mechanics: echocardiographic assessment and clinical implications. MJ Vieira, R Teixeira, L Goncalves, BJ Gersh, J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014 27 463 78 10.1016/j.echo.2014.01.021 24656882
3. Clinical utility of multimodality LA imaging: assessment of size, function, and structure. AC To, SD Flamm, TH Marwick, AL Klein, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011 4 788 98 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.02.018 21757171
4. Imaging diastolic dysfunction with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. JT Kowallick, F Edelmann, J Lotz, P Lamata, A Schuster, J Cardiol Ther 2014 1 58 64
5. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking detects quantitative wall motion during dobutamine stress. A Schuster, S Kutty, A Padiyath, V Parish, P Gribben, DA Danford, MR Makowski, B Bigalke, P Beerbaum, E Nagel, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011 13 58 10.1186/1532-429X-13-58 21992220
6. Inter-study reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking. G Morton, A Schuster, R Jogiya, S Kutty, P Beerbaum, E Nagel, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012 14 43 10.1186/1532-429X-14-43 22721175
7. Feature tracking measurement of dyssynchrony from cardiovascular magnetic resonance cine acquisitions: comparison with echocardiographic speckle tracking. T Onishi, SK Saha, DR Ludwig, JJ Marek, JL Cavalcante, EB Schelbert, D Schwartzman, J Gorcsan 3rd, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013 15 95 10.1186/1532-429X-15-95 24134158
8. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking for quantitative viability assessment in ischemic cardiomyopathy. A Schuster, M Paul, N Bettencourt, G Morton, A Chiribiri, M Ishida, S Hussain, R Jogiya, S Kutty, B Bigalke, D Perera, E Nagel, Int J Cardiol 2013 166 413 20 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.10.137 22130224
9. Reply to letter to the editor: feature tracking cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of left atrial function. BD Hoit, J Am Coll Cardiol 2014 63 2435 36 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.544 24632275
10. How to diagnose diastolic heart failure: a consensus statement on the diagnosis of heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction by the Heart Failure and Echocardiography Associations of the European Society of Cardiology. WJ Paulus, C Tschope, JE Sanderson, C Rusconi, FA Flachskampf, FE Rademakers, P Marino, OA Smiseth, G De Keulenaer, AF Leite-Moreira, A Borbély, I Edes, ML Handoko, S Heymans, N Pezzali, B Pieske, K Dickstein, AG Fraser, DL Brutsaert, Eur Heart J 2007 28 2539 50 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm037 17428822
11. Atrial function as a guide to timing of intervention in mitral valve prolapse with mitral regurgitation. L Ring, BS Rana, FC Wells, AC Kydd, DP Dutka, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2014 7 225 32 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.12.009 24529886
12. Feasibility and reference values of left atrial longitudinal strain imaging by two-dimensional speckle tracking. M Cameli, M Caputo, S Mondillo, P Ballo, E Palmerini, M Lisi, E Marino, M Galderisi, Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2009 7 6 10.1186/1476-7120-7-6 19200402
13. Functional maturation of left and right atrial systolic and diastolic performance in infants, children, and adolescents. S Kutty, A Padiyath, L Li, Q Peng, S Rangamani, A Schuster, DA Danford, J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013 26 398 409 e392 10.1016/j.echo.2012.12.016 23337737
14. Assessment of left atrial volumes in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation using the biplane area-length method and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging with TrueFISP. B Sievers, S Kirchberg, M Addo, A Bakan, B Brandts, HJ Trappe, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2004 6 855 63 10.1081/JCMR-200036170 15646889
15. Assessment of left atrial volumes and phasic function using cine magnetic resonance imaging in normal subjects. V Jarvinen, M Kupari, P Hekali, VP Poutanen, Am J Cardiol 1994 73 1135 38 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90298-4 8198044
16. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. JM Bland, DG Altman, Lancet 1986 1 307 10 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8 2868172
17. Comparison of interstudy reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance with two-dimensional echocardiography in normal subjects and in patients with heart failure or left ventricular hypertrophy. F Grothues, GC Smith, JC Moon, NG Bellenger, P Collins, HU Klein, DJ Pennell, Am J Cardiol 2002 90 29 34 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02381-0 12088775
18. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography of the left atrium: feasibility and regional contraction and relaxation differences in normal subjects. R Vianna-Pinton, CA Moreno, CM Baxter, KS Lee, TS Tsang, CP Appleton, J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009 22 299 305 10.1016/j.echo.2008.12.017 19258177
19. Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography. V Mor-Avi, RM Lang, LP Badano, M Belohlavek, NM Cardim, G Derumeaux, M Galderisi, T Marwick, SF Nagueh, PP Sengupta, R Sicari, OA Smiseth, B Smulevitz, M Takeuchi, JD Thomas, M Vannan, JU Voigt, JL Zamorano, J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011 24 277 313 10.1016/j.echo.2011.01.015 21338865
20. Quantification in cardiac MRI: advances in image acquisition and processing. AK Attili, A Schuster, E Nagel, JH Reiber, RJ van der Geest, Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010 26 Suppl 1 27 40 10.1007/s10554-009-9571-x 20058082
21. Feasibility of asymmetric stretch assessment in the ascending aortic wall with DENSE cardiovascular magnetic resonance. H Haraldsson, M Hope, G Acevedo-Bolton, E Tseng, X Zhong, FH Epstein, L Ge, D Saloner, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2014 16 6 10.1186/1532-429X-16-6 24400865
22. Strong cardiovascular prognostic implication of quantitative left atrial contractile function assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with chronic hypertension. M Kaminski, K Steel, M Jerosch-Herold, M Khin, S Tsang, T Hauser, RY Kwong, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2011 13 42 10.1186/1532-429X-13-42 21843343
23. Left atrial function in diastolic heart failure. M Kurt, J Wang, G Torre-Amione, SF Nagueh, Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009 2 10 5 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.813071 19808559
24. Left atrial myocardial function in either physiological or pathological left ventricular hypertrophy: a two-dimensional speckle strain study. A D'Andrea, G De Corato, R Scarafile, S Romano, L Reigler, C Mita, F Allocca, G Limongelli, G Gigantino, B Liccardo, S Cuomo, G Tagliamonte, P Caso, R Calbrò Br J Sports Med 2008 42 696 702 10.1136/bjsm.2007.041210 18070810
25. Assessment of left atrial ejection force in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. AM Anwar, OI Soliman, ML Geleijnse, M Michels, WB Vletter, A Nemes, FJ ten Cate, J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007 20 744 48 10.1016/j.echo.2006.11.017 17543746
26. An integrated approach to determine left atrial volume, mass and function in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by two-dimensional echocardiography. AM Anwar, OI Soliman, A Nemes, ML Geleijnse, FJ ten Cate, Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008 24 45 52 10.1007/s10554-007-9224-x 17541727
27. Left atrial systolic and diastolic dysfunction in heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction. DA Morris, M Gailani, A Vaz Perez, F Blaschke, R Dietz, W Haverkamp, C Ozcelik, J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011 24 651 62 10.1016/j.echo.2011.02.004 21458230
28. A real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic quantitative analysis of left atrial function in left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. M Murata, S Iwanaga, Y Tamura, M Kondo, K Kouyama, S Ogawa, Am J Cardiol 2008 102 1097 102 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.05.067 18929716
29. Comparison of magnetic resonance feature tracking for strain calculation with harmonic phase imaging analysis. KN Hor, WM Gottliebson, C Carson, E Wash, J Cnota, R Fleck, J Wansapura, P Klimeczek, HR Al-Khalidi, ES Chung, DW Benson, W Mazur, JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010 3 144 51 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.11.006 20159640
30. The intra-observer reproducibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature tracking strain assessment is independent of field strength. A Schuster, G Morton, ST Hussain, R Jogiya, S Kutty, KN Asrress, MR Makowski, B Bigalke, D Perera, P Beerbaum, E Nagel, Eur J Radiol 2013 82 296 301 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.11.012 23246014
31. Singh A, Steadman CD, Khan JN, Horsfield MA, Bekele S, Nazir SA, Kanagala P, Masca NG, Clarysse P, McCann GP. Intertechnique agreement and interstudy reproducibility of strain and diastolic strain rate at 1.5 and 3 tesla: a comparison of feature-tracking and tagging in patients with aortic stenosis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014. doi:10.1002/jmri.24625.
32. Feature tracking compared with tissue tagging measurements of segmental strain by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. L Wu, T Germans, A Guclu, MW Heymans, CP Allaart, AC van Rossum, J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2014 16 10 10.1186/1532-429X-16-10 24450803
33. Echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance-based feature tracking in the assessment of myocardial mechanics in tetralogy of Fallot: an intermodality comparison. A Padiyath, P Gribben, JR Abraham, L Li, S Rangamani, A Schuster, DA Danford, G Pedrizzetti, S Kutty, Echocardiography 2013 30 203 10 10.1111/echo.12016 23167248